>>> TONIGHT I ORDERED A TARGETED MILITARY STRIKE ON THE AIRFIELD
IN SYRIA FROM WHERE THE CHEMICAL ATTACK WAS LAUNCHED.
IT IS IN THIS VITAL NATIONAL SECURITY INTEREST OF THE UNITED
STATES TO PREVENT AND DETER THE SPREAD AND USE OF DEADLY
CHEMICAL WEAPONS. THERE CAN BE NO DISPUTE THAT
SYRIA USED -- CHEMICAL WEAPONS -- VIOLATED ITS
OBLIGATIONS UNDER THE CHEMICAL WEAPONS CONVENTION AND IGNORED
THE URGING OF THE U.N. SECURITY
COUNCIL. >>> PRESIDENT TRUMP PULLED THE
TRIGGER ON AN ATTACK. MULTIPLE CRUISE MISSILE STRIKES
AGAINST THE SYRIAN AIR BASE FROM WHICH THE PRESIDENT ASSAD
LAUNCHED THE CHEMICAL AIR STRIKE.
>>> FOLLOWING THE ATTACK, PRESIDENT TRUMP SENDING A
MESSAGE TO FRIENDS AND FOES ALIKE.
>> IN JUST A FEW MOMENTS WE'LL TALK TO A MEMBER OF THE FOREIGN
RELATIONS COMMITTEE, SENATOR MARCO RUBIO, BUT FIRST HERE ON
SAID THE CHAIRMAN OF THE -- REPUBLICAN SENATOR JOHN McCAIN.
ALSO WITH US DAVID IGNATIUS, CATTY KAY AND -- KATTY KAY.
>>> ALL WE'VE HAD HEARD FOR SIX YEARS IS SYRIA IS TOO TOUGH, A
LOT OF WRINGING OF HANDS 5 MILLION PEOPLE, TWO CHEMICAL
ATTACKS, YOU ACTUALLY HAVE BEEN WARNING ABOUT THIS OUTCOME FOR
THE PAST FOUR TO FIVE YEARS. SO YOU TELL US, WAS LAST NIGHT
AN APPROPRIATE ATTACK? DID WE DO ENOUGH?
>> I THINK IT WAS APPROPRIATE, BUT I WOULD LIKE TO SAY, DESPITE
ALL THE ENTHUSIASM WE SEE THIS MORNING, IF I MIGHT QUOELT
CHURCHILL, IT'S THE END OF THE BEGINNING, NOT THE BEGINNING OF
THE END. WE HAVE A MIDDLE EAST IN CHAOS,
THE EUROPEAN BEING DESTABILIZED, THE SPREAD OF ISIS THROUGHOUT
THE WORLD. THIS IS THE CHALLENGE TESTIFY
BASHIR ASSAD AND WE ALSO HAVE THE CHALLENGE OF ISIS, SO
THERE'S A LOT MORE TO GO. THE SIGNAL I THINK WAS SENT,
JUST AS YOU SAID, WAS A VERY, VERY IMPORTANT ONE.
>> WAS IT IMPORTANT NOT ONLY TO RUSSIA AND ASSAD, BUT ALSO TO
CHINA AND NORTH KOREA? >> AND OUR FRIENDS, AS HAVE BEEN
DISCUSSED EARLIER. DAVID MENTIONED IT.
A LOT OF THE ARAB COUNTRIES ARE WILLING TO BE PARTNERS WITH US,
AS LONG AS THEY THINK WE CAN RELY ON US.
IF WE'RE REALLY GOING TO STABILIZE THAT REASON IT'S GOING
TO TAKE ARAB PARTICIPATION, WHO ARE CARED TO DEATH ABOUT THE
CONTINUED SUCCESSES OF IRAN. THIS IS 1,000 YEARS OLD RIVALRY
BETWEEN PERSIANS AND ARABS. IT'S JUST ANOTHER MANIFESTATION
OF IT. >> DAVID, WHAT WE HEAR FROM THE
SUNNI ARABS OVER AND OVER AGAIN OVER THE PAST FIVE, SIX, SEVEN
YEARS IS THAT THEY DIDN'T FEEL LIKE THE UNITED STATES HAD THEIR
BACK. DOES LAST NIGHT CHANGE THAT IN A
SENSE? >> IT BEGINS TO.
THESE ARE PEOPLE WHO HAVE A DEEP SENSE OF INSECURITY, ANXIETY,
ANGER TOWARD IRAN. THE SHIELDED IRAN HAS BEEN
PUSHING THEM AROUND. THE QUESTION I HAVE FOR SENATOR
McCAIN IS WHAT IS THE RIGHT MEASURED NEXT STEP?
THE PRESIDENT BEGAN SOMETHING LAST NIGHT.
WHAT'S THE RIGHT NEXT PLACE TO GO?
>> BY THE WAY, COULD I ALSO COMMENT BEFORE I SAY THAT, THIS
IS A TEAM THAT THE PRESIDENT HAS ASSEMBLED THAT I HAVE PRAISED.
THE QUESTION WAS THAT A LOT OF US HAD -- GET THAT, DAVID.
>> I APOLOGIZE. I TOLD THE WHITE HHITE HOUSE NO
CALL ME. >> I THINK THE QUESTION WAS,
WOULD THE PRESIDENT LISTEN TO THIS TEAM?
ARGUABLY THE STRONGEST TEAM I HAVE SEEN IN THE WHITE HOUSE.
THE NATIONAL SECURITY TEAM. OBVIOUSLY HE DID.
OBVIOUSLY HE LISTENED TO THAT TEAM, AND THAT'S WHAT'S MOST
ENCOURAGING TO ME, IS THAT HE RESPECTS MATT IS, HE RESPECTS
McMASTER, HE RESPECTS KELLY. I THINK THAT'S VERY IMPORTANT.
I THINK THE NEXT STEP IS TO SEE WHAT THE REACTION AND THEN BE
PREPARED TO TAKE OTHER ACTION. YOU KNOW, IT'S NOT JUST CHEMICAL
WEAPONS, BUT IT'S BARREL BOMBS, OTHER ATROCITIES THAT HAVE BEEN
COMMITTED OF THOSE 400 SOME THOUSAND WHO HAVE BEEN KILLED A
SMALL NUMBER BY CHEMICAL WEAPONS.
THE REST IS GROSS VIOLATIONS OF INTERNATIONAL LAW.
BY THE WAY, I WOULD MOVE FORWARD WITH THE SAFE ZONES.
I WOULD MOVE FORWARD WITH THE ARMY IN TRAINING OF THE FREE
SYRIAN ARMY, WHICH YOU WOULD HAVE TO REBUILD FROM A VERY LOW
LEVEL, BUT I WOULD GO AHEAD AND MOVE FORWARD WITH THOSE PLANS.
AND BY THE WAY, YOU HAVE TO SETTLE THE PROBLEM WITH TURKEY,
AS YOU KNOW, ABOUT THE KURDS. >> WE'VE BEEN TALKING ABOUT THE
PRESIDENT NOW SURROUNDED BY A NEW DYNAMIC, IN THE FOXHOLE WITH
THE NATIONAL SECURITY TEAM, WHICH MOST PEOPLE THINK, AS YOU
DO THE STRONGER TEAM IN YEARS. >> I'VE NEVER SEEN BETTER
PEOPLE. >> ME TOO.
I ASK HOW IMPORTANT IT IS WITH THE WORLD WATCHING NOW WITH
ALMOST A PSYCHOLOGICAL RESET HAPPENING, AS THE COUNTRY
WATCHES THIS UNFOLD, HOW IMPORTANT IS IT THAT THE
PRESIDENT IS METHODICALLY MOVING FORWARFORWARD, NO TWEETING, NO
BLURTING, NO LURCHING. NO, SERIOUSLY.
>> I WOULD LOVE TO SEE THE TWEETING STOP, BUT I WOULD ALSO
LIKE TO SEE PIGS FLY, BUT I DOUBT -- I JUST THINK IT'S IN
HIS DNA. BUT PERHAPS THERE COULD BE MORE
RESTAIN. I WOULD HOPE THAT WOULD HAPPEN.
HE NOW HAS AN OPPORTUNITY TO REBOOT WITH THE AMERICAN PEOPLE.
>> I AGREE. >> AT LEAST AS FAR AS NATIONAL
SECURITY IS CONCERNED. I'VE HEARD YOU ALL DISCUSS THE
POLLING NUMBERS HE HAS. I THINK HE WILL SEE THAT THE
AMERICAN PEOPLE PROBABLY APPROVE OF THIS.
WHAT AMERICAN DIDN'T SEE THE PICTURES OF THOSE DEAD BABIES?
I MEAN, YOU KNOW -- >> AN OPPORTUNITY.
>> IT'S NOT A POSITIVE REACTION TO A MILITARY STRIKE.
IT'S THAT MOST OF THE PEOPLE THAT HAVE SEEN THIS, AND
UNDERSTAND WHAT HAPPENED, UNDERSTAND THAT THIS WAS THE
MOST MEASURED RESPONSE THAT HE COULD HAVE, AND KAKATTY, HE LAI
ONE CARD DOWN. HE HAS FIVE MORE AIRFIELDS TO
STRIKE IF ASSAD STEPS OUT OF LINE AGAIN.
>> THE YES IS HOW MANY OF HIS CARDS DOES HE CHOOSE TO PLAY ON
THE TABLE, RIGHT? WAS THIS A ONE OFF, A REACTO
SHOWING HE WAS SOMEBODY WHO STOOD BY HIS WORDS AND THAT IT
ENDS WITH THERE? SENATOR, YOU HAVE QUITE A LONG
LIST, THE SAFE ZONES, THE AIR FORCE D. YOU WANT COORDINATE
WITH THE AMERICAN ALLIES. >> I AGREE THERE'S A LOT OF
ENTHUSIASM, BUT WE ALSO SHOULD BE ASKING QUESTIONS AND HAVE
SOME SKEPTICISM. IF IT STOPS H HERE AND YOU DON'
GET THE LIST OF THINGS YOU HAVE LAID OUT QUITE CLEARLY, HOW
MEANINGFUL IS THIS IN TERMS OF WHAT'S ACTUALLY HAPPENING IN
SYRIA AND TO SYRIAN CIVILIANS? >> AS I MENTIONED, THIS IS A
BEGINNING. A LOT OF HARD THINGS HAVE TO BE
DONE, BUT WITHOUT THIS, THOSE OTHER THINGS COULDN'T HAVE BEEN
DONE, EITHER. SO AGAIN I'VE HAD CONVERSATIONS
WITH McMASTER AND MATTIS AT LENGTH.
THEY REALIZE THIS IS A LONG, HARD SLOG.
AFTER ALL, IT'S BEEN EIGHT YEARS IN THE MAKING.
TO THINK WE'LL REVERSE THAT IN A MATTER OF DAYS, WEEKS OR MONTHS,
BUT THE SIGNAL THAT'S BEING SENT, AS YOU ALL HAVE BEEN
DISCUSSING, THE SIGNAL IS IMPORTANT, BUT THE HARD WORK
STILL LIES AHEAD OF US. >> DO YOU THINK IT WILL HAPPEN?
>> I DO. I DO, BECAUSE I THINK THAT
THAT'S WHAT THE THINKING OF THE SMARTEST PEOPLE I KNOW IS AS
WELL. A LOT OF IT IS NOT GOING TO BE
VERY EASY, BUT I THINK YOU'RE GOING TO HAVE MOST ENTHUSIASTIC
PARTNERS IN THIS EFFORT THAN WE HAD -- THE SKEPTICISM THAT
EXISTED BEFORE. LET'S ALL FACE THE FACTS.
WHEN THE PRESIDENT DREW THE RED LINE, DIDN'T ACT, WE ALL KNOW
WHAT THE RESULTS WERE. NOW THE PRESIDENT BASICALLY HAS
REVERSED THAT ACTION AND RESTORED CREDIBILITY.
COINCIDENCES ARE NICE, I'M GLAED HE'S TALKING TO THE CHINESE
PRESIDENT AT THE SAME TIME. >> IT DOESN'T HURT.
>> THAT'S NOT SOMETHING THAT WAS LOST ON THE ADMINISTRATION.
I TALKED TO TOP ADMINISTRATION OFFICIALS LAST NIGHT AFTER THE
NEWS BROKE AND ASKED IF THEY WERE CONCERNED THAT THE CHINESE
LEADER WAS THERE. AND TO A PERSON, THEY ALL SAID
CONCERNED? WE'RE GLAD HE'S HERE, BECAUSE
WE'RE GOING TO BE TALKING ABOUT NORTH KOREA NEXT, AND AT LEAST
IN THEIR CONVERSATIONS WITH ME LAST NIGHT, SAID THEY WERE GOING
TO MAKE IT VERY CLEAR TO THE CHINESE LEADERS THAT THEY WERE
NOT GOING TO STAND BY AND ALLOW NORTH KOREA TO GET NUCLEAR
CAPABILITY TO STRIKE SEATTLE, PORTLAND, SAN FRANCISCO AND LOS
ANGELES. >> THE MOST IMMEDIATE CRISIS WE
HAVE IS NOT IN THE MIDDLE EAST. THE MOST -- IS THIS CRAZY FAT
KID, WHO IS HONEST -- >> YOU WERE --
>> HE'S NOT RATIONAL, FROM EVERYTHING I'VE READ ABOUT THEM.
THE WORST KIND OF ADVERSARY IS A NONRATIONAL PERSON WITH NUCLEAR
WEAPONS. I WOULD HOPE THAT THE MEETINGS
WOULD BE THAT HE COULD TAKE SUFFICIENT ACTION TO STOP IT.
THEY CAN DO IT. >> A LITTLE KNOWN FACT ABOUT
MIKA AND HER FAMILY -- >> WHAT?
>> THEY LEFT HER WITH SANTA CLAUS RINGING A BELL IN TIMES
SQUARE BACK WHEN SHE WAS 5 YEARS OLD.
OUT OF SIGHT, OUT OF THE MIND. >> WE HAVE DONE THE SAME THING
WITH JOHN HEILMAN. >> OKAY.
I WAS WONDERING WHERE THE SEGUE WAS.
>> WE FOUND HIM. JOHN, HEILMAN, JUST A GOOD
CHANCE TO TELL A STORY. JOHN HEILMAN, YOU HAVE A
QUESTION FOR SENATOR McCAIN. >> I DO, OF COURSE.
SENATOR McCAIN, YOU JUST MADE A COMMENT ABOUT HOW STRONG THE
TEAM AROUND PRESIDENT TRUMP IS ON NATIONAL SECURITY AND FOREIGN
POLICY. UNTIL A COUPLE DAYS AGO STEVE
BANNON WAS SITTING AT THE TABLE WITH THE NATIONAL SECURITY
COUNCIL. HE'S NO LONGER DOING THAT.
DO YOU HAVE A COMMENT ON THAT, WHETHER YOU THINK THAT'S A
POSITIVE DEVELOPMENT, NEGATIVE OR NEUTRAL?
>> I THINK IT'S POSITIVE, BECAUSE NO POLITICAL PERSON HAS
EVER BEEN ON THE NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL, AND BY THE
WAY, I'VE ALWAYS SAID THAT HE HAD A VERY STRONG TEAM AROUND
HIM, BUT I'VE ALSO SAID DURING THIS PERIOD OF TIME, WILL THE
PRESIDENT LISTEN TO THEM? I THINK THAT QUESTION WAS
ANSWERED LAST NIGHT. >> MOVING FORWARD, THAT TEAM IS
GOING TO HAVE TO FIND A WAY TO HELP HIM COMMUNICATE EFFECTIVELY
DAY AFTER DAY AFTER DAY. AS YOU SAID, THIS IS THE
BEGINNING OF A LONG CONVOLUTED PROCESS.
>> PART OF THAT PROCESS, OBVIOUSLY THE MORE COMPLICATED
PART OF THAT PROCESS IS DAVID IGNATIUS HAS BEEN TALKING ABOUT
THIS MORNING, HAS TO DO WITH WHAT'S GOING ON IN EASTERN
SYRIA. MORE COMPLICATED, BUT AS DAVID
HAS REPORTED THIS MORNING, AND MAYBE YOU CAN HELP US OUT HERE,
THERE IS GOING TO BE A TIGHTENING OF THE GRIP ON ISIS.
>> YES, AND I BELIEVE YOU'LL SEE THEM TAKE MOSUL AND SEE THEM
TAKE RAQQA, BUT THERE'S A HUGE PROBLEM LOOMING OUT THERE, WHICH
IS ERDOGAN. HE DOES NOT WANT THE KURDS
TAKING RAQQA. WE HAVE DEPENDENT ON THE TURKS
FOR A LOT OF THINGS, INCLUDING THE TAKING OF INCIRLIK.
>> HOW DO WE RESOLVE THAT? ERDOGAN, WHO'S BEEN ANYTHING BUT
A GOOD ALLY. >> THE FASTER WE TAKE RAQQA, THE
QUICKER WE'LL CUT OFF THE STREAM OF TERRORISTS COMING OUT OF
RAQQA. AT THE SAME TIME IF YOU USE THE
KURDS, THEN YOU HAVE A CONTRADICTION AND REALLY BE
PROBLEM WITH THE TURKS, I.E. ERDOGAN, WHO BELIEVES THE KURDS
ARE A GREATER ENEMY THAN ISIS IS.
THERE HAING TO BE SOME INTENSE NEGOTIATIONS.
WHAT'S THE ANSWER? I THINK YOU COULD USE THE KURDS
UP TO THE OUTSKIRTS OF RAQQA, AND I DON'T THINK I WOULD WANT
THEM IN, AND I'M A GREAT SUPPORTER OF THE CURTIS.
>> DAVID? >> I WANT TO ASK ABOUT WHAT MANY
SEE AS THE WILD CARD IN THIS CONFRONTATION.
THAT'S IRAN. THE U.S. HAS 5,000 OR MORE
TROOPS WHO ARE VULNERABLE IN IRAQ, OVER 1,000 NOW IN SYRIA.
THE IRANIANS HAVE SHOWN THEIR ABILITY TO STRIKE WITH VERY
ADVANCED MUNITIONS THAT CAUSE REAL HARM TO OUR TROOPS.
WHAT SHOULD WE BE DOING TO DETER IRAN FROM ANY ATTACK LIKE THAT.
>> DAVID, OBVIOUSLY THE ANSWER IS TO TELL THEM THAT THE PRICE
THAT THEY WOULD PAY FOR ATTACKING AMERICANS WOULD BE
HIGHER THAN ANYTHING THAT THEY MIGHT BENEFIT, BUT THE IRANIANS
WILL NOT GO QUIETLY INTO THE NIGHT.
THEY ARE IN A SUPERIOR POSITION IN IRAQ AS WELL AS SYRIA, AS
WELL AS -- THEY HAVE THAT SHIA CRESCENT THAT WE HAVE DISCUSSED
IN THE PAST, AND THEY HAVE BEEN CLOSE TO ACHIEVING IT.
SO I THINK THAT ONE OF THE WORST THINGS I HAVE SEEN IN MY
LIFETIME WAS TO SEE AMERICAN SAILORS ON THEIR KNEE WITH HIS
THEIR HANDS CLASPED BEHIND THEIR NECKS.
WE CAN'T LET THAT KIND OF THING GO UNANSWERED.
>> REX TILLERSON GOES TO MOSCOW AND MEETS PUTIN.
WHAT WOULD YOU LIKE HIS MESSAGE TO PUTIN TO BE WHEN IT COMES TO
SYRIA AND THE FUTURE OF ASSAD? >> I THINK WE HAVE TO -- FIRST
OF ALL, IT IS UNACCEPTABLE FOR ANYONE WHO USES CHEMICAL WEAPONS
IN GROSS VIOLATION OF ANY NORM. IT'S NOT ACCEPTED FOR THEM TM TE
SUPPORTED BY VLADIMIR PUTIN. WE EXPECT THEM ONCE WE PROBABLY
HAVE TO DO SOME MORE THINGS TO FORCE THE SYRIANS TO THE TABLE
AND SAY, LOOK -- IT MAY END UP IN A PARTITION, BUT IT'S NOT TO
STOP. 6 MILLION REFUGEES?
WE TALK ABOUT IT ALL THE TIME, THE DESTABILIZATION OF EUROPE,
NEEDLESS DEATHS OF OVER 400,000 PEOPLE, WE'VE SAT AND WATCHED
IT, AND WE'VE BECOME NUMB UNTIL YOU SEE THOSE PICTURES.
DO YOU THINK PUTIN IS GETTING THERE?
HE DIDN'T STOP THE BARREL BOMBS. >> I THINK WHEN WE DIDN'T STOP
THE BARREL BOMBS IS BECAUSE WE DIDN'T ACT.
ONE THING THAT VLADIMIR PUTIN UNDERSTANDS, AND THAT'S POWER.
HE AS AN OLD KGB AGENT AND HELLBENT ON RESTORING THE
RUSSIAN POWER. WE HAVE TO GET SOME DEFENSIVE
WEAPONS TO UKRAINE. >> I WONDER WHAT PAGE THEY ARE
ON, THE RUSSIANS COMPARED TO THIS PRESIDENT AND YOU'RE
ADMINISTRATION, BECAUSE THE
RUSSIANS ARE EVEN PAINTING THIS STRIKE AS NOT BEING VERY
EFFECTIVE. IS THAT WISE?
>> WHICH IS NOT WISE. >> THIS WERE BACK TO THE DAYS OF
THE SOVIET UNION. WE REALLY ARE.
WE'RE BACK TO THE GOLDEN DAYS OF YESTERYEAR WHERE THE SPOKESMAN
SAYS THE MOST OUTRAGEOUS THING. >> WELL, LOOK AT US LATELY.
BUT HAVING SAID THAT IT'S NOT WISE PERHAPS TO TRY AND CREATE
FAKE NEWS OUT OF THIS ATTACK AND SAY THAT, YOU KNOW IT WASN'T --
MIGHT WE STRIKE AGAIN JUST TO PROVE A POINT?
AND DO YOU EXPECT THIS PRESIDENT TO CHANGE HIS VERBIAGE ON
VLADIMIR PUTIN? >> I HOPE SO.
AND I THINK THAT HE IS BEGINNING TO OBVIOUSLY HAVE A SIGNIFICANT
SHIFT THERE PEACE THROUGH STRENGTH.
WE HAVE TO REBUILD OUR MILITARY. IT'S IN TERRIBLE SHAPE.
WE HAVE TO DO A BETTER JOB THERE.
EVEN THOUGH PUTIN IS THE OLD KGB COLONEL, HE IS A PRAGMATIST.
I UNDERSTANDS.ER. HE UNDERSTANDS THOSE BOUNDARIES.
IT'S A WHOLE OTHER PROGRAM ABOUT THE PROPAGANDA EFFORT AS WELL AS
CYBER. CYBERIS THE -- CYBERFESS IS THE
NEW BALD. >> GEORGE WILL CAME ON EARLIER,
AND IT MADE SENSE TO ME. HE SAID, IF YOU WANT TO STOP THE
FILIBUSTER OR SLOW IT DOWN, MAKE THEM STAND ON THE FLOOR AND MAKE
EVERYTHING IN THE SENATE STOP UNTIL THE FILIBUSTER STOPS.
>> I UNDERSTAND THAT'S THE WAY IT WAS WHEN YOU FIRST CAME TO
THE CONGRESS BACK DURING THE COOLIDGE ADMINISTRATION.
>> IT WAS. I WAS WE WANT IN WITH SIEM IN
24. 24 WAS A BIG YEAR FOR PEOPLE
LIKE ME. >> YESTERDAY WAS A DARK DAY IN
THE HISTORY OF THE UNITED STATES SENATE.
WE ABANDONED THE VETO -- EXCUSE ME -- THE PROCESS THAT THEN
ALLOWS THE MAJORITY TO BAKLEY RULE.
THE RESULT WILL BE WHEN THE REPUBLICANS ARE IN CHARGE YOU'LL
SEE MORE CONSERVATIVE SUPREME COURT JUSTICES.
WHEN THE DEMOCRATS ARE IN CHARGE, YOU'LL SEE MORE LIBERAL
SUPREME COURT JUSTICES, BECAUSE THEY DON'T HAVE TO RELY ON THE
60 VOTES. THEY DON'T HAVE TO --
>> WHY DON'T WE GO BACK TO HOW IT WAS PRE-1970, AND MAKE PEOPLE
FILIBUSTER, STAND ON THE FLOOR? >> I'M ALL FOR THAT, BUT THE
ACTION TAKEN YESTERDAY NOW BRINGS ON THE TYRANNY OF THE
MAJORITY, WHICH WAS NOT -- WHICH IS WHY WE WERE BICAMERAL.
YESTERDAY BENJAMIN FRANK LINK WAS SPINNING IN HIS GRAVE.
>> SENATOR McCAIN, A GREAT HONOR TO HAVE YOU?
>> THANK YOU FOR COMING IN. >> YOU'RE DOING A TERRIBLE JOB.
>> THANK YOU SO MUCH, WE STRIVE TO DO A WORSE JOB EVERY DAY.
I THINK WE ARE SUCCEEDING. >> HE'S EVOLVED A BIT, HASN'T
HE? OVER TIME?
>> WE'VE BEEN TALKING TO SENATOR
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét