Youtube daily Jul 9 2017

Democrats constantly claim that sanctuary cities paradoxically reduce crime.

Luckily, we now can test that assumption.

Phoenix, Arizona did away with their sanctuary city policy eight years ago to receive startling

results.

"We saw a 20-year low crime rate.

When we were allowed and had the discretion to contact our federal immigration partners,

crime fell dramatically," Explains the executive director of the Arizona Police Association.

(via Fox News).

The changes were felt immediately.

In less than a year from ditching sanctuary status Phoenix's murder rate dropped 27

percent, robberies fell 23 percent and theft fell by 19 percent.

Crime rates continue to decline year after year.

But, the largest drop occurred as soon as sanctuary status was reversed, indicating

that protecting illegal immigrants increases crime.

The benefits of the Phoenix experiment were made apparent after a six-year study from

University of California, Riverside, which found there is no benefit to being a sanctuary

city, despite liberal claims that it drops crime.

The study compared 55 American cities and found that there was "no statistically discernible

difference in violent crime rates, rape, or property crime," between sanctuary cities

and regular cities.

This study faced the difficult task of drawing conclusions by comparing vastly different

cities.

However, its conclusions aren't the whole story.

Now that we can compare the same city before and after sanctuary laws, it is clear that

protecting illegal immigrants increases crime rates.

However, even if Arizona didn't see any changes and conformed to the University of

California study that found no "discernible difference" in crime rates between sanctuary

cities and law abiding cities, the case study still would not be reason enough to adopt

sanctuary policies.

Essentially, Democrats in sanctuary cities argue that sanctuary status lowers crime rates.

They claim that illegal immigrants are more likely to cooperate with police when they

do not face the fear of deportation.

However, the California study thoroughly showed that that is not true: there is no reduction

in crime.

If cities want to violate federal law they should have good reason.

If crime rates remain the same across sanctuary and non-sanctuary cities than there is absolutely

no reason to propose sanctuary status unless sanctuary cities have nothing to do with crime

rates.

The true reason that Democrats prefer sanctuary cities is because illegal immigrants overwhelmingly

vote Democrat.

Democrats cannot compete in fair elections, so they offer legal protection for their secret

constituents.

All of the available evidence suggests either that sanctuary status has no impact or only

increases rates of criminal behavior.

This forces us to question the motives of Democrats.

Why do you think Democrats demand sanctuary status?

Please share this news and tell us what you think!

For more infomation >> ALERT: Major U.S. City Drops "Sanctuary City" Law, Instantly Gets Surprising Result | Top Stories To - Duration: 3:10.

-------------------------------------------

James Harden, Houston Rockets Agree to Historic $228M NBA Contract - Duration: 1:27.

For Complex News, I'm Hanuman Welch.

The Houston Rockets announced that they've signed James Harden to a four-year super max

contract extension that will run through the 2022-23 season for a monstrous $228 million

dollars

ESPN's Adrian Wojnarowski and Brian Windhorst reported the extension is worth $170 million

over four years.

Harden became eligible for the designated player veteran extension after making the

All-NBA team and according to ESPN, Harden will now earn $228 million total through the

end of his contract.

Rockets owner Leslie Alexander said in the team's statement.

"Since he arrived in Houston, James has exhibited the incredible work ethic, desire to win,

and passion to be the best that has made him one of the most unique and talented superstars

in the history of the game.

Additionally, the commitment he has shown to our organization, the City of Houston,

and Rockets fans all over the world makes him a perfect leader in our pursuit of another

championship."

EPSN also reported Saturday that the Rockets "are turning full attention" to completing

a trade with the New York Knicks for Carmelo Anthony,

Harden, in a statement on the team's official Twitter account said,

"Houston is home for me.

Mr. Alexander has shown he is fully committed to winning."

According to the terms of his 2016 extension, Harden will earn $28.3 million next season

and $30.4 million during the 2018-19 campaign before the new DPVE terms kick in.

That's all for now, for everything else subscribe to Complex on Youtube.

For Complex News, I'm Hanuman Welch.

For more infomation >> James Harden, Houston Rockets Agree to Historic $228M NBA Contract - Duration: 1:27.

-------------------------------------------

ALERT: Obama FURIOUS He's Not President, So He Tried to HUMILIATE Trump. Your Response? | Top Storie - Duration: 2:44.

Obama has gone out of his way on multiple occasions to sabotage President Trump.

His latest stunt almost left him in a bad spot.

The G20 summit is being held in Germany this week, and all of the representatives from

around the world are there.

According to Daily Mail, It quickly became evident that President Trump was not going

to have access to a 5-star hotel room for his trip because Obama sabotaged it.

It's important to note that the summit was announced in February of 2016, and that gave

Obama plenty of time to plan for a hotel room.

Instead of setting up a reservation, he "forgot" about it, and no one knew until President

Trump arrived.

As always, the president handled the situation with grace, but the idea behind Obama's

motives are infuriating.

There were multiple interviews with staff from the current administration, and they

all had the same reaction.

One said, "Obama's people left everyone high and dry," they continued, "They didn't

care enough to make sure whoever was president would have a place to stay."

One of the most disturbing things about this story is the way the media is handling it.

As you would expect, they're trying to make Trump look like a fool because he didn't

plan.

The fact of the matter is that, by the time the president tried to get a room, everything

was booked because, as previously mentioned, the summit was announced at the start of 2016.

How could he have possibly planned for something that was booked before he was even elected

as president?

Many feel like if Hillary had won the election, the press' story would be a little different.

The mainstream media is using this as a chance to take a stab at the president because they

have no dignity.

Many of the journalists on this case have been creating falsified stories and other

misleading content.

Many agree that Obama should've done better as a former president.

He could've stepped up to help President Trump, but instead he sabotaged the new president

during an important time of need.

This story shows how little respect Obama has for our current president.

It is distasteful to think that he would have no sympathy for the new leader of the United

States.

President Trump did end up finding a place to stay.

He had to stay in a government-owned Senate guest house because the decent hotels were

booked months in advance.

Even though Trump found a place to rest, the complications could have been avoided with

a simple phone call from the former president.

Do YOU think Obama intentionally sabotaged President Trump?

Please share this news and tell us what you think!