TRUMPS RECENT ATTACKS
AGAINST THE JUDICIARY OVER THE TEMPORARY BLOCK OF HIS MUSLIM
TRAVEL BAN HAVE NOW LED HIM INTO A POSSIBLE CONFRONTATION OF
CONFLICT WITH HIS OWN SUPREME
COURT NOMINEE.
WE WON'T GO THROUGH ALL THE THINGS HE SAID
ABOUT THE JUDGES WHO ARE CONSIDERING KEEPING THIS HOLD ON
THE BAN, BUT HERE'S ONE THING HE SAID RECENTLY.
WHICH IS HIM
SAYING IN HIS THIRD GRADE LEVEL WAY THAT COURTS SHOULD NOT
CHALLENGE HIM, THEY SHOULD JUST READ STATEMENTS SAYING HE IS
AWESOME AND HAS POLICIES ARE GREAT.
HE WENT ON TO SAY THAT IF
THERE IS A TERROR ATTACK THE JUDGES WHO HAD STOPPED THE
MUSLIM TRAVEL BAN WOULD BE RESPONSIBLE FOR IT, EVEN THOUGH
THE PEOPLE THAT THEY STOPPED HAVE NEVER BEEN FOUND TO BE
TERRORISTS INSIDE THE US.
CALLING THEM "SO-CALLED JUDGES" WHEN THEY ARE REAL JUDGES.
IT TURNS OUT SOME PEOPLE WHO ARE NOT LIBS ARE ALSO WORRIED
ABOUT HIS ATTACKS ON THE JUDICIARY.
YOU WILL SEE THAT IN THIS VIDEO.
MY STRONG HOPE IS THAT HE WILL BE MORE VEHEMENT PUBLICLY,
HE CERTAINLY EXPRESSED TO ME
THAT HE IS DISHEARTENED BY THE DEMORALIZING AND IMPORTANT
COMMENTS MADE BY PRES.
TRUMP ABOUT THE JUDICIARY, BUT I WILL
BE ASKING FOR MORE SPECIFIC AND FORTHCOMING RESPONSES TO THOSE
KINDS OF QUESTIONS BEFORE I DETERMINE HOW I WILL VOTE.
THAT IS DEMOCRATIC SEN.
BLUMENTHAL.
SAYING THAT GORESUCH
IS CONCERNED.
IN THIS NEXT CLIP YOU WILL SEE HIM ATTACKING THE LITERAL
MESSENGER.
YOU MISREPRESENTED HIS COMMENTS TOTALLY.
HIS COMMENTS
WERE MISREPRESENTED AND WHAT YOU SHOULD DO IS ASK SEN.
BLUMENTHAL
ABOUT HIS VIETNAM RECORD THAT DIDN'T EXIST AFTER YEARS OF
SAYING IT DID.
ASK SEN.
BLUMENTHAL ABOUT HIS VIETNAM
RECORD.
HE MISREPRESENTED THAT
JUST LIKE HE MISREPRESENTED JUDGE GORESUCH.
I WANT TO ASK YOU ABOUT YOUR VIETNAM EFFORT?
I LOOKED INTO THAT, FIVE DEFERRALS.
HE DID ACTUALLY SERVE
IN THE MARINE RESERVES.
HE ADMITTED TO THAT SEVEN YEARS
AGO.
WE ARE GOING BACK TO GORESUCH AND HIS COMMENTS.
IT IS
A DEMOCRAT WHO SAID IT SO TRUMP
WILL TRY TO PRETEND THAT GORESUCH DIDN'T ACTUALLY SAY
THAT.
DISHEARTENING IS A GREAT WORD.
JUDGE GORESUCH AND I
TALKED ABOUT THAT AND FRANKLY HE
GOT PRETTY PASSIONATE ABOUT HIM.
I ASKED HIM ABOUT THE SO-CALLED
JUDGES COMMENT, BECAUSE WE DON'T HAVE SO-CALLED JUDGES OR
PRESIDENTS OR SENATORS.
THIS IS THE GUY WHO KIND OF WELLED UP
WITH SOME ENERGY AND HE SAID ANY
ATTACK ON ANY OF THEM, HIS TERM WAS BROTHERS AND SISTERS IN THE
ROW, IS AN ATTACK TO ALL JUDGES.
I THINK WHAT I SAW ON THAT GUY WAS HE GOT SOME ENERGY ABOUT IT.
I CAN'T IMAGINE ANYONE WOULD MAKE UP THE PHRASE BROTHERS
AND SISTERS OF THE ROBE.
IT SOUNDS LIKE SOMETHING YOU WOULD HEAR IN GAME OF THRONES.
IT DOES.
IT'S NOT CRAZY TO BELIEVE THAT GORESUCH WOULD
HAVE A PROBLEM WITH TRUMP TRYING TO GET PEOPLE TO DISTRUST THE
JUDICIARY.
WE KNOW THAT MONTHS AGO HE SAID SOMETHING
ABOUT THE JUDGE OF HISPANIC DESCENT.
MAYBE HE DOESN'T KNOW
THAT THAT IS THE ROLE THAT THE JUDICIARY HAS IN THE
CONSTITUTION, BUT HE CERTAINLY DOESN'T LIKE AND NOW THAT IT
IS HIM THAT IS BEING CHECKED.
BASED ON THE READING I HAVE DONE BASED ON JUDGE GORESUCH, I
DON'T AGREE WITH EVERY RULING HE HAS MADE.
I THINK HE IS A
PRO-CORPORATE JUDGE AND HAS
RULED IN FAVOR OF CORPORATIONS OVER THE BEST INTEREST OF THE
PEOPLE ON MANY OCCASIONS, HOWEVER I DO FEEL HE IS SOMEONE
WHO ACTUALLY VALUES THE ROLE OF THE SUPREME COURT AND JUDGES IN
THIS COUNTRY.
HE UNDERSTANDS THE
IMPORTANCE OF IT, THE IMPORTANCE OF PRECEDENT WHICH STOOD OUT TO
ME.
THAT WAS SOMETHING I NOTICED
OVER AGAIN.
IT WAS A TREND AS I WAS RESEARCHING HIM.
HE ISN'T MY
FAVORITE PICK TO REPLACE ANTONIN SCALIA, BUT HE SEEMS LIKE A
REASONABLE PERSON.
I THINK THAT HE WOULD BE CONCERNED ABOUT SOME
OF THE STATEMENTS THAT DONALD
TRUMP HAS MADE.
HAVING A REPUBLICAN COME OUT AND OPENLY
SAY THAT WAS THE REACTION HE HAD TO DONALD TRUMP MAKES ME FEEL
BETTER.
I THINK THAT HE COME OUT OF EVERYONE THAT DONALD TRUMP HAS
NOMINATED, IS ONE OF THE MORE REASONABLE INDIVIDUALS.
I AGREE, THAT SAID I DON'T THINK HE SHOULD EVER BE
CONFIRMED.
OF ALL THE THINGS THE DEMOCRATS SHOULD HOLD THE LINE
AS LONG AS THEY CAN, I WOULD SAY BECAUSE MERRICK GARLAND WAS
DENIED THE SEAT I WOULD NOT CONFIRM ANYONE.
I DON'T KNOW
EVENTUALLY WHEN THAT STOPS AND I ASSUME THAT WE WILL GET GORE
SUCH ON THE COURT, BUT I WOULD NEVER VOTE TO CONFIRM ANYONE
FOR THAT SEAT.
THAT IS NOT DONALD TRUMP SEAT TO NOMINATE SOMEONE FOR.
I AM A HUGE FAN OF TIT FOR TAT, QUID PRO QUO.
YOU KNOW ME,
I AM SALTY AND I LIKE REVENGE.
HOWEVER I FEEL YOU NEED TO PICK
YOUR BATTLES.
ONE OF MY FEARS IS
THAT THEY ARE FRUSTRATED ABOUT WHAT HAPPENED WITH OBAMA'S
NOMINEE SO THEY WANT TO
RETALIATE.
I DON'T THINK THAT IN THIS CASE IT WILL BE PRODUCTIVE
AND I DON'T THINK IT WILL BE A
GOOD IDEA.
AND I GET WHERE YOUR LOGIC COMES FROM BUT AT THE SAME
TIME THERE IS A LOT TO FIGHT TRUMP ON.
I WOULD PREFER JUDGE
GORESUCH AFTER ANY OTHER CRAZY PERSON DONALD TRUMP MIGHT
NOMINATE.
IN DEFENSE OF MY POSITION, SOME OF YOU MIGHT SAY IF YOU DO
THAT THEN YOU REFUSE TO CONFIRM SOMEONE WILL IT EVER END?
THAT
IS WHAT REPUBLICANS WILL DO REGARDLESS.
IT WAS ONE YEAR A
PRESIDENT DOESN'T GET BEFORE THE END OF HIS TERM TO NOMINATE
SOMEONE.
IF IT IS PRESIDENT SANDERS IN FOUR OR EIGHT YEARS,
THEY ARE EMBOLDENED.
I SAY SCREW
IT.
ONE MORE CLIP FOR YOU.
I JUST SAW A POLL, THE VAST
MAJORITY OF REPUBLICANS SAY IT IS A TRUTHFUL ADMINISTRATION,
HALF OF THE PUBLIC SAYS IT IS TRUTHFUL.
HIGHER THAN FOR THE
MEDIA.
YOU WILL BE LIED TO BY DONALD TRUMP AND HIS
REPRESENTATIVES ON A DAILY
BASIS.
RIGHT THERE YOU HAVE HAD THAT THIS IS WHAT GORESUCH SAID
IN RESPONSE TO A QUESTION ABOUT
TRUMP BY SEN.
SASS.
WE ALL KNOW THE FACTS, LET'S SEE WHAT THE
OFFICIAL PRESS SECRETARY FOR
TRUMP DESCRIBES IT.
DOES THE PRESIDENT HAVE ANY REGRETS ABOUT THE COMMENTS
THAT HE HAS MADE ABOUT FEDERAL JUDGES?
NO, HE HAS NO REGRETS.
HE IS VERY PROUD OF THE SELECTION HE
HAS MADE.
IT'S GOING TO MAKE A GREAT ASSOCIATE JUSTICE OF THE
SUPREME COURT.
HE HAS NO REGRETS.
THE SENATOR THAT IS WORKING WITH THE WHITE HOUSE TO HELP
SHEPHERD JUDGE GORESUCH RELEASED A STATEMENT CONFIRMING
THOSE SAME REMARKS.
DISHEARTENING AND DEMORALIZING.
WAS THE PRESIDENT AWARE OF THAT?
THIS IS WHAT THE SENATOR SAID.
HE COULD NOT COMMENT ON
SPECIFIC CASES AND THAT JUDICIAL ETHICS PRESENTED FROM COMMENTING
ON POLITICAL MATTERS.
HE HAS ALSO EMPHASIZED THE IMPORTANCE
OF AN IMPOTENT INDEPENDENT
JUDICIARY AND MADE CLEAR HE WAS NOT REFERENCING ANY SPECIFIC
CASE.
HE SAID HE FINDS ANY CRITICISM OF THE JUDGES
DISHEARTENING AND DEMORALIZING.
HE DOESN'T LIKE ATTACKS IN
GENERAL.
IT WAS A VERY DISTINCT ARGUMENT HE WAS MAKING.
THE
JUDGE WAS VERY CLEAR THAT HE WAS NOT COMMENTING ON ANY SPECIFIC
MATTER, RIGHT.
AND HE WAS ASKED ABOUT HIS GENERAL PHILOSOPHY.
YOU CAN'T THEN TAKE THAT AND
EQUATED BACK TO THE SPECIFIC.
I WANT TO MAKE SURE I UNDERSTAND.
ARE YOU SAYING THAT
DEMORALIZING AND DISCERNING WAS NOT SPECIFICALLY ABOUT THE
PRESIDENT'S COMMENTS?
THE JUDGE LITERALLY MADE IT VERY CLEAR IN HIS COMMENTS.
THE
SENATOR WHO WAS THERE MADE IT
CLEAR THAT HE WAS COMMENTING IN GENERAL ABOUT ATTACKS ON THE
JUDICIARY, THAT WAS IT PLAIN AND SIMPLE.
YOUR ANSWER ABOUT THE CONTEXT DOESN'T MAKE SENSE.
HE SAID HE
ASKED GORESUCH SPECIFICALLY
ABOUT THE PRESIDENT'S SO-CALLED JUDGE TWEET.
THIS IS THE FOURTH TIME I HAVE ASKED ñ
WHY ISN'T THE WHITE HOUSE ñ THE PRESIDENT CONCERNED ABOUT
THE INFLUENCE OR THE APPEARANCE
OF THE INFLUENCE ON THE INDEPENDENT JUDICIARY?
HE IS FREE TO SPEAK HIS MIND.
WHERE HAS THIS OUTRAGE BEEN?
BUT THAT'S NOT HOW THE JUDICIAL PROCESS WORKS.
THANK YOU.
YOU HAVE NOW ASKED THE QUESTION NOW EIGHT TIMES.
SO HE DENIES IT.
I'M GLAD THE LAST REPORTER BROUGHT IT BACK
AROUND TO WHAT IS IMPORTANT, THAT WE DO NEED THE EXECUTIVE
BRANCH TO RESPECT THE RULINGS OF JUDGES.
JUDGES DON'T HAVE
ARMIES.
THEY HAVE THEIR DECISIONS AND THEY HAVE THE
RESPECTED PRECEDENT.
IF DONALD TRUMP IS ATTACKING THEM NOW, DO
WE KNOW THAT HE WILL ACTUALLY ABIDE BY A COURT RULING THE
FUTURE?
AND IF WE JUST ACCEPT THESE ATTACKS CAN WE BE
SURPRISED IN SIX MONTHS OR A
YEAR WHEN HE RIPS UP AND IGNORES WHAT THE JUDGES SAY?
WE SHOULD BE CONCERNED ABOUT THAT, THAT IS AT THE HEART OF
WHAT THIS DEBATE IS ALL ABOUT.
ABSOLUTELY.
I THINK THE REPORTERS WHO ASKED ALL THOSE
QUESTIONS DESERVE CREDIT.
USUALLY YOU DON'T SEE REPORTERS
IN THE PRESS POOL ASKING
FOLLOW-UPS AGGRESSIVELY, AND FORCING THE PRESS SECRETARY TO
STAY ON TOPIC.
I JUST WANT TO GIVE THEM CREDIT BECAUSE WE DO
GIVE REPORTERS A LOT OF HEAT FOR NOT DOING THEIR JOBS
APPROPRIATELY.
IN THAT CASE, THEY WERE BEING TOUGH ON HIM AND
I ENJOYED SEEING THAT.
I ALSO ENJOYED THE NASTY LOOK THAT
SPICER GAVE TO ONE OF THE REPORTERS EARLY ON IN THAT
VIDEO.
YEAH.
I THINK WITH BOTH HIM AND KELLYANNE CONWAY THERE IS
BLOOD IN THE WATER.
I THINK THE REPORTERS KNOW THAT THESE ARE
PEOPLE THAT ARE ALREADY A LITTLE
BIT ON THE BAD SIDE OF DONALD TRUMP IN OUR WEAK AND THAT'S WHY
I THINK THEY ARE WILLING TO GO
HARD AND STRONG AGAINST THEM.
For more infomation >> 22 Savage Officially Changed His Rap Name - Duration: 1:17. 
For more infomation >> Mega tormenta de nieve paraliza el Noreste del país | Al Rojo Vivo | Telemundo - Duration: 3:03. 
For more infomation >> Si Vas a Usar El Ajo Como Remedio Natural No Cometas Estos Errores - Duration: 6:57. 
For more infomation >> ¿Que pasa con mi voz? - Geometry Dash #4 - Duration: 7:33. 
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét