Youtube daily Jun 25 2018

Two Deep State Agents Just Got The Worst News Ever Hand-Delivered By Trump.

Despite weakening the deep state's power, they still lurk within the shadows.

Their entire goal is to destroy President Donald Trump and his agenda.

But two deep state agents are done for after President Trump hand-delivered them the worst

news ever.

It is clear to anybody paying attention that Robert Mueller's investigation, into possible

collusion during the 2016 election is politically motivated.

That has become so clear that even people who were on Mueller's side have been forced

to turn on him.

The most damning evidence of political motivation is a series of text messages sent between

two FBI agents.

Peter Strzok was caught sending vehemently anti-Trump text messages, to his extramarital

lover and fellow FBI agent Lisa Page.

Those text messages went so far as to state that he was trying to take down Trump when

he was a presidential candidate.

And Strzok isn't some low-level agent; he was one of the top investigators during the

investigation into Hillary Clinton's use of a private email server to send classified

information.

Once that investigation ended, he was quickly picked up by special counsel Robert Mueller

as an investigator in his Russia collusion investigation.

His text messages being released ended up resulting in him being removed from that investigation,

but he still remains in the FBI.

That is what brings us to what happened this week.

In the wake of news that Strzok is going to testify before Congress as a part of Robert

Mueller's investigation, President Trump took notice of him.

During a campaign rally in Minnesota, he called out both Strzok and Page by name, using their

messages to call Mueller's investigation a "phony witch hunt."

But he didn't stop there.

In classic Trump-like fashion, he went after Strzok and Page with the one thing they didn't

want to hear come from the President's mouth.

He went after the extramarital affair the two of them were engaging in, rhetorically

asking if the wife and husband of the two agents are happy about that.

"WITH PETER STRZOK AND HIS LOVER, LISA PAGE.

I DON'T THINK THEIR WIFE AND HUSBAND ARE TOO HAPPY ABOUT THAT, WHAT DO YOU THINK?"

TRUMP STATED.

"I DON'T THINK SO."

This one statement was absolutely brutal.

An affair that was later exposed to the world coming out of the mouth of the President of

the United States is perhaps the worst thing, that could happen to Strzok and Page right

now.

Their reputations are forever tarnished due to their inappropriate behavior both in their

professional and personal lives.

But while that was bad, there's no telling what will come out of Peter Strzok's testimony

in front of Congress.

A major part of the hearing is to find potential political bias in Robert Mueller's investigation.

So far the text messages sent between the two FBI lovers is the best evidence pointing

towards that conclusion.

The only person with more to lose from the upcoming Strzok hearing is Robert Mueller,

as it could serve to destroy his entire investigation.

what do you think about this?

Please Share this news and Scroll down to comment below and don't forget to subscribe

Top stories today.

For more infomation >> Two Deep State Agents Just Got The Wor*t News Ever Hand-Delivered By Trump - Duration: 3:27.

-------------------------------------------

The Supreme Court Just Gave Barack Obama Some Very Bad News - Duration: 10:30.

The Supreme

Court Just Gave Barack Obama Some Very Bad News

Barack Obama has not given up on his crusade to fundamentally change America.

Since leaving office, Obama has launched a new project to rig elections in favor of Democrats.

But his plan hit a snag when the Supreme Court gave him some very bad news.

Obama and former Attorney General Eric Holder have teamed up on a project – the National

Democratic Redistricting Committee – to fight so-called "partisan gerrymandering."

After the Republican midterm sweep in 2010, the GOP takeover of state legislatures allowed

them to draw Congressional and state legislature district maps after the 2010 census.

State legislature's drawing the district maps has been a standard feature of American

politics.

But since Democrats lost the 2010 elections, they did not end up with maps that favored

them.

And now, rather than winning elections to try and take back state legislatures ahead

of the 2020 census, Democrats are scheming to default to their fallback political position

of using the courts to win the victories they can't achieve at the ballot box.

Wisconsin Democrats filed a lawsuit seeking to strike down the map Republicans drew after

winning control of the state legislature.

They claimed they "packed and cracked" into legislative districts that denied the

Democrats a chance to win the votes necessary to advance their policy agenda.

This case – Gill v. Whitford – made it all the way to the Supreme Court.

But in a shocking defeat for anti-gerrymandering Democrats like Obama, the Supreme Court found

the plaintiffs lacked the standing to bring the case.

Chief Justice John Roberts wrote that the plaintiffs were trying to throw out the whole

map, when their complaints was with specific districts:

"HERE, THE PLAINTIFFS' PARTISAN GERRYMANDERING CLAIMS TURN ON ALLEGATIONS THAT THEIR VOTES

HAVE BEEN DILUTED.

THAT HARM ARISES FROM THE PARTICULAR COMPOSITION OF THE VOTER'S OWN DISTRICT, WHICH CAUSES

HIS VOTE—HAVING BEEN 16 GILL V. WHITFORD OPINION OF THE COURT PACKED OR CRACKED—TO

CARRY LESS WEIGHT THAN IT WOULD CARRY IN ANOTHER, HYPOTHETICAL DISTRICT.

REMEDYING THE INDIVIDUAL VOTER'S HARM, THEREFORE, DOES NOT NECESSARILY REQUIRE RESTRUCTURING

ALL OF THE STATE'S LEGISLATIVE DISTRICTS.

IT REQUIRES REVISING ONLY SUCH DISTRICTS AS ARE NECESSARY TO RESHAPE THE VOTER'S DISTRICT—SO

THAT THE VOTER MAY BE UNPACKED OR UNCRACKED, AS THE CASE MAY BE."

Democrats are focused on getting "non-partisan" experts or hand-picked judges to draw legislative

maps because they know the districts they will produce will rig elections going forward

for the left.

The left successfully petitioned judges to overturn the district map Republicans drew

in Pennsylvania.

Federal judges redrew the map to favor Democrats and that boosted their chances of winning

back the House.

Democrats were seeking to do nationally what they achieved in Pennsylvania by winning a

Supreme Court precedent to overturn GOP maps heading into the 2018 elections.

Party officials believe they will be riding a blue wave this fall and they want judges

to draw Democrat-friendly districts so they can maximize their gains.

Democrats and the media had no problem with gerrymandering when the Democrats were the

ones drawing the districts.

The real "harm" alleged by the left after Republicans drew the district maps in states

like Wisconsin was that the map wasn't rigged in their favor.

We will keep you up to date on any new developments in the 2018 midterm elections.

Facebook has greatly reduced the distribution of our stories in our readers' newsfeeds and

is instead promoting mainstream media sources.

When you share to your friends, however, you greatly help distribute our content.

Please take a moment and consider sharing this article with

your friends

and family.

Thank you.