What does a NASA engineer, a military veteran, and a journalist, and a college student all
have in common?
They've all been forced to hand over their laptops and smartphones without a warrant,
by Homeland Security officials when re-entering the United States.
Now, ten of these citizens are filing a federal class action lawsuit, saying their constitutional
rights were violated.
Joining me now to discuss this, in RT New York, correspondent Trinity Chavez.
Trinity, thanks for coming.
What does this lawsuit allege?
What are the violations?
What's the background or the cornerstone of this lawsuit?
The Electronic Frontier Foundation and the American Civil Liberties Union filed a lawsuit
earlier this month, against the Department of Homeland Security for warrantless border
searches.
The lawsuit alleges that Homeland Security officers violated the plaintiffs fourth amendment
rights when the agents searched, in some cases confiscated their devices without a warrant
at all, like their phones and their laptops.
The two organizations will represent ten US residents, who they say are law-abiding US
citizens who are Muslim or people of color.
They were re-entering the United States from either business or personal travel, when they
all had their computers and smartphones searched, when none of them were accused of doing anything
wrong.
These plaintiffs are students, are journalists, one was even a military vet, and another one
worked for NASA when this all happened.
Some of these individuals had their phones held by border officers for months, even though
they weren't accused of a specific crime.
Under the US Constitution, the fourth amendment prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures,
and requires law enforcement to have warrants.
But courts however, have made exceptions for the searches at US ports of entry, like at
the airport, and have ruled that the government can do warrantless border searches to enforce
immigration and custom laws, to protect national security.
But since Trump has taken office and implemented his travel ban, concerns of racial profiling
and stereotyping have really become more of an issue, along with violation of one's human
rights, and especially in today's society, where we are living in the digital age, our
phones and our computers have a vast amount of personal information on them.
We're talking about pictures, videos, emails, and private text messages, even applications
that store credit card information, health information, so the level of personal information
is really unbelievable.
One plaintiff, Akram Shibly, who had their phone searched, called the ordeal a gross
violation of his human rights.
Let's go back to the NASA engineer, his name was Sidd Bikkannavar.
He works for NASA in jet propulsion laboratories, an employee.
He was subject to one of these searches.
What's the full story and the background on the NASA employee's case.
This plaintiff is an Indian origin Muslim, who is a scientist for NASA.
He designs technology for space telescopes.
In this case, he was on his way back from vacation in Chile, in February.
When he returned to the US, it was just days after the signing of the travel ban, when
a customs and border protection agent in the Houston airport pressured him to unlock his
phone by typing in his password, and forced to hand it over.
Bikkannavar is a natural-born citizen, and even had global entry, which is basically
pre-approved clearance to get you through customs quicker and easier.
Keep in mind, to join this program, you have to go through a thorough background check,
and even an in-person interview.
But regardless, he was escorted to an interview room and was forced to give up his phone.
The officer told him that they had to search his possessions to make sure that he wasn't
bringing anything dangerous into this country.
The officials had asked him everything from where he worked, where he was coming from,
and where he lives.
This is all information that the officer should have already had, since the plaintiff was
a part of the global entry program.
Bikkannavar had answered the questions and explained that he worked for NASA, and that
his phone was issued actually by NASA, it wasn't his own personal cellphone, so it may
contain sensitive information that wasn't meant to be shared.
But none of that mattered, he was still searched along with his device.
At one point, he even asked the officer why he was chosen to be searched and questioned,
but the officer didn't tell him, he just insisted that he had the legal authority to do this.
The border officer had his phone for a half an hour, before he finally gave it back to
him, saying that he had been searching his phone using algorithms.
Bikkannavar had not known what information that the officials might have taken from his
device, so that is still unknown.
Trinity, to me, from an outsider looking in, this certainly does look like these are people
with the wrong skin color, and the wrong names, and are getting just picked out of line based
on profile issues.
Is there a legitimate basis for US border officers searching their phones and their
persons, and doing these extensive background checks, or is this just look like racial profiling?
It gets complicated because the government is initially, seemingly so, trying to protect
the US from terrorism and things of that nature.
But this isn't a new protocol, this is something that they have been really kind of going for,
for the last few years, but this has become more of an issue recently.
Officials say that the electronics searches began late in the Bush administration, but
CBP officers have cracked down on these inspections this year, since Trump has implemented the
travel ban.
People can be searched based on a number of different reasons.
According to the guidelines though, on the CBP website, you could be subjected to inspections
because your travel documents are incomplete, or you don't have the proper documents or
visa.
You may also have previously violated one of the laws that CBP enforces, or even if
you have a name that matches a person of interest in their database.
There are several different reasons that may apply to a person.
One thing is how they even know that these are people of interest, or if their documents
are incorrect.
How do they know that without initiating the conversation with these travelers?
As far as the people's phones go, travelers are not legally required to unlock their phones
or devices, but border agents are known to detain individuals for long periods of time
when they don't cooperate, so that's why people feel pressured to give them the passwords
to their phones.
Just like in Bikkannavar's case, where he was not allowed to leave until he gave the
agents the passcode to unlock his phone.
So you hold him hostage until you give the password, I mean we're not talking about looking
at travel dockets, you're looking in phones, they're looking at laptops.
So in addition to not having any warrant to search through someone's private information,
what hazards are posed to citizens if their emails, text messages, as you mentioned, photos,
they can all be searched by authorities like they have been?
Yeah, absolutely.
To really pinpoint the exact racial make-up of the individuals who are being targeted,
and who are getting inspected, gets a little tricky.
That information hasn't been released by the CBP, but what I can tell you is that the ACLU
reported that the amount of searches at border patrol have spiked recently.
According to the data on the CBP site, the number of searches grew from 8,503 in 2015
to 19,033 in 2016.
That's an increase of almost 125%, and officers have already carried out nearly 15,000 searches
just this year, between January and June, which puts the CBP on track to conduct about
30,000 searches for the year.
But the government has said that those searches happen to fewer than one hundredth of 1% of
international travelers, and that they are authorized by some laws that allow border
agents to look through suitcases without a judge's approval, and those are the same laws
they are using to search peoples' devices.
Trinity, thank you for joining us today.
For more infomation >> Hurricane Maria's Aftermath Differs From Hurricane Katrina, Harvey And Irma | MSNBC - Duration: 1:57. 
For more infomation >> NORD celebrates national accreditation - Duration: 0:28. 
For more infomation >> World's Most Trusted and Popular Mobile Apps For make money online EARN 10 DOLLER IN A MINUTES - Duration: 6:08. 
For more infomation >> Hugh Hefner: Nach Hugh Hefners Tod: Was wird aus der legendären Playboy Mansion? - Duration: 7:52. 
For more infomation >> Así es el contrataque de Bernardo Elías en el caso Odebrecht | El Espectador - Duration: 3:32. 
For more infomation >> "Como está El Raton?" - Duration: 1:48. 
For more infomation >> 有村藍里、イケメン大学生とカップル成立で涙＜恋んトス＞|24H ニュース - Duration: 8:41. 
For more infomation >> حظك اليوم السبت 30-09-2017 فى التوقعات اليومية للابراج بقلم عالمة الفلك د. نيفين ابو شالة - Duration: 7:34. 
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét