Thứ Năm, 9 tháng 11, 2017

Youtube daily Nov 9 2017

In an age of sharing everything on social media and a 24 hour online news cycle everything

is a story and you are forever traceable google-able.

Think about what you'd like people to find when they search for your name.

Tales of your sporting prowess or the scandal of doping?

It's current practice for employers to google potential employees.

How will you convince them you're trustworthy?

Your children will be able to google you too.

Are you ready to have that conversation with them?

Are you willing to explain your actions from sport to every employer you have or every

personal relationship you are going to be a part of?

The decision to dope can take place in a heartbeat but the repercussions can last a lifetime.

For more infomation >> ASADA Olivia Bartram: The Age of Google and Social Media - Duration: 1:06.

-------------------------------------------

THE MONROES - Drink To That - Duration: 3:10.

When night is young 'n' I just got paid

Ain't gonna drown my sorrows in the shade

Gonna go out walkin' on the avenue

Tonite I'll get so high I`m over you

Bet'cha bottom dollar if you got one to spare

You can't take it with you so blow it while it`s there

I'll drink to that I'll drink to that

When the game is up 'n' the chips are down

And it seems your whole world's spinnin' upside down

When your lover's gone and it's all gone wrong

When the nights are too damn short 'n days too long

You can't take it with you boy cause this is where it's at

I'll drink to that You bet your hat

Lady Luck is a knocking at your door

One thing's for sure

I need some love like I never needed love before

I need some more

Till were on the floor

Let's drink some more

I'll drink to that

When the beat goes on

And it all breaks down

And the bands so high their feet don't touch the ground

Give the boys a hand

Time to make you stand

Just gimme something I can understand

Cause it ain't out there waiting somewhere this is where it's at

I'll drink to that

You bet your hat

I'll drink to god

I'll drink the lot

I'll drink to god damn anything you got

Cause it ain't out there waiting somewhere this is were it's at

I'll drink to that

Feet on the mat

You bet your hat

I'll drink to that

For more infomation >> THE MONROES - Drink To That - Duration: 3:10.

-------------------------------------------

Good Samaritan used belt as tourniquet for shooting victim - Duration: 0:55.

For more infomation >> Good Samaritan used belt as tourniquet for shooting victim - Duration: 0:55.

-------------------------------------------

Subway's High School Playbook School of the Week: Nov. 10 - Duration: 2:24.

For more infomation >> Subway's High School Playbook School of the Week: Nov. 10 - Duration: 2:24.

-------------------------------------------

Video: Guardsman comes home early to surprise daughter - Duration: 2:00.

For more infomation >> Video: Guardsman comes home early to surprise daughter - Duration: 2:00.

-------------------------------------------

Seventh Ward damaged by Hurricane Katrina set to get facelift - Duration: 0:32.

For more infomation >> Seventh Ward damaged by Hurricane Katrina set to get facelift - Duration: 0:32.

-------------------------------------------

Me Too rally protests Dan Johnson on Metro Council - Duration: 1:26.

For more infomation >> Me Too rally protests Dan Johnson on Metro Council - Duration: 1:26.

-------------------------------------------

NOPD touts crime reduction in Fifth District - Duration: 0:51.

For more infomation >> NOPD touts crime reduction in Fifth District - Duration: 0:51.

-------------------------------------------

NASA Silicon Valley Podcast - Episode 67 - Roger Hunter - Duration: 26:53.

Host (Matthew Buffington): You are listening to NASA in Silicon Valley episode 67.

Kimberly, tell us about our guest today!

Kimberly Minafra: Hey, Matt!

Well, we have Roger Hunter.

He's the program manager for the NASA Spacecraft Technology Program, where he actually oversees

the progress of technologies that are demonstrated on small satellites, we also call them CubeSats

because they're the size of a shoebox, for a variety of missions for NASA.

Host: This is a fun thing, the Small Sats, because you think of these tiny, little, Kleenex

box sized small satellites.

And it's not just NASA working on this stuff, you have tech companies in the area, in Silicon

Valley working on this, you have a ton of universities and groups, all working on this

as a new platform.

Kimberly Minafra: Oh yeah, and they're so popular that it's more actually encouraged

to have outside non-NASA people be a part of this as our partners.

They can actually pack so much in these little four inch by four inch cubes to go ride on

larger missions.

Like this one coming up on November 11th!

We actually have four small sat missions that will be taking a ride to the International

Space Station.

Host: I get a kick out of this because you think of the big rocket with the big multimillion

dollar payload.

Really expensive to catch a ride on a rocket, but fortunately there's little nooks and

crannies on that rocket where you can put little Small Sats and people can like take

advantage of it.

Kimberly Minafra: Oh yeah, and it's a lot lower cost for the actual missions themselves.

It costs about a quarter of the price of a larger mission.

And even before that, which he may be talking about in his podcast, he was the project manager

for the Kepler mission, which was our mission to see and look for Earth-sized habitable

zone planets in the Milky Way Galaxy.

Host: So before we completely spoil the entire episode, just a reminder we have a phone number.

If you have any comments, questions, we are at (650) 604-1400.

You can give us a call, just like our friend Raymond did, but Raymond called and said he

had a question, and asked us to call him back.

And Raymond, if you're listening out there, go ahead and just call us back, leave your

question, we'll record it, and then we'll add that to a future episode as we go along.

But for the folks who don't want to call and actually use your voice, and you want

to type it on the internet, we're using the hashtag #NASASiliconValley.

But before we jump in, I want to give a shout out.

We are a NASA podcast, we are not the only NASA podcast!

And there is a new podcast that's going to be starting out of headquarters, hosted

by NASA's very own director of planetary science, Dr. Jim Green.

This is called Gravity Assist, and basically it's a virtual tour of the solar system

and beyond, talking to a whole wide range of scientists.

I think they're actually kicking it off with the Sun, and working their way through

10 episodes, all the way until they end up talking about Pluto and beyond.

But today, for this episode…

Kimberly Minafra: … Now let's hear from Roger Hunter.

[Music]

Matthew Buffington: What brought you to NASA?

How did you end up in Silicon Valley?

Tell us about you.

Roger Hunter: I was working for The Boeing Corporation, running global positioning systems

for them.

And that was after I had a career in the Air Force.

And I retired from the Air Force after 22 years and went to work for The Boeing Corporation

afterward because they had a position lined up that just seemed right up my alley.

And it was all space systems, again.

Because most of the time that I was with the Air Force, I was doing a lot of space systems'

activities, whether it was designing ground systems or actually operating a spacecraft

or planning systems for the future.

And when I decided to retire from the Air Force, The Boeing Corporation recruited me

to come run their global positioning system activities in Colorado Springs.

And it was in support of, guess who?

The U.S. Air Force, again.

And so, I spent a lot of time redoing some of the things I had done when I was in the

Air Force, and ended up managing a nice team of people there that was providing sustainment

for all of the Air Force ground systems that controlled GPS satellites, and also helping

perform the analysis for the Air Force on how well the GPS satellites were performing.

Host: Well, I would imagine, it's very much the same way -- because you're thinking of

NASA, and you think of the astronauts and how much infrastructure and humans go to support

them doing their work.

I would imagine, it was probably the same for you in the Air Force.

It was like you have the people who fly the planes, obviously a much larger group than

astronauts, but there's a whole --

Roger Hunter: There's a whole infrastructure that supports the team.

Host: Exactly.

Yeah.

Roger Hunter: And, as a matter of fact, they talk about the pointy end of the stick when

you're in the Air Force.

Were the ones that actually were, if you will, guns on target or bombs on target -- things

like that.

But there's a whole infrastructure behind that that helps that team be successful.

And it was, while I was working for Boeing in Colorado Springs, that I received a phone

call, out of the blue, from the former NASA Ames Center Director, Pete Worden and one

of his directors, Alan Weston.

And I thought it was just a casual conversation at first, and all of a sudden, he says --

Host: Then the pitch came.

Roger Hunter: The pitch came.

He says, "We would like for you to come work with us on a mission called Kepler."

And I didn't know that NASA had a mission called Kepler because I was keeping up with

NASA at the time.

And, I knew who Johannes Kepler was from my math and physics days at the University of

Georgia.

And they said, "Oh, we're building a telescope to go search the galaxy to see if there are

other earth's out there."

And I said, "You have my attention."

[Laughter] I said, "Go on.

Tell me more about when you're going to do this."

And this was early 2008, and the Kepler space telescope was still under development.

And they wanted somebody to come work with the team, who had some experience managing

large teams, and also had experience bringing a space telescope or a space system from development

into operations.

And I said, "Well, where do I sign?"

And I said, "You only get two chances in life, to go either, one, work for NASA, or run a

mission called Kepler that is in search of one of the most fundamental questions that

humankind has always had.

Are we alone?"

Host: Yeah.

Absolutely.

Roger Hunter: And you want to go look for -- you think about this when you're a kid.

Host: Yeah.

Totally.

Roger Hunter: You look up in the sky and say, "Is there another earth out there?"

And I thought, "Wow, we're actually going to go do this.

And NASA is actually going to go build a telescope called Kepler to go look for another earth."

And I said, "Where do I sign?"

Host: Exactly.

Well, it's like instead of daydreaming about science fiction, you get to do science fact

--

Roger Hunter: Exactly.

Host: -- and actually prove: Is this the real thing or not?

Roger Hunter: You're right.

Because it was.

It was turning science fiction into science fact.

And so, I left Boeing and moved to Silicon Valley in early 2008.

And we helped continue the development of this space telescope, until we launched it

in early 2009.

And so, I was a Kepler program manager for about six years.

And towards the end of the baseline mission --

Host: Yeah.

The primary mission.

Roger Hunter: -- the primary mission, Pete Worden, who was still the Center Director,

asked me to move over into a new area called the Small Spacecraft Technology Program.

And that's what I've been doing for the last two or three years at NASA.

Host: So moving over into small spacecraft, was it mainly just looking at smaller missions?

Or were you moving into the territory of CubeSats and that kind of work?

Roger Hunter: It's both.

It was moving into CubeSats, which is sort of a new paradigm out there.

Because we, as in NASA, also academia, and industry have been looking at these small

spacecraft, which were basically the size of a tissue box or the size of a loaf of bread.

And looking where technology and electronics revolution has brought us, we were thinking,

"We can actually do science with these things."

Host: Yeah.

Roger Hunter: And so, that's what has happened.

That's where the industry has brought us now.

And NASA is now looking at using spacecraft, of this size, to actually go do science.

Host: And so, I would imagine, when you moved into the Air Force and you're working -- I'm

sure there was, obviously, some set mission, set program, some projects.

You move in and you're kind of filling in a position on the team.

And it's already a well-oiled machine.

But, especially, even at NASA, there's certain -- whether it's a telescope that's already

in the sky, a mission that's already ongoing -- but you're going in to do small spacecraft.

You're accepting into something that hasn't been done.

You're almost kind of building it from scratch that is going to be a whole different thing.

It's not like you're moving into something that's already established.

Roger Hunter: It's a new mindset.

Because when you look at some of the -- many of the telescopes that NASA has flown before,

they're rather large.

They're big entities.

Host: Millions and billions -- are millions of dollars.

Roger Hunter: Millions and billions of dollars, in some cases.

Host: Wow.

Roger Hunter: And they're called, "Great Observatories," because of the magnitude of the mission that

they're either conducting or the amount of money and time that has gone into the development

of these things.

They're, essentially, one-offs.

You know, no one had built a Tubble before a Hubble was built.

No one had built a James Webb Space Telescope before it was built.

And they're one-of-a-kind.

And they are artisanal, if you will.

But we are looking --

Host: It's custom-made.

Roger Hunter: They're custom-made.

They're custom-made units.

But we're looking at CubeSats and small satellites as more of a commodity.

How can you make lots of these, and then go do a mission with them.

And if a few of them fail, you don't jeopardize the mission?

Host: Yeah.

Roger Hunter: Think about that, from the perspective, if a singular system onboard one of those

giant spacecraft's fails.

You're in jeopardy of losing the mission itself.

You build in redundancy, of course, but now we're looking in making these small spacecraft

much more redundant, much more robust, much more flexible.

Host: Yeah.

And even for like a large thing, like a Hubble or a Kepler, there's a whole lot of -- you

have to be very conservative on what you're doing.

You have to make for sure you have the redundancy built in.

This thing is going to work.

We're not wasting millions of taxpayer dollars on this thing.

So you have to be very conservative and thoughtful in doing this.

But for something like SmallSats, where you're kind of opening it up, you're in an opportunity

where you can get kind of ambitious --

Roger Hunter: Right.

You can.

You can actually --

Host: -- and stretch your legs out.

Roger Hunter: You can take more risk.

Host: Yes.

Exactly.

Roger Hunter: That's the name of the game in the small spacecraft area.

Because you can build more of them at a much lower cost.

And when you can do that, you can take more risk for the things that you're trying to

do.

Host: And so, talk a little bit about starting those programs and working in those early

days.

How do you even begin something from scratch like that?

Roger Hunter: Well, you do it from an envelope.

[Laughter]

Host: Nice.

Roger Hunter: Sometimes you scratch these things on the back of an envelope.

But we're looking at: What are the things that we can do with the electronics and technology

revolution that has brought us to today?

And just package that into something that you can go do science with.

For example, if you look at your smartphone.

Host: Absolutely.

Roger Hunter: Yet, we have built a spacecraft that we called PhoneSat.

Because we want to prove that you can take the guts out of a smartphone and put it into

one of these 1U size -- which is like 10 centimeters -- on the edge of a CubeSat -- 10 x 10 x 10

centimeters -- and put the guts of the smartphone inside that, launch it into space, and see

what it does.

Host: How nice.

Roger Hunter: And we turned that into the first spacecraft.

So let's call it PhoneSat because it was based upon a smartphone.

Host: Yeah.

And it makes sense because you couldn't have done this in the '80s or in the '90s, you

know?

Roger Hunter: No, you couldn't.

Host: This is only with the advent of smartphones, and electronics getting smaller and smaller

and smaller, and batteries, and sensors, and cameras.

Now, it's able to take advantage of it.

Roger Hunter: Absolutely.

Because if you look at the processing power in your smartphone today and the computers

back in the '60s, it took a room size to provide the processing power that little smartphone

gives you today.

Host: And so talk a little bit more about PhoneSat.

Is this just one phone?

Are these CubeSat things?

Is it like a swarm of them?

How does it work?

What are you doing with that?

Roger Hunter: Well, the first ones were just singular.

And we also proved that the technology works, and we can get it into space --

Host: You got it there.

Roger Hunter: -- got it there -- and see how it reacts.

And, of course, the first couple we actually -- we broke them.

Host: [Laughs] Nice.

Roger Hunter: But that's what happens.

Host: Of course.

Roger Hunter: You break these things, but you learn from that.

And then the next ones, you get a little better.

Then you get to the point where you don't break them.

And now, we're looking at -- for example, let's think about how GPS operates.

That was a constellation of spacecraft.

To provide you worldwide coverage, you needed an entire constellation.

Well, the way NASA does science --

Host: When you say constellation, what -- for people who --

Roger Hunter: That's mini-spacecraft orbiting the earth, and they're all interconnected.

They're all doing the same kind of mission.

Host: Okay.

Roger Hunter: Now, think of having a bunch of satellites that are oriented towards science.

And you want to collect a lot of science data because the more data you have, the better

the science.

And so, if you can orbit a bunch of satellites at one time, and they're all very small, you

can launch them all at once, on one rocket, deploy them, and then collect science across

the entire globe or across an entire region, allowing you more data collection, which gives

a scientist more data to analyze.

Host: And then, I would imagine, that also plays into -- typically a satellite is looking

at one part of the earth.

And it can't look at it all at once, obviously.

Roger Hunter: That's right.

Host: But with many of these smaller satellites, you can cover a bigger width.

Roger Hunter: Exactly, as opposed to just collecting data singularly across a path,

across the earth.

As the spacecraft orbits the earth, you can deploy many of these and collect data from

many different advantage points.

And when you can do that, then that improves the science that you can collect.

And it informs the scientists better about what the earth is doing, for example, climate

change.

If you can collect multiple data points of science across the entire globe, simultaneously,

that can give you a better feel of how the climate is reacting, how the climate is changing,

and how you can assess what's going to happen on the surface of the planet better.

Host: And so, I'm guessing, during the early days of starting, you know, working with SmallSats,

CubeSats, doing this kind of stuff -- was it primarily NASA researchers and NASA engineers

and scientists working on this stuff?

At what point do you start branching out into Universities, companies, startups?

How does that work out?

Roger Hunter: Oh, in many cases, the Universities and the other industry were leading the way.

Host: Oh, wow.

Roger Hunter: As a matter of fact, when you look at the form, fit, and function of CubeSats,

they were established at a University level.

And NASA is following this.

As a matter of fact, a lot of the innovation that's going on now is happening at University

or in industry.

And NASA is partnering with a number of these Universities and a number of these industries

across not just the United States, but around the globe to accelerate the development in

small spacecraft technologies.

Host: And, I know a big thing that Ames has been working on are, what we affectionately

call, the Virtual Institutes.

Roger Hunter: Right.

Host: Where it's not only just NASA working with special space act agreements with other

people, but it's actually creating an institute, bringing in all of these different communities

who are working on the stuff so that people aren't like silos.

And they can share information and share their progress -- and that even moved into the whole

virtual institute for small satellites.

Roger Hunter: Correct.

We've had some virtual institutes already established that are oriented towards, for

example, solar system exploration and research.

And so, NASA saw the need to copy that success from a small spacecraft perspective.

And so now, NASA has established a Small Spacecraft Virtual Institute, which is going to, hopefully,

mimic the success that we've had in these other virtual institutes and further the sharing

of knowledge, further the collaboration, further the coordination between not just NASA centers,

but across academia and industry alike.

So that we can all take advantage of the revolution that's going on in electronics and technology

to make small spacecraft even more capable and flexible than they are today.

Host: Well, even thinking about the people who are listening to this podcast or your

students, interns, who are wanting to get jobs with NASA, getting jobs working in the

space industry.

It's like now those people who are applying for these internships, applying for jobs,

could literally have small satellite missions on their resume that they did through high

school or college.

You know, they've already done this stuff.

Roger Hunter: That's true.

As a matter of fact, there's a number of Universities that are flying their own missions.

Host: Oh, wow.

Roger Hunter: And they are using that to further the research and development that's going

on at their institute so that they can infuse that into industry.

There's even elementary schools that are now building small spacecraft and launching them.

Host: So talk a little bit about yourself, like your day-to-day, what you're working

with on SmallSats now.

What do you come in?

You know, you get your coffee, open your laptop.

How's it look?

Roger Hunter: Well, we're actually marching towards some upcoming launches.

And so, we spend a bit of time right now on, what we call, the end-game of getting the

spacecraft into orbit.

We have two spacecraft that are launching on September 12th.

And that they're going to go up on a Cygnus resupply mission to the International Space

Station.

And these two spacecraft, one is called OCSD and it's an acronym for the: Optical Communications

and Sensor Demonstration.

Host: Of course, NASA, you have to have an acronym.

Roger Hunter: Yes.

Oh, absolutely.

We live by acronyms.

Host: Exactly.

Roger Hunter: And another one is called ISARA, which stands for: Integrated Solar Array Reflectarray.

Now, both of these are demonstrations of first-time uses for NASA and for anybody, for that matter.

And this is another example of where NASA is at the cutting-edge of developing some

technologies that are going to improve our small spacecraft technology.

Now, the first one, the OCSD, is going to demonstrate, for the first time, laser communications

from a CubeSat to earth and, also, laser communications from the earth to the CubeSat.

We think it is necessary, given the expected number of small satellites that are going

to be launched in the coming years.

And there will be many spacecraft out there.

And the regular electromagnetic band radio frequencies are getting crowded.

And so, we see the necessity of moving to communication by laser or communication by

light.

Host: I was going to say -- normally when you talk about communications you specifically

said, "Laser communications."

So the sci-fi sense is going off, of like, "Oh, laser is into communications."

So this is, basically, electromagnetic -- I would imagine, yeah, it just doesn't work

the same, I guess.

Roger Hunter: No, it doesn't.

There is a difference.

Host: There's different factors involved.

Roger Hunter: Because it has to use -- there's a lot of things that you have to take into

consideration when you're using laser communication from space.

You have to point the thing accurately.

Because when you're pointing a laser, it's very precise in where you originate the laser

from and also where you terminate the laser on the ground.

And so, we have to make sure that that type of pointing is accurate enough so that you

can complete, if you will, the circuit between the small spacecraft and the ground terminal.

Now, we had only done laser communication once before.

It was a bigger spacecraft, and it was from the moon.

Remember, LADEE?

Host: Yeah.

Roger Hunter: And that was just a one-way communication.

And that was to gather a lot of information on the LADEE spacecraft.

And then we blasted it back down to the earth, and it worked perfectly.

Well, now we want to extend that to CubeSats.

So, no one's done this before.

And so, when this spacecraft launches it's going to spend a little bit of time inside

this Cygnus resupply capsule while it's attached to the International Space Station.

Because they've got to resupply the space station.

They're going to take material off the capsule and then exchange stuff that was used on the

ISS back onto the capsule.

And then the Cygnus capsule will maneuver away from the International Space Station

to a higher orbit.

And then it will deploy our CubeSats.

We will go through a readiness checkout of the CubeSats.

And then we will conduct the experiment.

We will lase from the ground to the CubeSats.

And then, when they collect more data, they will lase from the CubeSat to the ground.

And there will be two of them that will be doing this mission.

Host: And this is critical.

Because if you can prove this, show that it works, have it functioning -- then that is

just -- for the next generation, those SmallSats that go up, and like, "Hey, we've already

done this.

Let's add this."

And then have other functionality put on top.

Roger Hunter: Exactly.

And there will be other users out there -- whether they're within NASA or within the Air Force,

perhaps, or within industry -- who would be very interested in the success of this mission.

They want to see that this laser communications is going to work.

And if we can prove that it does, then they will welcome that new technology into their

systems.

Host: So, talk about the other one.

Roger Hunter: Okay.

Integrated Solar Array Reflectarray.

Host: I was going to see if I could remember.

All I could remember is "array" something, so --

Roger Hunter: Yes.

Host: -- I'm glad you have it.

Roger Hunter: This is another first of its kind.

In this case, we have the first demonstration of Ka-band communications from a CubeSat.

But what's also interesting about this is that we have an antenna onboard the CubeSat.

One side of it is the antenna, but the other side of that structure are solar cells.

So you have a part of the spacecraft that provides two functions.

One side helps reflect the Ka-band or the signal from the CubeSat to the ground while

the other side of that structure is collecting solar energy and providing power to the spacecraft.

So this will be a first demonstration of that technology as well.

Host: Oh, wow.

And where do you see that that could go?

You know, for other people -- I mean, is it just more of -- I don't know -- like a way

that these SmallSats can gather more power or power from just the --

Roger Hunter: Well, yeah.

It's like a dual-use technology.

For example, you're using to not just generate power for your spacecraft, but you're also

using it to help generate your communications for your spacecraft.

Host: Oh, so it's more like -- it's just self-sustaining.

Roger Hunter: Yeah.

You become a dual-use technology, essentially.

What happens, in this case, is that most of your subsystems are one function.

And this is a stepping on the path of making multifunctional spacecraft.

Host: Oh, wow.

And then that just exponentially grows.

Not only do you have multiple small satellites out there, you have your swarm.

But then each one can do multiple things.

Roger Hunter: Yes.

Think of the chassis for your car.

It serves one function.

And for your spacecraft, you have a chassis that you bolt all your things inside.

Whether it's your sensors, your batteries or your attitude, determination, control subsystem

-- think if that structure was also not only providing a form for your spacecraft to attach

parts to, but also served as a battery.

Now, you're getting into a spacecraft that's multifunctional.

And that helps you reduce the weight of your spacecraft, but also gives you more capability

and more robustness to your spacecraft.

Those are some of the things we're working on for the future.

Host: And so, if I understand, you have another launch coming up that's apart from these two?

Roger Hunter: Yes.

It's apart from the first two I mentioned.

This one that launches in October is called CPOD for: CubeSat Proximity Operations Demonstration.

Host: Always with the acronym.

Roger Hunter: Always the acronyms.

And this one is going to be the first demonstration ever of two spacecraft, two small spacecraft,

two CubeSat spacecraft that are going to dock with each other.

Host: Okay.

I remember -- we are recording this in June, and we just recently had -- the Centennial

Challenge of SmallSats awards were announced.

And we have animations.

I've seen this, of the SmallSats, circling each other, docking.

Roger Hunter: Yeah.

They deploy attached to each other.

And then after they maneuver some distance from the stage of the rocket that gets them

into orbit, they will detach, move to a distance, tens of kilometers, and then we will initiate

them.

We'll turn them on.

And then they will start looking for each other.

Host: Nice.

Roger Hunter: And then they will start homing in on each other, and they do this circular

pattern.

Host: They're kind of circling around.

Roger Hunter: Yeah.

And they circle around, and then, eventually, they will come together.

And there is a mechanical docking mechanism; they're like little fingers.

And then they grab each other.

And then there are electromagnets that are turned on, and it finishes the docking of

the two.

We've never done this before for CubeSats.

And so, we want to demonstrate this for the first time.

Why is this important?

We envision that many of the large observatories, that we may send into space in the future,

are going to be manufactured in orbit and assembled in orbit, which means that some

parts of these spacecraft will have to dock with each other.

And so we're proving out some of the concepts today that will enable some of the missions

that we will fly in the future.

Host: Wow.

And you can just think about that.

You have the laser communication, so you're gathering data and sending it back, probably,

in like real-time.

They're doing multiple functions; they're dual-use.

But then also moving it into: they can dock, they can separate.

You have this swarm of SmallSats that are able to serve different functions.

Roger Hunter: Exactly.

Host: And so, for anybody who is listening, who is like, you've peaked their interest

-- they're all about learning more about SmallSats -- I believe, you have nasa.gov/smallsat.

Roger Hunter: Right.

Host: So for anybody who is looking for information, I'm sure there's a lot of information from

the Centennial Challenge that happened in June.

And all that you could hope for, to learn all there is about the small satellites --

Roger Hunter: Yep.

Just google: NASA and small spacecraft technology program.

In the show notes, we'll add links to everything so if anybody has any questions, want to learn

more about that.

Also, we are on Twitter @nasaames.

We're using the #NASASiliconValley.

So if anybody has questions for Roger, feel free to ping us there, and we'll get back

to Roger and go ahead and send some responses back and forth.

Roger Hunter: Sounds awesome.

Host: So, excellent.

Well, thank you so much for coming over.

Roger Hunter: No, thank you.

For more infomation >> NASA Silicon Valley Podcast - Episode 67 - Roger Hunter - Duration: 26:53.

-------------------------------------------

York County has plan to fix election glitch - Duration: 1:11.

For more infomation >> York County has plan to fix election glitch - Duration: 1:11.

-------------------------------------------

Update from scene of double homicide in Harrisburg - Duration: 1:01.

For more infomation >> Update from scene of double homicide in Harrisburg - Duration: 1:01.

-------------------------------------------

NFL Commissioner Just Woke To The Worst News Of His Life When He Saw Who Sued Him Overnight. - Duration: 5:16.

NFL Commissioner Just Woke To The Worst News Of His Life When He Saw Who Sued Him Overnight.

Sometimes even the greatest friendships fail, and duos like Sonny and Cher find themselves

at an impasse where they just can't get along.

That seems to be the case with National Football League Commissioner Rodger Goodell and what

was formerly known as "America's team" owner, Jerry Jones.

Jones is the longtime owner of the Dallas Cowboys and has worked quite a bit with Goodell.

He knows what the good, the bad, and the ugly are in the NFL, and he knows who is responsible

for it.

Every team owner has a vested interest in the league doing well, and at this point,

it has become clear that Goodell isn't what's good for the league.

The National Anthem protest that led to the largest nationwide NFL boycott in history

has hit the league's bottom line hard, and the trickle-down effect to the teams has been

incredibly detrimental.

That means that the commissioner, who is supposed to be looking out for the good of the league,

isn't doing his job, and Jones intends to do something about it.

Daily Mail reports that Jones, who has been threatening to sue the NFL has now decided

the best course of action will be to block commissioner Goodell's contract from being

extended.

It's safe to say that Goodell isn't thrilled with the proposition:

Dallas Cowboys owner Jerry Jones is reportedly threatening to sue the NFL and several owners

over contract negotiations with embattled commissioner Roger Goodell, going so far as

to hire high-profile lawyer David Boies, who defended scandalized Hollywood executive Harvey

Weinstein against accusations of sexual harassment.

Goodell's contract is set to expire in 2018, and although Jones is not on the committee

responsible for negotiating a new deal, the Cowboys owner is threatening to serve legal

papers if the committee extends the NFL Commissioner, according to the New York Times.

Jones declined to comment through a team spokesman.

A spokesman for Boies also declined to comment.

The NFL protest wasn't the first issue that Jones had with the commissioner.

Undoubtedly, the commissioner has to make some tough choices, even ones that might infuriate

the teams or the owners, and up to now, everyone has accepted that.

However, the differences between now and then is that when it came to tough decisions that

were detrimental to an individual time, like benching a player, Goodell has no problem

with it.

But when a whole slew of owners asked him to make a decision that would be good for

the league but would tick-off the social justice warriors, the man seems to have his hands

inexplicably tied behind his back.

"Jones's issue with Goodell ostensibly began when the Commissioner suspended Cowboys

running back Ezekiel Elliott for six games back in August after the former Ohio State

star was accused of domestic violence by his former girlfriend, Tiffany Thompson.

Elliott, however, has remained on the field thanks to a series of rulings and court appeals.

Last week the second-year running back was granted an emergency injunction that lifted

the suspension again and allowed him to play in Sunday's 28-17 win over the visiting

Kansas City Chiefs.

According to the report, Jones told the owners of the Chiefs, Atlanta Falcons, New York Giants,

New England Patriots, Pittsburgh Steelers, and Houston Texans that legal papers had been

drawn up and would be served if the negotiating committee decided to extend Goodell's deal.

Jones was a nonvoting member of the owners committee that is negotiating Goodell's

extension, but the six aforementioned owners recently revoked that status after he told

them of his plans to sue, according to the report.

Goodell's salary is no longer disclosed publicly since the NFL changed its tax status

in 2015.

But he did earn $34.1 million in 2014 and was paid a whopping $174.1 million over the

first seven years of his tenure as commissioner."

Jones has referred to Elliott's suspension as an 'overcorrection' for Goodell, who

admittedly mishandled the suspension of former Baltimore Ravens running back Ray Rice back

in 2014.

Goodell first suspended Rice only two games after [a] video emerged of the former Rutgers

star dragging his unconscious fiancée out of an elevator at an Atlantic City casino.

However, that suspension was extended indefinitely after another video was released depicting

Rice striking his fiancée in the elevator.

Rice has been out of the NFL ever since.

Jones has questioned the suspension of Elliott, who has maintained his innocence.

In fact, Ohio prosecutors decided against pursuing a case against Elliott last year.

'Zeke is a victim of an overcorrection,' Jones said in an October radio interview."

Perhaps Jones is right, and Goodell could have fallen back on his desire to only do

what was best for the league and that Elliot was in the wrong place at the wrong time to

get the kind of reputation that the league wanted no part of.

He still could have probably gotten away with that reasoning had it not been for this confounded

protest.

This commissioner sticking to these guns and letting the players do something that is ripping

the league apart is proof positive that whatever is motivating Goodell isn't what's good

for the league, and Jones plans to do something about it.

what do you think about this?

Please Share this news and Scroll down to comment below and don't forget to subscribe

top stories today.

For more infomation >> NFL Commissioner Just Woke To The Worst News Of His Life When He Saw Who Sued Him Overnight. - Duration: 5:16.

-------------------------------------------

Weather At Your School: Shapleigh Memorial School - Duration: 0:49.

For more infomation >> Weather At Your School: Shapleigh Memorial School - Duration: 0:49.

-------------------------------------------

Walt Gary: Alabama Crimson Tide superfan - Duration: 1:24.

For more infomation >> Walt Gary: Alabama Crimson Tide superfan - Duration: 1:24.

-------------------------------------------

Failing at French (with Azren) - Duration: 10:23.

Oh hi! You know I've been trying to teach myself French for the last few weeks, and

there's only so much Amelie that you can watch in one lifetime. So I need a little

bit of help. I've got Azren here for me. And you consider yourself a polyglot. AZREN: Yes.

KYLE: Right. What does that maybe for the audience

who might not know. AZREN: So a polyglot is basically someone who speaks a bunch of languages.

KYLE: You deal a lot with that on your own personal YouTube, channel and so I

thought you would be the best person to bring into here... AZREN: Oh thank you. KYLE: ... to help

me out on my journey. I was kind of telling you before we started filming

how I am doing pretty good at reading French, but speaking French is not

working out 100% here. So I've cobbled together some objects and I'm hoping we

can try to have a bit of a conversation around them. AZREN: I'm excited. KYLE: All right. Cool we

start with this. A very important book. Now ... livre is how I say it in French. AZREN: Yeah.

Livre. You got a nice French 'R' in the back. KYE: I know it's

like, yeah. I could be very Anglican right now and be, like, "leever." La livre or le livre?

AZREN: Le livre. It's masculine. KYLE: It's masculine. Do you have any recommendations on how to

figure that out? Whether something is masculine versus feminine? AZREN: It's kind of weird.

Because I find them – so the thing about French is that it's one of those

things you just have to memorize generally speaking. KYLE: Right. It's kind of

like the the "i before e" rule that's true until it's not.

AZREN: Yeah, I mean it's just one of those things you have to know. But the

weird thing is that one ... here's the weirdest thing about French in my

perspective. I find that, like, I find that a lot of people (a lot of teachers) they

put a huge emphasis on this new le la, un une, like is it masculine or is it feminine. But the

funny thing is that it's actually probably one of the least important

things. Because if I say la livre to a French person

there is zero error of, like – they might register as a mistake, but

it's such a small one. It's not something that affects comprehension. By the

way that's a good book. KYLE: This video sponsored by The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People. AZREN: Please tell me it actually was.

KYLE: What's that? AZREN: Please tell me it actually was sponsored by them. KYLE: No. It's not.

Je 'lees' un livre. AZREN: Je lis. KYLE: Je 'lee.' So, hmmm, is there a word that's 'lees?'

AZREN: L I S S E. Means, like, very smooth. KYLE: Oh smooth. Okay. AZREN: So French, if you have

any, generally speaking, final consonants don't get pronounced. KYLE: Je lis le livre.

AZREN: Yeah. That can work. "I read the book." I read the book. KYLE: I don't think I know what

'page' is. AZREN: Very similar to English. Page. KYLE: Page? okay okay okay. I know my I know

some of my numbers. I don't know if I can do – oh gosh – can I remember what a hundred

is?

AZREN: Cent. KYLE: It is cent! It wouldn't be... is it trois cents? AZREN: Yeah, yeah. Trois cents.

KYLE: So trois cents... And then I can't remember 50. Because 50 is a different name again is

it not? AZREN: Yep. KYLE: Is it cinq dix? AZREN: Cinquante.

KYLE: Trois cents cinquante huit. AZREN: Oui. KYLE: OK.

That's how many 'page' are in this 'livre.'

AZREN: Exactly. That's right. KYLE: Now we're gonna go to, like, probably

currently my favorite word I've learned in French. AZREN: Is it actually? KYLE: I just think it's ...

I mean, okay, I don't want to bury the lead too much. So this, right here, we have is

an umbrella. Which is le parapluie. AZREN: Parapluie. Yeah. KYLE: This is gonna show my ignorance – cuz I'm

using this this app called Duolingo. Again, not a sponsor, but would totally be

open to sponsorship. It says right now that I'm 41% through the course of Duolingo.

And, A. we talked about this already they give you these really weird sentences

sometimes to read out. AZREN: Was it you I saw on Facebook? I think I have you on Facebook.

Was it you that posted a picture recently on Facebook of a Duolingo sentence? KYLE: Oh could have been!

AZREN: Like, the cat rolls pineapples or something? KYLE: Yeah, oh there's

another good one that I came across. But something like that. Like, no

one's ever gonna say that sentence. Ouvrir le parapluie. AZREN: Oui. Oui!

KYLE: My next course, I know, is about weather.

AZREN: Oh interesting. You could probably say something like 'I have an umbrella."

KYLE: I have? So... j'ai parapluie. AZREN: Un parapluie. KYLE: Oui.

KYLE: Ferme le parapluie. AZREN: Oui. "To close the umbrella."

KYLE: I was going to hit you, but I won't.

I get a little bit confused with not only just a masculine/feminine of

words, but also the like... in English we have give, gave, and given for instance.

Three tenses of the same word that we're doing. Where in French it looks

like you still say the word the same way in the sentence, but they're spelled

differently. And it throws me off every single time. So the biggest one I have is,

like, 'manges' (I'm eating). So it's spelled, like, sometimes with an S, without an S,

and sometimes with a G O N T at the end of it.

So I kind of instantly know like I'm eating, or to eat, or have eaten.

Something like that. But I always get confused about what I'm trying to say.

AZREN: It is a confusing part of French, and I find that for people who are learning, more

for conversational purposes, it actually makes it easier. Because especially

as a beginner because what happens – I don't know if you've noticed – but as a

beginner there's really only two, I guess, pronouns you use. I and you. KYLE: Right. AZREN: Because

you're mostly ... you're pretty selfish – this sounds weird – you're pretty selfish when

you're a beginner because you're always on the receiving end of questions. If you're

ever talking to people because you don't have the knowledge to drive

conversations. So what happens is that you're always in je, je, je, je, je, je.

Maybe some 'tu' because you'll ask about the other person.

KYLE: And then 'nous' is us. AZREN: But even that you won't use that much as a

beginner. You don't use that. And so what's nice is that the je and tu in

French usually sound the same. They're written differently. But they almost always

in most tenses, most of the time as a general they sound the same.

So I find that for beginners, often, it's actually kind of useful for them in the

beginning because you're like, "Oh least I know how to say it."

KYLE: Le chapeau. Le chapeau 'grees.' AZREN: 'Gree.' KYLE: Right. Don't say the last consonant. AZREN: Noire, non? Mmm. It could go either way.

Is it je porte un chapeau?

That sounds 99 percent correct. I'm pretty freaking sure that's right. It's

actually – here's a fun fact – depending on the day you catch me, my knowledge... So my

French is like my English, in terms o level.. It's obviously lower because English is my

first language. But generally it is. But the problem is, depending on the day that

you catch me, there are days ... so just

the other day (yeah I was right). But there are those days where

like my Chinese brain is better. KYLE: Oh got it! AZREN: Or my Spanish brain is better. Those days where,

like, if I switch between a Spanish lesson that I teach, French next, yeah my

brain will still be in Spanish mode. And it's kind of like, oh how do you say cow?

It's like I know cow... KYLE: Vache is cow in French. AZREN: Vache.. KYLE: Je porte chapeau gris.

AZREN: Un chapeau. KYLE: oh yes. Un chapeau. Am I beyond hope? AZREN: No! Nobody's beyond hope. That's the good thing about languages

So it's actually funny. Languages, in my

perspective, from my experience and perspective is it's kind of like, in

certain ways, like math. Or something else. Like that where some people do find it

easier than others. Like their brain, maybe their DNA or whatever it is, they

just – it comes more natural. Some people less natural. I feel like there are

some skills that if you're not good at it naturally, right, there's a harder

learning curve. If you're not good at languages naturally, there's still a

harder learning curve, but it's one that's possible to do. Because if I

were to throw you into China, and you had to learn (because you need to eat, need to

do stuff) you'll get it. You're not gonna be fluent. That's where we get into interesting

territory. I don't think everyone can be like super fluent, a hundred percent.

KYLE: But you should be able to speak it and be comfortable. AZREN: I think people – I think everybody has the

capability. Most people have the capability of going and becoming

functional to the level that they need. Need is a crucial part.

It's the level that they need to get to to be able to function in their life.

That is something everyone can get to. KYLE: What is, like, your biggest piece of

advice you can give to me as I continue learning French? AZREN: I would say – I would

probably say the biggest thing is make sure you're having your ... like you're

consistent with it. I think even probably equally, if not more important,

is that whatever you choose to do it has to be something that you enjoy. KYLE: I think

it was Tim Ferriss – listening to his podcast or watching a video. And he's

also someone who's learned like multiple different languages.

AZREN: Really? I didn't know that. KYLE: Yeah, like he's fluent in Japanese and a bunch of other ones.

Regardless, he was saying that how he started to actually learn some of his

languages was comic books. He would get whatever the Spanish version of

the Spider-Man comic he was reading to go back and forth. It was

something I'm interested in anyways, I might as well, like, learn

it in a different language at the same time. AZREN: Interesting. Huh. That's cool.

KYLE: Maybe I'll got and start buying French comic books. I'll go buy some Tintin. AZREN: Do it!

KYLE: What is the easiest way if people want to follow you on the Internet?

AZREN: Any social network is @polyglotazren

Sorry! YouTube is Azren The Language Nerd. Everywhere else @polyglotazren

Snapchat, Instagram, Music.ly you name it I'm there. KYLE: I feel your pain. I am

@thekylemarshall everywhere except for YouTube. So branding is not my strong

suit apparently. Alright perfect! Thank you for coming out. AZREN: No worries!

For more infomation >> Failing at French (with Azren) - Duration: 10:23.

-------------------------------------------

Morning Coffee Music for your morning coffee: 3 Hours of Morning Coffee Music Playlist - Duration: 3:21:03.

Title: Morning Coffee Music for your morning coffee: 3 Hours of Morning Coffee Music Playlist

Không có nhận xét nào:

Đăng nhận xét