Youtube daily Nov 17 2017

So when people voice fears of artificial intelligence,

very often, they invoke images of humanoid robots run amok.

You know? Terminator?

You know, that might be something to consider,

but that's a distant threat.

Or, we fret about digital surveillance

with metaphors from the past.

"1984," George Orwell's "1984,"

it's hitting the bestseller lists again.

It's a great book,

but it's not the correct dystopia for the 21st century.

What we need to fear most

is not what artificial intelligence will do to us on its own,

but how the people in power will use artificial intelligence

to control us and to manipulate us

in novel, sometimes hidden,

subtle and unexpected ways.

Much of the technology

that threatens our freedom and our dignity in the near-term future

is being developed by companies

in the business of capturing and selling our data and our attention

to advertisers and others:

Facebook, Google, Amazon,

Alibaba, Tencent.

Now, artificial intelligence has started bolstering their business as well.

And it may seem like artificial intelligence

is just the next thing after online ads.

It's not.

It's a jump in category.

It's a whole different world,

and it has great potential.

It could accelerate our understanding of many areas of study and research.

But to paraphrase a famous Hollywood philosopher,

"With prodigious potential comes prodigious risk."

Now let's look at a basic fact of our digital lives, online ads.

Right? We kind of dismiss them.

They seem crude, ineffective.

We've all had the experience of being followed on the web

by an ad based on something we searched or read.

You know, you look up a pair of boots

and for a week, those boots are following you around everywhere you go.

Even after you succumb and buy them, they're still following you around.

We're kind of inured to that kind of basic, cheap manipulation.

We roll our eyes and we think, "You know what? These things don't work."

Except, online,

the digital technologies are not just ads.

Now, to understand that, let's think of a physical world example.

You know how, at the checkout counters at supermarkets, near the cashier,

there's candy and gum at the eye level of kids?

That's designed to make them whine at their parents

just as the parents are about to sort of check out.

Now, that's a persuasion architecture.

It's not nice, but it kind of works.

That's why you see it in every supermarket.

Now, in the physical world,

such persuasion architectures are kind of limited,

because you can only put so many things by the cashier. Right?

And the candy and gum, it's the same for everyone,

even though it mostly works

only for people who have whiny little humans beside them.

In the physical world, we live with those limitations.

In the digital world, though,

persuasion architectures can be built at the scale of billions

and they can target, infer, understand

and be deployed at individuals

one by one

by figuring out your weaknesses,

and they can be sent to everyone's phone private screen,

so it's not visible to us.

And that's different.

And that's just one of the basic things that artificial intelligence can do.

Now, let's take an example.

Let's say you want to sell plane tickets to Vegas. Right?

So in the old world, you could think of some demographics to target

based on experience and what you can guess.

You might try to advertise to, oh,

men between the ages of 25 and 35,

or people who have a high limit on their credit card,

or retired couples. Right?

That's what you would do in the past.

With big data and machine learning,

that's not how it works anymore.

So to imagine that,

think of all the data that Facebook has on you:

every status update you ever typed,

every Messenger conversation,

every place you logged in from,

all your photographs that you uploaded there.

If you start typing something and change your mind and delete it,

Facebook keeps those and analyzes them, too.

Increasingly, it tries to match you with your offline data.

It also purchases a lot of data from data brokers.

It could be everything from your financial records

to a good chunk of your browsing history.

Right? In the US, such data is routinely collected,

collated and sold.

In Europe, they have tougher rules.

So what happens then is,

by churning through all that data, these machine-learning algorithms --

that's why they're called learning algorithms --

they learn to understand the characteristics of people

who purchased tickets to Vegas before.

When they learn this from existing data,

they also learn how to apply this to new people.

So if they're presented with a new person,

they can classify whether that person is likely to buy a ticket to Vegas or not.

Fine. You're thinking, an offer to buy tickets to Vegas.

I can ignore that.

But the problem isn't that.

The problem is,

we no longer really understand how these complex algorithms work.

We don't understand how they're doing this categorization.

It's giant matrices, thousands of rows and columns,

maybe millions of rows and columns,

and not the programmers

and not anybody who looks at it,

even if you have all the data,

understands anymore how exactly it's operating

any more than you'd know what I was thinking right now

if you were shown a cross section of my brain.

It's like we're not programming anymore,

we're growing intelligence that we don't truly understand.

And these things only work if there's an enormous amount of data,

so they also encourage deep surveillance on all of us

so that the machine learning algorithms can work.

That's why Facebook wants to collect all the data it can about you.

The algorithms work better.

So let's push that Vegas example a bit.

What if the system that we do not understand

was picking up that it's easier to sell Vegas tickets

to people who are bipolar and about to enter the manic phase.

Such people tend to become overspenders, compulsive gamblers.

They could do this, and you'd have no clue that's what they were picking up on.

I gave this example to a bunch of computer scientists once

and afterwards, one of them came up to me.

He was troubled and he said, "That's why I couldn't publish it."

I was like, "Couldn't publish what?"

He had tried to see whether you can indeed figure out the onset of mania

from social media posts before clinical symptoms,

and it had worked,

and it had worked very well,

and he had no idea how it worked or what it was picking up on.

Now, the problem isn't solved if he doesn't publish it,

because there are already companies

that are developing this kind of technology,

and a lot of the stuff is just off the shelf.

This is not very difficult anymore.

Do you ever go on YouTube meaning to watch one video

and an hour later you've watched 27?

You know how YouTube has this column on the right

that says, "Up next"

and it autoplays something?

It's an algorithm

picking what it thinks that you might be interested in

and maybe not find on your own.

It's not a human editor.

It's what algorithms do.

It picks up on what you have watched and what people like you have watched,

and infers that that must be what you're interested in,

what you want more of,

and just shows you more.

It sounds like a benign and useful feature,

except when it isn't.

So in 2016, I attended rallies of then-candidate Donald Trump

to study as a scholar the movement supporting him.

I study social movements, so I was studying it, too.

And then I wanted to write something about one of his rallies,

so I watched it a few times on YouTube.

YouTube started recommending to me

and autoplaying to me white supremacist videos

in increasing order of extremism.

If I watched one,

it served up one even more extreme

and autoplayed that one, too.

If you watch Hillary Clinton or Bernie Sanders content,

YouTube recommends and autoplays conspiracy left,

and it goes downhill from there.

Well, you might be thinking, this is politics, but it's not.

This isn't about politics.

This is just the algorithm figuring out human behavior.

I once watched a video about vegetarianism on YouTube

and YouTube recommended and autoplayed a video about being vegan.

It's like you're never hardcore enough for YouTube.

(Laughter)

So what's going on?

Now, YouTube's algorithm is proprietary,

but here's what I think is going on.

The algorithm has figured out

that if you can entice people

into thinking that you can show them something more hardcore,

they're more likely to stay on the site

watching video after video going down that rabbit hole

while Google serves them ads.

Now, with nobody minding the ethics of the store,

these sites can profile people

who are Jew haters,

who think that Jews are parasites

and who have such explicit anti-Semitic content,

and let you target them with ads.

They can also mobilize algorithms

to find for you look-alike audiences,

people who do not have such explicit anti-Semitic content on their profile

but who the algorithm detects may be susceptible to such messages,

and lets you target them with ads, too.

Now, this may sound like an implausible example,

but this is real.

ProPublica investigated this

and found that you can indeed do this on Facebook,

and Facebook helpfully offered up suggestions

on how to broaden that audience.

BuzzFeed tried it for Google, and very quickly they found,

yep, you can do it on Google, too.

And it wasn't even expensive.

The ProPublica reporter spent about 30 dollars

to target this category.

So last year, Donald Trump's social media manager disclosed

that they were using Facebook dark posts to demobilize people,

not to persuade them,

but to convince them not to vote at all.

And to do that, they targeted specifically,

for example, African-American men in key cities like Philadelphia,

and I'm going to read exactly what he said.

I'm quoting.

They were using "nonpublic posts

whose viewership the campaign controls

so that only the people we want to see it see it.

We modeled this.

It will dramatically affect her ability to turn these people out."

What's in those dark posts?

We have no idea.

Facebook won't tell us.

So Facebook also algorithmically arranges the posts

that your friends put on Facebook, or the pages you follow.

It doesn't show you everything chronologically.

It puts the order in the way that the algorithm thinks will entice you

to stay on the site longer.

Now, so this has a lot of consequences.

You may be thinking somebody is snubbing you on Facebook.

The algorithm may never be showing your post to them.

The algorithm is prioritizing some of them and burying the others.

Experiments show

that what the algorithm picks to show you can affect your emotions.

But that's not all.

It also affects political behavior.

So in 2010, in the midterm elections,

Facebook did an experiment on 61 million people in the US

that was disclosed after the fact.

So some people were shown, "Today is election day,"

the simpler one,

and some people were shown the one with that tiny tweak

with those little thumbnails

of your friends who clicked on "I voted."

This simple tweak.

OK? So the pictures were the only change,

and that post shown just once

turned out an additional 340,000 voters

in that election,

according to this research

as confirmed by the voter rolls.

A fluke? No.

Because in 2012, they repeated the same experiment.

And that time,

that civic message shown just once

turned out an additional 270,000 voters.

For reference, the 2016 US presidential election

was decided by about 100,000 votes.

Now, Facebook can also very easily infer what your politics are,

even if you've never disclosed them on the site.

Right? These algorithms can do that quite easily.

What if a platform with that kind of power

decides to turn out supporters of one candidate over the other?

How would we even know about it?

Now, we started from someplace seemingly innocuous --

online adds following us around --

and we've landed someplace else.

As a public and as citizens,

we no longer know if we're seeing the same information

or what anybody else is seeing,

and without a common basis of information,

little by little,

public debate is becoming impossible,

and we're just at the beginning stages of this.

These algorithms can quite easily infer

things like your people's ethnicity,

religious and political views, personality traits,

intelligence, happiness, use of addictive substances,

parental separation, age and genders,

just from Facebook likes.

These algorithms can identify protesters

even if their faces are partially concealed.

These algorithms may be able to detect people's sexual orientation

just from their dating profile pictures.

Now, these are probabilistic guesses,

so they're not going to be 100 percent right,

but I don't see the powerful resisting the temptation to use these technologies

just because there are some false positives,

which will of course create a whole other layer of problems.

Imagine what a state can do

with the immense amount of data it has on its citizens.

China is already using face detection technology

to identify and arrest people.

And here's the tragedy:

we're building this infrastructure of surveillance authoritarianism

merely to get people to click on ads.

And this won't be Orwell's authoritarianism.

This isn't "1984."

Now, if authoritarianism is using overt fear to terrorize us,

we'll all be scared, but we'll know it,

we'll hate it and we'll resist it.

But if the people in power are using these algorithms

to quietly watch us,

to judge us and to nudge us,

to predict and identify the troublemakers and the rebels,

to deploy persuasion architectures at scale

and to manipulate individuals one by one

using their personal, individual weaknesses and vulnerabilities,

and if they're doing it at scale

through our private screens

so that we don't even know

what our fellow citizens and neighbors are seeing,

that authoritarianism will envelop us like a spider's web

and we may not even know we're in it.

So Facebook's market capitalization

is approaching half a trillion dollars.

It's because it works great as a persuasion architecture.

But the structure of that architecture

is the same whether you're selling shoes

or whether you're selling politics.

The algorithms do not know the difference.

The same algorithms set loose upon us

to make us more pliable for ads

are also organizing our political, personal and social information flows,

and that's what's got to change.

Now, don't get me wrong,

we use digital platforms because they provide us with great value.

I use Facebook to keep in touch with friends and family around the world.

I've written about how crucial social media is for social movements.

I have studied how these technologies can be used

to circumvent censorship around the world.

But it's not that the people who run, you know, Facebook or Google

are maliciously and deliberately trying

to make the country or the world more polarized

and encourage extremism.

I read the many well-intentioned statements

that these people put out.

But it's not the intent or the statements people in technology make that matter,

it's the structures and business models they're building.

And that's the core of the problem.

Either Facebook is a giant con of half a trillion dollars

and ads don't work on the site,

it doesn't work as a persuasion architecture,

or its power of influence is of great concern.

It's either one or the other.

It's similar for Google, too.

So what can we do?

This needs to change.

Now, I can't offer a simple recipe,

because we need to restructure

the whole way our digital technology operates.

Everything from the way technology is developed

to the way the incentives, economic and otherwise,

are built into the system.

We have to face and try to deal with

the lack of transparency created by the proprietary algorithms,

the structural challenge of machine learning's opacity,

all this indiscriminate data that's being collected about us.

We have a big task in front of us.

We have to mobilize our technology,

our creativity

and yes, our politics

so that we can build artificial intelligence

that supports us in our human goals

but that is also constrained by our human values.

And I understand this won't be easy.

We might not even easily agree on what those terms mean.

But if we take seriously

how these systems that we depend on for so much operate,

I don't see how we can postpone this conversation anymore.

These structures

are organizing how we function

and they're controlling

what we can and we cannot do.

And many of these ad-financed platforms,

they boast that they're free.

In this context, it means that we are the product that's being sold.

We need a digital economy

where our data and our attention

is not for sale to the highest-bidding authoritarian or demagogue.

(Applause)

So to go back to that Hollywood paraphrase,

we do want the prodigious potential

of artificial intelligence and digital technology to blossom,

but for that, we must face this prodigious menace,

open-eyed and now.

Thank you.

(Applause)

For more infomation >> We're building a dystopia just to make people click on ads | Zeynep Tufekci - Duration: 22:56.

-------------------------------------------

10 Unseen Sister And Brother Of Bollywood Celebrities ! You Never See - Duration: 3:05.

10 Unseen Sister And Brother Of Bollywood Celebrities ! You Never See

For more infomation >> 10 Unseen Sister And Brother Of Bollywood Celebrities ! You Never See - Duration: 3:05.

-------------------------------------------

Try Not To Laugh Funny Chinese Pranks 2017 - Just for Laugh Gags Videos2017 | Funny Videos 2017 - Duration: 10:06.

Thanks for watching

Hope you have a great time

Please, like, comment and subscribe for more!!

For more infomation >> Try Not To Laugh Funny Chinese Pranks 2017 - Just for Laugh Gags Videos2017 | Funny Videos 2017 - Duration: 10:06.

-------------------------------------------

'Downton Abbey' Stars Talk About Possibility Of Movie Spinoff | Megyn Kelly TODAY - Duration: 4:33.

For more infomation >> 'Downton Abbey' Stars Talk About Possibility Of Movie Spinoff | Megyn Kelly TODAY - Duration: 4:33.

-------------------------------------------

How to get Photoshop CC 2018 for FREE and FAST ✔ - Duration: 3:01.

For more infomation >> How to get Photoshop CC 2018 for FREE and FAST ✔ - Duration: 3:01.

-------------------------------------------

Thursday, November 16th: Erin Bakes Cake - Duration: 6:44.

For more infomation >> Thursday, November 16th: Erin Bakes Cake - Duration: 6:44.

-------------------------------------------

DIY Christmas Sprinkles (Gingerbread Man,3d Christmas Tree, Candy Canes) - Zuccherini Natalizi DIY - Duration: 4:27.

For more infomation >> DIY Christmas Sprinkles (Gingerbread Man,3d Christmas Tree, Candy Canes) - Zuccherini Natalizi DIY - Duration: 4:27.

-------------------------------------------

Parents Of Tim Piazza Speak Out On Fraternity Hazing They Say Killed Their Son | Megyn Kelly TODAY - Duration: 5:29.

For more infomation >> Parents Of Tim Piazza Speak Out On Fraternity Hazing They Say Killed Their Son | Megyn Kelly TODAY - Duration: 5:29.

-------------------------------------------

Former Nightclub Promoter Scott Harrison Now Brings Clean Water To The World | Megyn Kelly TODAY - Duration: 4:51.

For more infomation >> Former Nightclub Promoter Scott Harrison Now Brings Clean Water To The World | Megyn Kelly TODAY - Duration: 4:51.

-------------------------------------------

Fatima Sana Shaikh Movies List 2017 #Update | Fatima Sana Shaikh Upcoming movies 2017 to 2018 - Duration: 0:55.

Fatima Sana Shaikh Movies List 2017 #Update | Fatima Sana Shaikh Upcoming movies 2017 to 2018

For more infomation >> Fatima Sana Shaikh Movies List 2017 #Update | Fatima Sana Shaikh Upcoming movies 2017 to 2018 - Duration: 0:55.

-------------------------------------------

섬총사 강지환 김희선과 동갑내기, 강지환 한혜진 집 사고 루머|조회수4.989.283 - Duration: 8:44.

For more infomation >> 섬총사 강지환 김희선과 동갑내기, 강지환 한혜진 집 사고 루머|조회수4.989.283 - Duration: 8:44.

-------------------------------------------

House Just Passes Major Bill About Presidential Pensions, Obama Is Livid - TODAY NEWS - Duration: 2:47.

Why on the planet would a previous President of the United States require a pension, or

some other money-related advantages, so far as that is concerned?

They should simply give maybe a couple speeches for every year and they will profit than just

the wealthiest of Americans.

In the event that they can't make it on speaking and consulting fees or lucrative

book deals, that is quite recently too awful.

We have an example being set by President Trump.

He has declined to accept his presidential pay.

Almost certainly that practice will extend after he leaves office, appearing as his declining

the presidential benefits.

While this won't settle the deficit, it points toward the first thought that those

in elected office ought to be national leaders, instead of those searching for a lifetime

salary from their government "service."

Surprisingly Mr. Trump won't need to settle on that decision to decay the presidential

pension.

The House just voted to cut the extent of pensions for mogul past presidents.

Finally.

In the event that Mr. Obama is troubled, he can get the chance to work, albeit any "work"

he may do is a far cry from what most by far of Americans do once a day.

"The House easily passed legislation on Monday to reduce the pensions and federal

benefits provided to former presidents.

"BEFORE APPROVING THE BILL BY VOICE VOTE, LAWMAKERS EXPRESSED AGREEMENT THAT MODERN-DAY

FORMER PRESIDENTS DON'T NEED FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE FROM THE GOVERNMENT IF THEY ALREADY EARN SALARIES

IN THE MILLIONS."

It's intriguing to note where this routine with regards to paying past presidents pensions

got its begin.

"Under a law established in 1958, former presidents are eligible for an annual six-figure

pension, plus funds for staff salaries, office space and other expenses."

What's more, here is the place it is probably going to get cut.

"Rep. Jody Hice (R-Ga.), the author of the bill, questioned the necessity of providing

funds for former presidents who can make millions of dollars from book deals and speaking engagements.

"'Because of these opportunities, it's no longer necessary to provide taxpayer-funded

support to former presidents in the same way as envisioned in 1958,' Hice said during

House floor debate."

Mr. Obama vetoed a comparative bill, guaranteeing worries over the fate of presidential staff

members and the security of past presidents.

Whatever.

This time around it will be President Trump who will have the chance to sign the legislation.

Also, there ought to be no uncertainty regarding what this president will do.

For more infomation >> House Just Passes Major Bill About Presidential Pensions, Obama Is Livid - TODAY NEWS - Duration: 2:47.

-------------------------------------------

Corvette ZR1 2019 - 5 interesting things you need to know★★★Top Cars - Duration: 5:38.

Please subscribe to the channel to watch the latest video. Thanks You!

Welcome back to the YouTube top cars channel

This top cars channel will give you five things you need to know about the zr1 Corvette

2019

One, this is the most powerful Corvette Chevrolet produced

For 64 years in the world of sports car. This is the first Corvette

755 horsepower

Chevrolet engineers have equipped the Corvette zr1

2019 with a 6.2 liters lt8 v8 supercharged engine for

755 horsepower and

969 Nm of torque

Compared to the LT 4 engine of the Corvette z06 it produces only 650 horsepower

105 horsepower and less than 8 8 Nm of torque

All the above parameters are obtained by the supercharger is 52 percent larger than the set on z06

in addition to the dual fuel injection system for heat sinks and

- it is the fastest Corvette

With that much power the Corvette zr1 will definitely be faster than the z06

with a maximum speed of up to

330 eight kilometers /h the Corvette is as fast as supercars like the aston martin db10

F-type or even the Ferrari 812 superfast for Porsche 911

3 this is the first zr1 equipped with automatic transmission

It can be sent at customers who choose to buy this special version of the zr1 will choose a 7-speed manual

Gearbox, but do not underestimate the version of the automatic transmission 8 level

This is the first 8-speed automatic transmission

equipped on the zr1 on the z06

this gearbox helps the car accelerate from 0 to

100 kilometers /h in just 2.9 seconds and on the zr1

this cute

For the low-wing variant generates more than 70% of downforce

High speed on a straight line is not the only goal that zr1 is aiming for

with the basic wing package the corvette zr1 produces more than

70% downforce on the road compared to the z06

While the ztk variant with large wing can be adjusted to produce more than 60% of the race force

On the other hand both variants are equipped with carbon kit

the front bumper is modified with new windscreens side skirts and even wind change plates and

Do not forget about the suspension. It's improved to fit this version and comes

Five and you can buy zr1 in orange

This does not seem to be a bit related to improving performance

But the severing orange package is actually stand-alone

The orange paint along with the orange brake shoe and orange stripes on the wind

Inside the seatbelt is orange and decorated with orange lines

The interior is finished in bronze and aluminum

Vehicles will be sold early Nick

Before they're right here in the Middle East introduce you to the world the 2009

Agua

For more infomation >> Corvette ZR1 2019 - 5 interesting things you need to know★★★Top Cars - Duration: 5:38.

-------------------------------------------

Nightcore - Hold Me Tight Or Don't (Fall Out Boy) - Lyrics - Duration: 3:08.

Hold Me Tight Or Don't (Fall Out Boy)

For more infomation >> Nightcore - Hold Me Tight Or Don't (Fall Out Boy) - Lyrics - Duration: 3:08.

-------------------------------------------

You Won't Believe Who Just Launched Impeachment Charges On President Trump - TODAY NEWS - Duration: 5:05.

We have achieved a state of ultra-immersion in the Fake News Industrial Complex and a

final turning point for the hapless Democrats looking for a message and an approach to some

way or another associated with the average American voter.

Somebody truly needs to tell the DNC that they can't "associate" with America

by offending them and calling them extremists.

That ought to be their first lesson.

The FNIC has broadly gotten to the heart of the matter where they can't locate a solitary,

singular thing great to say in regards to Donald Trump.

The Leftist lobbyist press has turned out to be so harmed with its own particular self-hatred

that it is presently making features about everyday things that would appear to any Democrat

candidate as a charming flaw.

Take, for example, the CBS News feature that Donald Trump had an "awkward moment with

a water bottle on live television!"

Really?

A water bottle?

This is the means by which far not far off of never-ending reckless projection we've

gone.

While Democrats battle to answer straightforward inquiries in the matter of why they seem just

ready to win races in places that are unequivocally Left as of now, the FNIC guarantees that not

all that much concentrate is set on that and, rather, lines up the triumph lap talks for

their wins in New Jersey and Virginia.

As they are doing that, the Democrats in Congress are buckling down at diverting reality by

focusing on reprimand talk.

This should make Maxine Waters grin for whatever is left of the year.

Six Democrats have now presented articles of impeachment against President Trump!

Via Daily Caller:

A group of six Democratic House members introduced articles of impeachment against President

Donald Trump Wednesday, claiming the president has violated federal law, the public trust

and should be charged with high crimes and misdemeanors.

DEMOCRATIC REPS.

STEVE COHEN OF TENNESSEE, LUIS GUTIERREZ OF ILLINOIS, AL GREEN OF TEXAS AND ADRIANO ESPAILLAT

OF NEW YORK INTRODUCED FIVE ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT AT A PRESS CONFERENCE AT THE CAPITOL WEDNESDAY.

THE ARTICLES HAVE TWO MORE CO-SPONSORS: REPS.

MARCIA FUDGE OF OHIO AND JOHN YARMUTH OF KENTUCKY.

The congressmen list a number of charges against the president, including: obstruction of justice,

a violation of the Constitution's foreign emoluments clause, a violation of the Constitution's

domestic emoluments clause, undermining the federal judiciary process and undermining

the press.

The articles focus primarily on Trump's handing of the termination of former FBI Director

James Comey, and potential conflicts of interest with Trump's businesses and properties while

he's served as president.

Cohen said they are simply calling for the House to begin hearings on the articles.

"We believe that President Trump has violated the Constitution, and we've introduced five

articles of impeachment," Cohen, the ranking member of the House Judiciary subcommittee

on the Constitution and Civil Justice, said Wednesday.

The Tennessee congressman also said there are at least "a dozen other members who

are close" to joining them in calling for Trump's impeachment.Cohen said that House

Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi understands why they are bringing forth the articles, even

though she does not agree.

Pelosi said in early November that she thought impeachment is "not someplace that I think

we should go," and that Democrats should be focusing "first and foremost" on trying

to "unify the nation."

Republicans are currently focused on pushing tax reform through Congress before the clock

runs out on the 2017 legislative calendar.

"House Democrats lack a positive message and are completely unwilling to work across

the aisle, so instead they've decided to support a baseless radical effort that the

vast majority of Americans disagree with.

Republicans are focused on issues the middle class actually cares about, like cutting taxes

and growing the economy," Michael Ahrens, a spokesman for the Republican National Committee,

said in a statement to The Daily Caller News Foundation.

If at any time there was a sob for help with respect to the Democrat Party, this is it.

Ideally, the FNIC will act the hero (and you know they will) in light of the fact that

the piece de resistance from top of this year would be a staggering dismissal by the American

individuals of this silly and ridiculous assault on the president.

Luckily for the Republican voters, this exertion will just serve to draw more voters for our

side and to leech away voters from the Democrat Party (as occurred amid the election a year

ago when Trump took truly a huge number of voters from the Democrats).

In the event that this impeachment business holds out until the races of 2018 (and ideally

it will) we will sit beautifully come 2020.

For more infomation >> You Won't Believe Who Just Launched Impeachment Charges On President Trump - TODAY NEWS - Duration: 5:05.

-------------------------------------------

Kako zamenjati zadnji zavorno čeljust na BMW 5 E39 VODIČ | AUTODOC - Duration: 8:14.

Use a simple screwdriver to take brake caliper spring out

Use a special brake line wrench № 14

Use an end bit №7

Use a special break wrench № 10

For more infomation >> Kako zamenjati zadnji zavorno čeljust na BMW 5 E39 VODIČ | AUTODOC - Duration: 8:14.

-------------------------------------------

Thunder Show: Up the ante - Duration: 5:30.

In this episode:

Acrobatic stunt show

Head-on master

Up the ante

Priority target

Welcome to Thunder Show!

THE FUNNIEST VIDEO

Do you like circus shows?

How about circus acrobats?

Hm, knife throwing masters, maybe?

If you do, then your will probably like this video.

Ladies and gentlemen, i present to you the wondrous flying MBT-70 and its assistant,

the sabot-throwing talent - T-64!

The aerial assistant first helps the MBT to the sky, then the T-64

will land a shot on the target in mid-air,

while the target will eva..de.. the shot.

Ladies and gentlemen!

Please, do not be alarmed.

This is all going according to plan!

You have just witnessed some spectacular accuracy by our master-thrower!

Security, take that guy, fast, before he gets away!

I hope you enjoyed the show!

Please, come again, ok?

Marko Vuksanovic, we believe that it's time for you to change the act

and change your appearance.

Like now!

Here, take these Eagles to cover your expenses!

THE BEST FAIL

Any head-on attack in the sky is a lottery.

Even when you got powerful weaponry, that's mounted in the fuselage of your machine,

they still provide no guarantee that your pilot won't be suffering an enemy round to the face

that your plane will still have its wings in one piece.

When it comes to Soviet aircraft, the MiG-3 BK has some really serious firepower in comparison,

but is it sufficient to survive FOUR head-on attacks in a row?

The first enemy, flying the P-38 failed to use his guns to the max,

even despite setting fire to the MiG.

But, luckily for the Soviet, the flame goes out almost instantly!

Next on the list

the P-400 and a Buffalo, which both take a serious salvo

and go straight to the ground.

Finally, one last P-400,

that should have enough time to know that going head-on is not such a great idea

but still tries his luck.

Only to follow his teammates back to the hangar.

Oh well.

Some pilots nowadays, they don't train 'em like they used to.

This video earns 5000 Gold for its maker, zmysel09

THE MOST EPIC VIDEO

To destroy an aircraft with a blast from your HE shell is not that difficult,

really, especially if the enemy is flying close to the ground.

But if the pilot is smart and stays well above the ground,

it will be much harder to make the kill.

Not impossible, though, if you're quick on your feet,

like this Sturmpanzer here.

After spotting the attacking enemy aircraft,

he made some lightning-fast calculations,

predicting the flight path of the foe

and making that one-in-a-thousand shot.

The result is a frag well-earned

and respect from the spectators of Thunder Show.

Mr, Marek Sandomżski, your Golden Eagles are coming in!

THE MOST ORIGINAL VIDEO

In a battle where Tigers fight IS tanks, while Panthers duke it out with the T-34s,

there's one tank, that's far more deadly than all of those combined.

That tank is... the M2A2.

Its powerful offensive package of TWO machine guns can cause serious trouble.

Don't forget about the nigh-impenetrable armor, that can withstand colossal punishment.

Well, as you can clearly see for yourself, the commander of the German SPG

was quick enough to realize the real threat, for what it was and began hounding his true nemesis.

The rest is as follows.

Ğємнєαят, thank you for your efforts. Enjoy your prize!

Now it's time for the best comment of the past week:

That T-64 wasnt lucky, he just loaded his S.A.M,

or Stalin Assisted Missile, to take down the enemy jet)))

This comment has just earned its author 1,000 Golden Eagles!

Please, respond to your original comment with your in-game nickname and email address,

so we can send you your prize!

Please, be advised that the prize eagles may take up to five business days to be added

to your in-game account.

Thank you for watching Thunder Show!

Ok, let's recap the three simple steps on how to submit your video to Thunder Show:

STEP 1.

Record and put together a video up to 3 minutes long,

which corresponds to one of the four categories mentioned earlier.

ATTENTION:

The submitted video must be made by you,

must be published for the first time,

must have public access for viewers

and must not violate any copyright laws.

STEP 2.

Subscribe to our Youtube channel and hit the like button below this video.

STEP 3.

Upload your video to Youtube and send us a direct link to thundershow@gaijin.ru

The covering email should contain the desired category for your video,

your in-game nickname

and the email address registered with your game account

so we can send you the reward should your submission win!

Every week, each winner in every category of the show will get 5,000 Golden Eagles!

We will also be awarding the best comment of the week.

So, get your creative juices flowing, make some content,

send it to us, or simply watch and comment,

either way - we've got plenty freebies to go around!

Good luck and see you in a week!

For more infomation >> Thunder Show: Up the ante - Duration: 5:30.

-------------------------------------------

Cum se înlocuiesc etrierul față din spate pe BMW 5 E39 TUTORIAL | AUTODOC - Duration: 8:14.

Use a simple screwdriver to take brake caliper spring out

Use a special brake line wrench № 14

Use an end bit №7

Use a special break wrench № 10

For more infomation >> Cum se înlocuiesc etrierul față din spate pe BMW 5 E39 TUTORIAL | AUTODOC - Duration: 8:14.

-------------------------------------------

Wie BMW 5 E39 Bremssattel hinten wechseln TUTORIAL | AUTODOC - Duration: 8:14.

Use a simple screwdriver to take brake caliper spring out

Use a special brake line wrench № 14

Use an end bit №7

Use a special break wrench № 10