Thứ Ba, 23 tháng 5, 2017

Youtube daily May 23 2017

Thanks for watching

Hope you have a great time

Please, like, comment and subscribe for more!!

For more infomation >> TRY NOT TO LAUGH or GRIN: Funny Fails Vines Compilation 2017 | Best Pranks Fails & Funny Videos 2017 - Duration: 10:03.

-------------------------------------------

This is Jamboard - Duration: 1:37.

This is Jamboard,

It's like a whiteboard

except it's way better, because it

lets this team

and this team

work together

with this guy, who lives in France.

On the same thing, at the same time.

This is how you write

and erase

but you can also do this, and add some of these

and even turn this, into this

and it's got all this other stuff

so it's really easy to do this

unless you're no Michelangelo

in which case you can do this

That's because it's a part of G Suite, so you can pull

in anything from any of these

"Hey guys I have this room reserved"

And this is how you save your work.

"It saves automatically!"

Oh right, it's in the cloud

This is how you pick up where you left off

this is how you share your work

"Got it!"

So you never have to do this

or write this

so you can do more of this

This is Jamboard, a new way to collaborate from Google

For more infomation >> This is Jamboard - Duration: 1:37.

-------------------------------------------

What's a MacGuffin in Films and Why is It Called That - Duration: 8:27.

What's a MacGuffin in Films and Why is It Called That

In the last scene of the 1941 film classic, The Maltese Falcon, Sam Spade (played by Humphrey

Bogart) hands over a murderer (played by Mary Astor) and a black falcon statuette to authorities.

When asked what the statuette was exactly, Spade looks off in the distance and rather

unsatisfactorily explains, "It's stuff that dreams are made of."

This black falcon statuette – the so-called "Maltese Falcon" – is a perfect example

of what film connoisseurs call the "MacGuffin" (or "McGuffin"), an important and oddly-named

plot device that appears in many movies.

For the uninitiated, in a nutshell a "MacGuffin" is an object, event, or person that the characters

in a story value greatly- so much so that nearly the whole plot revolves around it,

despite that the thing itself isn't actually terribly important to the actual unfolding

story.

In the end, it really doesn't matter what the "thing" – or "MacGuffin" – is,

only that it provides motivation for the characters to push the actual story forward.

As famed filmmaker Alfred Hitchcock explained in an interview for the 1967 book Hitchcock

The main thing I've learned over the years is that the MacGuffin is nothing.

I'm convinced of this, but I find it very difficult to prove it to others.

My best MacGuffin, and by that I mean emptiest, the most nonexistent, and the most absurd,

is the one we used in North by Northwest.

The picture is about espionage, and the only question that's raised in the story is to

find out what the spies are after.

Well, during the scene at the Chicago airport, the Central Intelligence man explains the

whole situation to Cary Grant, and Grant, referring to the James Mason character, asks,

'What does he do?'

The counterintelligence man replies, "Let's just say that he's an importer and exporter."

"But what does he sell" "Oh, just government secrets!" is the answer.

Here you see the MacGuffin has been boiled down to its purest expression: nothing at

all!

(It should be noted here that while Hitchcock and in more modern times the likes of J.J.

Abrams who frequently uses this "it doesn't matter what it is or what it does / nothing

at all" approach to MacGuffins in most of his works- e.g. Rambaldi and his artifacts

in Alias or the Rabbit's foot in Mission Impossible III- other directors, such as George

Lucas, go the other way and feel that the MacGuffin should be more defined and something

"the audience should care about… almost as much as the dueling heroes and villains

on screen.")

While the word "MacGuffin" comes from relatively modern times (which we will get

into in a moment), the concept of it dates back to some of the earliest masterpieces

of the written word.

In Homer's Iliad, which was first composed almost 3,000 years ago, the MacGuffin was

Helen of Troy and her great beauty.

Again, it could have been Helen of Troy's great sweet potato pie that led to the launching

of a thousand ships, as long as the story made it clear why the characters were so intent

on having that pie.

(Perhaps with the characters intrigued over what exactly this then unknown food item of

"potato" was, or maybe if the composer wanted to be more explicit about its importance,

stating it was made from a recipe given to her by the gods, with those eating it said

to become immortal.)

This all brings us around to why the MacGuffin is called that.

Hitchcock, who is often credited as coining the term though never claimed such himself,

once explained he thought it may have come from a common humorous story, with this particular

instance of his telling the story appearing in the February 22, 1950 edition of the El

Paso Herald-Post:

There is a bloke on a train He sees a package, and asked what it is.

Man says it's a McGuffin.

Other man asks what is a McGuffin?

Other cove says a McGuffin is an apparatus for trapping lions in the Adirondacks.

'But there are no lions in the Adirondacks,' other bloke says.

'Then this thing is no McGuffin,' second lad says.

This is a variant of similar stories with a common message, such as this one published

in 1884 in Henry Irving's Impressions of America by Joseph Hatton (with the moral of

the story being the age old quip, "Ask me no questions, and I'll tell you no lies!"):

"Excuse me, sir; but would you mind telling me what is in that extraordinary bundle?"

"Certainly, a mongoose," replied the man.

"Ah, indeed!" ejaculated the broker, with unslacked curiosity.

"But what is a mongoose, pray?"

"Something to kill snakes with."

"But why do you wish to kill snakes with a mongoose?" asked the broker.

"My brother has the delirum tremens and sees snakes all the time.

I am going to fix 'em."

"But, my dear sir, the snakes which your brother sees in his delirium are not real

snakes, but the figments of his diseased imagination, — not real snakes sir!"

"Well! this is not a real mongoose."

As for who actually coined the term "MacGuffin," writer Angus MacPhail is often given credit

here.

For instance, filmmaker Ivor Montagu worked with Hitchock and MacPhail around the time

the term first started popping up; he claimed in an article he wrote in 1980 on what it

was like to work with Hitchcock:

…sometimes the scenario editor Angus MacPhail, my old schoolmate [would be there].

It was Angus who established the term 'MacGuffin' for the unknown plot objective which you did

not need to choose until the story planning was complete.

(This convenient word Hitch gleefully adopted and used to the end of his career.)

MacPhail was a studio writer, meaning he was hired to "fix" scripts and most of the

time did not get the credit he deserved for the task.

However, he became widely trusted by Hitchcock (because he specialized in "scenario editing")

and was often hired to help on the director's films, such as one of Hitchcock's early

greats, The Thirty-Nine Steps, where it is generally claimed MacPhail first came up with

the term.

In the 1967 book Hitchcock, by Francois Truffaut, Hitchcock explained the interesting evolution

of that particular MacGuffin and particularly how it inspired them to go from something

important to "nothing at all," which became a hallmark of his MacGuffins:

in The Thirty-nine Steps, what are the spies after?

The man with the missing finger?

And that woman at the beginning, was she on to some big secret?

Is it because she was getting close to the truth that it became necessary to stab her

in the back?

In the early stages of the construction, we felt, and we were all wrong, that since life

and death were involved, the pretext had to be a very important one.

In our first draft, when Robert Donat arrives in Scotland, he picks up some additional information

on his way to the spy's house, possibly by following the spy.

He rides to the top of the hill, and looking down, he sees underground plane hangars carved

into the side of the mountain, secret hangars, which made the planes safe from bombings.

Our original idea was that this MacGuffin should be something big and pictorially striking.

Then we went on to work it out in our minds: What does Donat do upon discovering these

secret hangars?

Will he send off a message to report their locations?

And in that case, what counter steps would the spies take?

[One option was to blow it up].

But how were we going to have them blow up a whole mountain?

Anyway, whenever we found ourselves getting terribly involved in this way, we would drop

the idea for something very simple…

If MacPhail did indeed coin the term, it's unclear today how he came up with it.

According to some sources, MacPhail himself used to say he borrowed it from the aforementioned

story of the two men on the train, but I could not track down any such instance of MacPhail

ever stating anything of the sort, and none of the sources who claim this back up the

claim with any primary text.

Some have alternatively speculated it alludes to that the word "guff," which is defined

as meaning "nonsense."

It also once meant "stupid" or "clumsy" person.

So, perhaps MacPhail took the first part of his last name and put the word "guff"

behind it, creating a whole new term (that was named loosely after him) for story telling

nonsense or a "stupid" element of the story.

(It should also be noted that in 1926, almost a decade before The Thirty-Nine Steps, one

Robert Haven Schauffler states in the journal, The Writer, that "McGuffin" is a word

for a gift that is not opened until Christmas.

However, this is the only known time this word/name was applied to such and it's unclear

whether there is any connection here or not.)

For more infomation >> What's a MacGuffin in Films and Why is It Called That - Duration: 8:27.

-------------------------------------------

Canales de Tv en vivo para Android y SmartTv. España México Argentina - Duration: 2:25.

Hello friends today we will see an application to watch TV channels of 27 countries and also

We may also view these channels in a SmartTV

the application a name is called heliaca Tv a little weird but the important thing is that it works

pretty well and then show you how to see channels SmartTV

we have several categories like sports movies and music but I've been trying to see

movies and as we see appears to me a movie Roman

as I was saying the movie categories sports or music is not the strongest part of

This application thus leave channels turquia and other countries I think we are not interested

So to watch TV channels we go to countries and enter for example in espaa

and here if there are quite a few channels They are free but some are paid as

for example this sports such as habreis has seen advertising the application and

if we enter mejico also reproduced as many channels obviously not all always

someone who is down but there are many who They work and load pretty fast

We have seen that 'running well enough to watch TV channels now let's see them

a chromecast or simply go SmartTV lso settings and change the player for

and we choose default Android player internal

now simply we enter a country Argentina example and we chose a channel and

appear all the players we have installed if you want to see the channel in the

phone screen recommend mxplayer but to redirect by dlna a SmartTV

or chromecast will choose web video cast so we hope to load the device list

Here we featured a chromecast he should go around here and we have the typical screen

Chromecast to enter the pin number guest

I'll connect with other similar device chromecast we remove the advertising and now

If we can send to the tv as we see It is very easy to control reproduction

If you have any questions leave you link where explain how it works some of the options

video web cast I say goodbye here we are in another video soon

For more infomation >> Canales de Tv en vivo para Android y SmartTv. España México Argentina - Duration: 2:25.

-------------------------------------------

How Bilingual Brains Perceive Time Differently - Duration: 3:09.

That was a really good clap.

Good job, Amy.

Des que j'ai deux ou trois ans, ma mere ma parlee en Francais.

Dann im universitet, ich habe fur drei Jahren Deutsche gelernt… aber Ich benutze es nicht…

In researching bilingual brains, that is, how brains work when someone speaks more than

one language fluently, scientists have found there are differences.

Bilingual brains activate in different ways depending on the language they're speaking,

and and also demonstrate incredible cognitively flexibility, switching back and forth between

languages in a phenomenon called code-switching.

And a new study has found an interesting link between language and time: the language you

think in can impact the way you perceive time.

Every language has its specific vocabulary for organizing the world around us, but when

it comes to time, there are two general categories this is done: distance, as in crossing an

area, and volume as in a space being filled.

Swedish and English both use physical distances to express a measure of time.

In English we'd say "a short break" or "a long wedding."

We use these descriptive terms as though the passage of time is a measurable distance.

In Greek and Spanish on the other hand, time is marked with terms that refer to volume.

In Spanish you'd say "a small break" or "a big wedding."

So the question the researchers had was whether people who think about time with distance

or volume measurements have a better sense of how much time has passed.

To measure this, they had Swedish-Spanish bilinguals watch a line grow across a screen

or watch a container being filled, the first a measure of time as distance and the second

a measure of time as volume.

And in each instance the subject was given a prompt in one of the two languages — 'duración'

in Spanish or 'tid' in Swedish.

The results showed that subjects perceived time as it's measured in the language of

their prompt.

When given the Spanish prompt, participants estimated time based on volume, in this case

how full the containers were.

When they were given the Swedish prompt they could better estimate time as distance, using

the line's travel as a marker.

So this might not matter to any of us on a day to day basis, but it's interesting to

have some scientific evidence pointing to how much language impacts the way we perceive

something universal, the passage of time.

And we even found this in our office!

Maybe it's because I've been exposed to multiple languages.

When I think of a big wedding I think of a lot of people and a long night.

But other people in our office only think about the number of attendees.

Language, it seems, can creep in and affect our most basic senses, from emotions to perception

and, apparently, time.

Which means it's possible that learning a new language could change the way you experience

the world… which in itself is wild to think about.

This episode is brought to you by Squarespace.

Whether you need a domain, website, or online store, make your next move with Squarespace.

Squarespace is used by a wide range of creatives and people — musicians, designers, artists,

restaurants, and more.

Start your free trial today, at Squarespace.com and enter offer code SEEKER to get 10% off

your first purchase.

So this is our human brain, but would the same thing happen to artificial intelligence?

We talk about giving computers consciousness in this episode right here.

So who out there speaks multiple languages and is aware of these different cues for understanding

time?

Let us know in the comments, be sure to like this video, and subscribe so you never miss

an episode of Seeker.

For more infomation >> How Bilingual Brains Perceive Time Differently - Duration: 3:09.

-------------------------------------------

Police: 1 man in custody after shots fired on Lancaster street - Duration: 1:16.

STREETS.

MEREDITH: THE LATEST IS THAT

LANCASTER CITY POLICE HAVE TAKEN

A MAN INTO CUSTODY.

THIS POLICE SITUATION HAS BEEN

CHANGING SINCE WE GOT HERE ABOUT

AN HOUR AGO.

WE ARE AT SOUTH FRANKLIN AND

EAST END AVENUE, DIAGONAL FROM

WHERE THE ORIGINAL CALL WENT OUT

AND THERE IS A HEAVY POLICE

PRESENCE AND MOST OF IT IS

FOCUSED ON A HOUSE AT THE CORNER

OF THE ALLEY.

INVESTIGATORS PLACED EVIDENCE

MARKERS THROUGHOUT THE STREET.

THERE IS NO WORD IF ANYONE WAS

HIT BY GUNFIRE.

THE K-9 UNIT AND SCORES OF

INVESTIGATORS ARE ON THE SCENE.

WE ALSO WATCHED OFFICERS BRING

AT LEAST FIVE PEOPLE OUTSIDE OF

THAT CORNER.

THEY ALL CAME OUT PEACEFULLY AND

SAT ON THE SIDEWALK.

THEN WITH -- THEN POLICE WENT

INTO THE HOME BUT IS WHEN THEY

BROUGHT ONE MAN OUT IN HADCUFFS

AND PLACED HIM IN A CRUISER.

WE DON'T KNOW IF ANYONE WAS HIT

BY GUNFIRE, BUT WE TALKED TO

NEIGHBORS WHO HEARD SEVERAL

SHOTS EARLIER, THIS MORNING.

For more infomation >> Police: 1 man in custody after shots fired on Lancaster street - Duration: 1:16.

-------------------------------------------

Should You Get Back Together With Your Ex? - Duration: 4:41.

Hello my friends! Kaitlyn here! And do you think you should ever get back with your ex?

Uh oh! Oh no! Whatch you talkin' bout!?

(INTRO MUSIC)

Dear subscriber friend, Sara Milky South wants to know if getting back together with your

ex is a bad thing.

Like what if you still like your ex.

Or you realize that your ex still likes you...do you take the plunge back into a relationship

that you felt like was doomed before?

So several things here. Because I've been a serial, get-back-together-with-your-ex kind of girl.

Why Kaitlyn? Why do you do this to yourself?

Situation #1: How long have you been broken up?

Like a few hours, a few days. Maybe even a week.

If it's been a super small amount of time, and you are now thinking, "Maybe this wasn't just a good idea."

I say go for it!

Basically, in that small amount of time, you've not done a lot of healing or moving on so I think it can still work.

Sometimes you just overreact and "end" a relationship, when honestly it's not really over.

This is what happened with Parker and I.

We'd been dating for over a year and then just a lot of life forces were pressuring us in different directions which ended up causing him to break up with me.

And that legitimately lasted for about a week. It was like, what are we doing? Why are we broken up?

Neither of us want to actually be broken up.

And now we've been together for just under 5 years.

So yeah, in this situation, I approve of getting back with your ex.

Situation #2: It's been a little bit longer since you and your ex broke up. Like a month. Several months. Maybe even a year.

But you still fee like there's some kind of spark.

This is when you have to ask yourself, why did we break up in the first place?

And who broke up with who?

When there's been some time and healing, it's easy to forget what actually happened

when you ended a relationship.

You get all nostalgic about it and you don't remember how badly your ex treated you.

Or how unhappy you were in the relationship.

Or maybe even how bad you were to your ex!

But then if you get back together, then there's the honeymoon phase and everything

seems great again because you're wearing rose colored glasses but eventually that will fade and

where will you be then?

Will you and your ex be able to weather the normal storms of a long-term relationship?

Or do you just want to be back with your ex for the honeymoon phase? A romance high.

In this situation, there are absolutely going to be times when it's okay to get back with your ex,

but you have to be much more careful here.

And think about BOTH of your motives for wanting to get back together.

Is it because it's for the long haul?

Or do you really just want someone to make out with?

I have also fallen for this.

A high school boyfriend and I were very on-and-off-again because he really couldn't commit for more than

a month or two, and I REALLY liked the idea of him.

And kissing him. He was a good kisser.

So I ended up causing myself more pain in the long-run.

Now we're at situation #3 which is did your relationship end because one or both of you

cheated on the other?

So I want to say first off that this advice is for dating relationships and not marriages.

Because I think cheating in marriage follows a different set of guidelines because there's

And I've seen marriages come back from the absolute rocks when there was cheating involved.

But for dating I think they follow just little bit differently.

But my general rule for dating relationships is that if there was cheating involved DO NOT GET BACK TOGETHER.

Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me.

I'm not saying that a relationship could never be fixed after cheating, but there's

so much room for abuse that I just don't think it's worth it.

My example of this, is that when I went to college my boyfriend was still a senior in high school.

And instead of admitting to him that I didn't want to be in a relationship anymore after

several months apart, I kissed another guy.

I know! I know! It's horrible! 18 year old Kaitlyn didn't know how to appropriately deal with her emotions!

But what's actually worse is that I felt so guilty for what had happened that I let him convince

me to stay in a relationship with him even though there was no way that things were going to be the same.

Instead, he spent all our time together punishing me by making me feel horrible for what had happened.

And in his own way, he was punishing himself too. We were both so miserable.

And if we'd just been able to say, "No, this has to end," we could have avoided SO MUCH pain.

So yeah, don't get back together with a cheating ex.

It's not good for either of you.

All righty! That's my take on whether you should get back with an ex.

As you can see that it varies by situation.

I'd love to know what you guys think though.

Are there any situations that I didn't bring up in this video that you think are okay or

really bad to get back with your ex?

Tell me down in the comments!

Plus remember to like, favorite, share, and subscribe if this video made you smile!

See you guys on Thursday!

(OUTRO MUSIC)

For more infomation >> Should You Get Back Together With Your Ex? - Duration: 4:41.

-------------------------------------------

2 dogs survive, 2 cats die in Lancaster County house fire - Duration: 0:19.

-- WENT BACK INTO THE HOME AFTER

FORGETTING HIS CELL PHONE AND

SAW THE FIRE.

THERE IS SIGNIFICANT DAMAGE TO

THE SECOND FLOOR AND THE ATTIC,

BUT THE FIRE CHIEF SAYS IT WOULD

HAVE BEEN WORSE HAD THE OWNER

NOT SPOTTED IT.

For more infomation >> 2 dogs survive, 2 cats die in Lancaster County house fire - Duration: 0:19.

-------------------------------------------

studio g 5 /22/ 2017 - Duration: 0:43.

hey TRIPPSTERS .. inside studio G nothing

to really talk about. he announced that

Trisha Yearwood would be doing the

national anthem at the Predators game

and then he hinted about something he's

building and he hinted at something

going on about the year 1997 but he gave

us no details on anything

so basically tonight was nothing new

okay and that is everything important

about inside studio G tonight. that is

going to do it for now

this is ICEPETS Queens and I am tripping

out

For more infomation >> studio g 5 /22/ 2017 - Duration: 0:43.

-------------------------------------------

5 BIGGEST MISTAKES WHEN WEARING A DRESS WATCH! - DRESSY vs SPORT WATCH DEBATE - Duration: 9:36.

[intro music]

Alright, so today we're gonna be going over the difference between a dress watch and a

sports watch.

Now, this is an important thing you want to focus on because if you're active participant

in the Watch Game, this could make a big difference on the effect you're trying to project.

Let me give you guys an example and tell you a quick story.

One day, I was going to attend a wedding here in Miami and it was one of those days where

you just have so many things to do that, before you know it, I was getting dressed for the

wedding.

And, when I put my suit on and I went to grab my watch, I realized that I did not go to

the bank that day and pick up my dress watch.

So my options were limited and when I mean limited, I'm talking about extremely.

The only thing I had that day to wear was, don't even ask why ask this watch, cuz I don't

want to get into that topic either, but it was a Yacht-Master II two-tone.

So me being a watch guy at heart, I said, �Man, I can't go without a watch.

I don't wanna be without a watch.

I feel like with no weapon!� So I pretty much wore the watch.

Needless to say, an hour and a half into the reception, I felt like a complete idiot.

I felt like the watch was too big.

It doesn't go with anything.

It's just completely the wrong watch to wear.

Why?

It was the wrong size.

It was 44 millimeters.

Totally the wrong size watch if you want it to be a dress watch.

I think a dress watch should always be maximum 40, 41 mm.

You know, in that area.

Maximum, because really you're gonna wanna be under that.

A number 2 thing that's very important is on a strap.

It should be on a strap.

Whether it's calf, alligator, crocodile, you need it to be on a strap.

Another important thing for me is one type of metal.

That day it was a two-tone, stainless steel and rose gold, incorrect!

I think you should stick to one color metal, would be the ideal scenario.

So you wanna avoid these mistakes and some of you guys might not even know this, but

not every watch can be worn for everything.

That particular watch, the ideal watch that I would have like to have been wearing, would

have been a Sky-Dweller on a strap.

Yes, I get it.

It's over 40 millimeter.

Whatever!

Rolex is very conservative, but it's nowhere compared to that 44-mm Yachtmaster I had.

I had, by far, the worst possible watch in my opinion for that scenario.

I felt like a complete idiot, so these are things you wanna think of.

In a good watch collection, you should always have a dress watch.

If you have a very young collection, where you don't have that dress watch yet, then

perhaps maybe you want a versatile watch.

For example, one sports watch that happens a diver watch that I feel can be used for

almost everything is the Submariner in stainless steel.

Can't go wrong with it.

You could dress it up.

You could dress it down.

It's one of those watches that does it all.

For example, gold Sub is not the same.

I just don't feel like it's the same.

This is a watch that I feel works better in shorts, very casual wear.

Doesn't give you the most effect in a formal situation.

Now, to throw a whole another extreme...the Presidential.

The Presidential is that one watch that I feel always looks dressy in a suit.

It's one of the few dress watches on a bracelet that I like.

Whereas I would, yes, rather have a Sky-Dweller on a strap or a great Daytona on a strap,

even though it's a Chrono.

You know, sports model?

But the Presidential is one of those watches you get away with and you can also dress it

down.

So, it's an ongoing topic, dressy versus sporty.

When a guy comes in to the store and he's trying to buy his first watch and I say, �Listen,

do you wanna go dressy or do you wanna go sporty?� That's a very important question.

If a guy is always in a kind of like an office situation, then he might go dressy if you're

gonna use it for work.

If he's only gonna use it to go out at night, to go to nice dinners and stuff like that,

again, you wanna maybe go a little bit dressy.

But if you're gonna wear it all the time, then you kinda wanna go with something that

works for both.

Now, I'll give you another example where you have two watches that, in my opinion, are

two different extremes.

The Pakte 5980.

Now in a perfect world, which we don't live in, both of these watches are bad ass and

you could do whatever you want with it.

But I wanna tell you something, if I was gonna wear a suit, the one I always have is this

one.

The strap is the way to go.

The strap, even though it's a chrono, does make it look dressy, whereas on a bracelet,

for me, it just gets more sporty.

Kinda something you wanna wear more casual.

So those are things that you wanna think about when you are selecting a watch.

Dress watches man, sometimes the simpler the watch, the better.

This is a topic that we can go on in circles all day.

You could make us sit there and say, �No, because the most dressy watch is the simplest

watch.� I don't see nothing wrong wearing a Patek Sky Moon in a suit.

Nothing simple about that watch.

It's full-blown complications on that.

So, this is a topic that we could go over and over and go all over the place with.

But I wanna just keep it as simple as possible.

Dressy versus sporty.

A sports watch is gonna be a diver, a chrono, a pilot.

Those types of things.

Dress watches is what you're always gonna thing is gonna be very slim, very conservative.

A watch that's fits under a suit.

You could tell, man.

It doesn't take a rocket scientist to tell what looks more dressy than not.

So use that.

Think about that.

Don't be that guy.

I have been there.

I have worn a 44 millimeter Yacht-Master II two-tone to a wedding and pulled those moves

where I looked like a complete jackass.

Don't be that guy!

Choose the right watch for the occasion or choose the right watches in your collection

and you'll always have the right watch for the occasion.

So I wanna go over some of the 5 Biggest Mistakes People Make While Wearing a Dress Watch.

Number 1 is the size.

Select the right size.

You don't want an overly large watch.

This is one of those situations where bigger is not better.

Number 2 would be the type of bracelet, a strap that comes on that watch.

Some models look dressier than others, depending on the bracelet or strap that it might have.

For example, the 5980, how I was saying that, on a bracelet it looks sportier than on a

strap.

Number 3 is, bi-color.

I don't recommend ever wearing a two-tone watch in a suit.

Always better to stick to one tone of metal.

Number 4, what color metal are you wearing with that outfit?

For example, you don't wanna have a rose gold watch with a gray suit.

You're gonna preferably want platinum, steel or white gold.

Number 5 is the strap color.

If you're wearing black shoes with a black belt, you obviously do not want a brown strap.

So my favorite brands for sports watches is probably gonna be Audemars Piguet and Rolex,

and for dressy, more formal watches, I feel like Patek has that on lock.

Also I'm a fan of the Breguets and Vacheron.

I feel like those watches overall they give you the best look for that type of distinction

that you're trying to get with a dress watch.

So, like I mentioned earlier man, this is a topic that can go around in circles and

circles, and at the end of the day, I'm a watch guy, so most of my decisions are gonna

be more inclined, more towards watches than extreme fashion or like a fashionista would

say, whatever!

To not go around in circles, but can you wear a sports watch to a formal occasion?

I guess you could do whatever you want, you know?

I did it and how did I feel?

Like an idiot!

I would have given anything to have that day this watch instead of the two-tone Yacht-Master

II.

It'd be a downgrade in status, but it would have been the right watch to go with that

outfit.

So at the end of the day, you could do whatever you want.

Do I recommend wearing a 5980 on a strap in the water on a boat, NO!

But if you can afford this watch, you could do whatever you want.

So if you liked this video, please like and share.

Also, remember to subscribe to our channel.

My name is Eric.

Watch Your Style!

For more infomation >> 5 BIGGEST MISTAKES WHEN WEARING A DRESS WATCH! - DRESSY vs SPORT WATCH DEBATE - Duration: 9:36.

-------------------------------------------

'Man, Fire, Food' Host Shows How To Make Cheesy Sausages, Grilled Chicken Thighs | TODAY - Duration: 4:22.

PIXAR.

. >>> THE COUNT DOWN TO MEMORIAL

DAY IS ON, BUT BEFORE YOU MAKE THAT SHOPPING LIST FOR YOUR

WEEKEND BARBECUE YOU'RE GOING TO WANT TO SEE WHAT OUR FOOD TEAM

HAS COOKED UP. >> THEY'VE CALLED IN ROGER, HOST

OF COOKING CHANNEL "MAN, FIRE, FOOD" SO SHOW US A COUPLE

DISHES. >> THAT'S THE BEST TITLE.

>> IT SAYS IT ALL. WHEN I SEE PEOPLE AT THE AIRPORT

THEY SAID YOU'RE THAT MAN ON FIRE GUY.

>> WHAT ARE YOU MAKING FOR US TODAY?

>> CHICKEN WITH SOME BEER GLAZE, BUT HERE WE'VE GOT CHEESE

STUFFED SAUSAGES. WE'RE GOING TO SCORE IT LIKE

THIS. SCORE IT LIKE THAT.

THEN SCORE IT LIKE THIS. >> SO IT'S Xs.

>> YES. LITTLE CROSS HATCH.

YES. AND THEN WE'RE GOING TO PUT THIS

CROSS HATCH LIKE THIS INTO THE BROILER.

YOU EVER HAVE THAT SETTING ON YOUR OVEN THAT YOU NEVER

ACTUALLY USE? >> I LOVE THE BROILER.

>> I DO TOO. I BROIL IT FOR A COUPLE MINUTES

.

IT'S GOING TO SPLAY OPEN LIKE THIS.

SMOKED CHEDDAR. SMOKED PAPRIKA.

YOU MIX ALL THAT UP. YOU CAN DO THIS ON THE BARBECUE,

BUT YOU CAN ALSO DO IT INDOORS. THERE YOU PUT THE CHEESE ON THE

INSIDE LIKE THAT.

THEN YOU PUT IT ON THE BROILER AGAIN.

IT GETS EVEN BETTER. AND THEN ENDS UP LIKE THIS.

>> THAT'S A BEAUTY. KATH, YOU WANT TO TRY A LITTLE

BITE? >> YEAH.

YOU PICK IT UP LIKE A HOT DOG AND EAT IT?

>> YES. THE CHEESE IS LOADED IN THERE

AND IT'S AWESOME AND YOUR TRAINER LOVES YOU BECAUSE YOU

NEED TO BOOK MORE SESSIONS. >> THAT IS GOOD.

>> LET'S DO THIS CHICKEN. >> WHAT ARE WE MAKING UP HERE?

>> I'VE GOT FOOD IN MY MOUTH STILL.

SO WE HAVE SOME OLIVE OIL. >> TOO MUCH FOOD.

>> THAT MEANS SHE LIKED IT. >> SHE LIKES IT.

>> HERE WE HAVE OLIVE OIL. THIS IS SOME LEMON ZEST, GARLIC.

>> WHO THOUGHT YOU HOW TO COOK? >> YOU KNOW, I JUST WAS ALWAYS

AROUND A COOKING HOUSEHOLD. I JUST LEARNED BY WATCHING.

>> OSMOSIS. >> EXACTLY.

MIX THAT STUFF UP. SUPER SIMPLE.

>> USE CHICKEN THIGHS, RIGHT? >> I LIKE THEM.

>> ME TOO. >> WHAT DO YOU LIKE ABOUT THEM?

>> TENDER. >> FLAVOR.

>> SO MUCH BETTER THAN THE BREAST.

>> I LIKE THE BREAST. >> OF COURSE YOU DO.

>> SO THEN YOU MARINATE IT. YOU GUYS ARE TROUBLE.

SO YOU MARINATE. COVER IT.

PUT IT IN THE FRIDGE AN OVER TO OVERNIGHT.

OVER HERE WE'VE GOT SOME BEER. >> ANY KIND OF BEER?

>> CHOPPED ONIONS. >> ANY KIND OF BEER THAT YOU

LIKE. >> ALL THE ALCOHOL BURNS OFF

ANYWAY, RIGHT? >> GREAT TO BAKE.

ONIONS. BROWN SUGAR.

LET THAT REDUCE BY HALF AND GET THAT LITTLE GLAZE.

WE PUT OUR CHICKEN. >> I LIKE YOUR SOUND EFFECTS.

>> STICK IT ON THERE. >> IS THAT THE -- WAIT.

WHERE ARE YOU COOKING IT? ON THE STOVE?

>> ON THE STOVE. YOU DO IT IN THE BARBECUE TOO,

ON YOUR GRILL. THEN YOU TAKE THAT.

WHEN IT'S ALMOST DONE COOKING, YOU GLAZE IT WITH THAT BEER

GLAZE. YOU TAKE THAT.

YOU TAKE SOME OF YOUR GOODIES. THIS IS THE COOKED PORTION.

>> LOOKS DELICIOUS. >> ISN'T THAT TASTY?

>> THAT'S GOOD. >> CAN I FEED YOU?

For more infomation >> 'Man, Fire, Food' Host Shows How To Make Cheesy Sausages, Grilled Chicken Thighs | TODAY - Duration: 4:22.

-------------------------------------------

Orphan Black Season 5 The Final Trailer (SUB ITA) - Duration: 1:01.

For more infomation >> Orphan Black Season 5 The Final Trailer (SUB ITA) - Duration: 1:01.

-------------------------------------------

Red Nose Day: Learn How You Can Help End Child Poverty | TODAY - Duration: 4:59.

. >>> THIS WEEK WE'RE MARKING THE

THIRD YEAR OF RED NOSE DAY HERE IN THE U.S. AND IT IS A MASSIVE

EFFORT TO KEEP KIDS AND THEIR FAMILIES FROM FACING HUNGER AND

TO END CHILD POVERTY. >> ONE OF THE WAYS YOU CAN HELP

IS BY BUYING THESE RED NOSES. THEY SELL THEM AT YOUR LOCAL

WALGREENS. IF YOU'VE EVER WONDERED WHERE

THE MONEY GOES, CHECK OUT THIS FAMILY STORY.

>> TODAY A A GOOD DAY FOR THE WISHON FAMILY.

MAY MAKE LUNCH WITH THEIR KIDS THANKS TO A PANTRY FILLED WITH

FOOD IN A PLACE THEY CAN CALL THEIR OWN.

>> THE JOY OF HAVING A HOME AGAIN.

IT'S THE LITTLE THINGS THAT PEOPLE TAKE FOR GRANTED

HONESTLY. HAVING A HOUSE OVER YOUR HEAD.

HAVING A BED TO SLEEP IN. HAVING FOOD ON THE TABLE.

>> SEVEN YEARS AGO MARY WAS WORKING AS A BAKER AT A GROCERY

STORE AND ERIC WAS A CONSTRUCTION WORKER WHEN HE

SUFFERED A BACK INJURY. HE STOPPED WORKING AND WAS

PRESCRIBED PAIN MEDICATION BUT EVENTUALLY BECAME ADDICTED.

THE FAMILY MOVED AND FOUND NEW JOBS, BUT BEFORE LONG THEY WERE

BOTH OUT OF WORK AGAIN. >> THINGS WERE HARD FOR US.

WE DEFINITELY WERE STRUGGLING TO FIND EMPLOYMENT.

>> THEIR SITUATION DETERIORATED. BOTH BECAME INVOLVED WITH

ILLEGAL DRUG USE AND EVENTUALLY BECAME HOMELESS.

>> WE DEFINITELY MADE SOME DECISIONS IN OUR LIVES THAT

WE'RE NOT PROUD OF, THINGS THAT WE WISH WE COULD TAKE BACK.

WE RAN INTO SOME HARD TIMES. WE DEFINITELY HIT OUR ROCK

BOTTOM. >> IN 2016 THE COUPLE DECIDED TO

TAKE THEIR FAMILY BACK TO OHIO. THEIR KIDS STAYED WITH MARY'S

PARENTS WHILE ERIC AND MARY MOVED INTO A LOCAL HOMELESS

SHELTER. >> WE KNEW THAT WE HAD TO TAKE

CARE OF OURSELVES FIRST BEFORE WE COULD HELP OUR CHILDREN OUT.

>> THAT WAS PROBABLY THE HARDEST THING WAS EXPLAINING TO THEM WHY

WE WERE WHERE WE WERE. AND IT WAS TO BETTER OURSELVES

SO THAT THEY COULD COME BACK HOME.

>> TAKING CARE OF THEMSELVES MEANT FINDING THE RIGHT PEOPLE

TO HELP. THAT PERSON WAS JACK REAM.

>> WHEN GOD GETS AHOLD OF YOU, YOU'RE GOING TO DO THINGS YOU

NEVER THOUGHT YOU WOULD DO. >> THE RETIRED MINISTER FOUNDED

OHIO'S FRIENDS OF THE HOMELESS SHELTER WHERE ERIC AND MARY

STAYED. THE ACTIVE 86-YEAR-OLD WAS ALSO

A DRIVING FORCE BEHIND THE GREATER DOVER NEW PHILADELPHIA

FOOD PANTRY. THEY PROVIDED TWO MILLION MEALS

LAST YEAR WITH HELP FROM FEEDING AMERICA FUELED BY DONATION

PROSECUTE RED NOSE DAY. >> WE CAN MAKE PEOPLE THAT COME

INTO THIS FOOD PANTRY FEEL VERY GOOD WHEN THEY WERE SCARED TO

DEATH COMING IN AND EMBARRASSED. >> FOR MARY, THE EXPERIENCE WAS

HUMBLING. >> I WAS AN HONOR STUDENT.

I HAD A FULL RIDE SCHOLARSHIP TO COLLEGE.

TO COME BACK HOME AND BE LIVING IN A HOMELESS SHELTER IN MY

HOMETOWN WHERE I FELT LIKE I WAS -- I JUST FELT LIKE THIS IS

NOT WHERE I WAS SUPPOSED TO BE. >> JACK'S SHELTER HELPED ERIC

AND MARY FIND DRUG TREATMENT AND FAMILY COUNSELING PROGRAMS THAT

THEY CREDIT WITH HELPING THEM BOTH GET CLEAN AND STAY CLEAN.

>> ONCE WE STARTED LIVING RIGHT, ONCE WE STARTED DOING THE THINGS

THAT WE WERE SUPPOSED TO BE DOING, IT JUST SEEMED LIKE

THINGS STARTED FALLING BACK INTO PLACE.

>> LESS THAN A YEAR AFTER CHECKING INTO THE SHELTER, THE

COUPLE IS EMPLOYED AGAINST AND MORE IMPORTANTLY BACK ONE UNDER

ROOF WITH THE KIDS. ERIC IS SO GRATEFUL FOR THE HELP

HE RECEIVED THAT HE NOW VOLUNTEERS AT THE FOOD PANTRY

HELPING JACK HELP OTHERS WHO NEED A HAND LIKE HE ONCE DID.

>> I KNOW THAT IF IT WASN'T FOR THE THINGS THAT JACK DOES, I

PROBABLY WOULDN'T HAVE HAD ANYWHERE TO GO.

>> AND NOW THANKS TO THE SUPPORT, JORDAN AND BRADEN ARE

HAPPY TO BE HOME WITH THEIR PARENTS AND APPRECIATE ALL THE

PEOPLE THAT HELP GIVE THEIR FAMILY A SECOND CHANCE.

>> IT WAS AN AMAZING EXPERIENCE TO HAVE A NICE HOME AND OUR

FAMILY BACK TOGETHER AND TO JUST HAVE ALL THE FOOD WE NEED.

>> I NEVER FELT LIKE BEING IN A VERY GOOD HOME BEFORE AND NOW I

CAN FEEL IT HERE. SO THANK YOU FOR ALL YOU DID TO

HELP US. IT'S IMPORTANT TO GIVE BACK

BECAUSE IF YOU GIVE BACK, THIS COULD HAPPEN TO SOMEONE YOU GAVE

BACK TO. >> OH MY GOD.

>> OH MY GOSH. >> THAT IS BEAUTIFUL.

>> DON'T FORGET. >> YOU CAN HELP THESE FAMILIES

LIKE THE WISHONS WHO NEEDED HELP PUTTING FOOD ON THE TABLE AT

DIFFICULT TIMES. ALL YOU DO IS PICK UP YOUR RED

NOSE. >> BE SURE TO TUNE IN

For more infomation >> Red Nose Day: Learn How You Can Help End Child Poverty | TODAY - Duration: 4:59.

-------------------------------------------

Trisha Yearwood On Manchester Attack: 'Music Is A Healer' | TODAY - Duration: 4:23.

THE NATIONAL ANTHEM BEAUTIFULLY

AT THE HOCKEY PREDATORS GAME.

AND THIS ALL HAPPENED AS NEWS OF

THE MANCHESTER BOMBING WAS

UNFOLDING.

WHEN YOU WERE AT THE EVENT LAST

NIGHT IT JUST SORT OF HAPPENED.

>> WE WERE JUST ABOUT TO GO OUT

AND SING AND THERE WAS, LIKE,

YOU KNOW, THINGS -- SOCIAL MEDIA

KIND OF SAYING SOMETHING'S GOING

ON, SOMETHING HAPPENED.

WE REALLY DIDN'T KNOW ANY

DETAILS.

IT SEEMED LIKE IT TOOK A WHILE

FOR THE DETAILS TO COME OUT.

EVEN THIS MORNING I FEEL LIKE I

WAS LEARNING NEW THINGS.

EVERY TIME YOU SING THE NATIONAL

ANTHEM, I ALWAYS THINK ABOUT,

ESPECIALLY IN THIS DAY AND TIME,

I THINK ABOUT, YOU KNOW, WHEN --

FOR ME WE WERE TALKING BEFORE WE

CAME ON, YOU WERE TALKING ABOUT

OUR FLAG WAS STILL THERE.

I ALWAYS GET REALLY TINGLY WHEN

I SING LAND OF THE FREE, BECAUSE

IT JUST GOES ALL OVER ME.

IT'S ALWAYS A SPECIAL MOMENT.

>> CAN WE LISTEN A SECOND.

*

LAND OF THE FREE AND THE HOME OF

THE BRAVE *

>> WOW.

>> IT'S NOT ABOUT YOU WHEN

YOU'RE SINGING THAT SONG, IS IT?

>> NO.

AND LAST NIGHT, I'M A

NASHVILLIAN.

OUR CITY IS JUST A BUZZ WITH

WHEN WHOLE STANLEY CUP THING.

>> CONGRATULATIONS.

IT'S A FIRST.

>> YES, IT IS.

TO HEAR EVERYBODY SINGING WAS

AMAZING.

>> WE WERE THINKING ABOUT ARIANA

GRANDE AND HAVING THIS BIG DO

YOU FEEL CONCERT.

>> AND MADE ALL THOSE PEOPLE

HAPPY.

>> DOES THIS SORT OF THING EVER

CROSS YOUR MIND WHEN YOU -- WHEN

YOU'RE PERFORMING OR WHEN YOU'RE

PERFORMING WITH YOUR HUSBAND?

>> YES AND NO.

I THINK THAT IN THIS DAY AND AGE

YOU DON'T DO ANYTHING WITHOUT

CONSIDERING THAT WE LIVE IN A

DIFFERENT WORLD.

>> WE SURE DO.

>> BUT YOU ALSO, IT'S THAT WHOLE

THING.

EVERY TIME SOMETHING LIKE THIS

HAPPENS EVERYBODY SAYS YOU'VE

GOT TO LIVE YOUR LIFE AND YOU

CAN'T --

>> YOU CAN'T LET THEM WIN

ZBRCH.

>> EXACTLY.

THAT'S WHAT YOU SAY.

BUT THERE IS A TRUTH IN THAT

EVERYBODY TAKES, EVERYTHING IS

MORE SAFE, MORE PRECAUTIONS ARE

TAKEN, BUT THERE'S STILL A RISK

EVERY TIME YOU GO OUT THE DOOR.

I THINK MUSIC IS THAT PLACE

WHERE IT IS A HEALER.

IT IS THE PLACE THAT PEOPLE GO

TO ESCAPE THE THINGS IN THEIR

LIFE THEY WANT TO GET AWAY FROM.

THAT'S WHAT MAKES ME THE

SADDEST.

ESPECIALLY ARIANA GRANDE, THESE

LITTLE GIRLS WHO JUST WANT TO

HEAR HER SING AND HAVING THE

TIME OF THEIR LIVES AND JUST

HAVE FUN.

>> WHEN YOU HEAR SOMETHING LIKE

THIS, WHAT DO YOU AND YOUR

FRIENDS TALK ABOUT OR YOU AND

HUR HUSBAND?

WHAT IS THE CONVERSATION?

>> I THINK WE JUST -- I KNOW

IT'S HAPPENING OFTEN ENOUGH THAT

IT ALMOST BECOMES WHERE YOU

DON'T -- YOU'RE NOT SURPRISED BY

IT, BUT WE NEED TO STILL BE

COMPLETELY SURPRISED AND

DEVASTATED EVERY TIME SOMETHING

LIKE THIS HAPPENS, BECAUSE I

DON'T WANT IT TO BE LIKE OH,

WELL, THERE'S ANOTHER ONE.

EVERY PERSON WHO LOST SOMEBODY,

THIS IS EVERYTHING THAT'S

HAPPENING IN THEIR LIVES RIGHT

NOW.

I'M FRUSTRATED AND I'M SAD AND

I'M SAD FOR THE FAMILIES AND THE

VICTIMS.

I'M ALSO SAD FOR ARIANA, BECAUSE

EVEN THOUGH IT HAS NO BEARING ON

HER, IT'S STILL GOT TO BE

DEVASTATING.

>> SHE HAS CANCELED APPARENTLY

SOME OF HER TOUR AND THAT MAKES

SENSE, WOULDN'T YOU THINK?

>> ABSOLUTELY.

>> I HOPE SHE DOESN'T FEEL

RESPONSIBLE IN ANY WAY, BECAUSE

SHE ISN'T.

>> NO, SHE ISN'T.

>> WE WATCHED YOU SING THE

ANTHEM AND WE KIND OF TOUCHED

ON.

HOORAY FOR NASHVILLE FOR GETTING

TO THIS POINT IN THE STANLEY

CUP.

>> NASHVILLE IS A GREAT

COMMUNITY FOR REALLY GETTING

BEHIND THEIR ATHLETIC PROGRAMS.

WE REALLY DIDN'T HAVE ANYTHING.

WE HAD THE NASHVILLE SOUNDS, A

AAA BASEBALL TEAMS.

THEN WE GOT THE TITANS.

WHEN THE PREDATORS CAME WE

RALLIED AROUND.

WE'VE NEVER BEEN TO A STANLEY

CUP.

WE'VE MADE IT VERY CLOSE, SO

THIS WAS BIG FOR THE WHOLE --

NOT JUST IN THE A REEN NARKS BRENA.

>> IS THAT GARTH BESIDE YOU?

>> THAT IS EDDIE GEORGE.

>> WE'RE GETTING OLD.

WE DON'T SEE SO WELL.

>> AND WE DO WANT EVERYBODY TO

KNOW THAT THERE'S BIG NEWS IN

YOUR LIFE AS WELL BECAUSE OF

YOUR -- THE NEW DEAL THAT YOU

HAVE GOING WITH YOUR COOKWARE

AND YOUR COOKING.

CAN EVERYBODY FIND OUT MORE

ABOUT ALL THAT ON YOUR WEBSITE?

>> OF COURSE.

>> WE FELT LIKE TODAY WAS NOT

THE DAY TO TALK ABOUT THAT.

>> I THINK THIS IS A DAY OF

RESPECT AND WE'RE CLOSE TO

MEMORIAL DAY SO IT MAKES SENSE

TO KIND OF BE TALKING ABOUT THE

ANTHEM AND CELEBRATING OUR

VETERANS.

EVERYBODY WILL BE GETTING

TOGETHER NEXT WEEKEND AND THAT'S

ALWAYS GOOD.

I THINK I SAW SOMETHING JUSTIN

TIMBERLAKE POSTED.

WE NEED TO DO BETTER.

WE NEED TO LOVE ONE ANOTHER.

I SAY LOVE ONE ANOTHER EVERY

NIGHT AT THE END OF MY SHOW.

I FEEL LIKE ESPECIALLY THIS

WEEK, IT'S A CHANCE TO BE WITH

YOUR PEOPLE.

>> IF YOU WANT TO FEEL BETTER,

GO ON YOUTUBE AND LISTEN TO

TRISHA SING THE NATIONAL ANTHEM.

>> OR LISTEN TO TRISHA SING

ANYTHING.

ANOTHER PERSON WE LOVE TO LISTEN

TO, TIM TEBOW OPENS

For more infomation >> Trisha Yearwood On Manchester Attack: 'Music Is A Healer' | TODAY - Duration: 4:23.

-------------------------------------------

Kasturi (Musk) | Asal Ya naqal | Pakistan Mai Milti Hai Ya Nahin | Live Video By My Help in Health - Duration: 15:22.

Kasturi (Musk) | Asal Ya naqal | Pakistan Mai Milti Hai Ya Nahin | Live Video By My Help in Health

For more infomation >> Kasturi (Musk) | Asal Ya naqal | Pakistan Mai Milti Hai Ya Nahin | Live Video By My Help in Health - Duration: 15:22.

-------------------------------------------

Donald Trump converts US AID to Pakistan into Financial Loan - Duration: 3:06.

For more infomation >> Donald Trump converts US AID to Pakistan into Financial Loan - Duration: 3:06.

-------------------------------------------

Hundreds attend service for fallen Stanislaus County sheriff's deputy - Duration: 1:59.

E OFFICERS ARE ARRIVING.

GOOD MORNING.

LETICIA: GOOD MORNING.

THE FUNERAL STARTS AT 10:00 THIS

MORNING.

IT HAS BEEN QUITE THE CROWD.

MOMENTS AGO, A EMOTIONAL

PRECESSION AS THE CASKET OF THE

FALLEN DEPUTY ARRIVED.

[BGPIPES]

LETICI HIS WIFE WIPED AWAY

TEARS AS H BODY WAS ESCORTED

INSIDE OF THE CHURCH.

ENFORCEMENT ARE SHOWING -- LAW

ENFORCEMENT ARE SHOWING THEIR

SUPPORT.

HE THESE BEHIND A WHITE -- HE

LEAV BEHIND A WIFE AND FOUR

DAUGHTERS.

HE AND MICHELLE JOHNSON DIED --

AND MICHELLE JOHNSON -- AND

RASCHE JOHNSON WHI CHASING A

SUSPECT.

>> THEY A BOTH FAMILY.

THEY ARE WILLING TO HELP OUT.

EVERYTHING YOU LOOK FOR IN A

COMMUNITY, THATIS WHAT I

REMEMBER THEM BY.

THEY ARE WILLING TO HELP OUT IF

YOU KNEW WHAT -- IF THEY KNEW

YOU OR DO NOT KNOW YOU.

LETICI IT WILL BE A TOUGH

WEEK.

A FUNERAL SERVICE WILL BE HELD

FOR RASCHE JOHNSON AT THE HOUSE

CHURCH IN MODESTO.

THE PUBLIC IS ALSO INVITED TO

ATTEND THAT SERVICE.

THE SERVICE WERE DEBBIE GARDNER

GETS UNDERWAY -- FOUR DEPUTY

GARNER -- FOR DEPUTY GARNER GETS

UNDERWAY.

For more infomation >> Hundreds attend service for fallen Stanislaus County sheriff's deputy - Duration: 1:59.

-------------------------------------------

Top 10 Countries Causing the Most Pollution - Duration: 13:18.

Top 10 Countries Causing the Most Pollution

10.

Canada (557 mtCO2 emitted per year)

The second biggest nation on Earth, Canada is essentially an icy wilderness ringed by

a tiny human population clinging desperately to its slightly-less frozen parts.

It's a land of virgin forest, desolate mountain ranges, crystal blue lakes, and enough pollution

to suffocate a herd of buffalo.

Sorry, what?

Yep, despite its squeaky-clean image, Canada is actually kinda dirty.

And we don't mean in the way yo momma is.

Like the weed-addicted younger brother of America's beer-swilling older sibling, Canada

is puffing out more clouds of smoke than even the biggest bong-addict.

Want the numbers?

In 2015, Canada sent 557 mtCO2 (million tonnes of CO2) spewing into the air, from a population

of 35.9 million.

For comparison, the 11 th biggest polluter, Indonesia, sent 537 mtCO2 into the atmosphere

from a population of over a quarter of a billion.

And these guys have deadly annual smogs that have killed 100,000 people.

Yet Canada may not keep its less-than-coveted 10th ranking for long.

In October 2016, the government signed up for a carbon tax plan that could put the country

on a path to a cleaner economy.

Failing that, Indonesia's pollution output is increasing like mad, so they're probably

about to overtake North America's answer to Denmark pretty soon anyway.

9.

South Korea (592 mtCO2 emitted per year)

On a peninsula half-occupied by the country of a demented fat man armed with nuclear weapons,

South Korea can seem like a breath of fresh air.

It's clean, safe, modern, rich… and very, very dirty.

Yeah, that 'breath of fresh air' we just mentioned?

That was only metaphorical.

Visit Seoul in spring, and it can feel like you're trying to outdo your uncle's four-pack-a-day

habit with a single breath.

Partly, this is China's fault.

The neighboring super-polluter sends its toxic gunk spewing over both Koreas like an annoying

kid repeatedly chucking his carcinogenic deathball into your yard.

But the Global Carbon Atlas doesn't track pollution caused by other countries.

Plenty of Seoul's clean air problems come from the Republic of Korea itself.

As NPR has pointed out, the country is powered by 50 coal plants, with more on their way.

Then there's the sheer size of their capital.

Seoul has a bigger population than New York or London, and everyone's driving cars.

For comparison, dystopian nightmare LA recorded 7 days of air ranked 'unhealthy' in 2015.

Seoul recorded 53.

So what's South Korea doing to tackle this problem?

Umm, nothing actually.

They're one of the few countries in smog-choked Asia Pacific that are increasing their carbon

output.

8.

Saudi Arabia (601 mtCO2 emitted per year)

According to the World Health Organization (WHO) the Saudi capital of Riyadh is one of

the most polluted cities on Earth.

Even Beijing doesn't rank so highly in terms of horrifying stuff that'll get into your

lungs and make you feel like you've swallowed a cheese grater.

While some of this is thanks to stuff beyond human control – namely, the region's terrifying

sandstorms – plenty can be laid squarely at the feet of the ruling classes.

Across Saudi Arabia, industrial waste is let into the environment like it's going outta

fashion.

Part of this may be to do with the fact that the Wahhabist kingdom is a petro-state that

bungs its 31 million citizens subsidized gas.

Until recently, you could fill-up a medium-sized car from empty for about $7.

While prices have gone up, that's still a massive incentive to drive everywhere.

Add lax rules with industrial waste and plenty of oil flowing, and it all adds up to a state

where 'environmental concerns' are ranked by the government as a slightly lower priority

than 'literally anything else'.

Like South Korea, Saudi Arabia is not interested in cutting its current output by much.

Although they signed up to a 50% clean energy target a while back, this was recently reduced

to only 10%.

7.

Iran (648 mtCO2 emitted per year)

A short hop over the Persian Gulf from Riyadh, and you arrive in one of the planet's other

super-polluters.

The Islamic Republic of Iran is home to Ahvaz, a city with the unfortunate claim to fame

of being literally the most polluted place on Earth.

Air quality is so poor in this city of a million that the WHO can't even measure how dangerous

it is.

Their official scale calls any place with over 20 micrograms of tiny, health-destroying

PM10 particles per cubic meter of air a hazard.

Ahvaz has over 372 micrograms of PM10s per cubic meter.

You might as well just wire your lungs up to a sewage pipe as breathe this stuff.

But it's not just Ahvaz.

All across Iran, from Tehran to Qom, blankets of smog severely screw with people's lives.

In November 2016, all the capital's schools had to be shut down due to clouds of killer

fumes strangling the city.

We aren't using the word 'killer' lightly.

Over 400 people died from the pollution in just 23 days.

Aside from a reliance on petrochemical industries, one big reason for Iran's bad air is the

sanctions placed on it following the Islamic Revolution.

Fume-belching cars and low-grade fuel were all anyone could afford for decades, contributing

to the current situation.

6.

Germany (798 mtCO2 emitted per year)

So, we're probably all pretty surprised to see Germany on this list.

The economic powerhouse of the EU, Germany is also supposed to be unfailingly clean and

efficient.

Which it totally is… provided you just concentrate on visible dirt.

Focus on those pesky invisible PM10s, and wandering through Germany's cities is like

stepping into a blizzard of flying death.

Stuttgart, for example, has been called "Germany's Beijing".

While you won't get the same clouds of smog you get in China, you'll still get pretty

unhealthy air.

Hazardous particles exceeded the legal limit for 64 days in 2014, more than Seoul and Los

Angeles combined.

Elsewhere, things are just as bad.

28 areas of Germany, including Berlin, Hamburg and Munich, have levels of air pollution considered

dangerous.

In 2013 alone, hazardous amounts of nitrogen dioxide were estimated to have killed over

10,600 Germans.

Things have gotten so bad that the EU recently threatened to hit Germany with a hefty fine

if it didn't clean up its act (literally).

Not that they can really talk.

Taken as a single nation, the EU would be the 3rd biggest polluter on Earth.

5.

Japan (1,237 mtCO2 emitted per year)

Leaping upwards a few hundred million tonnes of CO2 per year, orderly Japan emits enough

bad gas per annum to make it Asia Pacific's 2nd biggest polluter.

Man, what is it with these supposedly clean countries and terrible air quality?

Actually, we're being pretty unkind here.

Japan may be a high-level emitter today, but it's a squeaky-clean utopia compared to

what came before.

In the 1960s, Japan was what China is now: a smog-choked industrial powerhouse that was

raking in billions, even as it killed hundreds of thousands of its citizens with horrifically

unsafe air.

Some pollution-related illnesses, such as Minamata Disease, are still known globally

after the Japanese cities where they were first identified.

It was only after a massive push to curb emissions in the 1970s that Japan started its slow climb

down from smog-filled dystopia to the relatively clean place it is today.

In fact, things would likely be even better, were it not for Japan's recent reliance

on coal fired power stations.

2014 was the country's second-worst year for emissions on record.

For that, you can thank the Fukushima disaster of 2011.

The only nuclear disaster in history to come within touching distance of Chernobyl, it

resulted in nearly all of Japan's nuclear plants being shut down and replaced with coal

fired ones.

4.

Russian Federation (1,617 mtCO2 emitted per year)

If you need an illustration of how polluted Russia is, look no further than the town of

Karabash.

A small town 100 miles north of Kazakhstan, Karabash is home to only 13,000 people…

possibly because no one else is fundamentally insane enough to live there.

The river water is orange.

The lake is dead and red.

A mile-long ridge of black slag runs through the town.

The air is so nasty it causes your eyes to sting and your throat to burn.

Children have multiple birth defects.

In 1996, the government declared it a disaster zone.

Of course, most Russians don't live in a city even remotely approaching this bleak

state.

But even in the richer, western cities, things can still get bad.

Moscow occasionally records pollution at 'especially dangerous' levels, and, in 2010, was hit

by a suffocating smog more like something you'd see in Beijing.

Still, it's the Siberian industrial towns that are really to blame for Russia's impact

on climate change.

Interestingly, the Kremlin doesn't seem too bothered about combatting this.

Although Moscow announced a recent carbon reduction plan, some analysts have said it'll

actually increase emissions in the long term.

3.

India (2,274 mtCO2 emitted per year)

When you're emitting as much gunk into the air as Russia and Iran combined, you know

you've got a problem.

At least, you probably should.

But India is something else.

Home to five of the world's most polluted cities, its insane population levels are contributing

to an ecological bomb that could threaten the entire region.

It's estimated that up to 1.2 million people die in India each year due to air pollution.

That's equivalent to the entire population of Prague dropping dead every 12 months.

Although India has signed up to cut emissions and move towards clean energy, economists

are asking whether this will be possible in a practical sense.

India's economy is booming, but it's still a long, long way behind even China in terms

of supplying a decent standard of living for its poorest citizens.

Hundreds of millions still lack electricity.

Tens of millions are stuck in poverty so dire most of us can't even imagine it.

Central to India's recent economic gains have been its reliance on cheap, atmosphere-destroying

coal.

Take that away, and Delhi worries it will be condemning its citizens to an eternity

of moneyless misery.

On the other hand, India is also one of the countries that will be most affected by climate

change, with its coastal cities being flooded and crops destroyed.

Huh.

Some choice.

2.

USA (5,414 mtCO2 emitted per year)

Sorry to any frat bros out there hoping to start up a chant of "USA!

USA!" when America snagged the top spot.

The good ol' US-of-A ain't even close to being the planet's number one emitter.

That's not to say they're a slouch, though.

With over 5,000 million tonnes of CO2 being released into the atmosphere each year, the

USA is laying into the atmosphere with more gusto than nearly any other country on Earth.

"But hang on," you may be thinking, "the US doesn't have any of the post-apocalyptic

pollution wastelands you've written about for most other entries."

Well, no, maybe not.

But that doesn't mean bad stuff isn't happening.

A 2016 report by the American Lung Association found more than half the country's population

lives at risk of breathing in dangerous air pollution.

That's 166 million Americans at risk of asthma, cancer, heart disease and reproductive

problems, all thanks to the air they're breathing.

To be fair, the US's air problems don't all start in Washington.

The smog in Western states frequently starts life in China and India, before drifting into

the USA and causing misery for millions.

Still, America isn't totally innocent.

According to the Global Carbon Atlas, it's still one of the biggest emitters, however

you cut it.

Yet even this pollution behemoth has nothing on…

1.

China (10,357 mtCO2 emitted per year)

Be honest: you saw this coming, didn't you?

No other country on Earth emits as much smoggy nastiness as China.

If the USA, India, Russia and Japan were all to suddenly decide to conglomerate into a

single state (we're not exactly sure why or how), that new super-nation would still

only be emitting the same amount of greenhouse gas as China.

If polluting was an Olympic sport, China would bring home gold every single time.

You hardly need us to repeat all the stories of China's toxic air.

The deadly smogs that suffocate entire regions.

The impenetrable haze that makes seeing more than a few meters in front of your face an

impossibility in Beijing.

The studies that have compared breathing the country's air to being as bad for you as

smoking.

It's all grim stuff that's pretty well known.

But hey, at least China signed up to the Paris Agreement, right?

And Beijing seems pretty down with combating this whole 'toxic air' thing.

Not quite.

Recent data has shown that China's air crisis is actually getting worse as time goes by.

Expect them to stay at #1 for some time yet.

Không có nhận xét nào:

Đăng nhận xét