Thứ Hai, 14 tháng 5, 2018

Youtube daily May 14 2018

[ INTRO ]

It's one thing to put your heart and soul into your art.

But it's another thing entirely to put someone else's heart into your art.

Or... any other body part.

And yet, that's what a lot of people have done, for thousands of years.

Here are 3 of the ways humans have used bits of ourselves to make things a little prettier.

They'll make you think twice about what exactly went into that art you're admiring.

Earwax, scientifically known as cerumen, is a waxy secretion made up of dead skin cells

and different oils produced in the outer ear canal.

It serves as a line of defense, protecting against water damage, trauma, and foreign

invaders.

So who would have thought it'd help artists make illuminated manuscripts?

Despite what the name implies, illuminated manuscripts aren't shining out light.

They get their name from gold or silver leaf, which is paired with vibrant painted pictures

on handwritten pages.

This art form hit its peak in medieval times, and was practiced both by European and Islamic

societies.

Once Gutenberg's printing press spread across the world, though, it dwindled.

Until the 15th century, manuscripts were decorated with a substance called glair.

To make it, you had to beat watered-down egg whites into a froth, and then let that stand

until it became a liquid.

Then, you'd mix in your pigment of choice, and froth it up again.

After that settles, you're good to paint.

Without any other ingredients, bubbles in the froth would leave tiny holes in the surface

of your paintings.

So that's where earwax comes in.

The oils in the wax prevent the water molecules from bonding with each other in bubble-forming

ways, which means nice, smooth paint.

Even when glair went out of style, earwax was also sometimes added to its successor,

gum arabic.

And the only reason we know it was used at all is advice books!

Or at least, the mid-14th century treatise called De arte illuminandi.

Thanks, anonymous author.

You're gross, but clever!

But speaking of gross, it turns out human urine has been used for thousands of years,

both to make pigments, and to keep the colors in cloth from fading.

It was used with a little plant called woad, the source of Europe's indigo since the Stone

Age.

Woad leaves make the same pigment molecules as the plants they used for indigo down in

India, but not as strong a concentration.

Some recipes for crafting balls of woad pigment called for soaking the leaves in urine under

the heat of the Sun, while trampling them for 3 days.

During all this, a strain of bacteria that's naturally in the woad munches on sugars and

releases the indigo pigment molecules through a process called fermentation.

And urine helps ferment those mashed-up leaves, probably because the ammonia inside helps

balance out any acidity in the plant goo.

On top of that, natural dyes from things like leaves, berries, or bark can leach out of

cloth when you wash it — unless you add a chemical that helps bind the dye, called

a mordant.

Basically, the dye's molecules get caught up in the mordant's molecules, which bind

to the cloth.

And turns out, some of the compounds in stale pee, like ammonia and possibly some trace

metals, makes it a surprisingly good mordant.

In 16th century England, the textile industry used 200 metric tons of urine annually — that's

roughly 1000 people's pee collected every day!

And if you're wondering how they gathered it all: specialized chamberpots, folks.

But why just use one excretion when you could throw an entire human body into your art?

An entire, dried out, crushed up body.

Yes, I'm talking about mummies.

Exporting mummies from Egypt to Europe, grinding them up, and selling them as medicine was

a big business by the 16th century.

In fact, mumia was one of the most common "drugs" found in apothecary shops.

But it was also used to make a pigment called Mummy Brown, usually by mixing it with two

resins from different trees: white pitch and myrrh.

It came in many shades because there wasn't a standard technique, like whether to use

the entire mummy, or — as one recipe called for — "only the finest muscle."

Plus, mummification techniques varied over the centuries.

Different plants, resins, and oils were used during the mummy-making process, and stained

the body different shades of brown.

Some artists felt like Mummy Brown had a good amount of transparency, and used it in watercolors

and oil paint for flesh tones, shading, and glazing.

Others weren't impressed by its quality, and felt like other brown pigments could deliver

the same hues just fine.

And nowadays, it's really hard to find true examples of paintings that incorporate Mummy

Brown.

Even using mass spectrometry to identify the molecules in the paint isn't so certain.

Turns out, a lot of the things used to embalm and wrap mummies were also plain old paint

ingredients.

The Mummy Brown hype went on for 4 centuries, .

And its downfall started in the early 20th century, as people realized they were painting

with grave-robbed human remains, or eventually got grossed out by it.

We started actually recognizing the scientific and archaeological value of mummies, too.

So thanks, society, for deciding that there are at least some human ingredients that don't

belong in art.

But hey, if you want to use your own earwax or pee… nobody's gonna stop you.

Thanks for watching this episode of SciShow, which is Complexly production.

If you want to learn more about all things art, beyond the weird science of it, you can

check out one of our other channels: The Art Assignment at youtube.com/theartassignment.

[ OUTRO ]

For more infomation >> 3 Ways Humans Have Literally Put Themselves Into Art - Duration: 5:27.

-------------------------------------------

El crecimiento del desempleo en EE.UU. - Duration: 1:36.

For more infomation >> El crecimiento del desempleo en EE.UU. - Duration: 1:36.

-------------------------------------------

Robert Mueller Caught Red-Handed Trying To Steal Congress's Most Dangerous Constitutional Right - Duration: 5:33.

Robert Mueller Caught Red-Handed Trying To Steal Congress's Most Dangerous Constitutional

Right.

Special counsel Robert Mueller seems to have many in mainstream media and on the progressive

left fooled, convinced he is some kind of an upstanding public servant.

In The Threat Matrix, Garrett Graff writes that "both political parties respect"

Mueller as "a consummate law enforcement professional with a track record, forged in

Vietnam, of grace under fire and getting organizations on track."

Yet, that veneer is starting to wear thin with moderates, independents, libertarians,

conservatives, and pretty much any other thinking person that is willing to actually consider

the facts.

Many are no longer fooled by Mueller's Boy Scout act and critics point out that Mueller's

actions along with the corruption and complicity of the FBI may be the downfall of America

as we know it.

Political commentator Mark Levin points out that Mueller has and continues to undermine

the Constitution and the very foundation of the United States of America with this continued

investigation.

He states that the very nature of the investigation itself is unconstitutional as the framers

never intended for one single man to have the power to impeach the president of the

United States.

It utterly obliterates the entire idea of checks and balances.

If Mueller has nothing on President Donald Trump at all, then he is simply trying to

railroad him and overthrow a legitimately elected leader to the office of president.

But, if Mueller does actually have any evidence at all?

Then it would be up to Congress to make the decision as to whether that offense is worthy

of impeachment, not Mueller and his team of sycophants.Levin states – "Mr. Mueller

wants to interview the President and he wants to interview him under the most onerous circumstances.

What is the purpose of an interview like that, based on those 49 general areas?

His purpose is to indict the President.

Now, what's the purpose of indicting the President?

To try the president and to find him guilty.

What's the purpose of a conviction?

It's to remove the President of the United States from office.

That's the bottom line.

o president has ever been indicted while in office, not one.

No President has ever been forced before a federal grand jury, not one.

No President has ever been removed from office by the United States Senate in two-thirds

vote of the Senate.

Not one.

Mueller's purpose, his purpose is to remove the President."

Levin goes on to explain exactly what that could mean and why it is so dangerous -"That

means one man, one jury will usurp the entire constitutional power of Congress, the power

to remove a President.

You can indict every other public official, a judge, for instance, while they're in

office, and go through the impeachment process.

You cannot do it with a President."

As this Russian collusion investigation heads towards the two-year mark with still no proof

of wrongdoing in sight – Press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders appeared to speak for

many Americans when she expressed frustration, stating – "the president is frustrated

by the continued witch hunt of the Russia investigation and he'd love for this to

come to a full conclusion so that everyone can focus fully on the thing that he was elected

to do."

Levin rightly goes on to point out that in his opinion it is way past time for the subversive

AG Jeff Sessions to step up, and it is time for the corrupt anti-American Rod Rosenstein

to pay attention.

Both of those things are unlikely to happen, given that their loyalties lie outside of

the wellbeing of this country.

The discussion about potential indictments and all of the associated chatter from various

attorneys claiming to be some level of expert involving issues so bizarre as to defy comprehension

with what the original framers of the Constitution and the original founders of this country

had in mind originally at this country's inception.Levin believes the entire purpose

that the progressive Left and their media lapdogs "are hanging their hat on Mueller"

is they'll never get 2/3rds in the Senate to remove this President.

I don't care if they impeach him, they'll never get 2/3rds.

It's never happened before."

Levin explains – "So what they're hoping to do is trap him in this notion of a subpoena

and questioning, indict him, try and humiliate him, try and force him in front of a court,

hope that they get the Supreme Court on their side, which I doubt they will, but you never

know with these courts and then get him to resign.

That's their game plan.

Mr. Mueller is undermining the Constitution.

He's not upholding the rule of law…what's going on right now is anti-Constitutional.

It is undermining our system.

The framers wanted the body politic to decide on whether or not to remove one branch of

government, just as the body politic put that person there in the first place."

After nearly two years of no proof, no crime, and no evidence committed by President Trump

and his administration, yet the ever-growing mountain of evidence mounting of crimes and

obstruction of justice on the part of the crooked Department of Justice, FBI and Obama-Clinton-Soros

Mafia.

The swamp is very, very deep and a very dangerous place for good, decent people to venture into.

what do you think about this?

Please Share this news and Scroll down to comment below and don't forget to subscribe

top stories today.

Không có nhận xét nào:

Đăng nhận xét