>>FOLLOWING NEWS THAT VLADIMIR PUTIN PLANS ON INCREASING
RUSSIA'S NUCLEAR CAPABILITY, DONALD TRUMP DECIDED TO TWEET
SOMETHING CURIOUS.
HE WROTE --
>>THAT MAKES IT SEEM AS THOUGH TRUMP IS SPARKING A NEW NUCLEAR
ARMS RACE IN RESPONSE TO WHAT VLADIMIR PUTIN PLANS ON DOING IN
RUSSIA.
OF COURSE PEOPLE WANT HIM TO CLARIFY, OR AT LEAST
ELABORATE, ON WHAT THAT TWEET MEANT.
MIKA BREZINSKI GOT AN ANSWER.
>>MIKA ASKED THE PRESIDENT-ELECT WHAT HIS POSITION WAS, TRYING TO
CLARIFY THE TWEET YESTERDAY REGARDING THE NUCLEAR ARSENAL,
AND HE TOLD YOU WHAT?
>>LET IT BE AN ARMS RACE, WE WILL OUTMATCHED THEM AT EVERY
PASS.
>>AND OUTLAST THEM ALL.
>>THAT WAS HIS REACTION, NOT MUCH OF A CLARIFICATION, PEOPLE
WANT MORE OF AN ELABORATION ON THAT.
I HAVE TO MAKE A NONSENSE
POINT --
>>THAT THE ONLY POINT I WANT TO MAKE.
>>YOU CAN'T HAVE A CONVERSATION ABOUT A NUCLEAR ARMS RACE WHEN
YOU ARE WEARING PAJAMAS.
>>THERE IS SOMETHING ALSO CAN'T DO WEARING PAJAMAS, PUT ON FULL
MAKEUP.
>>IT IS FUNNY HOW LIKE-MINDED WE ARE EVEN ON SILLY THINGS LIKE
THIS.
I GET IT THAT THEY WANT TO DO A SHOW IN PAJAMAS, IT IS
CHRISTMAS, IT'S CUTE, BUT WHEN YOU WANT TO HAVE A DISCUSSION
ABOUT NUCLEAR ISSUES, BRING ME A SUIT.
AND IT IS NOT A PAJAMA AND CHRISTMAS GET TOGETHER IF
YOU SLOPPED ON ALL THIS MAKEUP.
>>IT IS TV, YOU CAN WEAR A LITTLE, BUT THEY LOOK RIDICULOUS
AND IT IS A REMINDER THAT YOU SHOULDN'T TAKE THEM SERIOUSLY
EVEN WHEN THEY ARE NOT WEARING THEIR PAJAMAS.
>>NOW ONTO THE SERIOUS ISSUES.
>>IF THE ONLY THING PEOPLE TAKE AWAY FROM THIS VIDEO IS NOT TO
TAKE MORNING JOE SERIOUSLY --
>>MIKA LOOKS LIKE SHE'S DOING A
HOSTAGE VIDEO HALF THE TIME.
YOU
DON'T WATCH THAT SHOW EVER?
>>NEVER.
>>I STAY UP LATE, I LIKE TO WATCH MORNING JOE BEFORE
BED BECAUSE I LIKE TO GO TO BED ANGRY.
>>ALMOST ALL THE MORNING JOE CLIPS ICR EITHER ONLINE THAT WE
WILL CRITICIZE OR ON THE JIMMY DORE SHOW.
>>THERE IS A CAVALCADE OF JAGOFFS EVERY DAY ON THAT SHOW.
IT IS FILLED WITH WASHINGTON INSIDERS, WALL STREET
BILLIONAIRES, AND ODD PLAGIARIST OR TWO.
>>AND THE ESTABLISHMENT LOVES IT.
BACK TO NUCLEAR WAR -- I
DON'T KNOW WHAT TO MAKE OF THIS.
PUTIN IS TALKING TOUGH, IS
THIS ALL FOR SHOW?
IS THAT YOUR THEORY, BEN, THAT THEY BOTH WANT
TO SEEM LIKE TOUGH GUYS?
>>IT'S VERY DANGEROUS.
I WAS GOING TO SEND IT
TO ALL OF YOU
GUYS, A GREAT PIECE BY JERRY BROWN IN THE NEW YORK TIMES
REVIEW OF BOOKS FROM THE SUMMER -- I'M GOING TO BLANK OUT -- IT
DOESN'T MATTER, I'LL GET TO IT -- SOMEBODY WROTE A BOOK OVER
THE SUMMER, WILLIAM PERRY, MAYBE AMERICA'S FOREMOST AUTHORITY ON
THE ARMS RACE, SERVED IN THE DEFENSE DEPARTMENT IN THE 60S
AND AGAIN UNDER BILL CLINTON, HE'S A REPUBLICAN -- BUT HOW
CLOSE WE CAME TO NUCLEAR WAR DURING THE CUBAN MISSILE CRISIS.
AND NOT IN THE WAYS WE THINK OF, BUT IF A SOVIET SUB WAS PREPARED
TO LAUNCH A NUCLEAR TIPPED MISSILE AT AN AMERICAN DESTROYER
IN THE BLOCKADE, EXCEPT THE HEAD OF THE -- AND THERE WERE NO
ORDERS TO CONTRADICT IT, THEY HAD ORDERS IF THERE WAS AN
AGGRESSIVE MOVE TAKEN -- EXCEPT THE HEAD OF THE SOVIET NUCLEAR
NAVAL FORCES HAPPENED TO BE ON THAT SUB AND DECIDED WE ARE NOT
GOING TO DO THIS, WE ARE NOT GOING TO SHOOT FIRST.
BUT THEY
WERE READY TO GO, IF HE HAD NOT BEEN ON IT THEY WOULD HAVE
FIRED, THERE WOULD HAVE BEEN RESPONSE AND WHO KNOWS WHAT
WOULD HAVE HAPPENED, WE WOULD HAVE HAD NUCLEAR WAR.
THERE WERE
TWO OR THREE INSTANCES INCLUDING A U.S. PILOT WHO HAPPENS TO
WANDER INTO SOVIET AIRSPACE.
THIS IS AN ENORMOUSLY DANGEROUS
BECAUSE ONE OF THEM IS AN AUTHORITARIAN, AGGRESSIVE PERSON
WITHOUT ANY RESPECT FOR THE RULE OF LAW, AND THE GREAT THING IS
YOU DON'T KNOW WHO GOING TO SAY.
PUTIN.
AND THE OTHER ONE IS
DISINTERESTED IN THE WORLD, INTELLECTUALLY DISINTERESTED AND
A NARCISSIST.
SO PUT THEM TOGETHER, IT COULD BE
UNBELIEVABLY DANGEROUS.
BUT IT SUITS THEM BOTH POLITICALLY TO TALK THIS WAY.
>>I WANT TO GIVE YOU MORE CONTEXT IN A SECOND BUT EVERY
TIME WE TALK ABOUT NUCLEAR ARMS, IRAN, FOR INSTANCE, WHY WE WOULD
NOT WANT IRAN TO HAVE NUCLEAR WEAPONS, I ALWAYS THINK ABOUT
VARIOUS POLITICAL SCHOLARS AND THEIR THEORIES ON NUCLEAR WAR.
ONE SCHOLAR WHO ALWAYS STOOD OUT TO BE THE MOST WAS KENNETH
WALTZ, AND NOT JUST HIM, A LOT OF POLITICAL SCHOLARS USED THE
IDEA OF RATIONAL ACTORS TO HASH OUT THEIR THEORIES.
AND IN THIS
CASE, IS TRUMP A RATIONAL ACTOR?
HE SEEMS LIKE SOMEONE WHO HAS
KNEE-JERK REACTIONS TO THINGS, PULLS THE TRIGGER ESPECIALLY
WHEN IT COMES TO SOCIAL MEDIA WITHOUT THINKING ABOUT THE
RAMIFICATIONS OF WHAT HE'S SAYING, SO I WORRY ABOUT WHAT
THIS MEANS.
BUT BASED ON MORE OF THE CONTEXT ON NOT COMPLETELY
WORRIED YET.
LET ME TELL YOU MORE OF WHAT IS GOING ON.
SEAN
SPICER WAS TALKING TO MATT LAUER AND HE CONTRADICTS WHAT TRUMP
TWEETED AND FOLLOWED UP WITH, TAKE A LOOK.
>>PRESIDENT-ELECT TRUMP SAID THE U.S. MUST GREATLY STRENGTHEN
AND EXPAND ITS NUCLEAR CAPABILITY.
EXPAND.
EXPLAIN IT.
>>IT CONTINUED, UNLESS OTHER COUNTRIES COME TO THEIR SENSES.
I THINK THE POINT HE IS MAKING HIS WE ARE NOT GOING TO SIT BACK
AS A COUNTRY AND ALLOW OTHER COUNTRIES TO EXPAND THEIR
NUCLEAR CAPABILITIES WITH THE U.S. SITTING IDLY BY.
THIS PRESIDENT WILL MAKE SURE AMERICAN INTERESTS ARE
PROTECTED.
>>THIS PRESIDENT IS GOING TO REVERSE 40 YEARS OF POLICY IN
THIS COUNTRY WHERE PRESIDENTS SINCE RONALD REAGAN PLEDGED TO
REDUCE THE NUMBER OF NUCLEAR WEAPONS?
>>WE ARE NOT TO SIT BACK, MATT, AND WATCH OTHER NATIONS THREATEN
OUR SAFETY.
IF ANOTHER COUNTRY WANTS TO EXPAND THEIR NUCLEAR
CAPABILITY WE ARE NOT GOING TO SIT IDLY BY. AND JUST TO BE
CLEAR, THE PRESIDENT ISN'T SAYING WE ARE GOING TO DO THIS,
HE'S SAYING UNLESS THEY COME TO THEIR SENSES.
IT IS A WARNING
THAT THIS PRESIDENT WILL TAKE ACTION.
>>HE KIND OF COUNTRY DATES HIMSELF, HE IS LIKELY WILL
TOTALLY EMPTY UP OUR NUKES, BUT WE ARE NOT GOING TO AMP UP OUR
NUKES UNLESS THEY DO.
SO I DON'T KNOW.
BUT VLADIMIR PUTIN HAS
RELEASED A STATEMENT ON THIS, HE SAYS HE'S NOT BOTHERED BY DONALD
TRUMP'S TWEETS OR HIS PLANS TO INCREASE NUCLEAR WEAPONS IN THE
COUNTRY, IN FACT TRUMP JUST RECENTLY RELEASED A POSITIVE
LETTER THAT PUTIN HAD WRITTEN TO HIM DATING BACK TO DECEMBER 15,
AND I WANT TO READ YOU A LITTLE BIT OF THAT AS WELL.
PUTIN
WRITES TO TRUMP --
>>AND THE WAY THEY WOULD LIKE TO COLLABORATE IS BY EACH
BUILDING A NUMBER OF NEW NUCLEAR WEAPONS, BECAUSE THAT HELPS THEM
BOTH.
DOESN'T MEAN THEY WANT TO LAUNCH ATTACKS AT EACH OTHER, IF
THEY DIDN'T SPEAK IT IS SURE COINCIDENTAL THAT THIS IS
EXACTLY WHAT PUTIN WOULD LIKE, BECAUSE THIS IS ALSO A GUY WHO
HAS TO MAINTAIN LYRICAL POWER, AND HIS THREAT TO POLITICAL
POWER IS NOT LOSING AN ELECTION BUT MAINTAINING SUPPORT OF THE
ARMY AND THE POLITICAL POWERFUL ELITES AROUND -- AND THE WAY HE
WOULD DO IT IS WE'VE GOT A THREAT?
I'M THE GUY TO LEAD US
THROUGH THIS, THERE IS NO MORE AUTHORITARIAN THUG THAN I AM,
AND I'M THE GUY TO DO THIS.
IT OBVIOUSLY BENEFITS -- I THINK, I
DON'T KNOW THAT IT DOESN'T BENEFIT THEM BOTH, BUT THEY
OBVIOUSLY ARE THE KIND OF GUY WHO THINKS IT DOES.
BUT WE ARE QUITE A WHILE AWAY FROM ANY OF THOSE THINGS
BEING IMPLIMENTED.
>>AS USUAL NOBODY REALLY KNOWS, WE ARE ATTRIBUTING STRATEGY TO A
SIMPLETON.
IF YOU WERE A SOPHISTICATED PLAYER YOU MIGHT
THINK THIS WILL LET ME LOOK UNBIASED AS PEOPLE ACCUSE ME OF
BEING PRO-RUSSIAN, NOW I WILL FLEX MY MUSCLE AGAINST RUSSIA.
IT WILL ALLOW PUTIN TO FLEX HIS MUSCLE AND SEEM LIKE A STRONG
MAN, AND EVEN THOUGH WE APPEAR TO BE AGAINST EACH OTHER WE ARE
BOTH WINNING.
BUT THAT IS PUTTING TOO MUCH THOUGHT INTO
TRUMP'S HEAD.
I DON'T KNOW IF HE MEANT TO GET TOUGH OR SOFT ON
NUKES.
HE SAYS UNLESS OTHER COUNTRIES COME TO THEIR SENSES.
HE DOESN'T KNOW HIMSELF.
>>THAT IS DEFINITELY NOT WHAT HE MEANT.
I DON'T THINK IT IS WORTH
MENTIONING, IT IS DEFINITELY WORTH MENTIONING, THIS IS IN THE
CONTEXT OF THE PRESIDENT WHO HAS ANOTHER MONTH IN WASHINGTON AT
THE WHITE HOUSE -- I COULDN'T REMEMBER WHAT WE CALLED THE
HOUSE -- WHO CAME INTO OFFICE PLEDGING TO RID THE WORLD OF
NUCLEAR WEAPONS, SEEKING A NUCLEAR FREE WORLD, IN THE LAST
YEAR PROPOSED $1 TRILLION IN NEW SPENDING ON NUKES.
>>OBAMA DID.
>>MUCH OF THAT WAS TO DO WHAT MAKES SOME SENSE, WHICH IS WE
PROBABLY CAN'T HAVE 1960S AND 70S OPERATING SYSTEMS
CONTROLLING THESE NUKES, REFURBISHING THEM MAKES SOME
SENSE, BUT THE FLIPSIDE IS SOME OF IT WAS GOING TO BE ON BETTER,
SMALLER, EASIER TO USE, THEREFORE FRIGHTENING, NUCLEAR
WEAPONS.
NO MATTER WHO IS IN OFFICE IT WOULD TAKE REMARKABLE
LEADERSHIP TO LEAD TO A WORLD THAT IS ACTUALLY LARGELY
FREE OF NUCLEAR WEAPONS.
>>WE DON'T HAVE ENOUGH MONEY FOR FREE COLLEGE EDUCATION TO GIVE
EQUALITY OF OPPORTUNITY TO YOUR KIDS, BUT WE HAVE ENOUGH TO
SPEND 1 TRILLION ON NUKES.
THAT IS OBAMA.
THE OTHER STRATEGY IS,
IF YOU PUT ANY STRATEGY BEHIND THIS WITH TRUMP, DEFENSE
CONTRACTORS WANT US TO BUILD MORE NUKES SO THE REPUBLICAN
PARTY AND THEIR DONORS GET RICHER.
THE LAST THING IS FOR
PUTIN, BE CAREFUL WHAT YOU WISH FOR.
HE WANTED TRUMP, HE WANTED
TO MAKE OIL DEALS, HE GOT REX TILLERSON, HE THINKS IT'S
CLEVER, HE GOT RID OF THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY THAT PUT
SANCTIONS ON HIM, ETC.
BUT TRUMP DOES NOT KNOW WHAT HE IS DOING.
HIM CAVALIERLY CHALLENGING THE ONE CHINA POLICY -- IF YOU ASKED
HIM WHAT THE ONE CHINA POLICY WAS BEFORE HE TOOK THE CALL FROM
THE LEADER OF TAIWAN, IT WAS INCONCEIVABLE THAT HE KNEW IT.
BUT IF YOU DO THAT, IT HAS CONSEQUENCES.
BUT THIS GUY OF
VASTLY LIMITED INTELLIGENCE -- THAT'S A FUNNY WAY OF PHRASING
-- HE'S LIKE, WHAT, I TOOK A CALL FROM THE LEADER OF TAIWAN
BECAUSE BOB DOLE TOLD ME TO, I LIKE BOB DOLE.
WHAT'S THE BIG
DEAL?
THE BIG DEAL IS IF YOU CHALLENGE THE ONE CHINA POLICY
THEY MIGHT WANT TO FLEX THEIR MUSCLES AND PROVE YOU WRONG, AND
ONE WAY THEY COULD DO THAT IS JUST WALK OVER TO TAIWAN AND
TAKE IT.
WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO DO, GET INTO A NUCLEAR CONFLICT
OR A GIANT WAR WITH CHINA?
THAT'S A TERRIBLE IDEA.
SO
WORDS DO HAVE CONSEQUENCES, BUT WE HAVE A PRESIDENT-ELECT WHO
DOES NOT UNDERSTAND IT.
IF HE GETS INTO A STANDOFF WITH PUTIN,
ALL OF A SUDDEN YOU HAVE TWO IDIOT STRONGMEN -- PUTIN IS
SMART, BUT HE WOULD WANT TO PROVE HIS STRENGTH --
THEY BOTH HAVE NUKES AND IT
WOULD BE A DISASTER.
For more infomation >> Życzenia i prezent - OGLĄDAJ Z NAPISAMI! - Duration: 2:53. 
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét