Thứ Sáu, 24 tháng 3, 2017

Youtube daily Mar 24 2017

- We spend a lot of time on this channel

focusing on where to start your smart home,

but we rarely talk about the finished product.

Today, we're going to look at how one smart home enthusiast

has used the best smart home tech

to create a remarkable experience.

Stay tuned.

(digital music)

Hi again, John Stone, the DIY Smart Home Guy.

Over the past year, I've been releasing DIY smart home

how to videos and home automation reviews.

If you're watching one of my videos for the first time,

I encourage you to also check out

the rest of the channel videos,

since this one is gonna be focused on the end product.

I get a lot of questions about where to start a smart home.

And oftentimes, the question lurking behind it is,

what all can I do?

So today I reached out to Jason Reuter and asked him

if he would mind giving us a tour of his smart home.

If you don't know Jason, he's the moderator and chief

of the Wink Hub group over on Google Plus.

I left the Google Plus Wink group in the description below.

So just to get your primed for what you're about to see,

Jason will be walking you through

a normal day with a smart home.

You'll see how he's brought together his Wink Hub 2,

Google Home Assistant, Philips Hue, Osram Lightify,

Nest Cam and a whole host of other smart home tech

that's tied together with about 120 robots

inside his Wink Hub.

And other IOT cloud services like Stringify and IFTTT.

So without any further ado,

here's Jason!

- Good morning, my name's Jason

and I'd like to show you my smart home.

This is my dog Bella.

My home is powered by a Wink Hub 2.

I actually have it plugged into a Wemo plug,

that way I can remotely reboot it if necessary.

I have Show Home Plug providing the power

to my theater seats.

Each one's individual, it's a great product.

The colored lights you're seeing are Phillips Hue.

I got the LEDs and the Blooms.

The Blooms around the seating are set up on Stringify

to give me the high temperature of the day.

Where the LEDs give me the low temperature.

This only happens at 5 in the morning

when I get up for work, it's not an all day thing.

Hey Google, set living room lights to orange.

- (Google) Okay, changing five lights to orange.

- Since I have Nest Cams, which you're watching me on,

I have to go with the AI thermostat

and I've had the Chromecast for years.

They all work flawlessly.

Hey Google, what's the temperature of the living room?

- (Google) It's currently 73 degrees.

- Nice and toasty, let's go check out the kitchen.

Come on, Bella!

As soon as I step into the kitchen,

my Osram LED lights under the cabinet come on.

The Quirky Outlink turns on an outlet

back here with the light on it.

It does say Ohio State, there ya go.

There's very useful for crock pots

and all kinds of other things.

The Lutron switch over here

is powering the lights over the sink.

I also have the GoControl sensor, it's there in the corner.

I also have it set up here in the mud room.

So, when you step into the mud room, the lights come on.

It's very nice, Yale Lock there.

So, I have this Leviton switch here.

I have two of 'em in my home,

one in the garage and one here.

They work well, they're very reliable.

I just don't like 'em compared to the Lutrons.

Hey Google, unlock the door.

- (Google) Okay, unlocking the doors

at Jason's house of fun!

- When the door unlocks,

the Osram light here should turn green, which it did.

I have a Go Control tripper there.

- (Robotic Voice) I have unlocked the side door.

- (Jason) The voice you just heard

is being broadcast by Tasker.

Hey Google, open the garage door.

- (Google) Okay, I'm opening your garage door for you now.

- Well, it's been fun showing you around.

I gotta go to work, I'll see ya this afternoon.

Hey, so I just got home from work.

Let me show you around a little bit

upstairs in the daylight, let's go see what it looks like.

Upstairs bedrooms are using Gen 2 Hue lightbulbs.

Over here, to run the fireplace, I have a quirky outlet.

I also have a window air conditioner

on the other wall that I use.

I'm using this leakSMART sensor sitting on top there

to get my temperatures to control the robots,

so if it gets below X temperature or above X temperature,

it can control them by turning it on.

So, over here, is the Pico Lutron remote.

It's used in a three way application, or whatever you want,

but this is the top of the stairs so that made sense.

There's the Nest Protect.

Let's go check out the basement.

There's a Go Control tripper on the door,

that when you open it, basement lights come on.

And they go well with the Cree 4Flow bulbs,

which you probably can't see very well, but.

I have a GE Link bulb over here,

really didn't have anywhere left to put it in the house.

I got my leakSMART sensor down here by the sump pump.

On the other side here,

I installed the leakSMART shutoff valve.

I put it in right in front of the softener system.

Alright so, let's head outside

and I'll show the outside lights and the garage.

The two lights on the front door are Osram.

Color changeables.

Ignore my daughter's cat,

that thing'll probably follow me all through this video.

These are the Osram Lightify Garden Strips.

You remove the plastic stakes

and I've screwed 'em on the deck as lighting.

They look really good at nighttime.

I have the Nest Cam up there in the top peak.

Open garage door.

That's Tasker, it is performing all the commands

by voice through Google.

Works really well.

So in the garage, I have a Leviton switch.

When the garage door opens,

it will actually power on the garage lights.

The Coke Light is also powered on

with the Leviton plugin module.

There's the Leviton plug.

There's the MyQ controller.

There's the Leviton switch.

It's just an on off, it's not a dimmable.

That way it can handle the load of the LED lights

that I have up in here.

Excuse the garage, it is a mess, but it is a garage

and that's what it's for.

This will be the entryway on the side of the garage.

Here a little GoControl sensor down there.

Alright, I also have this Quirky Outlink here.

This particular one is set up to run my air compressor.

The convenience thing is here when I open the garage door,

if it's open longer than five minutes, it turns it on.

So then my air compressor actually kicks on.

And when the garage door closes, it turns it off,

killing the power to the compressor

so it's not running all the time.

I'm standing in the bathroom,

and I have the tripper on the door that,

when it shuts the lights come on.

The two button Lutron switch there, I love it.

It turns on the exhaust fan.

And it also turns on a GE light over the shower,

providing a light.

It's setup with robots where if the bathroom lights

are on longer than three minutes, it comes on.

And when they're off longer than five minutes, it shuts off.

Lemme go show ya a tripper on one of my windows real quick,

just to see how I mounted it.

As you can see here, they're a real slim design.

I have one mounted on the glass and one on the frame.

That way either window that opens is triggered,

whether it be the top or the bottom.

And this here's the entryway.

It should be the last room in the tour of this house.

I have a motion sensor up here on the ceiling.

When you walk in, the light comes on.

The light is a GE link bulb.

Nothing fancy.

So this is the end of my tour. I hope you enjoyed it.

I thought I'd let you know that I have 76 devices

connected to the Hub 2, I currently have 126 robots set up.

I know it's a lot, and it can get overwhelming.

But when it's all said and done,

you never have to do a thing.

Lights come on when you walk in the rooms, they go off.

It's all automatic.

It's the way a true smart home should be.

And of course you're got your voice AIs

that you can always speak to if you need to.

Thanks for watching, and I hope you enjoyed this video.

Cheers!

- Thanks Jason, your setup is actually very impressive.

I really like how you integrated the Google Home Assistant

with your smart TV and the home automation

For the rest of you, don't forget to check out

the Wink and smart things and other home automation groups

over on Google Plus.

Thanks for watching, don't forget to subscribe,

and don't forget to click like.

Over here, there's a couple of other videos

that you might enjoy.

If you want more reviews, tips, and DIY videos,

visit AZHB.com.

And thanks to all of you that already followed me

over on Facebook or Twitter, both are @DIYSmartHomeGuy.

Until next time, cheers.

For more infomation >> Best Smart Home Tech w/ Wink Hub 2 + Google Home + Nest + Philips Hue - Duration: 9:54.

-------------------------------------------

Koch Brothers Offer Million Dollar Bribes To Republicans To Vote Against Trumpcare - Duration: 4:09.

The Koch brothers, Charles and David Koch, announced earlier this week that they're going

to help out any Republican who is willing to vote against the disastrous Republican

Obamacare replacement plan.

Now, according to Politico, two Koch funded groups, Americans for Prosperity and Freedom

Partners, are going to work together to create a seven-figure fund to bail out any Republicans

who are willing to vote against this horrible piece of legislation.

Now, in my opinion, and I think probably in most lawyers opinions, this would amount to

a bribe.

The Kochs are offering money to any Republican candidate or sitting politician, I should

say, willing to vote against this healthcare law.

So, if you do what they want you to do, they will give you money.

How is that not considered bribery?

How can anyone see this and think that this is okay for two billionaires jackasses on

the west coast to offer millions of dollars to Republicans to vote against a piece of

legislation?

Should they vote against it?

Absolutely.

It's a terrible piece of legislation.

But that's not why the Koch brothers are opposed to it.

The Koch brothers don't like the American Healthcare Act because it doesn't include

a full repeal of Obamacare.

So don't think that the Koch brothers suddenly had a change of heart, they've seen the light,

they were visited by three ghosts, and now they don't want to strip healthcare from millions

of Americans.

They absolutely do.

They're pissed off that the American Healthcare Act does not take health insurance away from

more Americans and that it leaves parts of Obamacare, the good parts, in place.

The Koch brothers don't want that.

They want an even more cruel, more heartless piece of legislation from Republicans in Washington,

preferably for them, one that Donald Trump hasn't stamped his name on because they hate

him.

That's what's going on here.

The Koch brothers want to pay millions of dollars to any Republican puppet that will

make an even worse healthcare law for the United States.

This is legalized bribery in the United States and it's absolutely what we have seen day

in and day out since citizens united, came down from the Supreme Court, telling corporations

that giving money to politicians was just your right to free speech.

I think the Koch brothers have had enough free speech.

They've had enough politicians doing their bidding in Washington because they're able

to write multi-million dollar checks to people who are grossly unqualified to serve in our

government.

This is not a government of the people, by the people, and for the people.

This is a government picked by the Koch brothers, by people like Sheldon Adelson, people that

have enough money where they can write a $10 million check and never even notice if it

clears.

That's how much money they have.

And the Supreme Court, the Republican picked Supreme Court, thinks that that is perfectly

fine.

We don't care because you're giving us the money.

This is disgusting.

And while this healthcare legislation needs to be defeated, Republicans can't even get

enough votes to pass it, but they're going to keep trying.

The fact that the Koch brothers feel comfortable enough to come out publicly and say that we're

going to bribe you vote against it, should leave every American feeling just a little

bit more dirty knowing that that is how United States government works

in 2017.

For more infomation >> Koch Brothers Offer Million Dollar Bribes To Republicans To Vote Against Trumpcare - Duration: 4:09.

-------------------------------------------

Thunder Show: A True Spartan - Duration: 7:32.

In this episode:

British Acrobat Cat Fight Just As Planned A True Spartan

Welcome to Thunder Show!

Ladies and gentlemen, i am proud to present this week's funniest video, a show onof its own!

A team of talented acrobats enters the stage! Today our acrobatic team crews a Churchill tank!

You are about to witness the first ever tank somersault! Here we go!

That was no mere flip. It was an attack, disguised as a circus act!

Right before the jump, the Churchill's crew took out the T-34's gun breech,

which made the enemy's cannon go boom during the shot!

I think we owe some applause forto Geral Infernal for this glorious show!

This time around the best fail was carried out by a group of German feline cats,

which allowed a single American cat to destroy a whole pack of five apex predators!

The first victim is a King Tiger, which lagged behind the rest of his brethren.

The American cat's attack is so swift, the mighty Tiger has no time to react!

Meanwhile the heroic SPG deals catastrophic damage to a JagdPanther,

which, sadly, has no fire extinguishers researched.

Next in line is another King Tiger, who's ensuing compartment fire got overspread to its ammo rack,

making for some spectacular fireworks! Then ANOTHER JagdPanther takes a lethal hit…

and then, just when the smaller American predator is about to finish it off… his prey explodes on its own.

The final course of this bloody meal is a third King Tiger,

who apparently had no clue what the Hellcat just did to his comrades...

That's some nice hunting, Leon Roland, we hope that your luck won't run out anytime soon!

Here are your Eagles, buddy!

Have you ever seen a tank shell bounce off one target and kill another?

Well, how about a shot from a T-34-85 bouncing off a Panther

to take out a TIGER!

The T-34's commander was trying to hit the Panther on the side, while the Tiger

tried to use the Panther as cover to attack the Soviet tank, but sometimes life has its own plans

The Panther's commander soon realized that having your side exposed to the enemy

is hardly a great idea and started to back out slowly,

but the T-34's shot was faster and hits along the hull and the track of the Panther,

barely skidding off the armour and right into the Tiger's side,

penetrating it and exploding the ammo stored behind it! Talk about tough luck!

dstech, congratulations! Here's your prize!

This week's most original submission could have easily won the previous category,

since it's epic levels are at least over 9000,

but we decided that the original style of this video's cinematography is even better.

Meet the protagonist, a player Flametz, who decided to capture and hold an enemy point all by himself.

He takes out an enemy Thunderbolt and severly damaged a Hellcat in the process.

The foes are reinforced by a whole squadron of ground attack aircraft,

which try and fail to take out or lone wolf.

Then an enemy Sherman Firefly arrives and a thrilling duel ensues!

Then an enemy ground pounder manages to hurt our lonely sentinel,

breaking his gearbox and setting fire to his tank.

Almost instantly after, an unsuspecting Churchill enters the fray and fails to see the repairing T-34,

which spells his doom shortly after. The T-34 finishes repairing and rolls back onto the capture point,

only to be shot by another enemy Firefly, which takes out the Soviet tank's driver and radio operator.

Our hero quickly avenges their demise and now he has a score of 4 frags.

Another reinforcement comes in, this time it's an SPAAG.

But it too, can't save the first Sherman and is quickly dispatched back to its hangar!

Finally, allies come to the aid of our lone beleaguered warrior!

Wow, such drama! This battle should be made into a movie, or something!

Thank you flamethorn77, your bravery is like pure Stalinium and this battle deserves 5000 Golden Eagles!

Now it's time for the best comment of the past week:

Stargamer says: Pe-8? Seems more like a Pe-9 now...

This comment has just earned its author 1000 Golden Eagles!

Please, respond to your original comment with your in-game nickname and email address,

so we can send you your prize!

Please, be advised that the prize eagles may take up to five business days to be added to your in-game account.

Thank you for watching Thunder Show.

Ok, let's recap the three simple steps on how to submit your video to Thunder Show:

STEP 1. Record and put together a video up to 3 minutes long,

which corresponds to one of the four categories mentioned earlier.

ATTENTION: The submitted video must be made by you, must be published for the first time,

must have public access for viewers and must not violate any copyright laws.

STEP 2. Subscribe to our Youtube channel and hit he like button below this video.

STEP 3. Upload your video to Youtube and send us a direct link to thundershow@gaijin.ru

The covering email should contain the desired category for your video,

your in-game nickname and the email address registered with your game account,

so we can send you the reward should your submission win!

Every week, each winner in every category of the show will get 5000 Golden Eagles!

We will also be awarding the best comment of the week.

So, get your creative juices flowing, make some content, send it to us, or simply watch and comment,

either way - we've got plenty freebies to go around! Good luck and see you in a week!

For more infomation >> Thunder Show: A True Spartan - Duration: 7:32.

-------------------------------------------

Witnessing Women and Doubting Disciples (Luke 24:1-12) - Duration: 55:17.

Let's open the Bible now to the twenty-fourth chapter of Luke's gospel, Luke chapter 24.

We have begun to look at the opening twelve verses, which is Luke's treatment of the resurrection

of Jesus Christ.

And I want to read these verses for you, so that you have them in mind as we look at them.

Luke 24, beginning in verse 1.

"But on the first day of the week, at early dawn, they came to the tomb, bringing the

spices which they had prepared.

And they found the stone rolled away from the tomb.

But when they entered they did not find the body of the Lord Jesus.

And it happened that while they were perplexed about this, behold, two men suddenly stood

near them in dazzling apparel.

And as the women were terrified and bowed their faces to the ground, the men said to

them, 'Why do you seek the living One among the dead?

He is not here but He has risen.

Remember how He spoke to you while He was still in Galilee, saying that the Son of Man

must be delivered into the hands of sinful men, and be crucified, and the third day rise

again?'

And they remembered His words, and returned from the tomb and reported all these things

to the eleven, and to all the rest.

"Now, they were Mary Magdalene, and Joanna, and Mary the mother of James; also, the other

women with them were telling these things to the apostles.

And these words appeared to them - the apostles - "as nonsense, and they would not believe

them.

But Peter arose and ran to the tomb.

Stooping and looking in he saw the linen wrappings only, and he went away to his home, marveling

at that which had happened."

This is Luke's account of the resurrection.

There is one in Matthew, there is one in Mark, and there is one in John, because the resurrection

of the Lord Jesus is not just a feature of Christianity - it is its essential truth.

In fact, without the resurrection of Jesus Christ, there is no Christianity.

The resurrection of the Lord Jesus is not the epilogue to the story.

It is not the epilogue to the life of Christ.

It is the goal of His life, it is the objective of His life, it is the purpose of His life.

The church has always understood that.

In fact, the church understood it right from the day of the resurrection on.

For since that time, the church has chosen to meet on Sunday, the first day of the week,

the day that Jesus rose from the dead, to commemorate the most important event in His

life, and the most important event in human history, His resurrection from the dead.

The church did not choose to meet on Friday.

The church chose to meet on Sunday, because Sunday is the interpretation of Friday.

Easter is the interpretation of Good Friday.

Resurrection is the divine interpretation of the death of Christ.

Resurrection is the divine vindication of the work that He did on the cross.

Without the resurrection, the cross means nothing, for it has no validation, it has

no vindication, it has no affirmation.

But when God raised Jesus from the dead, He was affirming, and validating, and vindicating

the fact that He had indeed borne our sins in His own body on the cross, and had satisfied

the justice of God with His sin-bearing.

Without the resurrection, the cross is meaningless, just another death.

The resurrection is everything.

The resurrection vindicates the great reason for the gospel, and for all redemption.

The purpose of the gospel is not just that we might experience the forgiveness of sin.

The purpose of the gospel is that we, having been forgiven of our sin, could enter into

eternal life, and live in the bliss of heaven forever, in perfect holiness and perfect joy,

in glorified, physical, resurrected bodies.

Bodily resurrection is peculiar to Christianity, and bodily resurrection is essential to Christianity.

The Christian gospel is not designed to deliver you from your troubles here; not at all, not

even close.

The Christian gospel is not so that your spirit can float on into eternity in some nebulous

way.

The Christian gospel does not promise that you will live on in influence in some way,

nor is the gospel saying that Christ lives on in His influence, or Christ lives on in

spiritual form.

The Christian message is that Jesus Christ rose from the grave in a glorified, physical

body, in some way like the body you have now, only stripped of all that is sinful and fatal;

and that we one day will receive a body like unto His glorified body, and we will live

in bodily resurrected form through all the eons of eternity.

That is the Christian message.

That is not the message of the other religions of the world.

There is no resurrection in Buddhism.

There is no resurrection of the body in Hinduism, just a recurring, cycling, reincarnation in

some different form.

Christianity teaches a bodily resurrection, and that is the goal of redemption, that we

might, in glorified human bodies, live forever with our glorified Christ, and serve Him,

and worship Him, in joy and peace.

Christianity promises a physical resurrection.

Now, your body will be different, thankfully.

It will have nothing about it that's fatal, terminal, nothing about it that's sinful,

or wicked.

Nothing about it that's imperfect, but it will be a physical body in a glorified form.

You say, "What's the model for that" - the glorified resurrection body of the Lord Jesus.

It could be seen, it could be touched.

It had scars.

He ate.

He walked.

He talked.

He thought.

He heard.

He acted in that body in ways familiar to those He met.

Listen to the importance of the resurrection in the language of the Apostle Paul in 1 Corinthians

chapter 15.

"If Christ has not been raised, then our preaching is vain, your faith also is vain."

If Christ is not raised from the dead in bodily form, then all gospel preaching is useless,

which means the New Testament is useless, because that's where the first gospel preaching

took place.

You can cancel Christianity totally.

There is no Christianity without the resurrection; none.

"If Christ is not raised, our preaching is useless, your faith is useless.

Worse than that, we are found to be false witnesses of God, because we witnessed against

God that He raised Christ when He didn't raise Him, if in fact the dead are not raised.

If the dead aren't raised, then Christ isn't raised," and we have no Christianity, and

what we've been preaching is a lie and a deception.

"But Christ has been raised" - verse 20 - "from the dead, and is the first fruits of those

who are asleep."

If Christ isn't raised, there is no New Testament to be believed.

There is no preaching about Christ to be believed.

Your faith is worthless.

But He has been raised.

And this is the Christian message.

Little wonder, then, that all four gospels deal with the resurrection.

They cover this monumental, unparalleled event, this most important, crucial, preeminent event

in His life.

We give a lot of time to the cross, and rightly we should, but it is the resurrection that

vindicates the cross.

And so, all four gospels record the resurrection.

The book of Acts records the history of the preaching of the resurrection, as the apostles,

and the prophets, and the other preachers and missionaries went out preaching the resurrection

of Jesus Christ, that He arose from the dead in physical form, and so shall those who put

their trust in Him.

The epistles follow the book of Acts, and the epistles give us the explication, or the

explanation and the implications of the resurrection - what it means, and how one is to understand

the resurrection, and how one is to apply that great reality to one's own life.

The book of Revelation closes the New Testament with a culmination, and it tells us where

we're going to be in our risen form in the glories of the New Heaven and the New Earth

that will be established by the risen Christ.

So when you look at the New Testament, it features the resurrection.

Prior to the resurrection, Jesus says it's going to happen.

Then it happens.

Then it's preached.

Then it's explained and applied, and finally realized, in the book of Revelation.

Now, as we look at the four accounts of the resurrection, the four historical accounts

by the writers of the New Testament, Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John, I want you to understand

that there is in those accounts what I would call an implicit harmony; an implicit harmony,

maybe, rather than an explicit harmony.

That is to tell us that this isn't contrived, that some committee didn't sit down and say,

"Well, we've got these four different records here; we need to tie these things together

and make them precise, or somebody's going to question their validity."

There's a wonderful, natural component to these gospels, so that each writer writes

out of his own experience, with the Spirit of God, and his own understanding of the event,

and it's natural, and it's personal.

And at the same time there's an implicit harmony, by which we weave it together in a perfect

tapestry of understanding.

Each of the writers have their own emphases, and they feature elements of the resurrection

that are unique to them, but they all agree on four truths.

They all feature four things that are critical to the validity and the evidences and verification

of the resurrection.

And those four are the emptiness of the tomb.

They all talk about the empty tomb.

That's critical as evidence that Christ is alive.

They all talk about the angelic testimony.

They all talk about the fact that angels brought a divine message explaining what had happened.

They all refer to the witness and the testimony of the women, who had seen the risen Christ

with their own eyes, and touched Him, and talked with Him.

And they all note the unbelief of the Apostles.

The emptiness of the tomb, the testimony of the angels, the witness of the women, and

the unbelief of the Apostles, these are the four core evidences for a real resurrection.

Now, let's go back to briefly review the first two that we did last time.

Number one, the emptiness of the tomb; let's look at our text.

"On the first day of the week at early dawn, they came to the tomb."

They, meaning the women, the women are identified in verse 10, "Mary Magdalene, Joanna, Mary

the mother of James, and other women."

Mark 16:1 names one of them Salome; probably a half a dozen, maybe more women.

The reason they came was you will remember they were there at the cross, remember?

Standing there, watching Jesus while He was dying, in silence, stunned silence.

If you go back into chapter 23, they are also there when Jesus is buried, verse 55.

"The women who had come with Him out of Galilee followed after Joseph of Arimathea, who was

taking His body to bury it in his own tomb, in which nobody had ever been placed.

And they were following, they saw the tomb and how his body was laid."

They saw the death of Christ.

They saw Him die.

They were there when the soldiers didn't break His legs they pierced His side and blood and

water came out.

They were there when He was buried.

And they saw Nicodemus show up with his hundred-pound weight of spices, of myrrh and aloes, to put

on the body of Christ as a testimony to his own love for Christ.

And they determined that they weren't going to be outdone by these men, Joseph and Nicodemus,

up to now secret disciples, and so it says that they returned, verse 56 of chapter 23,

and prepared spices and perfumes.

Remember, they put Jesus in the grave on Friday.

They went home.

They had a few hours, perhaps, or maybe an hour left that evening, before Sabbath begins

at six, or a little after, and they went back and prepared spices, 'cause you couldn't do

it on the Sabbath, you couldn't do any work.

They did it, and they were ready now to bring those spices back on Sunday, when the Sabbath

was over, early in the morning, and anoint the body of Jesus as an expression of their

affection for Him.

So they came, bringing the spices they had prepared.

It is now dawn on Sunday morning, an early dawn.

They found the stone rolled away from the tomb.

Remember, on their way they were discussing what they were going to do when they got there,

because the stone would be there, and who would be able to remove it.

To their shock, when they arrived, the stone was rolled away from the tomb.

When they entered they didn't find the body of the Lord Jesus.

Well, here it is, Sunday morning.

Here it is, the first day of the week.

Here it is, the third day since Jesus died.

And He did exactly what He said He would do: He would rise again on the third day.

Now, to put the story together, just very briefly, remember this, the women are probably

all connected to places in Bethany, which is about two miles away, and in the morning,

it appears that Mary Magdalene and one other Mary, Mary the mother of Joseph and James

and the wife of Cleopas, they start out together, according to the other gospel records.

They start out together; the other women are trailing along.

Mary Magdalene is assumed to be the youngest of them, she gets there first.

According to John 20, she arrives while it's still the dark side of dawn.

And she's alone when she gets there, because John says Mary Magdalene arrives there, she

looks through the dusk of that dark side of dawn, and she sees the stone is rolled away.

She draws one immediate conclusion, that somebody has stolen the body of Jesus.

She doesn't go in the tomb.

She doesn't go and look for the other women.

She turns and heads back.

On the dark side of dawn, they didn't see her; maybe she went another way.

There would be lots of ways to go.

But anyway, she heads back.

John tells us she is making a beeline to get back to the apostles, to Peter and John, to

tell them that somebody has stolen the body of Jesus.

And according to John, that's what she does.

She goes back, and John 20, verses 1 and 2 says she tells Peter and John they've stolen

the body of Jesus.

She's drawn that conclusion.

She had no expectation of a resurrection, nobody did, none of the women did, she didn't,

the apostles didn't, no one did.

Peter and John, then, in response to her message, decide they've got to go check it out, so

they head toward the tomb.

Well, probably before Mary ever got to them, the other women arrived, and that's where

we see the story here.

The other women have arrived.

They are a little more patient to try to discern what's gone on here, and so, Luke says, they

entered the tomb.

They didn't find the body of the Lord Jesus.

What they did find was the grave clothes lying in perfect place, as we learn later, because

that's the testimony of Peter and John.

Mary Magdalene, then, arrives first, goes back the two miles or so to tell Peter and

John.

In the meantime, probably soon after she left, the rest of the women arrive.

They have no idea what has happened; nobody does.

Matthew tells us what has happened.

In the dark of night, Matthew 28:2 to 4 says, the Roman guard was placed there.

The Jews went to Pilate, they said, 'We want a guard, we're afraid somebody will steal

the body and the end deception will be worse than the first deception.

So we need to guard that tomb so they don't steal it and pretend there was a resurrection.'

So a guard was placed there for security.

The guard was placed there in the dark of night, and sometime in the darkness of night,

Matthew 28:2 to 4 says, an angel came down from heaven.

Simultaneous to the angel coming down, there was a very severe earthquake that shook the

ground.

And the soldiers saw the angel, felt the earthquake, saw the dazzling, blazing angel roll the stone

away, and sit on it.

And then they fainted in a semi-coma, out of sheer terror and shock.

But they remembered what they had seen up to that moment.

When they finally were aroused, the angel was no longer to be seen by them.

The stone was still rolled away.

They must have looked in to check.

They, too, saw the wrappings lying there, and they would have been wrapped like this,

and they're just lying there, and a napkin that would have been wrapped around the head

was lying in a place by itself.

And immediately, still in the dark of night, they headed for the Jewish leaders, and when

they got to the Jewish leaders, it says in Matthew 28:11 to 15, they told them exactly

what had happened.

"We were there.

We had the place guarded.

We had it secured.

We had it sealed, and all of a sudden there was this horrendous, severe earthquake."

It must have been a very localized earthquake, because the Jews make no comment about the

earthquake.

Nonetheless, "in the midst of the earthquake down out of the sky comes a dazzling, blazing

angel, who pushes the stone away and sits on it.

And we checked the tomb, and there's no body there."

Wow!

This is so important.

The response of the Jewish leaders is this: "You can't tell anybody that.

You cannot tell anybody that.

You have to lie.

You have to lie and say the disciples stole the body.

And we're going to pay you, here's some money to lie."

Now, why do you invent a lie?

To cover up what?

The truth.

I mean, here is testimony by the Jewish leaders that there was a resurrection.

That doesn't shock them, because Jesus had the power of life, they knew that.

He gave sight to the blind.

He gave hearing to the deaf.

He gave a voice to the dumb.

He gave legs to those who were disabled and handicapped.

And He raised people from the dead.

Miracles had followed Him everywhere for three years.

They had never denied His miracles.

They had never investigated His miracles.

They never tried to debunk His miracles by some extensive investigation of them, never.

They were constant, they were ubiquitous.

They were plentiful.

And they were verifiable.

They knew they were dealing with a very powerful, powerful person.

And they knew that when the soldiers told them what happened, that's exactly what happened,

because they knew no one could steal the body, not with the Roman guard there.

And so, all they could do was cover it up, and in covering up, they invented the lie

that proved the resurrection.

Never asked for an explanation; isn't it interesting to you that they did not call for further

investigation?

That they didn't say, "Whoa, whoa, whoa here - what is this again?

A what?

An earthquake, and then an angel came down?

And a blazing angel," the likes of which they had never seen, or nor did they know anyone

who had ever seen?

"What?

We need to look into this more carefully, more thoroughly."

They had the most at stake, did they not?

They were the ones who wanted Jesus dead.

They had the most at stake if, in fact, He was alive.

Don't you think they would want to find out the reality?

Look, it was obvious, you have an empty tomb, you have grave clothes lying in the place

where they were when they were around the body, and the body has gone through the grave

clothes.

And they're in the same place they were when the body was lying there, and nobody steals

a body and leaves the grave clothes like that.

You get it and run, and you take in the form that it's in when you get there.

And the soldiers were guarding the grave.

What they had was a resurrection.

They knew they had a resurrection.

They knew there was no other explanation.

And they said, "Let's lie about it."

By the way, they had a lot more integrity than many of the skeptics and liberal critics

through the years who have tried to say the disciples stole Jesus' body.

Even the Jewish leaders knew that wasn't true.

That's why they invented the lie that they stole His body.

The story was believable.

The story satisfied them.

They never investigated anything, never asked for an explanation, never questioned the efficiency

of the guard.

They didn't say, "Well, what were you guys doing?

Were you awake?

What kind of security do you provide?"

They never questioned that.

They never even questioned the resurrection, they never questioned the angel, they never

questioned the earthquake.

The empty tomb is powerful evidence.

They certainly didn't offer some lame theory.

"Well, Jesus probably swooned, and came out on His own."

No.

Not a crucified man, not someone who has been hanging on a cross for six hours and bleeding

out His open wounds, someone who is so obviously dead that they don't break His legs, and they

ram a spear into His side and blood gushes out of His heart.

A dead body then peeled off the cross, and hauled off and put in a grave.

You mean to tell me He felt better after a couple of days in there?

And He got up, woke up, stood up, walked over to a small opening, with a massive stone across

a small opening, and from the inside had the strength, and by what angle, to push the stone

away?

Ludicrous.

Ludicrous - and left all His grave clothes there?

They knew.

They didn't even suggest such a stupid idea.

And they knew that the soldiers had checked the tomb to make sure He wasn't there.

And I'm sure the soldiers gave them the testimony about the grave clothes, and that was so convincing

that that's what convinced John, first of all, and I think Peter - the grave clothes,

the empty tomb and the grave clothes lying right where the body was.

So the first line of evidence that all four gospel writers want us to understand is the

tomb is empty, and there is no explanation except a resurrection.

Second line of strong evidence is the revelation from the angels, the testimony from the angels,

verses 4 to 7.

"It happened while they were perplexed about this, behold, two men suddenly stood near

them in dazzling apparel."

The other writers tell us they were angels in the form of young men.

"The women were terrified, bowed their faces to the ground.

The men said to them, 'Why do you seek the living One among the dead?

He is not here but He has risen.

Remember how He spoke to you while He was still in Galilee, saying, 'the Son of Man

must be delivered into the hands of sinful men and be crucified, and on the third day,

rise again.'"

This is the most important evidence, this is divine revelation.

Two angels come down from heaven, from God, with the truth, and declare to them that He

is risen; He is not here.

So you have the emptiness of the tomb, and you have the message of the angels to verify

the resurrection.

You have the evidence from the facts, and the evidence from divine revelation.

Now, that brings us to the third and the fourth lines of evidence the New Testament writers

give us.

Thirdly, the witness of the women - the witness of the women.

This is wonderful.

Verse 8, in response to the angels reminding them that Jesus had said to them while He

was still in Galilee -

remember they were the women who followed Him from Galilee, they heard Him teach there,

and He is now in Judea for the last year of His ministry.

But when He was way back in Galilee, He had told them He would be delivered to sinful

men, crucified, third day rise again, verse 8, they remembered His words.

It was on at least three separate occasions that Jesus said this.

It's recorded multiple times in the four gospels, but at least three separate occasions in which

He told them that He would be delivered over to sinful men, He would be crucified, and

He would rise again the third day.

And now it's beginning to make sense.

The angels bring them a revelation they can't deny.

They know they're godly angels, that's why they fall on their faces, bow down in terror

before these holy beings.

They hear the message from God, they remember the connection with what Jesus promised.

And it's not only dawn on the outside, it's dawn on the inside.

They're starting to get it.

They remembered His words.

And then - I love this - they return from the tomb.

They turn and they take off; and where are they going?

Verse 9: "To report to the eleven, and to all the rest."

They're all hiding, by the way, they're all hiding, they're afraid.

The men are afraid.

Now remember, they're going to turn and leave.

Who's on the way?

Peter and John.

Peter and John are on the way, because Mary's already gone back, told her story that somebody

stole the body.

Peter and John are on the way.

These women are now beginning their journey; they have a different story than Mary Magdalene.

Mary never looked in the tomb.

She never saw the grave clothes, and she never saw the angel.

She's got misinformation.

These women have the right information.

They start back.

It's so interesting to me, verse 9, "And they returned from the tomb and reported all these

things to the eleven, and all the rest."

But wait a minute, wait a minute.

Something happened on the way.

Look at Matthew 28.

Something happened on the way.

I don't know how Luke could leave this out, except by divine work.

On the way, this is Matthew 28:8, "And they departed quickly from the tomb" in response

to what the angel told them.

"They departed quickly from the tomb" - verse 8 - "with fear" - same terror from being in

the presence of holy angels, but now with the addition of "great" - what - "joy," because

it's all starting to come clear to them - wow - and they are now running, "and they ran

to report it to His disciples."

I love this - "And behold" - verse 9 - "Jesus met them and greeted them."

"Good morning, ladies."

I just love the simplicity of that.

There's just no - there's no wow factor, it doesn't say again the earth shook, and the

sky rent, and the stars fell, and people blew trumpets.

It was just, "Good morning, ladies."

"And they came up and took hold of His feet and worshiped Him."

They saw Him; so now they've seen the empty tomb, they've heard the angelic divine revelation,

and they've seen the risen Christ.

Then Jesus said to them, "Don't be afraid."

Now their joy's gone back to fear.

"Go, take Word to My brethren to leave for Galilee, and there they shall see Me."

"They're going to see Me.

In fact, they're going to see Me in Galilee.

Oh, they're going to see Me before that, but I want them to be in Galilee, and there'll

be a big meeting in Galilee," and that's exactly what happened later on.

So they're on the way.

They're going to tell the eleven, which is the official title for the apostles now that

there aren't twelve of them - instead of being called the twelve, they're called the eleven.

In actuality, there are only nine there, because Peter and John are on the way to the tomb.

So the women, as they head back, see the risen Christ, and their desire to tell the Apostles

is confirmed, "go ahead and do that."

What an experience.

You say, "Well, isn't it sort of odd that the women are the ones who are the original

and initial witnesses of the appearance of the Lord Jesus?"

You say, "Is that for the sake of elevating women?"

Well, it sure does that.

I don't know what else you could elevate them any more than that.

But that's not the primary reason.

How many apostles were standing there watching Jesus being crucified?

How many?

One - John - that's not enough, because if anything is to be given as a testimony, it

has to be confirmed in the mouth of two or three witnesses.

Where were the apostles?

Oh they were the sheep that were scattered when the shepherd was smitten, right?

They were hiding.

This is a wonderful testimony to the love of the women, to the courage of the women,

and to the dignity of women.

But more than that, folks, this is the same little group of a half dozen or so that saw

Jesus die, that saw Jesus buried, and that saw Jesus risen; and therefore they are the

only ones who can be credible eyewitness testimonies.

We don't have any men who saw Jesus die, except John.

We don't have any men who saw Him buried, which was a confirmation of His death.

And it has to be the women, because they're the eyewitnesses of everything else, and you

can't have a resurrection unless you have a death and a burial.

And you have to give testimony to the real death, the real burial and the real resurrection.

They've seen it all.

They saw Him die.

They knew He was dead, because they didn't break His legs.

They knew He was dead, 'cause the spear went into His side and out came the fluid and the

water.

They knew He was dead, because they watched Him being buried.

And now they know He's alive, because they've seen Him.

So in verse 9, they report all these things to the eleven and all the rest.

You've got the nine remaining from the eleven, although they're called the eleven because

that's their official title.

And you've got all the other believers, the group of disciples who were there, who a couple

of them appear on the road to Emmaus -

one was named Cleopas - so there are other disciples who are there along with the apostles.

Then in verse 10 - this is so interesting - it says, "Now they were Mary Magdalene,

and Joanna, and Mary the mother of James, also the other women with them were telling

these things to the Apostles."

That brings up a problem.

What do you mean they were Mary Magdalene?

How did she get in this group?

The last thing we heard about Mary Magdalene, she went there, saw nothing but an empty grave,

came back with the wrong information.

Up to now, as far as we know, she hasn't come to any conclusion except that somebody stole

the body.

She's told Peter and John her conclusion that somebody stole the body, which sent them on

their way back.

How does she get into this group?

Well, Luke is condensing this story.

I'll tell you how she got into this group.

Turn to John 20 - this is just so wonderful.

How can she belong to the group of eyewitnesses when she didn't go in the empty tomb, and

she didn't hear the angels say anything?

She left before the angels spoke, or appeared.

And she had not seen the risen Christ, so how can she be one of the witnesses?

Answer: This lady went back to the tomb.

This lady went back to the tomb.

At some point she decides she has to go back.

And so in John 20, verse 11, we find her standing outside the tomb weeping.

She's all alone.

"And so, as she wept, she stooped and looked into the tomb; and she beheld two angels in

white sitting" - now they're sitting on the inside.

These are two different scenes at two different times, and this one is a private viewing for

Mary.

And they're sitting there, "one at the head and one at the feet, where the body of Jesus

had been lying.

And they said to her, 'Woman, why are you weeping?'"

I mean it just seems so - like you walk in an empty tomb and an angel talks to you, and

he just says, "Hey, why you crying, lady?"

It's just such a natural conversation.

"She said, 'Because they have taken away My Lord, and I don't know where they have laid

Him.'"

She's still sticking with her theory.

"And when she had said this, she turned around and behold - or beheld Jesus standing there

and didn't know that it was Jesus."

Why?

I don't know; maybe she couldn't see through her tears.

But then, nobody after the resurrection of Jesus could really know who He was until He

revealed Himself, right?

That was true of the disciples on the road to Emmaus.

And Jesus asked the same question, "'Woman, why are you weeping?

Why are you crying?

Whom are you seeking?'

Supposing Him to be the gardener, she said to Him, 'Sir, if You have carried Him away,

tell me where You've laid Him, and I'll take Him away.'"

That's a really stupid thing, why would the gardener steal a body out of tomb?

I love this - "Jesus said to her, 'Mary!'

She turned and said to Him in Hebrew, 'Rabboni!' (which means, Teacher)."

And then she grabbed Him, hung on to Him, probably on His feet and ankles.

"'Stop clinging to Me,' He said to her, 'I've not yet ascended to the Father; go to My brothers,

say to them, "I ascend to My Father, Your Father, My God and Your God."'"

"Now, Mary, you go, you tell them you saw Me.

I am alive for a while, you can't keep Me here, I'm going to ascend to heaven, I'm going

to go back to the Father, but I will meet you all in Galilee for a while."

In fact, He met them that night, and the next Sunday night as well, and many other appearances

in the 40 days before He ascended.

So He says to Mary, "You go," and this is wonderful, verse 18, "Mary Magdalene came,

announcing to the disciples, 'I have seen the Lord,' and said that He had said these

things to her."

Can you get the picture?

These women are there.

They've arrived breathless from their encounter with Jesus on the way back.

And they're saying to these nine guys, "Look, we're telling you He's alive.

He's alive, we saw Him, He said 'Good morning, ladies,' and we had a conversation with Him,

and we saw angels, and the angels told us He was alive.

And it was exactly what He said He would do, and He did it, and exactly did it when He

said He was going to do it."

And these nine guys are saying, "Whoa, whoa, now, slow down, one at a time."

And the wonderful truth is they're all saying the same thing, they're all saying exactly

the same thing.

They don't need to kind of put the stories together.

But they must have been breathless.

And in the midst of all of this discussion in the place bolts Mary Magdalene.

And she's been running, so she is breathless.

"I've seen the Lord, I've seen the Lord."

And she starts telling them what He said to her.

She has now had a private audience, seen the empty tomb and the grave clothes, heard an

angelic revelation, and had a personal experience of Christ.

So therefore, she had the same experience all the other women had, and can be included

by Luke in chapter 24 as one of the three eyewitnesses to a risen Christ.

Skeptics have said, "Oh, they went to the wrong tomb."

Really, so did the angels.

So did the Romans.

What a ridiculous thought.

So why not go to the right tomb and pull out the body and end the deception?

Others have said, "No, actually Jesus was never in a tomb, that's why He wasn't there,

they threw Him in a criminal's pit."

Really, so they made up the story about Joseph of Arimathea; I think Joseph would have made

an end to that story, because his reputation was at stake, and if they accused him of stealing

- of taking the body of Jesus and burying it, he would have lost his place in the Sanhedrin

for sure.

And if that was not true, he would have managed to debunk that very, very fast.

Now, all these women are giving testimony to the same thing.

These are multiple eyewitnesses.

And this is just the beginning.

He appears to two disciples on the road to Emmaus, as we'll see.

Peter saw Him in a private appearing.

That night He appeared to the eleven, minus Thomas.

A week later He appears to the eleven with Thomas.

He appears to the disciples by the Sea of Tiberius.

Then He appears - that's in Galilee - then 500 brethren at one time in Galilee.

Then He appears to James.

Then He appears to the Eleven in a mountain in Galilee, where He gave them the Great Commission.

Then He appears in Jerusalem at the time of His ascension.

Then He appears to Saul on the Damascus Road, appears to Saul again in the temple, appears

to Stephen at his stoning - many, many eyewitnesses of a risen Christ.

And that takes us to the final line of evidence, the unbelieving disciples.

You say, "Well, how in the world does that prove the resurrection?"

It proves the resurrection because it proves the fact that they would not fabricate a resurrection,

because they didn't expect one.

'Cause the critics have said, "Well, they stole the body and made it look like a resurrection."

Or they said, "They had a mass hallucination.

They wanted it so bad they hallucinated that it had happened."

They didn't want it so bad, and they didn't expect it.

They wouldn't have fabricated it, because they didn't anticipate it.

They wouldn't have seen it as some kind of a hyper-illusionary experience, because they

had no concept that it would happen.

We find that - and this is so important - in Luke 24, in verse 11.

"These words appeared to them" - meaning the apostles - "as nonsense."

That's what they thought of a resurrection; folly, idle talk, lēros is the Greek word,

an empty tale, some kind of fable.

What is wrong with these women?

And they're all saying the same thing.

And no matter that all their stories are identical, and they all had the same experience, and

it was fresh - it wasn't like there were all kinds of weeks in between where they were

trying to put it together again - and they all say the same thing.

It didn't matter.

It didn't matter that their story had cohesion, that it had consistency.

It didn't matter that they gave details that had no other explanation.

They thought the whole thing was absolute nonsense, and they would not believe them.

They didn't fabricate a resurrection; they didn't even think there would be one.

Then Luke adds the little note about Peter.

Peter arose earlier - this is a flashback - and he had gone to the tomb, stooped, looked

in, saw the linen wrappings only; went away to his home marveling at what had happened.

What do you think he was thinking?

What do you mean marveling at what had happened?

Thaumazō , he was traumatized, he - I think he was beginning to think, "This is a resurrection

- this is a resurrection."

Now, when Peter did go to the tomb, it was before Mary Magdalene came back.

It was before the full testimony of the women.

The chronology is clear in John, so let's turn to John chapter 20.

This is wonderful.

Verse 3, Peter leaves after hearing from Mary Magdalene, "and the other disciple" - that's

how John refers to himself, in his humble way - Peter goes to the tomb with John, and

they're running.

They're going to verify Mary Magdalene's story that somebody stole the body.

And the other disciple is faster than Peter, which knowing Peter's personality was something

to bother him.

He always wanted to be the first.

So John's faster, younger; came to the tomb first, stooping, looking in.

He's a little more retiring and shy.

He saw the linen wrappings lying there, he didn't go in.

He's trying to process this.

"Simon Peter therefore also came following him and entered the tomb."

Of course, just blows right by John and goes in there.

And he sees "the linen wrappings lying there, and the face cloth which had been on His head,

not lying with the linen wrappings," like it was all jumbled up and thrown in a corner,

but lying exactly where it had been when it was put on His head.

"So the other disciple who had first come to the tomb entered then also.

He saw and" - what?

"He believed."

The empty tomb and the grave clothes was all it took.

Now remember, they at this point have only heard the testimony of Mary Magdalene, right?

They haven't heard the other women.

They left when Mary told them to leave.

In the meantime, the women came to the tomb, saw Jesus, came back with the story.

So all they have, all John has is an empty tomb and grave clothes, and that's enough

- that's enough.

He knew that stone couldn't be moved from the inside by a dead Jesus.

And he had seen Him dead, he was there.

He knew.

There was no other explanation but that He rose, and he believed.

"For as yet" - or up to that time - "they didn't understand the Scripture that He must

rise again from the dead."

But he understands it now.

"So the disciples went away again to their own homes."

That's interesting, isn't it?

I'm sure they didn't know, "What do we do next?"

So they went home.

Go back to Luke, and that's what Luke says Peter did in verse 12.

After he saw the linen wrapping also, "he went away to his own home, marveling - marveling

at what had happened."

Hey, this is not a grave robber's scene, folks.

Grave robbers, if you wanted the body, you just take the body intact, you don't fool

around in there unwrapping it, and then laying everything in perfect order.

You take the body, and you run.

It was very convincing.

John believed.

Peter - still struggling when he goes home.

Meanwhile, the women have these other nine guys on their hands, and they're trying to

convince them that this thing really happened, and they're not buying it at all.

Why are they so stubborn?

Go over to verse 19 of Luke 24, this is on the road to Emmaus, and Jesus shows up later

that day.

These two disciples are walking to Emmaus.

Jesus comes, they don't know who He is, and He starts a conversation with them.

They're looking sad.

"Why are you sad?"

Well, verse 19, "Ah, it's about Jesus the Nazarene, who was a prophet mighty indeed

in the Word in the sight of God and all the people, and the chief priests and rulers delivered

Him up to the sentence of death and crucified Him."

And verse 21, "We were hoping that it was He who was going to redeem Israel" - oh boy.

"Besides all this, it's the third day since these things happened."

Huh - it's the third day, they haven't seen Him.

The women told them He was alive, they don't buy that.

They don't believe that.

"It's the third day, nothing's happened.

We were hoping it would happen.

And also" - this is the throwaway, verse 22 - "some women among us amazed us.

When they were at the tomb early in the morning, didn't find His body, they came saying they

had seen a vision of angels who said that He was alive.

And some of those who were with us went to the tomb" - namely Peter and John - "and found

it exactly as the women had also said.

But Him they didn't see."

Peter and John didn't see Him, but they sent word back.

"Hey, we went to the tomb, and He may be alive, but we didn't see Him."

They're still processing this on the side of believing it, but not fully convinced.

And so this is the reflection of their stubborn unwillingness to believe until they see.

You know, you fault Thomas because he didn't believe.

Remember, he said, "If I don't see the nails in His hands, and where the spear went into

His side, I won't believe."

Well, they were just as bad as Thomas.

They didn't want to believe the testimony of the women.

And Peter and John came back and said, "Well, it's a bizarre deal.

The tomb is open, and the tomb is empty, and the grave clothes are lying there.

And, you know, He may be alive."

But they're not ready to fully commit.

However, before the day is over, He appears to all of them.

But the reason the Scripture lays out the unbelief of the disciples is to dispel any

ridiculous theories that they invented a resurrection because they wanted one so badly.

That's just not the case.

Well, there's a lot more to say.

Let me just close with some thoughts.

When I was a kid, we used to sing a little song called "He Lives," anybody remember that?

"He lives, He lives, He lives within my heart."

And there's a line in that song that always bothered me.

"You ask me how I know He lives, He lives within my heart."

Well, that's true.

But if you ask me how I know He lives, I've got to give you more than that, because that's

not verifiable.

Somebody might say, "Well good for you.

I'm so glad He lives within your heart.

That is not universal, that is not verifiable, that is not going to get this thing beyond

you."

So feeling may be something that helps us emotionally; it removes some emotional barriers

to experience the living Christ, emotional barriers to believing say in the resurrection.

But there's got to be something more than that.

You say, "Well you can't have only feeling, how about fact?"

Fact is good.

And you've been given facts.

And all that I've given you are facts.

While feelings deal with emotional barriers, facts deal with historical barriers.

And what these facts do, what these lines of evidence do - this is what evidentialism

always does - is it depletes, it dismisses, it dispels bad options, weak arguments, foolish

theories.

Feeling removes emotional barriers.

Facts remove intellectual barriers.

But neither of those necessarily saves.

You might feel in your heart that Jesus rose from the dead.

You might say, "Well, the facts look like He rose from the dead," and you would be among

the Jewish leaders, who all agreed that that was what happened.

That's not going to save you.

Your feelings about the resurrection, and even the facts of the resurrection, won't

save you; the only thing that will save you is faith in the resurrection.

Confessing with your mouth Jesus is Lord, and believing in your heart that God raised

Him from the dead; that's where real certitude comes from.

Don't trust your feelings, and you've got to move the facts inside, and that's what

faith does.

Faith embraces the truth concerning Jesus Christ.

So next time somebody says to you, "How do you know He lives?"

You say, "Number one, the facts indicate that He is alive, and that removes my intellectual

barriers.

My own experience of Him in my life removes any emotional or psychological barriers.

But more importantly than that, I have a faith that was given to me by God Himself that has,

with that faith, certitude and assurance.

It isn't the feelings that deliver the certainty, it isn't even the facts that deliver the certainty;

it's the faith that delivers the certainty.

It's a component of saving faith.

Ask God to give you that faith that makes the resurrection certain, and you confess

with your mouth Jesus as Lord, the one whom God raised from the dead."

Our Father, we thank You again for the greatness of this truth.

Thank You for the glory of the resurrection.

These are truths that are at the peak of our Christian faith, of the Christian gospel,

of Christianity itself.

It's all about resurrection, His and ours.

And help us to know, Lord, that all the gospel intends to do in the end is to take us in

glorified bodily form into eternal bliss, to serve, and love, and praise You forever

and ever, and to be fully satisfied, and fulfilled without any mitigation, in a perfect joy that

never ends.

May we understand the critical place of the resurrection; it is the reason for all redemption

that there might be, surrounding Your throne, a glorified humanity, in a form somewhat like

this very form, to praise You forever and ever.

That's the promise of the gospel, not what happens here only, but what awaits us in the

new creation, in the new heaven and the new earth beyond it, as we live in light of that

hope and as we proclaim the risen Christ, in whose name we pray.

Amen.

For more infomation >> Witnessing Women and Doubting Disciples (Luke 24:1-12) - Duration: 55:17.

-------------------------------------------

MyCarTracks - Android drives success for MyCarTracks - Duration: 1:15.

For more infomation >> MyCarTracks - Android drives success for MyCarTracks - Duration: 1:15.

-------------------------------------------

Suspected DUI driver killed in wrong-way crash, OHP says - Duration: 0:20.

ALSO BREAKING OVERNIGHT, A WOMAN

KILLED IN A WRONG WAY CRASH ON

THE KIPATRICK TURNPIKE.

ABIGAIL: TROOPERS SAY SHE WAS

DRUNK AND HIT A TRUCK HEAD-ON

NEAR NORTHWEST 10TH.

THAT WOMAN DIED AT THE SCENE.

THE DRIVER OF THE TRUCK WAS

TAKEN TO THE HOSPITAL, BUT HAS

For more infomation >> Suspected DUI driver killed in wrong-way crash, OHP says - Duration: 0:20.

-------------------------------------------

NH adds troopers along border to stop drugs from Massachusetts - Duration: 1:38.

SERA?

SERA HI, ANTOINETTE.

YES, I AM STANDING ON THE BORDER

WITH NEW HAMPSHIRE.

IT'S ALONGSIDE ROUTE 20 -- ROUTE

128.

IT'S ONE OF MANY ROADS THA

CONNECT MASSACHUSETTS AND NEW

HAMPSHIRE.

LAWMAKERS PROPOSING THIS

LEGISLATION TOOTH TOP THE FLOW

DRUGS HEADED NORTH AND THAT

MAY HELP MASSACHUSETTS

COMMUNITIES.

>> I THINK IT IS GREAT NEWS.

SERA: BORDER COMMUNITIES

STRADDLING MASSACHUSETTS AND NEW

HAMPSHIRE ARE PRAISING A NEW

PUSH TO FIGHT THE OPIOID CRISIS.

THEY GRANITE STATE SENATE

APPROVED MONEY TO HIRE 5 STATE

TROOPERS WHO WOULD FOCUS ON

WORKING WITH MASSACHUSETTS LAW

ENFORCEMENT TO STOP THE FLOW OF

DRUGS NORTH.

>> WE HAVE A LOT TO BE LOOKING

FOR.

WE DON'T HAVE A LOT OF MANPOWER.

THAT IS THAT ONLY SOMETHING THAT

COULD BE OF ASSISTANCE TO US.

SERA: THE ISSUE RAISED BY

GOVERNOR CHRIS SUNUNU EARLIER

THIS MONTH WHEN HE SAID LAWRENCE

WAS THE MAJOR SOURCE OF FENTANYL

FLOWING NORTH.

THE POLICE CHIEF IN METHUEN SAYS

MORE POLICE WILL HELP ALL BORDER

COMMUNITIES BECAUSE THE PROBLEM

IS EVERYWHER

>> YOU ARE WORKING A CASE IN

MANCHESTER, IN NASHUA.

THEN YOU COME DOWN HERE.

YOU CAN CONTINUE THE FLOW.

WE HAVE TO BE ONE.

THERE SHOULD BE NO BORDERS AND

LAW ENFORCEMENT.

SERA THE MAYOR OF LAWRENCE, WHO

INITIALLY BUT BACK AGAINST

GOVERNOR SUNUNU'

CHARACTERIZATION WOULD NOT

COMMENT ON THE PROPOSAL.

IT STILL NEEDS APPROVAL IN THE

HOUSE.

GOVERNOR SUNUNU HAS ALREADY

PLEDGED SUPPORT.

For more infomation >> NH adds troopers along border to stop drugs from Massachusetts - Duration: 1:38.

-------------------------------------------

How a NASA Science Flight is No Ordinary Journey - Duration: 2:59.

In order to put a snow satellite into space,

you need to test the instruments from a plane first.

SnowEx is a five-year NASA airborne campaign to

work towards a future snow satellite mission

and we need to find out what sorts of remote-sensing techniques

will work best for different kinds of snow.

The only way to find that out is to actually take a bunch of different types of sensors,

put them on an airplane,

fly them out in the field under real snow conditions,

and that's exactly what we're doing.

What plane is being used?

The P-3. It's an old military plane.

The military planes are loud, and vibrate, and they're cold.

Think of a commercial airplane. Take all the insides out.

What you have there, what every plane will have,

it's what's called seat rails. We use these.

We build our instruments in, what we call, data racks.

That's how we control the instrument.

We will build our racks in such a way that they also attach on to these seat rails.

How else is the plane different?

So the walls of this aircraft, I find pretty interesting.

They're not solid like on your commercial.

It's like a piece of cloth you can actually remove and run wires,

and run different instrument things and make it a lot easier to

modify where your things are on the aircraft.

How do you check that the instruments are measuring snow accurately?

We have a lot of people on the ground collecting science data

and they're doing that to compare what we're seeing with our instruments.

It's a data comparison type deal.

These flight lines are planned so that we specifically fly over

wherever the ground truth people are with their instruments

and taking their experiments.

What is the flight like?

So flying on the P-3 is really bumpy.

We do a lot of maneuvers that you would never do on a commercial jet.

High bank angles, sharp turns, really low flying.

The lower you are, the more turbulent it is.

What are you doing on the flight?

So when I'm on a science flight,

I'm checking to make sure the instrument's still running

and taking data the way I want it to.

Everyone's very focused on their instrument.

You're constantly checking to make sure that the data's coming in.

My job is to make sure all the instrument operators are looking at their instruments

and that they're collecting all the adequate data they need.

What is the goal for the first year?

The best thing that we can get out of SnowEx this year one

is really to collect a multi-sensor data set over a wide range of conditions.

These SnowEx science flights are the combinations of two plus years of work.

It's really exciting to be a part of something so big.

For more infomation >> How a NASA Science Flight is No Ordinary Journey - Duration: 2:59.

-------------------------------------------

Dug Wilderness Explorer Backpack | Disney Family - Duration: 1:17.

[music throughout]

Hi there.

My name is Dug.

I have just met you, and I love you.

[music]

For more infomation >> Dug Wilderness Explorer Backpack | Disney Family - Duration: 1:17.

-------------------------------------------

Visit: Young At Heart Club in Bow - Duration: 0:44.

STORM EARLY NEXT

WEEK AND WE DO NOT NECESSARILY

SEE IT AT THE PRESENT TIME.

A BIG HELLO TO THE YOUNG AT

HEART CLUB WHY VISITED YESTERDAY

TO TALK ABOUT WEATHER FOLKLORE

AND DID A QUIZ ABOUT THE

OLD-FASHIONED SIGNALS --

AND REALITY.

THIS CLUB HAS BEEN CELEBRATING

THEIR 40TH ANNIVERSARY AS A

CLUB.

ERIN: THAT IS GREAT.

KEVIN: I REALLY APPRECIATE IT

THEM ASKING ME BACK.

MY SECOND TIME NEXT YEAR WE WILL

DO ANOTHER TALK AND I WILL TRY

TO STOP THEM BETTER.

For more infomation >> Visit: Young At Heart Club in Bow - Duration: 0:44.

-------------------------------------------

ECHO celebrates community science night - Duration: 2:21.

IT IS ACTUALLY HELPI TO,

REALLY, MAK THINGS EXCITING

ABOUT HERE.

IT IS COMMUNITY SCIENCE NIGHT.

>> IT IS ALL ABOUT T

COMMUNITY.

AND IT IS ALL ABOUT SCIENCE.

WE THROW OUR DOORS OPEN FOR

MOBIUS MENTORING.

THOS PAIRS COME HERE TONIGHT

AND PLAY TOGETHER.

IT EVEN GETS BETTER BECAUSE

WE'VE GOT A BUNCH OF KIDS ALL

YEAR, TEENAGERS.

TOM: SO ARE THES PEOPLE THAT

HAVE BEEN COMING IN HERE

LEARNING FROM YOU GUYS TO SHOW

MENTORS SOME STUFF?

THEY HAVE BEEN TRAINING ALL

YEAR ON HOW TO INTERPRET ECH

FOR THE PUBLIC.

THEY GOT TO ORGANIZE DINNER

.

EVERYTHING IN THE WHOLE PLACE:

THEY OWN I.

THERE IS MENTEES A MENTORS

LEARNING TOGETHER WITH OUR

ADOLESCENTS.

IT MAKES YOUR HEAD SPIN.

SO, ANYWAY, SO.

THEY ARE, OF COURSE, GOING T BE

IN THE BUTTERFLY PAVILION.

AROUND THE WHO SPACE, ALL THE

THINGS WE DO O SATURDAY AND

SUNDAY FOR THE PUBLIC, WHETHER

IT IS A DESIGN CHALLEN -- WHAT

CAN YOU DO TO SAVE THE BABY

TURTLES?

YOU WILL JUST, YOU KNOW -- THE

For more infomation >> ECHO celebrates community science night - Duration: 2:21.

-------------------------------------------

Dur-line UCP - Einkabellösung (3 Receiver über 1 Leitung ) - Test: "Sehr Gut" - Duration: 1:30.

For more infomation >> Dur-line UCP - Einkabellösung (3 Receiver über 1 Leitung ) - Test: "Sehr Gut" - Duration: 1:30.

-------------------------------------------

Bawaseer Ka ilaj in Urdu | khooni, Badi, Nasoor | Hakeem Muhammad Koser Gold Medalist - Duration: 5:19.

For more infomation >> Bawaseer Ka ilaj in Urdu | khooni, Badi, Nasoor | Hakeem Muhammad Koser Gold Medalist - Duration: 5:19.

-------------------------------------------

40 wheelchair-bound residents evacuated during Chelsea fire - Duration: 1:27.

NEWSCENTER 5'S SHAUN CHAIYABHAT

IS THERE ON THE SCENE FOR US TO

EXPLAIN WHAT HAPPENED.

SHAUN: NO ORDINARY RESCUE.

FIREFIGHTERS HAD TO CARRY PEOPLE

FROM THE FOURTH AND FIFTH FLOORS

OF THESE BUILDINGS.

UCB TEAMWORK IT TOOK.

THE FIRE BROKE OUT JUST AFTER

SEVEN GLOCK THIS MORNING.

IT WAS CONTAINED TO ONE FOURTH

FLOOR UNIT, BUT THICK LAX SMOKE

FLOODED THE BUILDING.

MANY PEOPLE HERE ALREADY ON

OXYGEN.

DANGEROUS CONDITIONS FOR THEM.

IT WAS TOUGH TO SEE, SO TOUGH

FOR PEOPLE TO GET OUT ON THE

ROAD.

>> WE HAD PEOPLE IN THE

STAIRWELLS AND WHEELCHAIRS.

WE HAD TO BRING THEM DOWN BY

STAIR CHAIR.

IT WAS JUST -- IT WAS A LOT OF

MANPOWER AND IT WAS DIFFICULT.

SHAU THIS IS A HIGH WITH

ROUGHLY 300 ELDERLY PEOPLE

INSIDE.

LUCKILY, ONLY TWO FLOORS HAD TO

EVACUATE.

SOME PEOPLE WERE TREATED FOR

SMOKE INHALATION AND THE MAN

WHOSE UNIT CAUGHT FIRE WAS

TRANSPORTED TO THE HOSPITAL.

HE IS EXPECTED TO BE OK.

BACK ALIVE, I SPOKE WITH HIM A

FEW MOMENTS AGO.

HE THINKS THE FIRE STARTED

BECAUSE OF HIS HEATER.

THE FIRE MARSHAL IS

For more infomation >> 40 wheelchair-bound residents evacuated during Chelsea fire - Duration: 1:27.

-------------------------------------------

MOOC WHAW1.1x | 2.4.3 Enslaved Women in Colonial America | God, King, and Power in Colonial America - Duration: 0:29.

- As hard as servant women worked,

enslaved women worked harder

and without hope for eventual freedom.

Their lives were hardest of all.

For more infomation >> MOOC WHAW1.1x | 2.4.3 Enslaved Women in Colonial America | God, King, and Power in Colonial America - Duration: 0:29.

-------------------------------------------

3 house fires in Ensley - Duration: 0:52.

EUNICE: THREE EARLY

MORNING HOUSE FIRES IN

ENSLEY.

THEY WERE INTENTIONALLY

SET.

THE FIRST FIRE WAS

CALLED AROUND 4:00 THIS

MORNING IN A HUS ON 50TH

STREET AND AVENUE Q AND

JUST MINUTES LATER, TWO

MORE FIRES WERE REPORTED

JUST A COUPLE OF BLOCK

WAYS.

FIREFIGHTERS SAY AT ONE

POINT, THESE WERE ALL

LARGE FULLY INVOLVED

FIRES THAT TOOK NEARLY

35 FIREFIGHTERS TO PUT

OUT THE FLAMES.

WITHIN OFFICIAL SAYS

THIS USES UP A LOT OF

THE DPT'S RESOURCES.

>> THE FIRE STATIONS ARE

LOCATED IN DIFFERENT

AREAS AROUND THE CITY.

ONCE THROWS USED UP,

THEY HAVE TO COME FROM

FURTHER AWAY, SO IT IS,

IT INCREASES THE

RESPONSE TIMES TO

ADOINGS AL CALLS NOT

ONLY FIRE CALLS BUT EMS

CALLS AS WELL.

THE HOUSE FIRES ARE

STILL UPPER

For more infomation >> 3 house fires in Ensley - Duration: 0:52.

-------------------------------------------

MOOC WHAW1.1x | 5.5.2 Artifact Examination: Child's Shackles with Deborah Gray White - Duration: 2:21.

- These tiny shackles remind us that

even the very smallest children who were enslaved

could be chained, and I assume these shackles

are meant to hold children who are about to be sold.

- It's remarkable.

It almost leaves one speechless.

And I wonder whether or not it really is

to shackle the children to make sure

that they don't run away,

and whether or not it is a reminder

to the mother or to the parents

that we own this child, and if you run

or try to escape, we have them and we own them.

- Could have been used for both purposes.

- For both purposes, I think for it.

To make sure that the mother did not try to escape.

- And if you look closely at them,

it looks as though the shackles,

they look as though they're meant

for a three-year-old or four-year-old,

a small toddler, and that they could be used

either to hold two wrists of one child

or two tiny children next to each other.

- It is also a reminder perhaps

that merchants and masters were fearful

that even a small child, even the tiniest child,

could be a runaway.

It reminds us that black people of all ages resisted

and were not easily kept enslaved.

- Right, and that children in fact

might have been tempted to disappear

because they could see the way their parents--

- And the way their parents, yeah.

- And siblings were being treated.

For more infomation >> MOOC WHAW1.1x | 5.5.2 Artifact Examination: Child's Shackles with Deborah Gray White - Duration: 2:21.

-------------------------------------------

SAMSUNG GALAXY NOTE 8 / VAIO PHONE A - NEWS - Duration: 10:05.

Hello.

Today we'll talk about a few interesting news: Phone A from VAIO and Samsung Galaxy Note

8.

Let's go!

In 2014, Sony sold its unit VAIO, specializing in the production of computer equipment.

And under this brand continued the release of various devices.

Another novelty of VAIO was the smartphone Phone A, running the operating system Android.

Smartphone VAIO Phone A in many respects similar to last year's model of Phone Biz.

The device carries on board a 5.5-inch display with Full HD resolution, a Snapdragon 617

processor and 3 GB of RAM.

The device supports the ability to install two SIM-cards.

More detailed technical characteristics of the novelty have not been disclosed.

Also, information about the start of sales and the price of the VAIO Phone A smartphone

is not specified.

It is likely that this model will be sold only in Japan.

Go ahead!

Samsung has not yet introduced the Galaxy S8 and Galaxy S8 Plus smartphones, and the

network has already begun to appear rumors about the next generation of the smartpad

Galaxy Note.

After the problems with last year's Galaxy Note 7, many suggested that the manufacturer

will completely close this line, but it seems that Samsung does not plan to abandon the

devices that are very successful.

The network got the drawings Galaxy Note 8 and some details about the future smartpad.

Externally, the device will be similar to the Galaxy S8 and Galaxy S8 Plus, but with

a number of changes.

In the drawings of Galaxy Note 8, you can see the second speaker on the top edge and

an additional button on the right side.

The latter can serve to release the shutter of the camera, but this has not yet been confirmed.

In addition, the spoken microphone has an unusual shape and is located directly under

the screen.

As reported by various sources, Galaxy Note 8 will receive a Snapdragon 835 or Exynos

9-series processor depending on the region.

The amount of RAM in it will be 6 GB, and the built-in 256 GB.

The novelty should be a 6.4-inch Super AMOLED-display with a resolution of 4428x260 pixels.

Also in Galaxy Note 8, a dual camera may appear.

Presentation of Galaxy Note 8 is expected in the second half of the year.

And that's all.

Be sure to subscribe to the channel and all for now!

For more infomation >> SAMSUNG GALAXY NOTE 8 / VAIO PHONE A - NEWS - Duration: 10:05.

-------------------------------------------

easy muggulu designs for beginners | easy rangoli designs, easy kolam designs, easy muggulu designs - Duration: 2:42.

easy muggulu designs for beginners

For more infomation >> easy muggulu designs for beginners | easy rangoli designs, easy kolam designs, easy muggulu designs - Duration: 2:42.

-------------------------------------------

Dani (DaniIsntCool) | The Road to Nerdfighteria - Duration: 3:44.

Hi there! I'm Dani or DaniIsntCool as I'm

known on the YouTubes, and this is

the story of how I became a Nerdfighter.

So my story starts in 2014.

Remember when everyone was like freaking

out about Ebola and I thought that I was

straight? Yeah, then. I was in the

grocery store with my family, and my

parents told me and my sister that we

could pick out a book each. She ended up

getting Divergent and I was mysteriously

drawn to this blue book with two clouds

on the cover.

I read the back and it didn't really

seem like the kind of book that I would normally

read because up until then I had only

really ever read Harry Potter and was

obsessed with it. And I didn't think that

anything could ever top it, but even

though it didn't seem like something

that I was going to read, and my only

real experience of romance novels was

Twilight , for some reason I was like, "You

know what? I'll give this book a chance." I

was in Southern California visiting family

members, so we were all staying in a

hotel room. And when we got back to the

hotel room, I started reading it, and I

was immediately hooked.

I quickly found that I was able to

relate to Hazel. I was born with this thing

called pectus excavatum, which is

when your ribcage - instead of being shaped

like this - is shaped like this because

your sternum is indented. It's normally

not too bad, but in my case it was so bad

that it was pushing down on my heart and

lungs and making it difficult for me to

breathe. And even though my breathing

problems were as bad as Hazel's, like

merely, I could relate to not being able

to do things that normal people were

able to do. So 2014 was coincidentally

also the year that I underwent the Nuss procedure,

which is where they take a metal bar

that looks like this and put it under

your sternum and then flip it over to

pop it back out. Naturally this is very

painful and I was on a lot of

medication. At this point, I wasn't really used to having

anything stronger than Advil at all, so

I'm pretty sure that the medication they

put me on affected me more and

differently than it would have affected

someone else. I was constantly breaking

out in a cold sweats. I had trouble

sleeping and I was just generally acting

really weird. I started thinking

really deep about everything, then I stopped

talking to my friends for some reason,

and before I knew it, I was in the middle of

an existential crisis. I'd remember that

word from a danisnotonfire video that my

sister showed me, so I decided to look it

up on Youtube, but instead of dan

staring at me, I saw John Green's face

and I was like, "Isn't that the guy who wrote TFIOS?"

I clicked on it and aside from

the confusion of

"Who the eff is Hank" was, I enjoyed the video, so I

decided to subscribe. I was now a

casual viewer of the Vlogbrothers, but not

really a full-blown nerdfighter yet.

Fast forward to December of that year, I

saw that there was a Vlogbrothers live

stream in my sub feed, and I was kind of

bored, so I clicked on it, not really

expecting anything, just thinking that I

might watch for a bit. And I was greeted

with buttfartman! I didn't end up

watching for a bit like I thought I

would. I ended up watching whenever I

could during that year's project for

awesome. I had heard of what nerdfighters

were in their videos, but I didn't really

have the desire to become one until I

saw how amazing and ridiculous this community

can be. Over the next few months, I

did some research. I watched Brotherhood 2.0.

I totally legally acquired Hank's

music. I found out who Esther Earl was and I

even decided to start my own Youtube

channel. I don't think I would be the person

I am now if none of this had happened. After

years of trying to suppress my weirdness

in my passion for fandoms like Harry

Potter so I didn't scare people away, I

finally found somewhere where that stuff was

celebrated and I could be myself.

Unfortunately, I lent that first copy of

TFIOS to a friend and never got it

back, so I don't still have it, but I do

have this amazing community that I'm so

proud to be part of. That being said, I

kind of feel like the community has

spread itself thin because it used to be

that you could like go on the Ning and find

people to talk to, but that's not

really the case anymore.

Everybody's just kind of like spread

around and there's no real one place for

them to convene.....except NerdCon: Nerdfighteria

which is in Boston and I'm all the

way in California.

I'm not salty or anything! And I do wish

that I had more friends who are nerdfighters,

so please be my friend.

Yeah that's pretty much it. Generic,

TFIOS, Nerdfighter story. Bye!

Không có nhận xét nào:

Đăng nhận xét