Thứ Sáu, 24 tháng 3, 2017

Youtube daily Mar 24 2017

On Thursday evening almost every single cable news outlet and cable news personality was

talking about the fact that the Republicans delayed their vote on the healthcare bill.

It was supposed to take place Thursday, they pushed it to Friday morning.

Everybody was talking about that except one person.

That one person was Fox News' Tucker Carlson.

He knew that he couldn't handle himself in any kind of intellectual debate about the

Republican healthcare plan.

He knew that he couldn't sit there and intelligently defend the Republicans who drafted this bill,

Donald Trump who failed miserably in trying to make a deal with Republicans to support

it.

Tucker Carlson decided to tow the Trump line and spent his show talking about the fact

that undocumented immigrants are coming to the United States and raping American citizens.

His evidence for this?

A student at a Maryland high school who claims that she was raped by two undocumented immigrants.

Tucker Carlson had on the lawyer for one of the accused, where he told that lawyer you're

going to have to answer to God for this.

For defending these people.

For giving them a shot at justice as the US Constitution requires, Tucker Carlson told

the man you're going to have to answer to God for defending this.

Meanwhile, all of the grown ups in this country were focusing on real issues like healthcare.

Hell, even Sean Hannity had enough sense to do his program and talk about the fact that

the failure of this piece of legislation hangs around the neck of Paul Ryan.

When Sean Hannity is smarter than you, or says something more intelligent than you,

or actually says something that even progressives agree with, maybe you need to reevaluate your

show's content.

Maybe your producers, Mr Carlson, need to pay a little bit more attention to what's

actually happening in the United States today, because immigrants commit far fewer crimes

than US citizens.

That is a fact, but you're sitting there spending your entire prime time hour talking about

the fact that just like Donald Trump said, in fact you played this clip on your show,

that immigrants are coming over here and just raping us.

Just all the time.

You can't walk down the street without getting raped by an immigrant.

That's what Tucker Carlson wants you to believe.

That's what Donald Trump wants you to believe.

Meanwhile, the rest of the country wants you to focus on the fact that healthcare in the

United States is a frigging disaster and we need to fix it and Republicans have no idea

to fix it and even Republican commentators agree with that, but not Tucker Carlson.

No.

No, no, no.

His biggest concern is not about whether women can get healthcare, or Medicaid cuts, or any

kind of 14 million, 24 million people losing their health insurance.

None of that matters, because at the end of the day you'll probably just be raped by an

immigrant and isn't that a bigger concern?

Tucker Carlson thinks it is.

For more infomation >> Tucker Carlson Calls Immigrants "Rapists" For An Hour In Order To Avoid Talking Healthcare - Duration: 3:24.

-------------------------------------------

Top 5 footballing books - Duration: 1:26.

FOR THE NEXT TOP 5 WE BRING YOU A BOOK SELECTION ON FOOTBALL; THE BEAUTIFUL GAME

INSPIRES THE CREATION FOR ALL FANS

SEVERAL FOOTBALLING STORIES, WRITTEN BY SPORTSWRITERS UNITED BY A

COMMON PASSION, TO SHARE THE SAME DREAMS AND MEMORIES IN THE FORM OF TALES.

PUBLISHED IN 2015

WRITTEN BY BRITISH AUTHOR DAVID GOLDBLATT.

IN IT HE DESCRIBES HOW FOOTBALL EVOLVED ON AN INTERNATIONAL LEVEL.

WITH HISTORY ON THE TRANSFER MARKET, MONEY, POWER AND LOVE FOR THE GAME

IN THIS BOOK, JONATHAN WILSON TELLS IN DETAIL ALL ASPECTS OF FOOTBALL.

TRACES THE HISTORY OF TACTICS FROM MODERN PIONEERS BACK TO THE BEGINNINGS

IT INCLUDES AN INVESTIGATION OF STYLE OF PLAY FROM BARCELONA

IT IS A NOVEL BY JORGE VALDANO FOR FOOTBALL AND LITERATURE LOVERS

PUBLISHED IN 2001

IT FEATURES OPINION ON PRESIDENTS, STARS, TEAMS AND SYSTEMS OF PLAY

WRITTEN BY EDUARDO GALEANO, PUBLISHED IN 1995.

READING IS A MUST FOR ANYONE WHO LOVES FOOTBALL, IT IS A TRIBUTE TO THIS SPORT

DENOUNCING THE POWER STRUCTURES

THESE ARE THE TOP 5 PUBLISHED WORK ON FOOTBALL WHICH YOU CAN NOT STOP READING

WE INVITE YOU TO SUBSCRIBE TO OUR YOUTUBE CHANNEL TO SEE MORE VIDEOS!

For more infomation >> Top 5 footballing books - Duration: 1:26.

-------------------------------------------

7 Deadly Sins: Greed | Season 15 Ep. 17 | FAMILY GUY - Duration: 0:30.

[music playing]

Mom, you really going to Boston?

I didn't even think you liked baseball.

Oh I'm not going for baseball.

I'm going for shopping, the hotel

spa, and two days of being away from you life sucking turds.

[music playing]

For more infomation >> 7 Deadly Sins: Greed | Season 15 Ep. 17 | FAMILY GUY - Duration: 0:30.

-------------------------------------------

Slaves for Christ (Selected Scriptures) - Duration: 56:24.

We're going to turn to a subject in the New Testament that, as I think about it, is largely

ignored and overlooked.

And I've been made aware of that in recent months.

It was not too many months ago that I was flying on one of those jumbo jets from Los

Angeles to London, in the process reading a book that dealt with the issue of slavery

in the New Testament time and in the New Testament text.

It set me thinking in all kinds of directions.

I actually finished the book on the flight I was so rapt in my attention to this particular

theme.

Being a slave of Christ may be the best way to define a Christian.

We are, as believers, slaves of Christ.

You would never suspect that, however, from the language of Christianity.

In contemporary Christianity the language is anything but slave language.

It is about freedom.

It is about liberation.

It is about health, wealth, prosperity, finding your own fulfillment, fulfilling your own

dream, finding your own purpose.

We often hear that God loves you unconditionally and wants you to be all you want to be.

He wants to fulfill every ambition, every desire, every hope, every dream.

In fact, there are books being written about dreams as if they are gifts from God which

God then having given them is bound to fulfill.

Personal fulfillment, personal liberation, personal satisfaction, all bound up in an

old term in evangelical Christianity, a personal relationship.

How many times have we heard that the gospel offers people a personal relationship with

Jesus Christ?

What exactly does that mean?

Satan has a personal relationship with Jesus Christ and it's not a very good one.

Every living being has a personal relationship with the living God of one kind or another,

leading to one end or another.

But what exactly is our relationship to God?

What is our relationship to Christ?

How are we best to understand it?

Well if you read the New Testament in its original text, you would come away stunned

really by how different the original text is from any English version that you've ever

read...whether King James, New King James, New American Standard, ESV, NIV and you can

name all the rest.

All of them virtually have found a way to mask something that is an absolutely critical

element of truth.

In fact, the word "slave" appears in the New Testament 130 times in the original text.

You will find it once in the King James, once the Greek word "slave" is translated slave.

You will find it translated "slave" a few other times in other texts, like the New King

James text and even the New American Standard text, and it will be translated "slave" when,

one, it refers to actual slavery, or two, it refers to some kind of bondage to an inanimate

reality.

But whenever it is personalized, the translators seem unwilling to translate it "slave."

For example, in Matthew 6:24 Jesus said this, "No man can be a slave to two masters."

What does your Bible say? "No man can serve two masters."

The favorite word for slave is servant, favorite English word.

Very often bondservant is used which tends to move in the right direction but is not

exactly slave.

You have a word used 130 times in the New Testament, you have other uses of that word

with a preposition, sundoulos which means fellow slaves, used about a dozen times.

You have the verb form used another approximately a dozen times.

So you have at least 150 plus usages of just three of the words and there are others in

the group with the root doul, d-o-u-l in English for doulos.

There are about twenty established English translations of the New Testament, about twenty.

Only one of them...only one of them always translates doulos slave, only one and it is

a translation of the New Testament written by a formidable scholar in New Testament Greek

who studied the original papyri, and things like that, by the name of E.J.

Goodspeed.

Have you ever heard of Goodspeed translation?

Goodspeed is a well-known scholar.

For fifteen years he was a pioneering professor of New Testament Greek at the University of

Chicago.

The Goodspeed translation always translates doulos as slave.

And when you read it, it gives you an entire different sense of our relationship to Christ.

You do have a personal relationship to Jesus Christ, you are His slave.

That's putting it as simply as I can put it.

There are six words, at least, for servant, doulos is not one of them.

There is diakonos from which we get deacon, oiketes related to oikos, house, a house servant,

heis, having to do with one who serves by instructing the young.

Huperetes, a low-level, third level, under servant, literally an under-rower, the third

level on a galley slave, someone who pulled an oar down at the bottom of a great ship;

leitourgos, another kind of service, usually associated with religion; paidiske and maybe

misthios that can be translated minister.

There are plenty of words for servant, there's only one word for slave, doulos and sundoulos.

Yet in the history of the evangelical translation of the Greek into the English, all the translators

consistently have avoided the use of the word.

Now you might suggest that therefore it's disputed, that maybe doulos isn't quite as

clearly slave.

But that's not the case.

But they avoid it nonetheless.

Doulos is not at all an ambiguous term.

They are trying to avoid something.

It's not about a lack of linguistic information, it might well be a lack of courage, conviction.

As I said, they will use slave if it literally refers to a slave, a physical slave.

Or if it refers to bondage to an inanimate object, like being a slave of sin, or a slave

of righteousness.

But when it comes to being a personal relationship with God or Christ, they back away from the

word slave inevitably and use some form of the word servant.

This is a matter of preference in all cases to accommodate.

And we ask...to accommodate what?

Well I suppose to accommodate the stigmas attached to slavery.

I was...a couple of months ago I was at a pastors conference back in North Carolina

and I had a Q & A session with some pastors and one very gracious pastor stood up, he

was a black pastor and he said to me, "How am I to communicate to my congregation that

they are slaves of Jesus Christ when slavery is such a distasteful part of our past?"

And he really had put his finger on the issue.

I would venture to say that slavery is part...is probably a distasteful part of everybody's

past.

It's no more distasteful to a black pastor who is three or four or five generations removed

from actual slavery, than it is to me who am equally removed from slavery, but it is

just as distasteful to me to buy and sell humanity in the fashion that slave traders

did it.

Nobody thinks very positively about slavery.

But when you come to the New Testament, you can't get around it.

Open your Bible, if you will, to Ephesians chapter 6...Ephesians chapter 6.

And we're not going to be able to unfold all of this, this is a huge subject and I'm not

going to try to do too much.

I kept you a little long this morning, so I'll let you out a lot earlier tonight.

But I just want you to catch a few insights into this.

In the sixth chapter of Ephesians, you have an illustration where slave is used and it

is used because the Apostle Paul in writing to the church at Ephesus and to all other

believers who would read this, knows that he is addressing slaves.

And so he addresses them in verse 5 of Ephesians 6 as he addresses their masters in verse 9.

And here there is no reluctance on the translators of the New Testament to use the word slave

because he's talking to slaves. "Slaves, be obedient to those who are your masters according

to the flesh with fear and trembling in the sincerity of your heart as to Christ, not

by way of eye service, not just when they're looking as men pleasers, but as slaves of

Christ doing the will of God from the heart."

There you have the introduction of the phrase "slaves of Christ...slaves of Christ."

This is not just true of actual slaves, this is true of all of us.

And the translators of the NAS are comfortable to use the word "slaves of Christ" rather

than servants of Christ because that metaphoric use is built upon the literal use of slaves

who are being addressed in verse 5.

So they can't really get around it.

So here we have an honest translation of doulos, slaves of Christ...in a sense, forced by the

obvious object of the statement that is actual slaves.

Turn to 1 Corinthians chapter 7 and I'll come back and reference other things in that text

a little later.

But in 1 Corinthians chapter 7, you have a very similar situation where in verse 22 Paul

is regulating people's human relationships once they've come to Christ, says a lot in

this chapter about what do you do if you're married to a non-believer, or what do you

do if you're a widow, what do you do if you're a virgin, what do you do if your father has

a virgin daughter?

What do you do if you've lost your spouse, should you remarry and who should you remarry?

It's all about these relationships now that you're in Christ.

And he talks about those that are slaves, "He who is called in the Lord while a slave

in a sense is the Lord's freeman, likewise he who was called while free is Christ's slave."

There you have the same phrase again, slaves of Christ.

And again, there's no reluctance on the part of the translator to say slave because he

is talking about actual slaves.

And in verse 23 it makes it very clear what constitutes slavery, "You were bought with

a price."

There is no more defining expression in terms of what it means to be a slave.

It means to be owned.

It means to be owned.

This word doulos in the Greek should never be translated anything but slave...never.

Do you remember these words, Matthew 25:21? "Well done, good and faithful......," that's

what you've read all your life.

That is not the word for servant.

That is not any of the six words for servant, that is doulos, well done, good and faithful

slave.

And the NAS is true to that translation. "Well done, good and faithful slave."

Why?

Because it's drawn out of a parable taught by our Lord about a man who had slaves.

So whenever, in a sense, the New Testament is forced sort of to acknowledge that the

metaphor, the analogy or the object of the statement is in fact a slave, then they will

maintain that slave language.

But in other cases, they will change it as fast as they can.

Now the problem with this is that it shuts out the clarity and the power and the richness

of this metaphor.

You would understand that.

When you give somebody the gospel, you are saying to them, "I would like to invite you

to become a slave of Jesus Christ.

I would like to invite you to give up your independence, give up your freedom, submit

yourself to an alien will, abandon all your rights, be owned by, controlled by the Lord."

That's really the gospel.

We're asking people to become slaves.

I don't hear a lot of that slave talk today, do you?

We have by playing fast and loose with the word doulos, managed to obscure this precise

significance and substantial foundation for understanding biblical theology.

Now lest you think again that I may be overemphasizing this narrow usage of the word doulos, I tracked

it through all of the lexicons that are sources that analyze the original meaning of Greek

words, the sum of all of that is best contained in a massive set of books written by Kittel,

or pulled together by, edited by Kittel which is the last word, and more than the last word,

enough and more than enough on anything you want to know.

And in Kittel the article on doulos, this is what it tells us.

All the words in the doulos root group describe the status of a slave, the meaning is unequivocal,

the meaning is self-contained...and here's something Kittel never says, "It is superfluous

to give examples or trace history.

It's not even debatable."

It goes on to say, and this is a very technical source, it describes, this doulos, a kind

of service which is not a matter of choice for the one who renders it, a kind of service

which he has to perform whether he likes it or not.

It describes one subject totally to an alien will, the will of the owner and in total and

utter dependence on that owner.

That's what the word means.

It is the word for slave.

Now let's go into the Greek and Roman world of the New Testament.

When we say slave, we have a rather distant somewhat detached historical revulsion to

the word slave.

If you think that's a hard word for us to swallow, imagine how hard it was for those

living in the midst of slavery to swallow that idea.

When a pastor says to me, "How can I talk to my people about being slaves to Christ

when they have in their past history the abuses of slavery?"

Well if you think that's hard, how can Jesus and the apostles of the New Testament talk

to people living in the midst of a slave-dominated society, ten to twelve million slaves at that

very time, about the fact that being a Christian was being a slave to Jesus Christ?

There wouldn't be any distant foggy idea of what that meant, they would know exactly what

that meant, precisely what it meant.

Now remember, for Greeks, elevated people, the citizenry, freedom was the pinnacle of

life.

Personal dignity was attached to freedom, being a douloswas the worst, it was the opposite.

Let me tell you about slaves in the Greek/Roman world.

They had no freedom.

They had no rights.

They had no ownership of anything.

They had no legal recourse in the courts.

They could not give testimony as a witness in a law case.

They had no citizenship.

They had no possibility of doing what they wanted to do.

They weren't asked, "Say there, Mr.

Slave, what would you like to do to be fulfilled?"

They weren't asked, "What do you think your purpose is?

Can you dream your dream so I, your master, can fulfill it?"

Bizarre.

They had no choice about anything.

They owned nothing.

They couldn't be citizens and they couldn't be a part of the army, the military.

They were totally dependent on whoever owned them.

It doesn't mean that it didn't have some benefits.

They were provided for, cared for, protected.

In many cases, treated kindly, compassionately, loved within families.

But to the Greek and the Roman philosophically and socially, freedom was the pinnacle of

life.

So free men had only scorn for slaves and slaves longed to be free.

By the way, we cannot find in Greek literature, and there's a lot of religious Greek literature

cause they were very religious, they had many gods as we know.

Remember Mars Hill, Athens.

They had statutes to gods that they didn't even know, as well as the ones t hey thought

they knew.

Very, very religious, never in the religious language of that world can there be found

the use of the word doulos to describe the relationship between a worshiper and his God.

They used philos, friends.

They were friends of God, they were not slaves of their deities.

That was repugnant to them.

That was repulsive to them.

They loved freedom.

So the idea of coming along in that world and announcing to people that you must become

a slave of Jesus Christ, was just another way to present the message to make it impossible

to believe.

Nobody is going to line up to become anybody's slave.

Slaves already had enough of slavery.

Free men had nothing but disdain for slavery.

And yet the New Testament holds back absolutely nothing.

We're called to be slaves.

Now the difference between a slave and a servant is obvious...obvious.

Servants were hired to work for wages.

Servants were hired to work for wages and they could quit.

They were paid a wage for a job.

Slaves were owned and they could not quit.

If they ran away, they were found, arrested, flogged and there's all kinds of ancient writings

about the flogging of slaves and worse, and sometimes...sometimes...many times, crucified

publically as a demonstration to the rest of the slaves of what could happen to them

if they ran away.

One of the great stories of a runaway slave is the book of Philemon in the New Testament,

right?

In fact, the Apostle Paul encouraged Philemon when...encouraged Onesimus, the runaway slave

when he met him, to go back home because that was the right thing to do and he encouraged

Philemon to treat him with love, compassion, forgiveness and embrace him.

In spite of this reality of slavery, and because it is so distasteful and has been for so long,

the translators of the New Testament have done everything they can to edit it out.

I could only wish that if you get the opportunity, find a copy of Goodspeed's translation.

You might find one in a library, it's not a very popular translation and obviously a

translation done by one man lacks some of the richness of one that's done by a collection

of men who can kind of bounce off each other.

But you'll find it very interesting.

The Apostle Paul, for example, did not see himself, as one writer puts it, as the great

founder of Christianity.

He did not see himself that way.

He saw himself as the slave of God and he slave of Christ.

Let me just help you to see this the best I can, and we're limited because of the translation

of the NAS, but look at Romans 1:1.

It's almost as if the translators choke on the word slave and they just do anything to

replace it.

So in Romans 1:1 it's Paul, a bondservant of Christ Jesus.

It's actually the word doulos, a slave of Christ Jesus.

That was his formal introduction, a slave of Christ Jesus.

Happily so, Philippians chapter 1 verse 1, he includes Timothy, "Paul and Timothy," and

again the NAS is bondservants, the Greek is slaves of Christ Jesus.

Back in Galatians chapter 1 and verse 10, Paul says it again, the end of the verse,

he says, "If I was trying to please men, I would not be a slave of Christ."

Now he understood what slavery meant. "I only do what pleases my master."

This is the singular focus of being a slave.

You don't have to please a lot of people, you just please one.

That metaphor is critical to understanding our relationship to the Lord.

If we're going to talk about a personal relationship to Christ and to God, then our personal relationship

is we are slaves.

That's the best way to define that relationship.

And Paul here tells us it means that we only please Him.

He says to the Corinthians, "I have as my ambition to be pleasing to Him."

It came down to this, do what He says and do what pleases Him.

It's that simple.

That's what a slave did.

Really only two possibilities, where there was a direct command, you obeyed it.

Where there was not a direct command, you found a way to do what would please the master.

You obeyed him and you pleased him.

In his letter to Titus, again introducing himself in Titus chapter 1, he says, "Paul,

a slave of God."

He is a slave of God, he is a slave of Christ.

He's not alone, look at James...James, a slave of God...and I love this...and of the Lord

Jesus Christ, and this is James, the half brother of Jesus.

He's not trying to elevate himself, he doesn't say, "I'm James the half-brother of Jesus."

He says, "I am James, a slave of God and a slave of the Lord Jesus Christ."

That, of course, is why over in chapter 4 and verse 13 he says these familiar words,

"Come now, you who say today or tomorrow we'll go in to such-a-such a city, spend a year

there, engage in business, make a prophet, yet you do not know what your life will be

like tomorrow, you're just a vapor that appears for a little while and then vanishes away.

Instead you ought to say, if the Lord wills we shall live and do this, or that."

That's slave talk.

That's what it means to be subject to an alien will.

Jude, the same thing. "Jude, a slave of Jesus Christ."

Now, when you're coming to James and Jude and the Apostle Paul and we could include

our beloved Peter, 2 Peter 1, Simon Peter, a slave and an apostle of Jesus Christ, you're

talking about the elite.

You're talking about those at the top of the spiritual list and they happily and gladly

and joyfully identified themselves as slaves of Christ and slaves of God.

Just a couple of other illustrations.

Colossians 1:7 mentions Epaphras and then the NAS says, "Our beloved fellow bondservant."

It is in the Greek our sundoulos, our fellow slave, Epaphras.

Further in chapter 4 verse 12, "Epaphras who is one of your number, a slave of Jesus Christ."

They not only were willing to take to themselves the title of being a slave, but they conferred

it upon the most noble of other believers.

In 2 Timothy chapter 2 and verse 24, Paul is writing to Timothy and he's writing about

how pastors ought to conduct themselves and how they ought to minister in the church and

serve in the church.

And he says, in 2 timothy 2:24, "The Lord's slave must not be quarrelsome, but be kind

to all, able to teach, patient when wronged with gentleness, correcting those who are

in opposition that perhaps God may grant them repentance, leading to the knowledge of the

truth."

Here those who teach and lead the church are identified as slaves.

This is not some reference to the low-level of believers.

What I'm trying to tell you is, the Apostles took this identification to themselves.

The most noble authors of the New Testament took this signification to themselves.

They conferred it upon the noblest of their brotherhood and they so labeled those who

following them would be the leaders of the church.

We are slaves of God and slaves of Jesus Christ.

Several times in the book of Acts, believers are referred to as slaves.

This is consistent all through the New Testament.

Maybe there's a remarkable usage of it, however, in the book of Revelation.

Let me look with you at the book of Revelation.

You might not think this triumphal book is a place to talk about slavery, but this here

is another way and another location in the New Testament that the Spirit of God has deemed

to let us in to this broad sweeping identification of slavery.

The Revelation, verse 1, chapter 1 of Jesus Christ which God gave him to show to His slaves.

This extends it beyond the New Testament era, beyond the Apostles, beyond those upon whom

the Apostles conferred high honor, beyond those who followed the Apostles.

Now we are extending this to the great body of people who will come and will read this

great glorious revelation of the glory of Christ contained in this book.

It is to His bondservants that this truth is to be communicated, as the NAS says, but

the word is slaves.

If you go to chapter 7 for a moment, and we won't keep doing this too long, but you see

in chapter 7 how God pronounces protection upon His people during the time of the Tribulation.

Verse 3, "Do not harm the earth or the sea or the trees until we have sealed the slaves

of our God on their foreheads."

This is the 144 thousand in the future during the time of the Tribulation who are still

called slaves.

Chapter 10 of this book of Revelation, verse 7, "In the days of the voice of the seventh

angel when he is about to sound, then the mystery of God is finished as He preached

to His slaves, the prophets."

The prophets were His slaves in the past.

People of the future are also His slaves.

And it just continues to go on like that through the book of Revelation.

The people of God are identified as slaves.

In fact, look at chapter 19 for a moment.

This is the chapter in which the Lord returns, this is the great culmination. "A great voice...verse

1...says, "Hallelujah, salvation and glory and power belong to our God because His judgments

are true and righteous.

He has judged the great harlot, the false religious system of the Tribulation who was

corrupting the earth with her immorality and He has avenged the blood of His slaves."

Slaves...they will still be slaves of Christ in the future.

And He, that is our Lord Himself, will avenge the blood of His slaves.

Let's go to heaven in Revelation 22.

Revelation 22 we get a glimpse of heaven and in verse 3 part of it is there no longer will

be any curse there and the throne of God and of the Lamb that shall be in it and His...here's

the word again...slaves shall serve Him and they shall see His face and His name shall

be on their foreheads.

If a slave tried to get away, one of the punishments that they did to a slave was to put "FUG"

fugitivus, marking him as a fugitive.

Well, as slaves, we're going to have something on our foreheads, it won't be fugitive, it

will be His own name whom we serve.

Verse 6, "He said to me, These words are faithful and true and the Lord, the God of the spirits

of the prophets, sent His angels to show His slaves the things which must shortly take

place."

They were slaves in the past, they'll be slaves in the future, slaves in heaven, we're His

slaves now who are being taught by the book of Revelation that these things will come

to pass.

We will never stop being slaves...never.

Now having said that by way of introduction, and that's all that is...what characterized

a slave?

And I'm going to pull it together for you here, I hope.

Let me give you five things to think about, okay?

One, exclusive ownership...exclusive ownership.

A servant could be hired and quit.

A slave was owned.

That means exclusive ownership because he was bought with a price.

Does that sound like New Testament talk?

Two, complete and constant availability and obedience..complete and constant availability

and obedience.

Three, subject to one alien will.

No man can be a slave to two masters, right?

Impossible.

You could have two employers, you could have a day job and a night job.

But you can't have two masters who have total control over you because they both own you

and everybody knew that.

That's why that statement is self-evident.

No man can be a slave to two masters.

So, exclusive ownership by one master, complete, constant availability and obedience to that

one master, and simple in the sense that it is singular, let's call it singular devotion

to that one master.

That's New Testament talk, too, isn't it?

Love the Lord your God with...what?...all your heart, soul, mind and strength, have

no other god.

Do all that you do to please Him, to honor Christ.

Fourth, the slave had complete dependence on his master for everything...for everything,

absolutely everything.

And fifth, all discipline and reward came from that one master.

That's what it was to be a slave.

You were owned by one person.

You were completely and constantly to be available and obedient to that one master.

You had one consuming raison d'etat, reason to live and that was to please that master.

You were dependent on that master for absolutely everything.

And all discipline and reward came at the discretion of that master.

All of that is directly connected to what it means to be a slave of Jesus Christ.

We are owned by Him because we've been bought with a price.

We are in a position of complete and constant availability and obedience to that one master

to the degree that we can say, "Not my will but Thine be done," all the time.

We are singular in our devotion and that means we have no other master to obey and no other

master to serve, and that's why the New Testament says you cannot...these are the words of Jesus...serve

God and money.

You can't serve God and anything else.

Fourthly, as believers we are totally dependent upon our one master for everything...protection,

provision now and in the future...totally dependent on Him.

That too is what it means to be a Christian.

We only have the spiritual resources that are provided for us by our master.

And all discipline and reward comes from that master.

That's what it means to be a Christian.

I can't tell you how many years I have gone through discussions with people about the

lordship of Christ.

Let me tell you something real simple.

Kurios and doulos are two words that describe both sides of a relationship.

If there is a slave, let me tell you something, there is a lord.

If there is a lord, there is a master.

If there's a master, there's a slave.

You don't call yourself a master if you don't have a slave and you're not a slave if you

don't have a master.

That's why the New Testament never even bothers to defend the idea, as it were, of whether

or not when you come to Christ He is your Lord.

That is patently obvious.

When you confess Jesus as Lord, you are at the same time confessing yourself as slave.

There's no other way to view it.

Kurios and doulos are the two sides of the relationship.

A slave is someone whose life belongs totally to someone else, absolute ownership, absolute

control, absolute subjection, absolute obedience, absolute loyalty, absolute dependence.

Slavery then was a social relationship between two persons where one had nothing, willed

nothing and received nothing but what the master authorized, desired and provided.

Now if you don't grasp that idea of slavery and a lot of us, we miss it because it's been

hidden from our English text, it's hard for us to really understand the essence of what

it is to be a Christian.

You are a slave of Jesus Christ.

You are owned.

You have been purchased by His blood, Acts 20.

You have been bought, not with silver and gold, but with...what?...1 Peter 1:18 and

19, the precious blood of Jesus Christ.

You have been purchased, Revelation 5:9.

You have no independent rights.

Slaves had no rights.

Slaves owned nothing.

They could not own their own property.

In the eyes of the law they were not citizens, they could hold no public office.

They were completely under the discretion and the provision and the protection and the

care and the abuse in an earthly sense of their owner.

The New Testament, listen, does not condemn slavery, doesn't.

The New Testament does not condone slavery...just recognizes that it exists.

Look, the New Testament does regulate it, tells slaves how to act if they're Christians.

And it tells masters how to act if they're Christians.

The slaves are to serve as if they are serving Christ.

Didn't I read you that in Ephesians 6:5 and 6?

And the masters are to conduct themselves with their slaves in a way that honors Christ.

And that plays out in the wonderful little book of Philemon.

Colossians 3 says the same thing.

Look at Colossians 3:22...Colossians 3, "Slaves," and he's talking to those who actually are

slaves, "Slaves, in all things obey those who are your masters on earth."

That's the way the system works, do it.

Here you have it very clearly indicated that the New Testament does not call for the abolishing

of slavery.

It doesn't condemn it, it doesn't condone it. "Slaves, in all things obey those who

are your masters on earth, not with external service as those who merely please men, but

with sincerity of heart, fearing the Lord.

Whatever you do, do your work heartily as far as for the Lord rather than for men, knowing

that from the Lord you will receive the reward of the inheritance."

Then I love this, "It is the Lord Christ whom you serve."

That's not what it says. "It is the Lord Christ to whom you are enslaved."

Enslaved.

In other words, because of your slavery to Christ, you conduct your earthly slavery in

a way that honors Christ.

If you're a master, you conduct your care of the slaves in a Christ-honoring way.

If you're a slave, you conduct your life in a Christ-honoring way.

The New Testament doesn't condemn it, doesn't condone it, but it regulates it by calling

for the highest kind of Christ-honoring conduct.

And therefore the New Testament condemns all abuses on both sides.

There was a great upside to being a slave of a benevolent, gracious, generous, kind,

compassionate master.

I can't think of a better life.

In the church slaves and masters blended.

By the way, you couldn't tell them by their dress.

And if they hadn't been a fugitive and got stamped, you wouldn't know who was a slave

and who wasn't.

And in the church, Galatians 3:28, "In Christ there's neither bond nor free, all are one."

But Christianity doesn't overthrow the social structure.

Christianity was not a social reconstruction movement.

By the way, if Christianity exists to abolish slavery, then Jesus and the Apostles failed

miserably.

They're guilty of a massive failure.

They didn't abolish slavery.

Rather than abolish slavery, this is amazing, the Spirit of God took the slave metaphor

because it was the best metaphor to describe our personal relationship to Christ.

He bought us, He owns us.

We are devoted to Him and to Him alone.

To be obedient to Him at all times, we have no will but His will.

He is our Lord, we confess Him as Lord.

That's exactly what He demanded.

You remember the words of Luke 9:23?

We've repeated them so many times. "If any man will come after Me, let him deny himself."

That's slave talk.

That's slave talk. "Take up his cross and follow Me."

It's the end of you...the end of your life, you're finished, it's over, you're done.

You are now the slave of Jesus Christ.

And it's not burdensome.

Jesus said, "Take My yoke because My yoke is...what?...easy and My burden is light and

you'll find rest."

A slave could have some status, but the status the slave had was related to who his master

was.

That's why it was an honor to be part of Caesar's household even though you were a slave.

You were a slave at the highest level.

And we have no honor for ourselves other than that honor that comes to us because of who

our master is, right?

And that's why the apostles could say, "I'm a slave of God, I'm a slave of Jesus Christ."

That's where the honor came from.

And I submit to Him for all my needs, I'm dependent on Him as my protector and my provider

and I submit to all His discipline of my failures and my disobedience that He might conform

me more to His will and I submit to Him some day for that reward which He determines is

suitable to give to me when I come before Him and hear, "Well done, good and faithful

slave."

Let Him give me what He will.

And by the way, you're going to be a slave to someone.

Being a slave to Jesus Christ is beyond any kind of slavery that anybody ever knew because

this master, listen to this one, makes us sons and gives us all the rights of His own

sons.

He adopts us into His family, calls us joint-heirs with Christ, takes us to heaven where we rule

and reign from His own throne and pours out all the lavish riches in His possession forever

and ever and ever for our own unmitigated joy and His own glory.

Who wouldn't want to be a slave under that master?

What a joy to be a slave of Jesus Christ.

Father, we thank You tonight for helping us to see something that maybe we haven't seen

so clearly in the past.

We are slaves, happily so, gladly so, who have been bought out of another slavery, the

slavery to sin and death and hell.

We have been bought, redeemed from the slave market of souls under the power and authority

of the devil himself.

We have become Your own purchased possession.

We want to obey You as our Lord, our Master.

We want to please You in all that we do.

We will never have another Master.

We will not have duplicity.

We will not try to serve You and the world.

But we will only serve You knowing that You will provide everything we need and more,

that You have given us precious promises to do that now and forever and that You have

made us not just slaves but sons, not just sons but joint heirs, not just joint heirs

but rulers who will reign with You forever and upon whom all the glories of eternity

will be showered.

We are slaves who are loved.

We are slaves who are beloved by our master.

We love You in return, O Lord, and desire to serve You and to please You with all our

hearts in single-minded, undistracted devotion.

And we pledge ourselves again to that because we love You and because it honors You and

pleases You.

Thank You for the privilege and all that You give us of which we are so unworthy.

In the name of Christ, amen.

For more infomation >> Slaves for Christ (Selected Scriptures) - Duration: 56:24.

-------------------------------------------

5 Most Chilling & Scary True Paranormal Stories - Duration: 15:10.

For more infomation >> 5 Most Chilling & Scary True Paranormal Stories - Duration: 15:10.

-------------------------------------------

Meet Hamilton, our Pet of the Week - Duration: 2:10.

GEOFF: WE'RE BACK WITH OUR PET

OF THE WEEK.

JOINING US IS DR. STEVEN SHRUM

OF THE HOLLY TREE ANIMAL

HOSPITAL.

DR. SHRUM: I AM TRYING NOT TO

BLIND EVERYBODY.

GEOFF: HELPING RAISE MONEY FOR

CHARITY.

DR. SHRUM: THE SAINT AUGUST

FOUNDATION TO RAISE MONEY FOR

CHILDHOOD CANCER.

GEOFF: WHAT DO WE KNOW ABOUT

HAMILTON?

DR. SHRUM: HAMILTON COMES WITH

THREE LITTERMATES.

THE COUNSELOR SHELTER --

CONSERVATION OUT TO -- HE COMES

FROM A SHELTER.

ALL YOU HAVE TO DO IS KEEP HIM

AWAKE.

IT IS BEEN A BUSY MORNING FOR

THIS LITTLE MAN.

GEOFF: $195.

DR. SHRUM: HE IS NEUTERED AND

HIS FIRST SET OF SHOTS AND READY

TO GO.

GEOFF: HE IS ABOUT TO DO

MONDAY'S FL -- ONE OF THESE

FLOP THINGS WE HAD A COUPLE OF

WEEKS AGO.

DR. SHRUM: MOST HEARTWORM

PREVENTATIVES WILL COVER FOR

INTESTINAL PARASITES.

WE HAVE SEEN TICKS FOR MOST OF

THE MONTH ALREADY.

WE DID NOT HAVE A VERY COLD

WINTER SO TICKS ARE ABUNDANT.

FLEAS NEVER STOP, PARTICULARLY

IF YOU HAVE IN THE HOUSE.

WE WANT TO MAKE PEOPLE AWARE

THAT TICKS CARRY LYME

DISEASE TO A CERTAIN

EXTENT.

ANOTHER DISEASE THAT CAN AFFECT

BONE MARROW, RED AND WHITE BLOOD

CELLS.

HUMANS CAN GET LINE DISEASE SO

WE WANT TO KEEP TICKS OFF YOUR

DOGS.

CHECK OF EVERY TIME THEY ARE

OUTSIDE.

GEOFF: THEY CAN SHOW UP AT YOUR

PLACE OR OTHER VETS FROM TIME TO

TIME BECAUSE HE CAN FALL BEHIND

IN NEW LOOKING AT A BIG BILL.

DR. SHRUM: DEFINITELY.

GEOFF: THANK YOU FOR JOINING US

TODAY.

For more infomation >> Meet Hamilton, our Pet of the Week - Duration: 2:10.

-------------------------------------------

Latest on search for Elizabeth Thomas - Duration: 1:59.

LF AFTER AN AMBER

ALERT, STILL NO SIGN OF

THE FORMER TEACHER.

NOW AFTER POLICE, THE

TAN'S FATH AND FRIENDS

HAVE SPOKEN.

HER MOTHERS NOW TALKING.

HERE IS REPORTER NICK

BARRY IS.

>> I CANNOT EAT.

I CANNOT SLP.

SCARED TO DEATH.

REPORTER: INITIALLY SHE

DIDN'T KNOW WHAT TO DID

OR SAY.

SHE KNEW HER 15-YEAR-OLD

DAUGHTER DESPAIR AP WAS

HORRIBLY WORRIED AND

KNEW SOME BLAME HER FOR

WHAT HAPPENED BUT MU

WITH THE DAUGHTER STILL

MISS, SHE IS BREAKING

HER SILENCE.

I DON'T BELIEVE SHE

FEELS SHE IS BEING HURT.

OK.

BUT SHE IS 15.

SHE DOESN'T KNOW ANY

BETTER.

SHE IS BEING HURT.

DAMAGED.

>> THOMAS HAD NO CONTACT

WITH HER FAMILY FOR MORE

THAN YEAR.

THIS IS THE MUGSHOT.

SHE IS CHARGED WITH FIVE

COUNTS OF ABUSE AND

NEGLECT AMONG THE

ALLEGATION, THAT SHE

WOULD BANG ELIZABETH'S

HEAD AGAINST A WASHING

MACHINE AND LOCK HER IN

THE BASEMENT.

WITH THE CASE PENNING,

THOMAS WOULD SAY --

>> I AM NOT NOT GUILTY.

REPORTER: THOMAS WAS

ORDERED TO HAVE NO

CONTACT WITH ANY OF THE

TEN CHILDREN.

BUT THIS PAST CHRISTMAS,

WHILE PICK UP A FRIEND,

THOMAS SAYS, BY CHANCE,

SHE SAW HER DAUGHTER

ELIZABETH AND CUMMINS

TOWING AND WANTED TO

INTERVENE SLIGHTING THE

ORDER AND REGRETS SHE

DID THE D NOT.

>> IF I WOULD HAVE BROKE

THE LAW, I COULD COULD

HAVE, I COULD HAVE

STOPPED IT.

>> REPORTER: THOMAS IS

PROHIBITING FROM

ADDRESSING HER DAUGHTER

DIRECTLY BUT DOES HAVE A

MESSAGE FOR THE

50-YEAR-OLD CUMMINS.

PLESS, DROP HER DAUGHTER

OFF AT A HOSPITAL OAR

FIRE STATION.

>> THOSE ARE SAFE

HAVENS.

THEY COULD, THEY COULD

MAKE SURE SHE GOT HOME

SAFE.

EUNICE: THAT WAS NICK

For more infomation >> Latest on search for Elizabeth Thomas - Duration: 1:59.

-------------------------------------------

The Full Force of the Resurrection (Selected Scriptures) - Duration: 54:32.

And while we celebrate the resurrection, we anticipate the celebration of the resurrection,

look forward to it with great joy.

There are many in the world who believe that this is the perfect time to assault the resurrection

of Jesus Christ.

And so, every year around this time efforts are made to discredit the resurrection of

Jesus Christ among those who are skeptical.

This year, perhaps the most widely spread effort, was made by some anti-Christian people

who tried to sell the world on the idea that they had actually discovered the Jesus family

tomb and that Jesus' bones were there.

They suggested that this discovery, however, should not be at all disturbing to Christians

because the physical resurrection of the Lord Jesus Christ isn't really the idea, it's just

that He rose in spirit.

That's all that's important.

Well obviously they are very bad theologians.

They prove to be equally bad archeologists and bad journalists.

Since it only took a few days, amazingly, a few days after the appearance of the book

on the Jesus family tomb, and the first showing of the documentary on television to have the

whole thing debunked and all further broadcasts immediately cancelled.

Now are we surprised that an effort by established journalists, archeologists and film makers

was so far wrong?

Not really.

Denying the resurrection has been a long, long war.

It started really right at the time of the resurrection.

But the enemy, Satan, and all who are a part of the kingdom of darkness, understand how

critical the resurrection is to the Christian faith.

Everything collapses in a heap without it.

If there is no resurrection of Jesus Christ, it's the end of all things Christian.

So they know that.

If on the other hand Jesus did rise from the dead, then the Christian gospel is true and

Jesus is Lord.

They get it.

They understand that this is not negotiable, this is the cornerstone, this is the foundation

piece that holds everything in Christianity together.

It's the most essential reality in the Christian faith.

If Jesus rose, He is God.

If He rose, then the gospel is true.

If He did not, it is a hoax and a lie to be lined up with all other false religions in

the world, merely opiates to deceived people.

And so, we get ready to duck every year around this time as new efforts come to discredit

the resurrection.

There's even a proliferation of television programs about Jesus and articles about Jesus

and magazines about Jesus, features in newspapers about Jesus, all trying to ask questions about

Jesus as if they weren't answered in the Bible, giving opportunity to critics and skeptics

and unbelievers to reinvent Jesus and in particular His resurrection.

To show you how old this is, open your Bible to Matthew chapter 28...Matthew chapter 28.

Matthew chapter 28 is still talking about the resurrection.

In fact, Matthew 27 has Jesus in the grave, the stone rolled over, the stone sealed, the

Roman guard established.

You come in to chapter 28 and the resurrection takes place.

There was a severe earthquake in verse 2.

An angel of the Lord descends from heaven, comes rolls the stone away, sits on it appearing

like lightning.

His garment as white as snow, the guards shook for fear of him, became like dead men.

And the angels in verse 6 say, "If you're looking for Jesus, He's not here, for He has

risen just as He said.

Come see the place where He was lying.

Go quickly and tell His disciples He's risen from the dead."

Verse 10, "Don't be afraid."

Jesus actually says to them, "Go and take word to My brethren to leave for Galilee and

there they shall see Me."

And so in the opening ten verses of Matthew 28 you have the account of the resurrection

in all its simplicity and magnificence.

Verse 11 then, "While these women were on their way, having heard from the angel and

from Jesus, on their way to tell His frightened fearful disciples, some of the guard came

into the city and reported to the chief priests all that had happened."

What do you think those Roman guards told them?

They told them what happened.

We were on guard, the stone was over the opening, stone was sealed, severe earthquake occurred,

an angel rolled the stone away, appeared like lightning, garment as white as snow.

Scared us near to death.

We became like dead men.

He's not there.

The grave is empty.

The grave clothes are lying as if they were still wrapped around His body and His head.

A resurrection happened.

That's what the Romans reported to the chief priests.

Verse 11, "They told them all that had happened."

They gave them the true account.

Why did they tell the chief priests?

Because they were really carrying out a responsibility that came from the leaders of Judaism.

The Romans really had not initiated the execution of Jesus, they complied with it to pacify

the Jews, in particular Pilate because he had made so many blunders with the Jews.

He was about to lose his position anyway, Caesar would remove him with one more big

blunder.

And the Jews were so insistent on the execution of Jesus that he complied.

The Roman soldiers therefore were sent to guard, really to carry off this whole endeavor,

this whole enterprise which was the wishes of the religious elite.

So they reported back to them the truth of the resurrection.

Verse 12 says, "When they had assembled with the elders, the chief priests who heard this

then collected the ruling body of Israel called the Sanhedrin, the elders who ruled, and they

counseled together."

What did they decide?

They decided not to accept the truth.

They decided to deny the resurrection.

They decided then to bribe the soldiers.

So they gave a large sum of money to the soldiers...a large sum of money.

They bought them off.

And they said, "Instead of saying what really happened, you are to say His disciples came

by night and stole Him away while we were asleep."

Now just exactly how would you know that if you were asleep?

Just a small detail.

Shows you the rush to this deception, it's irrational.

And why would Roman soldiers be sleeping when they were expert professionals at doing their

duty which was to stay awake and guard whatever they were to guard with severe penalty if

they failed in their duty?

They told them to basically perpetrate a bizarre and ridiculous and unbelievable lie.

And verse 14, "If this should come to the governor's ears, we'll win him over and keep

you out of trouble."

Why?

Because they could lose their lives if they fell asleep while guarding.

The Jews would take care, make sure that didn't happen since it was their deal anyway.

And with this assurance, verse 15, "The soldiers took the money, they had no interest in the

resurrection either, and did as they had been instructed.

They were happy to lie and so this story was widely spread among the Jews and is to this

day."

What is the story?

That Jesus did not rise from the dead.

There was no angel.

There was no resurrection.

That's the lie.

It was a lie then, and it's still a lie now.

Denials of the resurrection of Jesus Christ, ridiculous explanations trying to do away

with the facts of the resurrection have come and gone through the centuries.

There are always those bent on destroying Christianity.

And if you're going to destroy Christianity, you have to destroy the resurrection of Jesus

Christ.

None has ever succeeded and all of them collectively have not succeeded.

There has never been an assault on the truth of the resurrection that has left one mark,

one blemish, one scar on this glorious reality.

The chain of evidences is linked so unbreakably and so powerfully so that it cannot be broken

at any point...the evidence of an empty tomb, a heavenly angel rolling a stone, grave clothes

lying as if they were still wrapped around the body, witnesses, women, apostles, five

hundred at one time in one place, transformed disciples who once are fearful, running and

fleeing in terror when their Lord is arrested and executed, and now they are transformed

in proclaiming that He lives, even to the point that it costs them their lives.

The truth of the resurrection has remained unscathed through two thousand years of assaults.

And it has to...it has to.

It is the cornerstone of the Christian gospel.

It never can be emphasized too much.

Everything hinges on the resurrection.

Let me help you to understand that by giving you some very important truths that are affirmed

by the resurrection.

Number one, the resurrection authenticates, affirms the truthfulness of the Word of God...the

truthfulness of the Word of God.

Now turn in your Bible to Acts chapter 2, the first sermon ever preached after the church

began, preached by Peter on the very day that the Spirit came and established the church.

This is the first sermon.

What will be the subject of this first sermon?

What is the cornerstone of the Christian faith?

What is the foundational truth?

None other than the resurrection.

Peter begins this great sermon on the day of Pentecost in chapter 2 of Acts in verse

22.

He talks about Jesus of Nazareth, that He was attested by God as Lord and Messiah through

miracles and wonders and signs.

And then in verse 23 he says He was delivered up by the predetermined plan and foreknowledge

of God as the primary cause.

Men were only the secondary cause.

He was then nailed to a cross by the hands of godless men who put Him to death, crucifixion.

Verse 24, here comes the theme of his sermon, "And God raised Him up again, putting an end

to the agony of death since it was impossible for Him to be held in its power."

Peter then launches in to this sermon on the resurrection of Jesus Christ.

God raised Him up.

It was not difficult for God to raise Him up because death could not hold Him, because

He is Himself life eternal.

And then Peter says this, "For David says of Him," and he goes back to Psalm 16, back

to the Old Testament.

And in Psalm 16, David the psalmist was inspired by God to write the following, and Peter rehearses

it starting in verse 25.

Quoting from Psalm 16, "I was always beholding the Lord in my presence.

He is at my right hand that I may not be shaken.

Therefore my heart was glad and my tongue exalted.

Moreover my flesh also will abide in hope because Thou will not abandon my soul in Hades,

nor allow Thy Holy One to undergo decay.

Thou hast made known to me the path of life.

Thou wilt make me full of gladness with Thy presence."

Interesting.

The Psalm basically says that someone is in the presence of the Lord.

In the presence of the Lord at His right hand.

In the presence of the Lord there is gladness and rejoicing.

And then flesh comes in.

And then death comes in because Hades is mentioned, and decay is mentioned.

And then comes life again in verse 28, "Thou hast made known to me the ways of life, or

the path of life.

Thou wilt make me full of gladness with Thy presence."

Through death back into the presence of God without the soul ever being left in the place

of the dead, which is Hades, without the body ever undergoing decay.

Of whom did David write?

Well everybody knew David wasn't talking about himself because his soul did depart and did

not return to this earth.

And his body went into the grave and decayed.

No one has ever claimed that Psalm 16 refers to David.

It must refer to someone else.

And Peter goes on to explain this Psalm in reference to the Messiah.

Verse 29, "Brethren, I may confidently say to you regarding the patriarch David that

he both died and was buried and his tomb is with us to this day."

And so implied, he obviously wasn't talking about himself but he was a prophet.

And he knew that God had sworn to him with an oath to seat one of his descendants upon

His throne.

David knew that one of his descendants would be seated upon an everlasting throne.

Why?

Because God told him that, 2 Samuel chapter 7 verses 12 to 14, God said to him, "I will

raise up one of your sons in the future who will have an everlasting throne.

And all the promises I have made to Israel and through Israel to the world will be fulfilled

through that one who is to come."

David spoke not of himself, he spoke as a prophet of the One who would come to sit on

that everlasting throne.

David certainly had that in mind when...if you go back to verse 27...he wrote, "Nor allow

Thy Holy One to undergo decay."

Thy Holy One is a familiar messianic title, a well-known name for Messiah.

And Messiah is the One who was in the presence of the Lord in eternity past and returns to

the presence of the Lord after the work of His incarnation.

David knew of whom He spoke.

And so verse 31 Peter says that, "He looked ahead and he spoke of the resurrection of

the Messiah, that He was neither abandoned to Hades, nor did His flesh suffer decay."

He came back in a glorified body and in His Spirit, in His person as one having been raised

from the dead.

And so the culmination, verse 32, "This Jesus is none other than the one to whom David spoke

whom God raised up again to which we are all witnesses."

The Old Testament prophesied that the Holy One, the Messiah, would die but not be abandoned

in the place of the dead.

His body would go into the grave, but it would never be corrupted.

That is prophecy of a resurrection, that He would come from the grave and fulfill all

the messianic promises given in the Old Testament and to David of a coming King and an everlasting

Kingdom.

They were all witnesses to this glorious resurrection.

And what is the conclusion?

The Bible is true.

The Word of God is trustworthy.

What it said would happen, happened.

Turn to Acts 13...Acts 13.

You remember when Peter is preaching that sermon on the day of Pentecost, the Jews stumbled

over the cross.

The idea of a crucified Messiah was a scandal to them, it was a blasphemy to them, it was

unacceptable to them.

It was folly to them.

It was a stumbling block to them.

And because they couldn't understand that the Messiah must suffer, they couldn't interpret

the Psalms and they couldn't interpret Isaiah 53.

They couldn't understand the pictures of the Old Testament sacrificial system that would

be fulfilled in the Messiah, they also not understanding His death could not comprehend

His resurrection.

And so early apostolic preaching was built on the theme that the Messiah had to suffer

for sin and rise again as the Scripture said.

In Acts 13 we move to the second great preacher that dominates the book of Acts, the first

one is Peter, the second one is Paul...Paul preaching down in verse 30.

Verse 29 he talks about Christ taking down from the cross, laid in a tomb, and then in

verse 30 says, "But God raised Him from the dead," almost verbatim what Peter said in

his sermon.

"God raised Him from the dead."

Now follow, "And for many days He appeared to those who came up with Him from Galilee

to Jerusalem, the very ones who are now His witnesses to the people."

Again Peter said God raised Him from the dead and we are all witnesses.

Here we are much later, in the book of Acts, Paul says the same thing, "God raised Him

from the dead and we're all witnesses."

And verse 32, "We preach to you the good news...listen...of the promise made to the fathers," the fathers

meaning Old Testament saints.

We're simply preaching what Old Testament saints knew because it was promised to them.

Verse 33 gets specific, that God has fulfilled this promise to our children in that He raised

up Jesus as it is also written in the second Psalm, "Thou art My Son, today I have begotten

Thee."

Second Psalm verse 7 says, "Thou art My Son, today I have begotten Thee," a prophecy of

God giving resurrection life to His Son, a prophecy of the resurrection.

Verse 34, as for the fact that He raised Him up from the dead, "No more to return to decay,

He has spoken in this way, I will give you the holy and sure blessings of David."

That's Isaiah 55:3, the promise of Isaiah 55:3 is that God is going to give to the Messiah

everything He promised to David.

Well Isaiah 55 comes after 53.

In 53 the Messiah suffers and dies.

In 55 He receives all the eschatological promises of God given through David to Israel and through

Israel to the world that will come in the glory of His everlasting Kingdom.

Therefore, there must be a resurrection.

He will, as the Son of God, as the Son of David receive all the holy and sure mercies

and blessings promised to David.

Then he goes where Peter went to Psalm 16, says in another Psalm, "Thou wilt not allow

Thy holy One to undergo decay."

And so from Psalm 2 and Isaiah 55, and Psalm 16 does Paul preach the resurrection.

The Scriptures promise the death and resurrection of the Messiah, a suffering servant but a

reigning King after a suffering servant, a sacrificial lamb and then a ruling monarch

to follow.

Resurrection must then take place.

Turn to the twenty-sixth chapter of Acts.

This apostolic preaching of the death and resurrection of Christ based on Old Testament

Scripture continues.

Here we see Paul in his defense before King Agrippa, Acts 22...26:22 verse 22, we read

this, "I stand...says Paul...I stand, I take my stand to this day.

This is where I stand now, this is where I've always stood, nothing has changed," as if

he's saying, "This is my permanent position, here's where I stand whether I'm talking about

small or great, whether I'm talking to the unimportant and insignificant, or the elite

and the substantial, no matter who I am speaking to, I take this stand, I state nothing new,

I state nothing but what the prophets and Moses said was going to take place...the prophets

and Moses."

That's a general term.

Moses instead of the word "Law."

Sometimes the Old Testament is referred to as Moses and the prophets, sometimes the Old

Testament is referred to the Law and the prophets, such as in Luke 24:25 to 27 when Jesus opens

the Law and the prophets and teaches them out of the Law and the prophets, it's all

the things concerning Himself on the road to Emmaus, talking to those two disciples.

The Law and the prophets, Moses and the prophets, a reference to the Old Testament.

He says, "I state nothing but what the Old Testament said would come."

And what is it?

Verse 23, (Acts 26) "That the Messiah was to suffer and that by reason of His resurrection

from the dead He should be the first to proclaim light both to the Jewish people and to the

Gentiles.

He will suffer and die and then He will be the Savior and Redeemer who brings light to

the world and establishes His glorious and everlasting Kingdom.

Only can happen if after He has died He rises from the dead.

And it's all based, Paul said, on what the Old Testament says.

So the very resurrection of Jesus Christ validates the Old Testament.

If Jesus does not rise, you can take the New Testament and throw it away because it tells

us He rose and lays out the implications of that resurrection, and you can take the Old

Testament and throw that away, too.

You can put an end to Christianity right now and you can put an end to Judaism right now

if Jesus didn't rise because the Old Testament can't be trusted to tell the truth.

But Jesus did rise and after two thousand years of assaults on His resurrection, the

resurrection still stands as strong as ever.

He did rise.

The Old Testament is true, and so is the New Testament.

One other interesting look at this same idea, John chapter 2.

At the beginning of His ministry Jesus is in the temple and referring to His body He

says in verse 19, "Destroy this temple...this is the true temple, they had turned the temple

into a den of thieves where God did not dwell...this temple, destroy this temple...verse 19...and

in three days I will raise it up."

That's a prophecy.

Verse 22, "When therefore He was raised from the dead, His disciples remembered that He

had said this and they believed the Scripture...the Old Testament...and believed the Word which

Jesus had spoken."

Because Jesus rose, the Old Testament can be believed.

Because He rose, He can be believed.

And so, the resurrection affirms the authenticity, the inspiration, the accuracy, the trustworthiness

of the Word of God, Old Testament and New Testament.

So, the resurrection of Christ affirms the truthfulness of the Word of God.

Number two, it affirms the deity of the Son of God.

Look at Romans 1...it affirms the deity of the Son of God.

And this is familiar to all of us.

If He rises from the dead, He is no mere man.

And so Paul begins his gospel in Romans 1:1, "A bondservant of Christ Jesus, called as

an Apostle, set apart for the gospel of God which He promised beforehand through His prophets

in the holy Scriptures," the full gospel is promised, laid out in the Old Testament.

He's saying the same thing.

"Concerning His Son who was born of a descendant of David according to the flesh," listen to

this, "who has declared the Son of God with power by the resurrection from the dead."

You wonder whether Jesus is man, you can look at His history...He walked, He talked, He

lived as a man.

You wonder whether He was in the line of David and therefore has a right to the throne?

You have His genealogy, twice given in the New Testament, you can trace it right back

to David.

He is in the line of David and has a rightful claim on the throne.

You would ask the question, is He God?

You need only to know that He walked out of His own grave by His own divine power, God

declaring Him His Son by the resurrection.

That's why Peter says, "God raised Him from the dead."

That's why Paul says, "God raised Him from the dead."

Look at Ephesians 1 and verse 20, again it says, "God," the antecedent all the way back

in verse 17, the God of our Lord Jesus, the Father of glory, "God raised Him from the

dead and seated Him at His right hand in the heavenlies."

And here are statements that reflect His deity.

He is far above, hyperano , way above, infinitely above all rule and authority and power and

dominion.

Those are such sweeping statements.

All rule, all authority, all power, all dominion, that is all lordships, all sovereignties,

He is way above them, far above them.

He is far above every name that is named, that is every personage that's ever been created

not only in this age but in the one to come.

He has put all things in subjection under His feet.

He is God, the sovereign, the King of kings, the Lord of lords and the testimony was made

by the Father of His deity in the resurrection.

Listen to how Peter brought his sermon to an end in Acts 2.

"Therefore, let all the house of Israel know for certain that God has made Him both Lord

and Christ this Jesus whom you crucified."

You crucified Him, God made Him Lord, God exalted Him to His right hand.

No greater proof exists for the divine nature of Jesus Christ than His rising from the dead.

He conquered death easily because He is Himself the eternal life.

Is the resurrection important?

Absolutely it's important.

Why is it under attack?

Because if it goes down, everything goes down.

It has withstood the attacks and the resurrection of Christ vindicates the truthfulness of the

Word of God, the deity of the Son of God.

Thirdly, the completely of the salvation of God...the completion of the salvation of God.

Look at Romans chapter 4...the completion of the salvation of God.

We know the Son of Man came to seek and to save that which was lost.

Jesus came into the world to save sinners.

We know that.

That was His purpose, a redemptive purpose.

Did He do it?

Did He accomplish it?

That's the question.

He came to seek and to save sinners.

Did He succeed in doing that?

We will find out.

Look at Romans 4:24.

Again it refers to Him who raised Jesus our Lord from the dead, that's God.

God raised Him from the dead.

He was delivered up, that is arrested and executed, because of our transgressions, not

His.

He died for our transgressions and was raised because of our justification.

God delivered Him up, God chose Him to be the sacrifice, it was by God's predetermined

plan and foreknowledge that the whole thing came to pass.

God is the primary cause of the death of Christ, men are only the secondary cause.

God delivered Him up for our transgressions to bear our sins in His own body on the cross,

to become the just for the unjust.

He was wounded for our transgressions, bruised for our iniquities, delivered here...Romans

says....because of our transgressions.

And then the same God who delivered Him up for our transgressions raised Him up because

of our justification.

What does that mean?

God was seeking to justify sinners, that is to make them righteous.

Justify means to be right with God, to be considered just or right or righteous.

God wanted sinners to be right before Him.

He wanted them to be acceptable to Him.

He wanted them to be righteous.

How could He do that?

He provided Jesus Christ as the infinite sacrifice to be punished in our place so that He was

punished for our sins.

Our sins then having been fully punished, God can treat us as righteous.

So, did He do it on the cross?

Did He succeed?

Well the resurrection is the affirmation that He did.

God raised Him because He had accomplished our justification.

His sacrifice on the cross was perfect, complete, total, lacking nothing, achieving everything,

satisfying divine wrath against our sins, satisfying the requirements of divine justice.

This is basic to the work of redemption.

Sin has to be punished.

God has to punish it fully to the max.

All sin must be punished.

Christ becomes the infinite substitute, punished in our place.

Was He a satisfactory offering?

Yes.

How do we know?

God raised Him from the dead because He was satisfied.

His sacrifice satisfied divine justice.

To put it simply.

Christ died for God before He died for us.

He could only satisfy us if He satisfied God.

His sacrifice could only be applied to us if it was applied to God's holy justice first.

If it was sufficient to accomplish the end of God's wrath, then it is sufficient to accomplish

our salvation.

That's what we mean when we say God was satisfied, God was propitiated, or an atonement was made

that was satisfactory to God.

Did He do it?

Yes He did it.

How do we know He did it?

God raised Him from the dead because He had done it.

His infinite offering of Himself fully satisfied the wrath of God for us.

And the resurrection makes it clear.

So the resurrection affirms the Word of God, the Son of God, and the salvation of God.

The resurrection, number four, also vindicates the establishment of the church of God...the

establishment of the church of God.

Back in Matthew chapter 16 and verse 18 Jesus said, "I will build My church and the gates

of Hades will not prevail against it."

Hades being the place of the dead in Jewish thinking.

What Jesus is saying is, "I will build My church and the gates to the place of the dead...that

is the gates to the place of the dead, the gates are death...death will not stop Me building

the church."

And He is in His own resurrection the evidence of that.

If Jesus dies and does not rise, then death has prevailed.

Jesus said, "I will build My church, death will not prevail against it."

If Jesus doesn't rise, death prevailed, there is no church.

Let me make it as simple as I can, if Jesus did not rise, you can all go home, never come

back, take your Bibles, all your Christian books, all your Christian hymns and take them

and pile them up, burn them all, we'll bulldoze this church and every other church on the

planet that represents Jesus Christ because He didn't rise from the dead, and there is

therefore no church, He didn't build His church.

This is just another hoax, this is just another invention of men and demons and opiate for

the people to keep them in a damning delusion.

How important is the resurrection?

It is all important in the truthfulness of the Word of God, the nature of the Son of

God, the salvation of God and the church of God.

Go back to Ephesians 1 where this is made abundantly clear.

When the Father raised Him from the dead, Ephesians 1:20, seated Him at His right hand

in heavenly places, when He exalted Him, it says He also, verse 22, "Gave Him as head

over all things to the church."

He is head over all things, meaning He's the King of kings, Lord of lords, sovereign of

the entire universe.

He gained eternal and universal sovereignty which belonged by right to Him as the eternal

Son, but He also became the head of the church which is His body, the fullness of Him who

fills all in all.

Wonderful statement.

Christ lives, He rose from the dead, the Father then makes Him head over the church not simply

in some administrative function, He is head over the church in an organic way, the way

a head works on a body, it is not detached information, it is the flow of life.

So it is in the church.

The true church, genuine believers are filled with Christ.

His life pulses in us spiritually.

We are His body, inseparably connected to Him.

The church is His very presence on earth.

It's His very fullness on earth because He rose.

Again, back to verse 20, "He raised Him from the dead and made Him head over His church."

This is the highest honor, by the way, of the church.

We don't just belong to some institution or some organization, some well-intentioned moral

religious movement.

The true church is sharing in the very life of Christ who lives in us each individually,

and the Son of God reckons Himself in some measure incomplete without us.

He is a head who must have a body for the expression of His glory.

What kind of consolation is that for us to learn that not until we are the possessors

of the indwelling Christ, not until He possesses all of us does He see Himself as complete?

This is the great glory of the church.

Because He lives, the church lives, it is a living organism in which pulses the very

eternal life of Christ.

"I am crucified with Christ, nevertheless I live and I live by the power of the Son

of God."

The true and living church is in union with the risen and living Lord, sharing His life

now and forever.

Because He lives, we live.

How important is the resurrection?

It vindicates the truthfulness of the Word of God, the deity of the Son of God, the completion

of the salvation of God, the establishment of the church of God.

And number five, it vindicates the inevitability of the judgment of God...the judgment of God.

The world doesn't like this but Christ rose from the dead to judge all humanity.

Every person who has ever or will ever live will be judged by Jesus Christ.

John chapter 8 and verse 23, Jesus says...this in itself is a judgment on those to whom He

was speaking...He was saying to them, "You are from below, I am from above."

And they were the religious leaders.

"You are of this world, I am not of this world.

I said therefore to you, you shall die in your sins for unless you believe that I am

He, you shall die in your sins."

That's a judgment.

Yesterday I saw a program on CNN, if Jesus were here, what would He say?

Appalling indeed to watch.

I know what He would say and nobody said it.

This is what He would say.

"You shall die in your sins unless you believe that I am He, you shall die in your sins,"

that's what He would say.

And so they were saying to Him, "Who are You?"

Boy, do You have an inflated view of Yourself.

Do You think You're the judge of every person?

You think every person's eternal destiny is dependent upon how they view You?

Jesus said to them what I have been saying to you from the beginning, "I have many things

to speak and to judge concerning you."

You better get it right.

He was raised from the dead to be the judge.

Back to John 5, one of the most notable, important texts in the Scripture, John 5....verse 21.

"Just as the Father raises the dead, gives them life, so the Son also gives life to whom

He wishes."

He has the same power of life, the power of resurrection as the Father cause He is one

with the Father.

Then verse 22, "Not even the Father judges anyone but He has given all judgment to the

Son."

He is the judge of everyone.

"In order that all may honor the Son even as they honor the Father.

He who does not honor the Son does not honor the Father who sent Him."

Don't think that you can honor God unless you honor Christ.

If you do not honor Christ, you do not honor God, they are inseparable.

And what you do with Jesus Christ will determine your eternal future.

He will judge you.

Verse 24, "Truly, truly I say to you, get it.

He who hears My word and believes Him who sent Me has eternal life and does not come

into judgment but has passed out of death into life."

That's what Jesus would say if He were here.

He would say there is a heaven, there is a hell, I will either be your Savior who will

welcome you to heaven, or I will be your judge who will send you to everlasting torment.

That's His message.

In fact, verse 25, "I say to you, an hour is coming and is imminent when the dead shall

hear the voice of the Son of God and those who hear shall live."

All the dead of all human history will be raised from the dead, all of them...not just

the righteous dead, but the unrighteous dead.

Everyone who has ever lived on this planet will be raised by the voice of Jesus who has

the power of life to raise the dead.

All will be raised and all will be brought to judgment.

Verse 27, "The Father has given Him authority to execute judgment on everyone."

He is the judge of every life.

So verse 28, "Do not marvel at this, an hour is coming in which all who are in the tombs

shall hear His voice...everyone.

Some shall come forth, those who by the transformation of salvation did good to a resurrection of

life, those who left in their sin in unbelief committed evil to a resurrection of judgment."

Everybody gets resurrected.

You either live in heaven in a glorified body, or hell in a resurrection body fit for torment.

And Jesus makes the final judgment on everyone.

Everyone who has ever lived will be judged by Him.

This is the warning that Jesus gave and would give if He were here now.

And there is one glorious and final truth.

The truthfulness of the Word of God, the deity of the Son of God, the completion of the salvation

of God, the establishment of the church of God, the inevitability of the judgment of

God, all established by the resurrection.

And finally, the eternal bliss of the saints of God...the eternal bliss of the saints of

God is affirmed by the resurrection.

John 14:19, "Because I live, you shall live also.

I am the resurrection and the life, whoever believes in Me though he be dead yet shall

he live.

And whoever lives and believes in Me shall never really die."

John 14, He says, "I go to prepare a place for you and where I am I will some day come

to bring you.

I am preparing for you a room in My Father's heavenly house in the glories of eternal heaven."

There is a day coming for the saints of God when we will be changed in a moment, in the

twinkling of an eye, when this perishable puts on imperishable, this mortal puts on

the immortal, we are transformed into heavenly saints to live forever in the joy and the

bliss of heaven.

And Jesus has guaranteed this by His resurrection.

Our salvation is complete, therefore no punishment remains for those who trust in Him.

And when we face Him as the judge, the verdict will be, "Come, beloved of My Father, inherit

the Kingdom prepared for you."

You put your trust in Him, you believe in Him as it says in John 5, I read it earlier,

you honor Him, He will usher you with a loving welcome into the bliss of heaven.

You reject Him and He will be your judge consigning you to the torments of an everlasting hell.

Because He rose, all of this is the way it really is.

This is no fantasy, this is reality.

And all the massive unrelenting assaults on the resurrection are understandable as the

kingdom of darkness does everything it can to destroy the truth at its most important

point.

Two thousand years, no success.

Why?

Because it's true.

Join me in prayer.

Father, what a glorious day it has been.

What a wonderful opportunity for us to treat the sweeping height and depth and length and

breadth of the resurrection to see it in all its majestic wonder.

May we go on singing, go on praising, go on rejoicing in the provision made for us through

the resurrection, looking forward to that day when we shall rise to be welcomed into

Your presence forever.

Lord, may You pour this saving grace on souls here today.

We pray, Lord, that You would be gracious to those who are still in sin and death and

headed for eternal darkness.

Make the light of the glory of the gospel shining in the face of Jesus known to them

today.

While your heads are bowed for just a moment, to my right in the front is a prayer room,

it's right under the exit sign in the front two double doors.

If you would like to talk with someone, pray with someone, get some personal help or counsel,

we are here to provide that for you and would be delighted to do it after I'm finished in

just a moment.

Come to the front to my right through the exit, there's a prayer room there, folks would

love to talk with you, or talk to someone that you know you came with, if you have questions,

we're here to serve you.

We want you to come to a true understanding of the life that is in Christ and in Him alone.

And now, Lord, send us on our way rejoicing, full of joy for what is provided for us because

You live.

We praise You and we thank You.

Amen.

For more infomation >> The Full Force of the Resurrection (Selected Scriptures) - Duration: 54:32.

-------------------------------------------

Jeep Wrangler Rugged Ridge XHD Front Bumper w/ Stinger & Stubby Ends (2007-2017 JK) Review & Install - Duration: 9:08.

I'm Ryan from extremeterrain.com, and this is my review and installation of the Rugged

Ridge XHD Front Bumper Kit with Stinger and Stubby Bumper Ends, fitting all 2007 and up

JKs.

Today, we are going to talk through the installation of this front bumper, which is a very simple

one out of three wrenches.

This is designed to bolt directly in place of your factory front bumper, so you can get

this installed in about an hour, maybe a little bit more because there is a little bit of

assembly to do.

But we'll talk about the installation a little bit more in just a second.

We're also gonna talk about the construction and a few of the features of this bumper.

This is a modular bumper kit, so it comes with your XHD modular front bumper base with

the winch mount, and it also comes with a couple of accessories right in the box as

a kit to put together.

Now, there are a few different benefits to having a modular bumper.

Obviously, you can customize this bumper.

You can add the stinger, the ends, you could add the high-clearance ends or no ends, you

could add a bumper hoop, you can change the stinger.

You can do a lot of different things with a modular bumper to build a bumper that exactly

fits your needs.

Now, the only drawback to a modular bumper is that, by the time you purchase the base

and then the accessories you want to put on that base, these can be a little bit expensive.

So, if you can find a bumper off-the-shelf that fits your needs, that looks how you want

it to look, you can probably get away with the same number of features for a little bit

less expensive.

You are going to spend a little bit more on a modular bumper setup like this, but you

are going to be able to get exactly what you want.

So it really comes down to what you want on your Jeep and if you can find an off-the-shelf

bumper that fits your needs.

As I said before, this bumper is a bunch of different pieces that Rugged Ridge puts together

for you as one example of how you can build a modular bumper from Rugged Ridge.

Now as I said before, this does have the XHD front bumper base with the winch mount.

This base is also available without the winch mount if you decided not to run one.

However, this does come ready to bolt a winch up to.

You won't have to purchase any other accessories.

This, of course, has your fair lead mount, it's drilled for a winch, it's ready to go,

which is a really nice feature.

This bumper base will also accept your factory fog lights, which is something I really like.

You already have your factory fog lights, you're wired for it, the switch is there.

Why not be able to use them?

And in a lot of stubby bumpers, because there is a lot less real estate, there isn't a spot

for your factory fog lights.

But in this bumper, there is, and again, that's a feature I really like.

Now, this kit also comes with the stinger attachment for your modular bumper base.

Now, the initial purpose of this stinger was so that, if you're coming down off of a very

steep obstacle off-road and you start to roll over forward, the stinger will hit the ground

and direct the Jeep to one side or the other, keeping you on the tires instead of rolling

over.

And if you were to roll over, the stinger was designed to be higher than the top of

the hood to protect your radiator and your core support and support the weight of the

vehicle.

Most stingers these days aren't going to see that type of use.

A lot of the time, people just like the look of a stinger, and there's nothing wrong with

that.

That's what this stinger is really about.

It's certainly going to provide some protection to the front end of the Jeep, but if you are

going to roll the Jeep over or put the full force of the vehicle on this stinger, I don't

know that it's necessarily going to hold up.

But it is going to give you some style.

It is going to give you the look that a lot of you are after.

This stinger also has your D-ring mounts built right into it.

It's all one piece.

So you do have two D-ring mounts on either side of this bumper, which is also a very

nice feature.

Now, the factory bumper, right off the assembly line, does have some tow hooks on the top

of it, but I really prefer a D-ring mount because it gives you a nice, solid connection

for your tow strap or your snatch strap.

With a hook, there's always a chance that the loop of the strap is going to come off,

especially if you're using a snatch strap, which is designed to have a little bit of

slack in it and then pulled taut very quickly.

With the D-ring, you make that connection.

You know it's gonna stay connected until you disconnect it.

Now, the winch and the D-rings also work really well together.

If you have a snatch block, you can essentially double the pulling power of your winch by

going to a snatch block on a tree and back to your D-ring mount on your bumper again.

Again, this gives you a lot of opportunity for recovery.

And the final piece that's included with this kit are the stubby bumper ends.

Now, right out of the box, this bumper comes with block off plates, and you can certainly

run the bumper like that.

It's just a little bit shorter.

With these stubby bumper ends, in my opinion, aesthetically, the bumper looks a little nicer,

but this still gives you a ton of clearance.

One of the reasons to run a stubby bumper is if you're running 37-inch tires and you

need additional clearance between the bumper and your tires, especially when you're off-road

doing a lot of articulating.

So even with these stubby bumper ends, you get a bit more of a finished look, in my opinion,

but they're still going to give you plenty of tire clearance.

And even if you're not running a set of 37s, but you like this stubby bumper look, again,

you're getting a nice, short bumper, but you're also getting a finished look because of those

ends.

Now, this is a modular bumper, so if you go with the stubby bumper ends now, you can always

swap them out with the high-clearance ends or the block off plates.

You could always change up your bumper as your build grows and as your build changes.

That is the nice thing about a modular bumper like this.

Now, one other piece that is included with this setup, because this is the bumper base

with the winch mount, is a vacuum pump relocation kit.

So for those of you with the newer JKs, you have a vacuum pump that's gonna be right in

this area here, which is going to be in the way of your new winch mounting plate.

Don't worry.

You will have to unbolt that, but this does come with your bracket to slightly move the

vacuum pump, get it out of the way.

So you're gonna have all the pieces you need to get this bumper installed.

Speaking of installation, as I mentioned before, this is a very simple one out of three wrench

installation that should be finished in about an hour for you.

The first step is, of course, removing your factory front bumper, which you'll do by first

removing the splash shield on the bottom of the bumper, the bumper cover on the front,

and finally removing the eight nuts that are holding that factory bumper in place.

You also have to unclip your fog lights and your fog light harness before you actually

remove the bumper from the Jeep.

After that, you can remove the fog light housings from your factory bumper and screw them into

your new bumper as well as attaching your stubby bumper ends and your stinger.

Now, you'll attach the stinger up on top using these eight nuts, but you're going to leave

the eight bolts that go through the front off for now because those are actually the

same bolts that hold the bumper on to the Jeep.

If you're going to be installing a winch, I also recommend that you install that winch

now while the bumper is on the ground.

It's a little bit easier to get to your winch mounting bolts when the bumper is not on the

Jeep yet.

Now, if you are installing a winch and all these other accessories, this is going to

be a pretty heavy package, but again, having everything put together on the ground is a

little bit simpler.

You will just have to use a little bit more muscle or have an extra set of hands around

to help you lift the bumper onto the frame rails.

Once the bumper is lifted over the frame horns, it's a simple matter of bolting through the

front of the bumper, through the stinger, through the frame horns, and nut and bolting

the bumper onto the Jeep.

That's gonna give you that nice, solid connection, so you're gonna be able to use your D-rings

or your winch with everything staying in place.

Again, you're not going to need any specialty tools to get this bumper installed, just your

traditional hand tools in about an hour's time.

This bumper does come in at just under $700.

Now, that does include your base, your stinger, and your stubby bumper ends, so you do end

up with a very complete, very nice looking, and very functional bumper.

But the fact of the matter is you can find stinger bumpers with a winch mount on the

web for a little bit less than $700.

So again, you are paying a bit of a premium for the ability to custom-build the bumper

and to change it up down the line as your build changes.

So I absolutely think this is worth $700.

This is a well put together piece, and you end up with a really nice looking, very functional

bumper.

However, if you're not going to take advantage of the fact that this is modular, if you're

never going to change it, or if you can find a bumper that suits your needs off the shelf

without being a modular setup, chances are you are going to be able to save a little

bit of money by going that direction.

So if you're looking for a modular bumper that's going to allow you to build exactly

what you want now, but also change that up down the line as your build changes, a modular

bumper from Rugged Ridge is a really nice option.

And this kit, in particular, gives you the Rugged Ridge XHD Base that you're gonna be

able to build on, but it also gives you the stubby bumper ends and the stinger.

So you end up with a very functional and very good-looking bumper.

So that's my review of the Rugged Ridge XHD Modular Front Bumper Kit with Stinger and

Stubby Bumper Ends, fitting all 2007 and up JKs, that you can find right here at extremeterrain.com.

For more infomation >> Jeep Wrangler Rugged Ridge XHD Front Bumper w/ Stinger & Stubby Ends (2007-2017 JK) Review & Install - Duration: 9:08.

-------------------------------------------

Esta es la Recomendación Astral para el 24 de marzo | Un Nuevo Día | Telemundo - Duration: 0:55.

For more infomation >> Esta es la Recomendación Astral para el 24 de marzo | Un Nuevo Día | Telemundo - Duration: 0:55.

-------------------------------------------

Adriel Favela nos cuenta su proyecto "Me llamo Juan" | Un Nuevo Día | Telemundo - Duration: 4:17.

For more infomation >> Adriel Favela nos cuenta su proyecto "Me llamo Juan" | Un Nuevo Día | Telemundo - Duration: 4:17.

-------------------------------------------

¡Rocco transformó a una televidente en "Beyonce"! | Un Nuevo Día | Telemundo - Duration: 3:28.

For more infomation >> ¡Rocco transformó a una televidente en "Beyonce"! | Un Nuevo Día | Telemundo - Duration: 3:28.

-------------------------------------------

¡Gana con los números de la suerte de Mario Vannucci! | Un Nuevo Día | Telemundo - Duration: 1:05.

For more infomation >> ¡Gana con los números de la suerte de Mario Vannucci! | Un Nuevo Día | Telemundo - Duration: 1:05.

-------------------------------------------

El detrás de cámara de la muerte de Emiliano Cabral | Un Nuevo Día | Telemundo - Duration: 1:40.

For more infomation >> El detrás de cámara de la muerte de Emiliano Cabral | Un Nuevo Día | Telemundo - Duration: 1:40.

-------------------------------------------

Ninel Conde prefiere no hablar de su ex Giovani Medina | Un Nuevo Día | Telemundo - Duration: 4:33.

For more infomation >> Ninel Conde prefiere no hablar de su ex Giovani Medina | Un Nuevo Día | Telemundo - Duration: 4:33.

-------------------------------------------

Pitbull le manda un mensaje a los cubanos de la isla | Un Nuevo Día | Telemundo - Duration: 1:14.

For more infomation >> Pitbull le manda un mensaje a los cubanos de la isla | Un Nuevo Día | Telemundo - Duration: 1:14.

-------------------------------------------

Chow Chow Dogs 101 Interesting Facts and Information #chowchow #dog - Duration: 5:08.

It is said that the Chow Chow combines the nobility of a lion, the drollness of a panda,

the appeal of a teddy bear, the grace and independence of a cat, and the loyalty and

devotion of a dog.

He's dignified and aloof, as behooves a breed that was once kept in imperial Chinese kennels.

Hi, welcome to Animal Facts.

Today it's time to chow down on some fun facts about the intelligent, yet independent

Chow Chow.

Let's get started.

But, before we start, take a moment to like and subscribe for more fun, fauna facts.

10.

According to Chinese legend, the Chow's tongue got its blue-black hue at the time

of creation, when a Chow licked up drops of color as the sky was being painted, according

to the book "Dog Tales: Inspirational Stories of Humor, Adventure, and Devotion" by Susy

Flory.

A link can be found in the description.

According to the American Kennel Club, the Chinese Sharpei and the Chow Chow are the

only two dog breeds known to have a blue-black tongue.

In the Chow Chow breed standard, the darker the tongue the better.

9.

Experts have long speculated that the Chow Chow is one of the oldest dog breeds, and

genetic testing has proven that to be true.

The ancient breed is believed to have originated in Mongolia and Northern China, slowly moving

south with the nomadic tribes of Mongolia.

Early depictions of dogs resembling the Chow Chow appear in pottery and paintings from

the Han Dynasty.

One Chinese emperor was said to have kept 2,500 pairs of Chows as hunting dogs and 10,000

men to hunt with them.

In addition to hunting, the dogs were used to guard their owners' possessions.

8.

Chow Chows are not usually social, outgoing dogs.

They tend to be aloof with strangers and can be aggressive with other dogs.

This is fitting with their history as guard dogs for homes and livestock.

Early socialization to other dogs, pets, and people is important.

Chow Chows are devoted to and protective of their families.

To make them good family pets, they need plenty of early socialization including exposure

to children.

Chow Chows do best with training to clarify their position in the family or they can become

dominant.

7.

The Chow reached the Western world in the late 1800s and began a rise to popularity,

which has landed it in the top-10 American Kennel Club breeds.

The breed has not fared so well in its native land where many Chow Chows were eliminated

during the Chinese Cultural Revolution from 1956 to 1976.

6.

We might call the dogs Chow Chows, but in China, the breed is called songshi quan.

The name 'Chow Chow' comes from a pidgin-English term used to describe anything coming from

the East in the 18th century.

The phrase was meant to describe various knick-knacks like dolls, porcelain, and other curios and,

despite being living creatures, the dogs were roped in with the other baubles.

As a result, the Chow Chow inherited the name from merchants who could not be bothered to

properly mark what they were shipping.

5.

A scene from Disney's "Lady and the Tramp" was inspired by a Chow Chow puppy.

There have been lots of dogs in the wonderful world of Walt Disney.

Early on in his marriage, Walt Disney gave a Chow Chow puppy as a Christmas present to

his wife, Lillian.

He presented the puppy to her in a hatbox.

The idea later made its way into "Lady and the Tramp," when Jim Dear gives a cocker spaniel

named Lady to his wife, Darling, in a hatbox.

4.

Among contemporary Chow Chow fans, Martha Stewart may be foremost.

Because she is Martha Stewart, she seems to do everything at a high level of sophistication,

including dog ownership.

Her chows aren't just regular dogs; they're champion show dogs.

One of her Chow Chows, Genghis Khan II, won Best in Breed at the Westminster Kennel Club

Dog Show in 2012.

3.

Sigmund Freud, the founder of modern psychoanalysis, owned a beloved Chow Chow named Jofi.

Freud often allowed Jofi sit in on his therapy sessions, and he considered Jofi's presence

to be an important part of the psychoanalytic process.

He believed dogs were good judges of human character and could gauge a patient's mental

state.

2.

We tend to think of dogs as good swimmers, but not all breeds are built alike in that

respect.

Chow Chows do not do very well in the water, and it's all that thick fur that's to blame.

The breed enjoys two coats, including a very wooly undercoat that's great for keeping the

dogs warm in cold weather, but that coat becomes waterlogged and quite heavy when wet.

1.

A legend says that the original teddy bears were modeled after Queen Victoria's Chow Chow

puppy.

It's said that she carried the dog everywhere she went.

Her cohorts disapproved, claiming that it did not befit a Queen to be seen everywhere

with a dog, so they paid a dressmaker to make a stuffed version of the animal for her.

Well, there ya have it – 10 Fascinating Facts about the mysterious, fluffy canine,

the Chow Chow.

We enjoy hearing about your pets, so tell us all about them in the comments below.

Before ya go, take a moment to subscribe for more fun, fauna facts.

We publish at least twice a week, so don't miss a single fact.

And as always, catch ya next time.

For more infomation >> Chow Chow Dogs 101 Interesting Facts and Information #chowchow #dog - Duration: 5:08.

-------------------------------------------

El 90% de los americanos quieren una reforma migratoria | Un Nuevo Día | Telemundo - Duration: 5:20.

For more infomation >> El 90% de los americanos quieren una reforma migratoria | Un Nuevo Día | Telemundo - Duration: 5:20.

-------------------------------------------

Miracle • Riki • 32 kills — Pro MMR Gameplay Dota 2 - Duration: 38:01.

miracle riki pro mmr gameplay dota 2

Không có nhận xét nào:

Đăng nhận xét