-------------------------------------------
Graphics Settings tested and compared - Rainbow Six Siege - Duration: 12:21.
What's up guys, Rogue-9 here!
As promised in my last video where I discussed the benefits and drawbacks of using non-native
aspect ratios (such as 4:3), I have gone out and tested every graphics setting in Rainbow
Six Siege to find out which would be the best for optimal game performance and competitive advantage.
So in this video, I will take you through the graphics settings one by one, demonstrate
and explain exactly what they do for you in game and give my recommendation in terms of
what settings will give you the best results in terms of framerate and image quality.
To start off, let me say first of all that of course every PC is different and the settings for consoles vary again.
Now my PC is quite powerful, check the description for full specs, but I will explain each setting
so that you can choose the best for you, no matter how powerful you gaming machine is.
Some of these settings will be quite simple and straightforward while for others;
I will go a bit more in depth.
As a general rule, you will want to pick the settings that give you the best framerate
that your monitor can handle but at least over 60 FPS at all times.
For instance, if you have a 120hz monitor, that would be your target but going above that won't be very helpful.
So with those general thoughts out of the way, let's just start at the top and work our way down!
When it comes to texture quality there are differences in terms of the quality of the
image you will end up with and there are also performance differences but neither of these
factors are hugely impacted.
When you compare the two most extreme texture quality settings, low and ultra, you can see
that for many of the map textures, such as walls and floors, the differences are definitely
noticeable but only when you get really close and when you put the two versions side by side.
I could also spot differences when I checked really unimportant textures such as the ones
on books and drinks bottles and yes sure, when you have the textures set to low, these
objects are pretty damn ugly but will running at these settings impact your ability to spot enemies?
Let's take a look at the way operators will look at low, high and ultra settings.
Again, when compared side by side, you can definitely see a difference but in game, this
will only be an issue when you get relatively close to your opponents.
Running at higher texture qualities will have a significant impact on the amount of graphics
card RAM that will be required but as long as your graphics card can handle that, the
impact on your framerate will actually be quite small.
My conclusion for texture quality is that going for the low setting will definitely
impact the visual quality of your game but the impact on spotting and tracking targets is probably minimal.
At the same time though, the game will look an awful lot prettier if you go for a higher
setting and the lost frames can be made up using other settings.
So for me personally, I will stick with high or I might even give very high a go but if
you're on an older machine, you may want to consider medium or high at most.
With the next setting, texture filtering, my experience was a little different.
When set to the lowest setting (linear) you can definitely see a distinct blurring effect
when you look along straight surfaces at a sharp angle.
You can see this effect when standing close to walls and looking along them and even crawling
along the floor was enough to create this blurry effect.
I have to say that I personally find the effect both unattractive and kind of distracting.
Could you get used to it and learn to ignore it?
Sure.
Will it have a negative effect on being able to spot enemies?
Probably not, but on my rig, turning the settings up to the maximum of 16x anisotropic filtering
also had very little performance impact.
I maybe saw a decrease of 1 or 2 frames per second when switching between these two extremes
and even if you are on a laptop or older PC and need to save frames, I would say that
this is not the setting to do it on.
If you feel your machine struggling on 16x, try 8 or 4x but I feel that most people will
not have too many issues here.
Next up, we have the level of detail or LOD quality, which is basically a setting that
changes at which distance objects within the game switch from a high detail to a low detail polygonal frame.
Let me demonstrate this on our hostage here.
With LOD quality set to low, you can see that between 4 and 6 meters distance the character
model's shoulders start to shrink a little and the t-shirt starts clipping through the jacket.
This is because the underlying frame is simplified to save on graphical processing load.
In comparison, if we set this to ultra, this change will happen between 19 and 21m at which
point it will be far less noticeable.
Is this an important setting for spotting opponents in the game?
I think to a degree it is…
If Vigil is hiding in a dark corner or if an opponent is holding a long angle with only
a small sliver of their body showing from behind cover, then the slightly less natural
looking shape of the lower detail mesh might just be that little bit harder to spot.
Of course the average kill distance in Rainbow Six is below 10m so it could be argued that
setting the LOD quality all the way to ultra is excessive and unnecessary but again, this
is one of those settings that didn't have a massive FPS impact for me, so I personally
will be sticking with Ultra but you may wish to go with somewhere around the middle depending on your setup.
When it comes to the shading quality, the game tells us that this will adjust the rendering's
visual fidelity by tweaking lighting quality, skin subsurface scattering, etc…
I tested all three available settings and for the life of me I couldn't really see
any visual difference in the image quality on screen and the performance impact for my
machine was basically non-existent as well.
You might as well switch this to low, I think.
Shadow quality on the other hand is somewhat different.
This setting controls the resolution of the dynamic shadows used in game.
The higher the setting, the more detailed the shadows of objects and characters in the
game will be and this will come at a bit of a performance impact.
For the greatest performance increase, you can set the shadow quality to low, which will
turn dynamic shadows off completely.
On my machine, this gave me an increase of around 10-15 FPS compared to the very high
setting but this choice may also impact your gameplay.
On the one hand, turning off the shadows cast by objects on the map such as tables, couches
etc. could make it easier to spot a sneaky opponent trying to hide in certain spots.
So there is actually a potential benefit to removing dynamic shadows completely.
On the other hand, setting the quality to low will also remove the shadows cast by the
other players in the game and I have definitely been in situation where a shadow coming through
a doorway a few hundred milliseconds before the opponent has given me an easy kill or
made me an easy target.
On balance, I would say that having shadows is more beneficial than not having them, so
I would recommend you go for at least the medium setting which for me still gave me
a saving of around 5 FPS versus very high.
If you want slightly prettier shadows and have the machine to handle the processing
load, you could also go for high but very high seemed unnecessary for me
since the quality increase was negligible.
So shadow quality is definitely one of the more important settings for you to consider
but if we move on to reflection quality, we have a similar situation to shading quality.
I spent hours walking around in custom games examining different reflective surfaces on
different maps and then comparing the footage at different settings and I was unable to
find any significant different in the way any of them looked.
Even when set to high, destroying the objects that were being reflected still did not change
the reflections themselves, so whatever setting you go for, reflections always seem static.
Bottom line is, you may as well go for low even if the performance improvement is relatively small.
With the ambient occlusion setting, we return to shadows.
Here, the choice is pretty straightforward.
Deeper, richer shadows can create better hiding spots for your opponents on the map, so by
using either the SSBC or HBAO+ setting, you could be making things more difficult for
yourself in addition to using up more processing power and lowering your FPS.
I keep this off and you should too.
The same really goes for lens effects.
Bloom and lens flare artefacts give the illusion that you are watching something that has been
filmed on a camera rather than through the eyes of the operator you are controlling.
This makes no sense at all, except maybe for games where you play as a robot who actually
has cameras for eyes or if you are playing a third person game where a camera is floating
above and behind your character… so fine, yes there are situations in which this could
make sense but for the most part this is kind of silly for first person games.
For Rainbow Six (and other competitive games for that matter) my recommendation is really
simple again: Turn these effects all the way off.
You wasting your FPS with these effects and in the worst case, you might actually be putting
yourself at a disadvantage by including these distracting effects that make target recognition
and tracking harder than it needs to be.
And again, the same goes for zoom-in depth of field.
Why use processing power on a blur effect that could actually put you at a disadvantage
when aiming downs sights?
And now, last but not least, we come to the anti-aliasing settings.
The options here were changed recently and we have three different settings remaining:
the choice of anti-aliasing and then render scaling and sharpness.
This looks a bit complex at first but let me break it down for you.
When it comes to the anti-aliasing choice, there are basically only three different settings:
T-AA, off and FXAA.
At the high end, you can (in theory) also choose T-AA x2 or x4 but all this does is
use T-AA and then render the game at double or quadruple your native resolution.
Actually using either of these two options has an insane impact on your game performance,
so unless you like playing at 23 FPS, these settings are probably not for you.
The render scaling can help you to significantly lower the impact of the anti-aliasing by lowering
the resolution at which the game is rendering and in theory, using double T-AA at 50% scaling
or quad T-AA at 25% should result in the same quality and performance as single T-AA at
100% but when I tested it, that wasn't quite the case.
Going for 2 or 4 times T-AA and then scaling down produced an image quality that actually
looked a little blurrier than single T-AA and also resulted in lower FPS, so my clear
recommendation based on my test is to stay away from the double or quad settings.
So as mentioned that leaves 3 settings, T-AA, off or FXAA.
I have seen some people say that turning anti-aliasing off is actually thy best choice for Rainbow
Six Siege since it will make it easier to spot pixel peeking opponents.
I can't say for sure if that is the case but what you can see very clearly from my
tests is that without anti-aliasing, straight lines will take on this saw tooth pattern
which I find not only significantly unattractive but I think this could also make it harder
to spot opponents on narrow angles.
So that's out too and only leaves T-AA and FXAA and in my comparisons, FXAA looked blurrier
with no significant performance increase and that means that my choice here would clearly be T-AA.
If you are looking for an FPS boost, you can get that here by adjusting the render scaling down a little.
Even 10 or 20% can give you a decent FPS boost without making the image on screen look very different.
The sharpness setting can also help save a few frames but I would advise against taking
this down if you can avoid it.
The image will quickly become blurry and you will be better off taking the scaling down another notch or two.
And that's it.
Every graphical settings option in Rainbow Six Siege tested, explained and demonstrated!
I hope that you found at least some of this info useful and somewhat interesting.
Do go ahead and leave a like if you would like to show your appreciation and support
the channel but of course you should dislike if the video was not up to scratch.
Anyway, as always: thank you for watching, I hope you enjoyed the video
and I will see you in the next episode!
-------------------------------------------
LaLiga Profiles: Aleksandr Mostovoi - Duration: 1:42.
Alexandr Mostovoi is the figurehead of the best Celta team in the history of the club.
Only the current generation of fans at the Galician club, who saw their team come near to a final just a year ago,
have seen a side that can compare with the one featuring Mostovoi.
An unforgettable team, who qualified for the final stages of the Champions League for the first and only time in the club's history.
The experience he brought to the team along with the contributions of other stand out players
like Mazinho and Vlado Gudelj, took a mid-table Celta all the way into Europe.
Competing across the continent of Europe became a way of life for the sky blues.
Along with Karpin, Gustavo Lopez and Catanha, they won the now defunct Intertoto Cup and were runners-up in the Copa del Rey.
The 'Tsar' was always at the helm of his side and it was a rare season when he wasn't among the top goalscorers in the squad.
His strong character, his leadership skills and the magic in his feet, beguiled the Galician fans who were sad to see him go in the
worst possible way when Celta were relegated the same season they played in the Champions League.
It seems like things at the Balaidos are back on course again, however, if you mention the name Alexandr Mostovoi to any
Celta fan, they'll look back in fondness at an incredible period and an exceptional player.
-------------------------------------------
"Cuộc Xâm Lược Thầm Lặng" - Tác Giả Clive Hamilton | Trung Quốc Không Kiểm Duyệt - Duration: 13:23.
On this episode of China Uncensored,
Guys, it supposes to be a silent invasion.
Hi, welcome to China Uncensored, I'm your host, Chris Chappell.
It's one of the most controversial books of the year:
Silent Invasion by Professor Clive Hamilton.
It details how the Chinese Communist Party
is infiltrating Australian society and politics.
I sat down with Prof. Hamilton to discuss
why he refuses to be silent.
about this invasion.
Thank you for joining us today, Professor Hamilton.
It's a pleasure to be here.
So, In Silent Invasion,
you talk about dark money, spies,
and gullible politicians.
Which should we be most terrified of?
Well, it's a constellation.
I'm sorry.
I wish I could pick out one,
but this is the thing about the CCP's influence operations in Australia.
As one intelligence official described it to me,
they call it a "Full Court Press."
I'm sure your American listeners will understand that basketball term.
I had to look it up.
It means an all-out offensive
and so what I describe in my book
is the whole series of operations whereby
the CCP and its agents have influence in Australia
and, from China, have attempted to influence
at times with great success all of Australia's major institutions,
from politics to media to business
and of course, into universities.
Yeah.
Well, I really appreciate the basketball reference.
It sounds like the communist party really scored a touchdown.
So, when you're doing the research for the book,
was there anything that surprised you?
I was constantly surprised...
Nothing is sacred.
No area of Australian society, politics
or culture is free from influence
if there is an opportunity there.
So, as you say, that was one of the
shocking elements that I came across,
the way in which ...
And I don't want to exaggerate this.
My understanding is that this has only happened in a small way so far,
but the way in which agents
of the CCP have made themselves present
in the congregations of Chinese Christian churches in Australia
and of course, the CCP is officially an atheist organization,
so the infiltration is certainly not because the CCP feels as though
it needs to inject a spiritual element into its ideology.
Is the Communist Party's infiltration targeting any particular political party?
They're quite eclectic in their political tastes.
They'll infiltrate anything that they can.
What impact do you hope Silent Invasion will have?
I wrote the book in order to wake up Australians
to what is happening, to give them the full picture
of the nature of these operations
and more particularly why.
Why is the CCP targeting Australia in this way?
So, really, it's to bring about social change,
political change, in response to what I see,
as many others do, as a really big problem in Australia.
How does this affect your average Australian
who might be more concerned about Rugby
or Vegemite or whatever the average Australian is into these days?
when I've been going around the country giving talks,
chatting to people about the book,
is that it seems to me that a very large number of Australians
had a kind of sense that there was something wrong,
that they'd picked up something in the newspapers
or in the local community about some kind of
intrusion from the CCP or a major Chinese corporation
and it worried them.
There's a kind of unease about what's been happening
and therefore,
many non-Chinese-Australians and a lot of Chinese-Australians
have seized upon the book
as a way of explaining more broadly
what has been happening,
this kind of niggling sense that they've had that
there's something odd going on
that's made them feel uneasy.
What was your reaction when your
publisher told you they weren't going to publish
Silent Invasion?
Were you like,
"Wow.
Should I include this story in my book"?
I was deeply shocked.
Allen & Unwin I've worked with for many, many years.
They have been extremely enthusiastic about the book
right up to the day before
I got the phone call and said,
"We're pulling the plug."
And they said subsequently in the phone call
and then in writing subsequently that they did
because they were afraid of retaliation from Beijing
and I thought,
"It's a kind of brilliant but unwelcome vindication
of the essential argument of my book."
So, it really worked out for you.
Well, at one level, it certainly drew a huge amount of publicity
to the book and suddenly,
publication of my book became a free speech issue.
Mind you, it's not a pleasant thing
to spend weeks and weeks feeling,
with good reason,
that the state security apparatus in Beijing
is keeping a very close eye on you.
I mean, am I at any risk,
being here with you right now?
Well, we did have a spy sitting outside of this building
who was carrying with her what,
I was subsequently told,
was probably a sniffer,
which is a device that looked like a mobile phone,
but in fact is a quite sophisticated electronic device
that can pick up all wifi and mobile telephone communication inside a building.
That sounds fun, to be getting that kind of attention.
Well, it does unsettle one and after a while,
you do start to take notice of things around you
that normally you wouldn't bother about...
There's no doubt, based on a vast and from security experts
and the Australian Federal Police,
that the Chinese authorities in Australia are
collecting a dossier on me.
I've been the subject of cyber intrusions.
I've been subjected to a really intense campaign of vilification and bullying
Were you surprised by the controversy the book generated?
You know, I anticipated it,
but in the abstract.
You know, you anticipate something.
I think this is going to be very controversial.
I think I'm going to be accused of racism
and anti-China xenophobia,
but when it actually happened,
it kind of comes on you with an intensity and an
emotional place that is really quite hard to take.
You need to have the skin of a rhino
to not want to crawl into a hole and stay there.
The Chinese Embassy has called,
"Critics of the China
filled with a Cold-War mentality
and anti-China hysteria and paranoia.
Which of those best describes you?"
Well, you know, I grew up in the cold war,
so maybe some of it's still hanging around me somewhere,
but you know, the key point which many of your listeners understand is that
whenever there's any criticism of the communist party,
the communist propaganda efforts work very hard to persuade
the public that, in fact, it's the Chinese people
who are under attack.
It's the only way it can really defend itself from this kind of criticisms.
Is racism a real, potential problem?
On the question of whether the book will stimulate racist elements in our society,
anti-China feeling ...
That was my concern from Day One
I took every measure I could as I researched
and wrote the book to avoid the possibility
that the book could lend any credibility
to those anti-China, racist elements
on the fringe of our society.
I consulted with people in the Chinese-Australian community
and reflected their views in the book
and I think I do that quite effectively.
So, you really have to work quite hard
to draw out of the book anything that can be used to defend
the idea that the book is racist or stimulates racism.
Some people have worked very hard at drawing
that conclusion from the book.
Some of them, I've been quite surprised.
I thought, "Why are you doing that?"
So, one of the fascinating things that I've learned in the last four weeks
is how deeply entrenched in some segments of the political left
is the idea that any criticism of the communist party
is a criticism of Chinese people
and therefore, we must defend this oppressed minority.
Give me a break.
I mean, Chinese-Australians that I spoke to,
many of them, don't feel that way.
You, defenders of multiculturalism,
should go and talk to them,
rather than community leaders
who actually represented United Front organizations
that dance to the Communist Party's tune.
You actually have a lot of connections in the Chinese-Australian community.
What was their reaction to your book?
Well, they welcomed it when I made contact with them initially
and started to talk to them.
We found that last week that a group of Chinese-Australians
was very, very eager to have a launch in Sydney for the book
and I was really blown away by the number of Chinese-Australians
that were packed in that room in Parliament House in Sydney
and gave the book such an extraordinary, enthusiastic launch off into the world.
Why do you think that was?
Well, I think that for the last ten to twenty years,
many Chinese-Australians who are critical of the Communist Party and say,
"We came to Australia to escape from
the clutches of the Communist party,
and now they're following me,"
Their voices have been silenced.
They've been marginalized.
They've been kicked out of the public debate
and the mainstream media and politicians
have been talking to community leaders,
who are, generally,
run United Front organizations.
So, many Chinese-Australians have been extremely grateful
that finally someone in the mainstream
has been taking their complaints seriously
and has written a book about it.
And most important question:
how does this affect America?
Well, it has a huge implication for the United States
and that is because the authorities in the United States
from Congress to the CIA, FBI,
to think tanks inside the Beltway
that take notice of China to a whole lot of scholars across the country,
are watching very, very closely
what is happening in the Australian parliament,
to the debate that we've been discussing today,
with a view to copying the ways in which
Australian governments and Australian society
more broadly pushes back against Beijing's attempts
to interfere with, influence, guide, and ultimately control
what happens in this country.
So in your book, it says, "The communist party is using
democracy to destroy democracy."
What can liberal democracies do to protect ourselves
and our freedoms?
Well, I think liberal democracies need to muscle up.
I mean, here is a serious threat
to the foundational values of liberal democracy
led by very powerful economic incentives
coming from the Peoples' Republic of China
and I think we in the liberal democracies need to
make a really fundamental decision,
one that we haven't been forced to do ...
I'm about to say, "Ever," but certainly for many decades.
And that is to decide: how much is our freedom worth?
Thank you very much for joining us today, Professor Hamilton.
I've enjoyed it.
And I would highly recommend picking up a copy of Silent Invasion.
I've read it myself and you can find a link to
how you can purchase it in the description below.
China Uncensored is supported by viewers like you.
Our trip here to Australia was not funded by the CIA or Taiwan--
but by our amazing supporters on Patreon.
Click here to visit our website on Patreon.com
to see how you can contribute to the show.
-------------------------------------------
Superman-Star Margot Kidder ist tot! - Duration: 2:40.
For more infomation >> Superman-Star Margot Kidder ist tot! - Duration: 2:40. -------------------------------------------
Box of Toys Toy Guns Military Guns Toy Weapons Kids Fun - Duration: 5:11.
Box of Toys Toy Guns Military
-------------------------------------------
Custom Luxury Empty Nester Tiny House Featured on Tiny Living Magazine - Duration: 3:11.
Custom Luxury Empty Nester Tiny House Featured on Tiny Living Magazine
-------------------------------------------
Smartphone Motorola Moto E4 16GB Dual Chip 4G Câm. 8MP + Selfie 5MP Tela 5" HD - Duration: 1:41.
For more infomation >> Smartphone Motorola Moto E4 16GB Dual Chip 4G Câm. 8MP + Selfie 5MP Tela 5" HD - Duration: 1:41. -------------------------------------------
Smartphone Samsung Galaxy S9+ - Duration: 3:07.
For more infomation >> Smartphone Samsung Galaxy S9+ - Duration: 3:07. -------------------------------------------
UFC 3 - Duration: 1:02.
For more infomation >> UFC 3 - Duration: 1:02. -------------------------------------------
Smartphone Motorola Moto C Plus 8GB - Duration: 1:53.
For more infomation >> Smartphone Motorola Moto C Plus 8GB - Duration: 1:53. -------------------------------------------
Smartphone Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge 128GB Black Piano 4G Câm. 12MP + Selfie 5MP Tela 5.5" - Duration: 1:54.
For more infomation >> Smartphone Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge 128GB Black Piano 4G Câm. 12MP + Selfie 5MP Tela 5.5" - Duration: 1:54. -------------------------------------------
Beats X: Still Cool? - Duration: 3:08.
What's up guys, NDM Tech here!
This is the BeatsX, I have been using it for almost one year and so far everything has
been going great.
The first main highlight of these earphones are their comfort.
It is made possible by the flex form cable.
The long cable is a bit annoying at first but then I got used to it pretty fast which
is a plus point.
Another contributer of comfort is the variety of eartips and wingtips that we get in the
box.
Wingtips are great for stability especially when you are working out but mine broke recently
so.............just keep in mind that it's been almost one year and I never removed the
wingtip because I was too lazy to do it.
I guess that's one of the reason why it broke.
Whatever, let's talk about the audio performance.
I heard other reviewers saying that "BeatsX is the best beats headphone ever made" and
that's because this earphones doesn't sound like traditional Beats.
What I meant is, it is not bass concentrated.
That means BeatsX is almost perfect for every genre.
It also does a good job at cancelling out outside noises.
You just need to find the perfect fit.
Battery life is also good.
I'm getting 6-8 hours of charge which is fine.
The 5 minute fast charge which gives 2 hours of playback is very useful.
The LED indicators work in way where White indicates "ON and Connected" or "Fully charged"
while charging.
Blinking White indicates "Pairing Mode" and Red indiactes "Low Battery" or "Charging"
when connected to AC power.
It comes with Apple's W1 Chip which makes pairing for Apple users seamless.
This and the fact that it has a lightning port tells us that these earphones are made
with iPhone users in mind but unlike Airpods, you won't lose any features by connecting
it to an non-Apple device.
You just need to go through the normal bluetooth pairing process.
BeatsX won't stay connected to two devices at one time and I consider that as a major
drawback.
My Bose Soundsport Wireless earphones used to do it perfectly.
BeatsX only pairs to them which requires the user to manually switch between devices.
It is very annoying in a situation where you get a call while watching a YouTube video
on your laptop.
You need to manually switch to your phone to attend that call with your earphone.
Updating the firmware of BeatsX is simple because Beats have an application called Beats
Updater and it is compatible with Windows and Mac.
The process is simple, just connect your BeatsX with the lightning connector to your computer
open BeatsX updater and boom that's it.
Thanks for watching guys, please don't forget to subscribe and see you guys in the next
one!
-------------------------------------------
PM urges National Assembly to approve supplementary budget bill - Duration: 1:45.
Rival parties finally agreed to get things moving.
With parliament set to resume normal function, the nation's Prime Minister took to the podium
to emphasize the importance and urgency of pushing through with the pending supplementary
budget bill.
Kim Mok-yeon has the highlights from his administrative policy speech.
"In order for the support measures on areas prone-to-restructuring and on youth unemployment
to be effective, the national assembly's approval of the supplementary budget bill is crucial.
We ask for you to swiftly pass the bill so that the government can implement it as soon
as possible"
During his administrative policy speech on Tuesday, Prime Minister Lee Nak-yon urged
the national assembly to combine forces so that the supplementary budget bill and other
bills related to public welfare can be processed quickly and thoroughly.
He stressed the need for the bill, which he calls an "emergency budget" to be passed in
order to help alleviate the nation's record high unemployment rate.
The prime minister also said that the bill is also essential for boosting the regional
economies suffering from restructuring in the shipbuilding and auto-making sectors.
At the extraordinary session last month, the government submitted a 3.6 billion U.S. dollar
extra budget bill, which the parliament agreed on Monday to vote on during a plenary session
set for Friday.
Aside from the extra budget, the prime minister also said the government is awaiting the parliament's
approval on bills directly related to the lives of the public, such as the revised tax
bill and bills on fine dust particles and public security.
He vowed to continue efforts to come up with deep-rooted, structural measures to boost
innovation in the education, labor and economic sectors.
Kim Mok-yeon, Arirang News.
-------------------------------------------
Fürst Karl-Heinz von Sayn-Wittgenstein: Emotionale Beichte! - Duration: 7:28.
For more infomation >> Fürst Karl-Heinz von Sayn-Wittgenstein: Emotionale Beichte! - Duration: 7:28. -------------------------------------------
North Korea has started dismantling Punggye-ri nuclear test site: 38 North - Duration: 0:44.
The regime has begun dismantling its Punggye-ri nuclear test site.
According to 38 North,.... satellite imagery shows several key operational support buildings
have been destroyed... while some rails for mining carts seem to have been removed.
Other more substantial buildings around the facility remain intact,... with no tunnel
entrances permanently shut down yet.
The U.S.-based North Korea monitoring website explains.... this is to save the complete
destruction of the tunnels and the removal of facilities.... so that foreign journalists
can witness those moments next week.
During today's regular briefing,... Seoul's Joint Chiefs of Staff said the North appears
to be getting ready for the destruction of the Nuclear Test Site,... and said it is closely
monitoring the situation in the area.
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét