hi YouTube okay we are looking at how to
analyze in Google Trends president
Trump's first 100 days because
apparently it's his first 100 days who
really cares he's doing a terrible job
in some senses but at least the one
thing I can say is like with health care
he told them to do something or be done
with it so anyway um but we want things
to be better don't we anyway let's go in
here um okay so the relevant articles
are making America great again
gauging 100 days of Trump the these are
the articles that are coming up as Trump
calls for wall a look at the world's
barriers and Trump's 100 days a chaotic
discovery of power says April 29th marks
100 days since President Trump took
office and people are turning to Google
to search for what he's done so far and
what it comes to so ok so this is the
search and interest in Trump since he's
um of taking office so you can see how
its plummeted
it was way up here and it's plummeted
way way down there so people are
apparently are less interested in Trump
than what they were before it says the
top trending questions on Trump since he
took office from January 20th is how
many executive orders has Trump signed
what countries did Trump ban how many
days has Trump been in office why did
Trump bomb Syria and what has Trump done
so far as president yes that's what we'd
like to know and so here's the search
interest on some of the political issues
at their highest ever on Google since
Trump took office so search interest in
daca I think that's Daca is that an in
search interest in Syria so some of
these issues have come up higher
actually that's probably good for us to
take notice and what kind of leader we
don't want um possibly because uh you
know I mean some of these things aren't
helpful for us as American citizens
it says in fact search interest in
President Trump is higher in his first
hundred days than President Obama in 2008
okay
so that's fair that's fair right there
so more and more people are actually on
the internet that's what this is saying
is that there's more people on the
internet searching for things then back
in 2008 and so there has been a big
shift in transition and and that's one
of the things that I've noticed and to
me that's why that's kind of why when I
think about this advertiser ban when
when they're doing this advertiser ban
on YouTube to me it's the advertisers
throwing a temper tantrum because they
know people have shifted online and they
don't want to shift online and so
because the thing is they're doing
things worse than what US as youtubers
are doing on YouTube so so they're
taught they're being very very
hypocritical so this is probably a good
statistic even though we don't have to
like Trump we don't have to like him as
a president that's our freedoms to not
like him as a president we just don't
have to okay see the breakdown of some
of the most searched political issues on
the h-1b visas Syria immigration LGBT
and health care so these are the top
issues right now you have health care we
hope that health care goes up they're
talking about immigration where maybe
they're talking about this stuff to push
health care down lower possibly that's a
possibility that's just my thinking is
that when there's things that are really
really important then they talk about
other things yet yes they're important
but though overemphasize things and this
might be part of the oh when they talk
about fake news stories and things like
that
that they'll overemphasize things to
push down something that's important and
that can be what's happening here with
health care so yes these things are
important yes we're a nation of
immigrants and people's rights are
important you know LGBT rights are
important so is health care affordable
health care for everyone so let's
go down here and it says the
most-searched issues since Trump has
taken office on January 20th and okay so
that immigration hb1 visas Syria
abortion and daca and so okay we need
health care we need health care up there
more trendy queries the Trump tax plan
lepen NAFTA Jared Kushner and Michael
Flynn and so yeah I think that's
probably it for right now and we'll see
what happens so over time next year we
should have some tent poles right here
there's a little tent pole here there's
a little tent pole I don't know what the
things are that have happened here looks
like a little tent pole so we might have
some within the four years that he's
president we might have some little tent
poles and things that pop up that that
are related to something and today is
April 29th is going to be the White
House Correspondents Dinner so that
probably should pop up let's look here
the White House
correspondents I spelled it wrong
correspondents but let's do the spell
check so I spell it right
Correspondents Dinner as a search term
okay Oh see this is okay this is what I
was talking about with the tent pole so
we've got the tent poles right here we
got the tent pole of May first the tent
pole do you see that so the this is a
tent polling trend so the White House
Correspondents Dinner itself is a little
trend and so this shows you here here's
the one over here so this one wasn't as
popular in 2017 well well all the datas
not in that's probably why so all the
data is probably not in yet and so let's
go down here but that's it for right now
and so I want to thank you guys so much
for watching please ring my bell ring my
bell to follow me and subscribe receive
email notifications and I want to thank
you guys so much for watching thumbs up
this video share it with your friends
see you guys soon peace love and avocados
For more infomation >> How to Find First 100 Days President Trump Trends on Google Live with Teresa - Duration: 6:38.-------------------------------------------
Man, arrested trying to set fire to South Sacramento home - Duration: 1:20.
DRE: LETICIA ORDAZ IS
JOINING US LIVE AT THE SCENE
WITH MORE ON WHAT HAPPENED.
>> GOOD MORNING.
ACCORDING TO FOLKS OUT HERE, IT
WAS A FRIGHTENING SCENE.
THEY COULDN'T BELIEVE WHAT THEY
SAW.
THE HOMEOWNER CAME OUTSIDE WITH
A MACHETE AND TRY TO STOP A MAN
WHO WAS TRYING TO TORTURE HIS
HOME.
OVERNIGHT.
NEIGHBORS CALLED 911 AND THE
FIRE DEPARTMENT AS WELL AS
SACRAMENTO POLICE.
LOOSE MORNING, THE MAN IS IN
CUSTODY FOR POURING GASOLINE AND
STARTING A FIRE.
NEIGHBORS SAY THEY HEARD AN
EXPLOSION AT CAME OUT TO HELP
AND THEY SAW THE HOMEOWNER
CHASING A MAN WITH A MACHETE AND
PINNED INTO THE GROUND.
NEIGHBORS GRABBED A GARDEN HOSE
TO TRY TO PUT OUT THE FIRE.
FIREFIGHTERS QUICKLY STOPPED THE
FLAMES.
AND FIREFIGHTERS STILL CAN'T
BELIEVE WHAT THEY SAW WHEN THEY
RESPONDED.
>> BEFORE WE FOUGHT THE FIRE, WE
HAD TO ASSIST WITH DETAINING THE
PERSON WITH A MACHETE UNTIL THEY
GOT IN THE SCENE.
>> THE HOMEOWNER WITH THE
MACHETE WAS NOT ARRESTED.
THE MAN IN CUSTODY IS SUSPECTED
OF ARSON AND HAS NOT BEEN
IDENTIFIED ACCORDING TO POLICE
DEPARTMENTS.
THIS IS NOT A RANDOM INCIDENT.
-------------------------------------------
'Godfather' Reunion: Al Pacino, James Caan, Robert Duvall Reveal Secrets | TODAY - Duration: 6:00.
FOR THE 45th ANNIVERSARY OF ONE OF THE GREATEST MOVIE FRANCHISES
IN HISTORY. >> LEAVE THE GUN.
TAKE THE CANNOLI. >> Reporter: "THE GODFATHER."
I WAS TELLING MY FRIENDS IN THE OFFICE, AND ASIDE OF THEIR
JEALOUSY, THEY WERE SURPRISED TO
HEAR IT WAS 45 YEARS. DOES IT FEEL LIKE THAT, AL?
>> EVERYTHING FEELS LONG TO ME NOW.
EVERYTHING IS IN THE DISTANCE AND I QUESTION WHETHER I DID IT
OR NOT. THAT KIND OF THING.
IT'S FINE. IT DOESN'T FEEL THAT LONG
BECAUSE IT'S IN -- SOMEWHAT IN THE IN CONSCIOUS LIFE, IT'S
REFERRED TO A LOT. IT'S EVER-PRESENT, THOSE MOVIES.
>> Reporter: "THE GODFATHER" FOLLOWS THE EPIC RISE AND FALL
OF THE CORLEONE CRIME FAMILY. >> DON'T TAKE SIDES WITH ANYONE
AGAINST THE FAMILY AGAIN. >> Reporter: AT THE HELM,
FRANCIS FORD COPPOLA, WHO SEAMLESSLY WEAVED TOGETHER
HORROR AND HEARTBREAK. >> LOOK AT THE MESS OF MY BOY.
>> THIS MAY NEVER HAPPEN AGAIN. AND IT'S ALL REALLY DUE TO
FRANCIS. >> Reporter: THE DIRECTOR.
YOUR BROTHER. >> HE'S MY BROTHER.
>> THE STORY I READ, HE DIDN'T WANT YOU IN THE MOVIE BECAUSE HE
DIDN'T WANT YOU TO HAVE TO WITNESS SOME OF WHAT HE WAS
GOING TO HAVE TO GO THROUGH IN THAT MOVIE.
>> AND IT'S ALL TRUE. IT'S ALL TRUE.
BECAUSE HE COULD HAVE BEEN FIRED AT ANY MINUTE.
APPARENTLY, THE DAILIES CAME IN VERY DARK.
VERY DARK. AT A CERTAIN MOMENT AFTER TWO
WEEKS, THEY CUT IT TOGETHER AND WENT, THERE'S SOMETHING REALLY
GREAT HERE. >> Reporter: WAS THE STUDIO IN
FAVOR OF YOU GETTING CAST AS MICHAEL CORLEONE?
>> NO. >> AS SOMEBODY SAID THERE,
BRANDO, PACINO, OVER MY DEAD BODY.
>> Reporter: THE WEDDING SCENE STICKS IN MY MIND HERE.
JUST DESCRIBE WHAT IT'S LIKE TO BE SHOOTING A SCENE, DANCING AT
WHAT WAS YOUR WEDDING, WITH MARLON BRANDO.
>> I WAS OVERWHELMED. I COULDN'T BELIEVE WHEN HE CAME
TOWARDS ME. VERY HANDSOME MAN.
I'M DANCING WITH HIM. I'M TRIPPING.
HE WAS SO KIND. >> Reporter: YOU'RE DANCING WITH
MARLON BRANDO. >> I KNOW.
>> Reporter: THE MOVIE PREMIERED IN 1972 AND BECAME THE
HIGHEST-GROSSING MOVIE OF ITS TIME.
BUT DURING FILMING, NOT EVERYONE WAS SO SURE OF ITS SUCCESS.
THE STORY GOES OUT, A COUPLE WEEKS IN, ACTUALLY AFTER THE
WEDDING SCENE WAS SHOT, YOU AND DIANE KEATON GO OUT, YOU HAVE A
COUPLE OF DRINKS AND YOU SAY, THIS MOVIE'S GOING TO SUCK.
THIS HAS BEEN A FLOP. >> BUT ALSO, COMPANY.
>> NOT ME. >> Reporter: YOU DIDN'T THINK
SO. YOU THOUGHT IT WOULD BE A HIT?
>> ABSOLUTELY. >> Reporter: WHY DID YOU THINK
IT WAS GOING TO BE A HIT? >> GREAT SCRIPT, ACTUALLY.
BUT THE WHOLE ENVIRONMENT OF SHOOTING -- FILMING SOMETHING,
AT THE TIME, SO YOUNG. AND INEXPERIENCED.
WE DIDN'T KNOW WHAT FILMMAKING WAS.
YOU KNOW, ESPECIALLY WHEN YOU'RE DOING SCENES AND YOU HEAR PEOPLE
SNICKERING FROM THE OTHER END. WELL, THIS ISN'T GOING WELL.
WHEN IS THE BALL GOING TO FALL? ANYWAY, FRANCIS, BEING AS CLEVER
AS HE IS, GETS THE SCHEDULE CHANGED AND PUTS THE SILOTSO
SCENE, SO THAT HE WILL BE IN A POSITION TO SHOW THE STUDIO
THIS, IS WHAT PACINO CAN DO. >> Reporter: COPPOLA'S BOLD
STYLE OPENED A DOOR TO A WHOLE NEW WORLD OF FILMMAKING.
HIS ORIGINAL MASTER'S THE AND ITS EQUALLY ACCLAIMED SEE SEEK
WILL. >> FIRST WAS A BIG HIT.
THE SECOND WAS GOING TO BE, YOU KNOW, THE IDEA OF PLAYING BRANDO
WHEN HE WAS YOUNGER, IT WAS GREAT.
>> Reporter: NO TREPIDATIONS OF THAT?
TAKING ON A SAME VERSION OF THE VITO CORLEONE ROLE?
>> NO. >> Reporter: WAS THE SEQUEL
BETTER THAN THE ORIGINAL? JAMES CAAN MIGHT HAVE SOMETHING
TO SAY ABOUT THAT. >> NO.
EXCEPT I WASN'T IN IT. >> IT WAS DIFFERENT.
I THINK FRANCIS WAS FRYING TO EXPRESS SOMETHING THERE THAT HE
WAS REALLY TALKING ABOUT AND THINKING OF MICHAEL AS THE --
>> BOTH WERE BETTER THAN THE THIRD ONE.
>> Reporter: "THE GODFATHER PART II" WAS THE FIRST FILM STARRING
AIL PACINO AND ROBERT DE NIRO. THEY NEVER SHARED A SCENE.
BUT THEIR APPEARANCE SPARKED RUMORS OF A RIVALRY.
ANY TRUTH TO IT? >> WE HAVE KNOWN EACH OTHER FOR
A LONG TIME. WE WERE UP FOR THE SAME PARTS.
>> WE GREW UP TOGETHER. >> YEAH.
>> ONCE I TOLD HIM, I REMEMBER, WHAT WAS THE THING WITH DePALMA?
>> "SCAR FACE." >> I SAID, IF YOU DON'T DO IT, I
MIGHT DO IT. >> THAT MOTIVATED ME.
>> Reporter: YOU GUYS ARE GREAT. HAPPY 45th ANNIVERSARY.
AND THANKS FOR BRINGING THIS GROUP TOGETHER.
>> YEAH. >> BOBBY DE NIRO MADE IT ALL
HAPPEN. >> HE DID IT.
>> HEAR IT FOR DE NIRO. >> THANK YOU, TRIBECA.
>> VERY COOL. >> SOMEWHERE, MATT IS STILL
PINCHING HIMSELF. THAT HAPPENED?
>> I THINK HE'S WATCHING. I THINK THIS MORNING HE WOKE UP
AND WATCHED THAT SEGMENT. >> HOW EXCITING.
>> IT WAS GOOD TO HEAR JAMES CAAN ECHO A SENTIMENT BY
EVERYONE WHO HAS SEEN THE TRILOGY.
THEY WERE BETTER THAN THE THIRD. >> LITTLE-KNOWN FACT, DYLAN
WATCHES THIS MOVIE EVERY CHRISTMAS.
>> IT'S ALWAYS ON. THAT MUSIC, IT GIVES ME CHILLS.
>> BY THE WAY, IF YOU CAN'T GET ENOUGH, MATT WILL HAVE
-------------------------------------------
Musique Pour Méditation Profonde ⚜ Flûte Relaxation Ambiance 🎵 - Duration: 1:07:25.
-------------------------------------------
State suggests APD save money by cutting at the top - Duration: 2:41.
TARGET 7'S NANCY LAFLIN TELLS US
THE FINGER POINTING CONTINUES.
NANCY: APS IS FACING $12 MILLION
BEING CUT FROM ITS BUDGET.
SO FAR THERE HAS BEEN TALK OF
CUTTING COMPETITIVE SPORTS FROM
THE MID-SCHOOLS, PICTURE LAYOFF
FURLOUGHS -- TEACHER LAYOFF
FURLOUGHS AND A REDUCTION IN
SUMMER SCHOOL PROGRAMS ALL WHICH
AFFECT THE KIDS.
THE GOVERNOR THINKS APS IS TOP
HEAVY AND SHOULD BE LOOKING AT
CUTS WITH THE BRASS BEFORE
ITTING THE CLASSROOM.
>> IT JUST BEGS THE QUESTION
WHAT ARE THOSE LAYERS OF
BUREAUCRACY DOING?
IS THERE A BETTER WAY TO DO IT?
NANCY: THE PUBLIC EDUCATION
DEPARTMENT SAYS APS CAN SAVE
MONEY BY CUTTING AT THE TOP.
THE STATE SENT ME DOCUMENTS
COMPARING APS'S SIX FIGURE
STAFFERS FROM 2011 AND 2016.
SIX YEARS AGO THERE WERE 20
PEOPLE MAKING MORE THAN 100
GRAND -- $100,000 A YEAR, THE
TOTAL ABOUT $2.5 MILLION.
NOW THE DISTRICT SPENDS $4
MILLION A YEAR TO PAY 35 TOP
ADMINISTRATORS MORE THAN
$100,000 A YEAR.
>> PEOPLE ARE MAKING A LOT OF
MONEY BUT OF WHAT BENEFIT TO THE
STUDENTS.
NANCY: TARGET 7 WANTED TO KNOW
WHY THE DISTRICT NEEDS 15 MORE
TOP EARNERS THAN IT HAD JUST SIX
YEARS AGO.
WHAT'S CHANGED?
I FOUND OUT THE STUDENT
ENROLLMENT HAS DROPPED SO WHY
ARE MORE ADMINISTRATORS NEEDED?
>> I DON'T KNOW OF ANY OTHER
SCHOOL DISTRICT IN NEW MEXICO
THAT HAS A CHIEF OPERATIONS
OFFICER THAT OVERSEES 146
SCHOOL
NANCY: APS SUPERINTENDENT RAQUEL
REEDY SAYS THERE REALLY ARE NOT
MORE ADMINISTRATORS THAN SIX
YEARS AGO JUST A LOT MORE MAKING
$100,000 A YEAR.
AND SHE'S DEFENDING HER STAFF
AND THEIR SALARIES.
>> WE LOOK AT DISTRICTS THAT ARE
OF COMPARABLE SIZE.
WITHIN THE SURROUNDING AREA.
WE CHECK AND SEE HOW DOES THIS
WITH -- HOW DOES THIS MATCH WITH
WHAT OTHER URBAN DISTRICTS OF
THIS SIZE ARE PAYING.
NANCY: IN MY HALF HOUR INTERVIEW
WITH THE SUPERINTENDENT WHILE
SHE SAID EVERYTHING IS ON THE
TABLE AS THE LOOK AT CUTS THERE
WAS NO APPETITE FOR CUTS AT THE
TOP.
>> WOULD THERE BE A POSSIBILITY
OF SOME OF YOUR SIX FIGURED
EMPLOYEES TAKING A SALARY PAY
CUT?
>> ONE OF THE OPTIONS WAS
FURLOUGH FOR EMPLOYEES.
FURLOUGH FOR OUR EMPLOYEES SO
THAT CERTAINLY IS IN THE REALM
OF POSSIBILITY.
NANCY: WHILE THE SUPERINTENDENT
SAYS SHE'D LIKE TO SIT DOWN WITH
THE STATE AND SEE IF THEY CAN
COME TO A CONSENSUS ON CUTS SHE
ADMITTED SHE HAS NOT MADE THE
CALL TO REQUEST A MEETING.
REEDY WAS QUICK TO POINT OUT
THAT THE STATE HASN'T CALLED HER
EITHER.
>> IF IT IS ME THAT CALLS, THAT
IS FINE.
>> DO YOU PLAN ON DOING THAT?
NANCY: I'LL BE FOLLOWING UP TO
SEE WHETHER THE SUPERINTENDENT
DOES INDEED ASK FOR A MEETING
WITH THE PUBLIC EDUCATION
DEPARTMENT.
MEANWHILE SCHOOL IS ABOUT TO END
AND NO ONE KNOWS HOW MANY
TEACHERS SHOULD BE HIRED FOR THE
FALL.
THAT IS ONLY ONE OF MANY
QUESTIONS UP IN THE AIR WHILE
THE STATE AND APS WRESTLE WITH
-------------------------------------------
Eric Green's Monday Weather Forecast - Duration: 1:33.
ERIC: JUST ABOUT A QUARTER TILL
7:00 AND HERE IS VIEW ONE OF THE
MORNING DAYBREAK AND WE CAN SEE
THIS ELEMENT OF THE SANDIA
MOUNTAINS -- THE
SILHOUETTE OF THE SANDIA
MOUNTAINS.
THE SUN IS SET TO REVEAL ITSELF
BEHIND THE MOUNTAINS.
IT'S LIKE THE OPPOSITE OF LAST
WEEK HERE.
NO WIND ISSUES EXPECTED.
WE HAVE LITTLE TO NO CHANCE OF
RAIN ON WHAT'S TO BE A VERY NICE
WEEK.
CLOSER TO 80 TOMORROW AND A
TOUCH BREEZY.
WE ARE DOING JUST FINE WEDNESDAY
AND THURSDAY AND EVEN TO FRIDAY.
BY THE WEEKEND, THAT IS WHEN THE
WINDS INCREASE.
A SMALL CHANCE FOR A
THUNDERSTORM ASSOCIATED AT THIS
POINT.
I THINK WE CAN CALL IT ALL THE
WAY DRIVE.
WATCHING FOR SOME LATE DAY CLOUD
DEVELOPMENT AND THAT WILL BE THE
CORNER OF THE STATE THAT WE
FOCUS ON FOR TUESDAY AND
WEDNESDAY.
KICKING UP SOME LATE WEEK STORMS
OUT OF SOUTHERN COLORADO AND
NORTHEAST NEW MEXICO.
THE REST OF US THAT WITH THE DRY
SKIES WITH AFTRNOON BREEZES AND
ONE TEMPERATURES.
STILL A FEW LEFTOVER SHOWERS.
YOUR AFTERNOON TEMPERATURES WILL
BE STUCK IN THE 50'S AND 60'S.
THE REST OF US ON WEDNESDAY AND
JOIN THE ABOVE AVERAGE
TEMPERATURES WITH THE BRIGHT
SKIES.
OVERALL A VERY NICE WEEK OF
-------------------------------------------
Thunderstorms to arrive Monday evening - Duration: 1:30.
STRETCH OF
95 INTO HER FOR COUNTY.
SO IT IS IN THE RANGE OF WHERE
IT IS MORE DIFFICULT TO SEE.
WE GET TO PITTSBURGH NOW.
ENERGY IS COMING IN WITH A COLD
FRONT.
STRONGER THUNDERSTORMS IN THE
EVENING.
SOME THUNDERSTORMS, IF THEY TURN
STRONG COULD PRODUCE ISOLATED
WINDS.
DEFINITELY A GOOD EVENING TO
STAY CONNECTED TO YOUR SMART
PHONE, TV AND RADIO, HOWEVER YOU
WANT TO RECEIVE WEATHER ALERTS.
WE DO EXPECT TO STAY DRY.
WE WILL BE FEELING HUMID BUT 82
DEGREES BY 4:00.
83 DEGREES IN D.C..
SHOWERS SHOULD BE REACHING
BALTIMORE SOMETIME AFTER 6:00
P.M. AND SOME OF THEM COULD BE
STRONG AROUND 8:00 OR 9:00.
ANYTHING AFTER THAT, IT SEEMS
LIKE JUST SHOWERS OR RULING
THROUGH.
WE WILL SEE DRYING CONDITIONS BY
TOMORROW MORNING.
COOL OR BY WEDNESDAY WITH
SUNSHINE AND A HIGH OF 66.
-------------------------------------------
Trump Blaming Obama For Flynn? Wrong | AM Joy | MSNBC - Duration: 11:28.
>>> I DO FEEL BADLY FOR HIM. HE SERVED THE COUNTRY.
HE WAS A GENERAL.L. BUT JUST REMEMBER, HE WAS
APPROVED BY THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION AT THE HIGHEST
LEVEL. AND WHEN THEY SAY WE DIDN'T VET,
WELL, OBAMA I GUESS DIDN'T VET BECAUSE HE WAS APPROVED AT THE
HIGHEST LEVEL OF SECURITY BY THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION.
>> AS A RUSSIA GATE UNFOLDS, THE BLAME GAME CONTINUES.
THIS TIME OVER TRUMP'S FORMER NATIONAL SECURITIER MIKE FLYNN
WHO WAS DISMISSED AFTER A BRIEF TENURE OF JUST 24 DAYS
OSTENSIBLY FOR MISLEADING WHITE HOUSE OFFICIALS ABOUT
CONVERSATIONS HE HAD WITH THE RUSSIAN AMBASSADOR.
DONALD TRUMP IS DOUBLING DOWN ON BLAMING FORMER PRESIDENT OBAMA
FOR AUTHORIZING SECURITY CLEARANCE FOR FLYNN DESPITE
OBAMA FIRED FLYNN FROM HIS JOB. BUT NBC'S "ANDREA MITCHELL
REPORTS" THE WHITE HOUSE AND TRUMP'S TRANSITION TEAM DID DO A
BACKGROUND CHECK ON FLYNN IN ADDITION TO HIS ALREADY IMPROVED
SECURITY CLEARANCE. JOINING ME IS A FORMER STATE
DEPARTMENT SPOKESPERSON, ROB REINER AND MALCOLM NANCE,
EXECUTIVE.
AUTHOR OF THE PLOT TO THE HACK AMERICA.
MALCOLM, RACHEL MADDOW HAD IT ON HER SHOW THE CLAIM THE VETTING
SHOULD HAVE BEEN DONE BY THE PREVIOUS ADMINISTRATION IS
ABSURD ON ITS OWN BUT IT TURNS OUT THERE ACTUALLY WAS A VET OF
MICHAEL ANYBODY AFTER HE WROTE AN OP-ED CLEARLY FAVORING TURKEY
WHO HE WAS TAKING MONEY FROM AND AFTER THE ADMINISTRATION
INCLUDING MIKE PENCE WERE INFORMED THAT HE WAS DOING WORK
FOR TURKEY. WHAT DO YOU MAKE OF THE
DEVELOPMENT THAT THEY DID VET HIM BUT CLAIMING THEY KNOW
NOTHING ABOUT IT? >> THEY ARE TRYING TO CONFUSE
SOMETHING WHICH IS VERY SIMPLE AMONGST PEOPLE WHO HAVE HELD A
TOP SECURITY CLEARANCE FOR A VERY LONG TIME.
WHEN YOU GET YOUR SECURITY CLEARANCE, YOU ARE GIVEN THAT
CLEARANCE AND THEN THAT CLEARANCE IS VALID FOR FIVE
YEARS. EVERY FIVE YEARS, THEY DOES AN
UPDATE. ONCE YOU'VE HAD THAT UPDATE
DONE, YOU HAVE THE ABILITY TO BE GIVEN ACCESS TO TOP SECRET OR
WHATEVER LEVEL INFORMATION THAT THEY ALLOW.
MIKE FLYNN GOT HIS SECURITY CLEARANCE FIVE-YEAR UPDATE DONE
IN 2016 WHICH IS JUST A STANDARD THING THAT WAS PERFORMED AT THE
DEFENSE DEPARTMENT. HOWEVER, THE VETTING FOR THE
WHITE HOUSE IS A COMPLETELY DIFFERENT ANIMAL.
THAT IS DONE BY THE WHITE HOUSE BY THE WHITE HOUSE STAFF, AND
EVEN THOUGH HE HELD A TOP SECRET CLEARANCE, HE COULD HAVE BEEN
RESTRICTED TO HIS ACCESS, AN AND THERE ARE TWO ENTIRELY DIFFERENT
THINGS GOING ON HERE. THEY'RE TALKING ABOUT OBAMA
DOING THE SECURITY CLEARANCE BUT IN FACT, HIS ACCESS TO TOP
SECRET INFORMATION IS ALLOWED BY THE WHITE HOUSE AS THE NEW
CONVENING AUTHORITY THAT IS RESPONSIBLE FOR HIM AND GIVING
HIM INFORMATION. SO THEY SHOULD HAVE VETTED HIM
MUCH, MUCH MORE CAREFULLY. BUT HE STILL HAS HIS CLEARANCE
EVEN NOW HE MAY STILL HAVE HIS CLEARANCE AS OPPOSED TO HIS
ACCESS. >> TO THAT VERY POINT, YOU HAVE
ALL THESE PEOPLE WHO SHOULD KNOW THAT.
SUSAN HENNESSEY WAS A BROOKINGS FELLOW EXPLAINED THE EXACT SAME
THING WE HEARD FROM MALCOLM NANCE.
THERE'S ALWAYS REINVESTIGATION AFTER YOU'VE BEEN OUT OF ACCESS
FOR A WHILE. HE WAS FIRES FROM THE DIA SO HE
WAS OUT OF GOVERNMENT. INSIDEINSIDE OF THE TRUMP WHITE,
YOU STILL SEE THIS DOUBLING DOWN ON IGNORANCE OF THE PROCESS.
JEFFERSON SESSIONS THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES,
THE ONE MEMBER OF THE TRUMP TEAM WITH GOVERNMENTAL EXPERIENCE, HE
WAS A UNITED STATES SENATOR, THIS IS HIM ATTEMPTING TO
EXPLAIN AWAY THE NONVETTING OR VETTING AND THEN FORGETTING THAT
THEY VETTED OF MICHAEL FLYNN. THIS IS SESSIONS ON FRIDAY.
>> HE'S BEEN -- WAS PART OF THE WHITE HOUSE ADVISER ON THE
NATIONAL SECURITY ISSUES. SO WE NEED TO DO A GOOD JOB OF
VETTING THAT, BUT THAT'S A COMPLEX ISSUE AND I'M NOT SURE
ANYONE COULD BE EXPECTED TO FIND THAT.
>> ARE YOU COMFORTABLE WITH THE LEVEL OF VETTING THAT WAS DONE?
>> WELL, I'M COMFORTABLE THAT THEY'RE WORKING HARD TO DO
VETTING BUT IT'S OBVIOUS THAT OFTENTIMES YOU DON'T CATCH
EVERYTHING THAT MIGHT BE A PROBLEM.
>> THEY WORK HARD ON VETTING. THEY DO THE BEST THEY CAN.
IT'S IMPOSSIBLE TO KNOW EVERYTHING.
>> FIRST OF ALL, ON GMA AND THE SECOND ONE ON NBC.
HE'S MAKING IT SOUND AS IF IT'S IMPOSSIBLE TO FIGURE OUT HOW TO
VET THE PERSON WHO IS GOING TO BE THE NATIONAL SECURITY ADVISER
TO THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES.
>> HERE'S SOME ADDITIONAL FACTS. CIA, DOJ, FBI AND WHITE HOUSE
ARE ALL INVOLVED WHEN IT COMES TO VETTING AND APPROVING AND
BACKGROUND CHECKS FOR SOMEBODY AS HIGH LEVEL AS A NATIONAL
SECURITY ADVISER. THERE IS A TON OF INFORMATION
OUT THERE. THE DIFFERENCE IS, AT SOME
POINT, SOMEBODY HAS TO MAKE A DECISION OF WHAT THEY CONSIDER
TO BE ETHICAL AND WHAT WILL PASS.
FLAGS WERE RAISED, CLEARLY THIS IS THE ENTIRE SALLY YATES KISH
HER HAVING TALKED TO THE WHITE HOUSE HAVING BEEN ASKED TO LEAVE
HERSELF BECAUSE SHE WAS QUESTIONING ACCOUNT CREDIBILITY
OF THEIR CHOICES. SOMEONE IS MAKING A POLITICAL
CHOICE EVEN THOUGH YOU HAVE SOMEBODY TAKING MONEY FROM THE
RUSSIAN GOVERNMENT, WHO HAS TAKEN MONEY FROM THE TURKISH
GOVERNMENT HAS THEN TURNED AROUND AND ADVOCATED RECOLLECTLY
FOR THEIR INTERESTS AND POLICY, NOT THAT THEY'RE JUST DOING THAT
INDEPENDENTLY BUT TRYING TO INSERT THAT INTO OUR OWN
GOVERNMENT AND POLICY SYSTEM, SOMEBODY MADE A CHOICE THAT
THAT'S OKAY AND ACCEPTABLE. THIS IS AN ENTIRE
ADMINISTRATIONWIDE NEW STANDARD OF ETHICS AND FRANKLY
UNDERMINING THE SYSTEM OF COLLECTION AND BALANCES TO BE
ABLE TO BE HAVE PEOPLE KNOWINGLY WORKING FOR FOREIGN GOVERNMENTS
IN OUR GOVERNMENT AT THE HIGHEST LEVELS.
>> ROB, ROB REINER, PART OF THIS FEELS LIKE IT'S SORT OF WHITE
NOISE OBFUSCATION. E.J. SAID ONE OF THE THINGS THIS
ADMINISTRATION HAS BEEN SUCCESSFUL AT IS THROWING UP SO
MANY SORT OF DATA POINTS THAT IT'S IMPOSSIBLE TO FIX ON ONE OF
THEM. IN THE CASE OF MICHAEL FLYNN,
PROBABLY THE MOST DAMNING STORY SO FAR IN RAUCHIA GATE, THEY'VE
WALKED IT BACK TO THE POINT WHERE IT'S ALMOST SO CONFUSING
THAT PEOPLE FORGET HE WAS WRITING OP-EDS IN JANUARY BEFORE
THE INAUGURATION. DO YOU THINK THEY'VE BEEN
SUCCESSFUL IN OBSCURING THIS ENOUGH THAT IT'S HELPED THEM
GUESS WEATHER IT FOR NOW? >> THEY CERTAINLY HAVE OBSCURED
IT UP TILL THIS POINT. THAT IS CERTAINLY THEIR INTENT.
BUT THE TRUTH ULTIMATELY WILL COME OUT.
IT MAY TAKE AWHILE AND IT IS A CONFUSING STORY.
BUT LET'S MAKE NO MISTAKE ABOUT IT.
THIS MAN WHO IS THE HEAD OF OUR COUNTRY IS A PATHOLOGICAL LIAR.
AND EVERYBODY AROUND HIM IS LYING.
THERE'S NO WAY TO OTHER WAY TO LOOK AT THIS THING.
NOT ONLY DID WE KNOW ABOUT MICHAEL FLYNN.
THERE WERE A NUMBER OF ARTICLES, THERE WAS A LETTER WRITTEN BY
THE HOUSE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE. IT WAS WELL-KNOWN WHAT MICHAEL
FLYNN WAS DOING. HE WAS FIRED BY THE BARACK
OBAMA. SO THAT IS CLEAR.
AND WHAT E.J. DIONNE SAID IS ABSOLUTELY TRUE.
THE ONE THING THAT THEY HAVE BEEN SUCCESSFUL AT SO FAR IS
OBFUSCATING THE BIGGEST SINGLE STORY THAT IS -- THAT IS
PERMEATING THIS COUNTRY RIGHT NOW, AND THAT IS THE INVASION OF
A FOREIGN POWER, A HOSTILE FOREIGN POWER INTO OUR
DEMOCRACY. AND THE MICHAEL FLYNN STORY
ASIDE FROM THE FACT THAT HE WAS TAKING MONEY FROM TURKEY, FROM
RUSSIA, FROM PLACES AND CLEARLY THAT'S A CRIMINAL BEHAVIOR, THE
MAIN PART OF THE STORY AND SOMETHING THAT WE HAVEN'T EVEN
TALKED ABOUT IS WHY? WHY WITH THE WHITE HOUSE KNOWING
FULL WELL THAT THIS IS WHO HE WAS, THEY STILL APPOINTED HIM
NATIONAL SECURITY ADVISER. AND THAT GOES TO THE STORY OF
WHY SALLY YATES HAS BEEN KICKED OFF THE STAGE.
SHE'LL NOW COME BACK ON AND THAT IS SHE OVERHEARD MICHAEL FLYNN
TALKING TO THE U.S. -- THE RUSSIAN AMBASSADOR, KISLYAK
ABOUT GETTING RID OF THE SANCTIONS.
THAT'S THE STORY. AND THAT'S WHERE WE HAVE TO
START THINKING ABOUT THE UNDERMINING OF OUR DEMOCRACY.
>> AND LET'S TAKE THE STORY TO THE NEXT LEVEL WHICH IS IT'S NOT
JUST MICHAEL FLYNN. YOU HAVE PEOPLE LIKE GORKA WHO
ARE THERE WHO IS AN AVOWED NAZI STLIIZER IN THE WHITE HOUSE
APPARENT DOING COUNTER EXTREMISM POLICY.
SO THE COGNITIVE DISSONANCE IS THERE AND PRESENT.
AND TRYING TO COVER THAT UP IS PART OF THE ADMINISTRATION
AGENDA. >> AND YOU KNOW, THE EXACT
QUESTION THAT ROB REINER JUST ASKED, ELIJAH CUMMINGS ASKED
THAT IN A SIMILAR VEIN. LET'S LISTEN TO ELIJAH CUMMINGS
ASKING WHAT IS THE SALIENT QUESTION HERE ABOUT MICHAEL
FLYNN AND THE WHITE HOUSE. >> I HONESTLY DO NOT UNDERSTAND
WHY THE WHITE HOUSE IS COVERING UP FOR MICHAEL FLYNN.
I DON'T GET IT. AFTER THE PRESIDENT FIRED HIM.
FOR LYING. THESE GUYS ARE PLAYING GAMES.
AND WHEN YOU SEE MR. SPICER, YOU CAN TELL HIM I SAID THAT TODAY.
THEY'RE PLAYING GAMEGAMES. IF WE CANNOT COME TO A
CONCLUSION THERE AND GET THE DOCUMENTS, THEN THEY'LL HAVE TO
BE SUBPOENAS. >> MALMANY COULD, AT THE END OF
THE DAY IT IS NOT ABOUT MICHAEL FLYNN.
THIS IS A WHITE HOUSE THAT HIRED HIM KNOWING WHO HE WAS AND WHAT
HE WAS DOING. THE VICE PRESIDENT CLAIMED HE
HAD NO KNOWLEDGE, GOLLY, HE HAD NO IDEA WHAT HE WAS DOING WHEN
HE DID. THEY WERE ALL INFORMED OF IT,
SALLY YATES INFORMED THEM OF IT. THEY KNEW WHAT WAS GOING ON AS
ROB SAID. HOW DO WE GET TO THE QUESTION OR
THE ANSWER WHO COORDINATED AND MADE IT SUCH THAT THIS MANY
PEOPLE WITH TIES TO RUSSIA WOUND UP EITHER IN THAT CAMPAIGN OR IN
THAT WHITE HOUSE? DO YOU FEEL CONFIDENT THAT WE
WILL EVER AN GET TO THAT QUESTION?
THAT ANSWER? >> I BELIEVE WE WILL GET TO THAT
ANSWER. AND YOU KNOW, TO GIVE CREDIT TO
A COMPONENT OF THE WHITE HOUSE, THERE ARE TWO WHITE HOUSES GOING
ON HERE. YOU HAVE THE GENERAL McMASTER,
GENERAL MATTIS WHITE HOUSE WHICH APPARENTLY HAS NONE OF THESE
PROBLEMS. EVERYBODY IS VETTED.
PEOPLE ARE CLEARED. THEN YOU HAVE THE POLITICAL
WHITE HOUSE WHICH ARE ALL OF THE ACTOR WHO'S CAME IN BEFORE
McMASTERS TOOK OVER AS NATIONAL SECURITY ADVISER.
AND THEY HAVE COMPONENTS OF THEIR LIVES, ACTIONS INNINGS
THINGS THAT THEY HAVE SAID WHICH STEM FROM JUST BEING PATENTLY
POLITICAL TO IN SOME CASES BEING EXTREMELY, EXTREMELY TIED TO A
HOSTILE NATION AND POSSIBLY TO A HOSTILE INTELLIGENCE AGENCY.
>> RIGHT. >> THAT STORY UP TO THE MINUTE
McMASTER IS HIRED AS NATIONAL SECURITY ADVISER, EVERYTHING
BEFORE THAT IS GOING TO BE A DRAMATIC STORY IN THE HISTORY OF
THE UNITED STATES AND QUITE POSSIBLY THE WORST SCANDAL.
AND THE ONLY THING DONALD TRUMP HAS GOING FOR HIM IS THAT HE HAS
McMASTER AND MATTIS TO MAINTAIN THE CONTINUITY OF THIS
GOVERNMENT AT THIS POINT AND THEY ARE THE ONLY BENEFIT THAT
AGAIN HE HAS IN HIS INTERESTS. >> I THINK IT'S CLEAR THIS IS
THE BIGGEST STORY AND BIGGEST SCANDAL IN A PRESIDENTIAL
ADMINISTRATION PROBABLY IN U.S. HISTORY.
IT'S VERY CONFUSING AND HARD TO FOLLOW.
BUT WE APPRECIATE ALWAYS HAVING YOU GUYS TO HELP US DO THAT.
THANK YOU. APPRECIATE YOU GUYS.
AND UP
-------------------------------------------
Say v Tell v Speak v Talk 💬 Simple English Grammar Lesson - Duration: 5:32.
Hi, how are you today? This is Greg from
www.onlinelanguageacademy.com and in this
video I'm going to be answering a
question I received on our Facebook page
and it's about the difference between
tell, say, speak and talk. So let's go!
Right, let's first start by looking at
the difference between say and tell.
This is a really, really common mistake among
language learners, English language
learners, like you and I talk about it
in my free eBook English Quick Fix.
It's one of the 16 steps to take your English
to the next level. Click the e-book.
So, say and tell. Basically the rule is simple,
we say something and we tell someone.
All right? So the verb you need depends on what follows the verb.
So, what follows the verb?
A person, like me, him, her, Andrew,
Peter, or a thing, a phrase, like happy birthday!
I went shopping. You look nice today.
All right, we need to think what follows
the verb and that will tell us which verb we need.
Let's have a look at some
examples and that's really going to help
us see it in context and understand this rule.
Okay, so let's first have a look at some examples with tell:
I've already told you the answer three times.
I've already told you the answer three times.
So the person is you, I've already told you the answer three times.
We can't say, say you,
we can't follow say by a person.
If the next word is a person we need tell.
Let's have a look at another example:
My students tell me, my students tell me
that they love my YouTube channel.
Okay, the person is ME, my students tell me
they love my YouTube channel and if you do too click subscribe.
Third example is:
Katy told Peter that she wanted to eat out.
Katy told Peter, so the person is Peter.
Katy told Peter that she wanted to eat out.
Okay, so if the next word is a person we use tell.
Now let's have a look at some examples with say.
Remember, we follow say with a phrase: Joe said he was coming to the party.
Alright, so the phrase is: he was coming
to the party or he is coming to the party.
Joe said that, Joe said that he was coming to the party.
This is reported speech. Okay, and when we use reported
speech we always use say.
Example two: If you see Jill say hello from me,
if you see Jill say hello from me, say happy birthday from me.
Example three: Rob said it wasn't fair and left the meeting.
Rob said it wasn't fair and left the meeting.
Okay, so again it's a phrase:
it wasn't fair. This is a phrase so we need said.
Now, speak and talk are very similar.
We speak a language. I speak English, I
speak Spanish, I also speak French and I
speak a little bit of Italian, speak a language.
But when we're talking about
communication, all right, speak is... it's
a more formal, it has a more
formal and serious tone. And it also has
more of a one-way communication.
Like I'm speaking to you, okay?
You're not replying to me, but I'm speaking to you.
Talk is more like two-way conversation
So if you are ever in the Chicago area
call me and we can meet for coffee and we
can talk about life, we can talk about
this, we can talk about your studies, we
can talk about whatever you want .
Okay, so talk is more
two-way, speak is more one-way and we
also speak a language, we don't talk a language.
Subscribe if you've liked this
video and give it a thumbs up too, hey?
And don't forget to get my free eBook and to
keep watching my YouTube videos if you
want to take your English to the next level.
Okay, thanks for being here and bye for now.
-------------------------------------------
Your Monday Morning KSBW Weather Forecast 5.1.17 - Duration: 2:39.
ART: GOOD MORNING T YOU.
A LIVE VIEW FROM THE HOTEL.
IN FACT THAT IS THE MONTEREY
LOOKING OUT IN THE DISTANCE
HERE, YOU CAN SEE THE PATCHY FOG
OUT THERE EXTENDING TO
WATSONVILLE.
IT IS DOWN TO FOUR MILES NOW.
TEMPERATURES AT 49 DEGREES.
MONTEREY IS ALSO 49.
GET INTO THE EASTERN PORTION OF
THE COUNTY PATCHING FOG THERE
AND TEMPERATURES WIDESPREAD
THROUGH THE 40'S.
AND SANTA CRUISE, THE
TEMPERATURES AROUND 52 DEGREES.
WE HAVE HIGH PRESSURE IN PLACE,
THAT MEANS WE WILL START TO SEE
THE OFFSHORE WINDS COMING.
THE OTHER DAY I TOLD YOU THE
NORTH, THE NORTHEAST BY
TOMORROW, AND POSSIBLY INTO
WEDNESDAY BEFORE THEY BREAKDOWN
AND WE GET THE SOUTHERLY SURGE
IN HERE AND WE ALL START TO SEE
COOLER CONDITIONS COMING IN.
IN FACT FOR MONDAY, GOOD-LOOKING
NUMBERS HERE.
STILL A BIT COOL INTO THE
OVERNIGHT HOURS.
BREEZY AS WELL.
WE GET INTO TUESDAY, HIGH
PRESSURE CONTINUES TO BUILD
BACK, KNOCKING THE NUMBERS BACK
INTO THE 9'S.
60Y'S, 70'S, 80'S ON THE BEACHES
AND WEDNESDAY WE START TO SEE
THE ONSHORE FLOW BREAKING DOWN.
AND THE SOUTHERLY SURGE THROUGH
THURSDAY.
AND BREEZY CONDITIONS THURSDAY
AND FRIDAY.
AND THE RAINFALL RETURNING BACK
TO NORTHERN CALIFORNIA.
AN AREA OF LOW PRESSURE WILL
MOVE DOWN ON THE COASTLINE INTO
SATURDAY AND SUNDAY.
PROBABILITY FOR RAINFALL COMING
IN SUNDAY AND THEN RETURNING
AGAIN FOR MONDAY FOR WRAPAROUND
SHOWERS.
50'S, 60'S, 70'S ALONG THE
BEACHES HERE.
NEAR 80 DEGREES IN CASES.
80'S IN THE INTERIOR VALLEY.
AND 88 FOR BAKERSFIELD.
AND 99 INTO PALM SPRINGS.
SO TODAY FOR THE COAST, SUNNY
CONDITIONS.
PATCHY MORNING FOG I MENTIONED
WITH WARMER TEMPERATURES.
INLAND IN THE MOUNTAINS AND OF
COURSE THE INLAND VALLEYS
SUNSHINE.
AGAIN WITH WARMER TEMPERATURES
AND AN AFTERNOON SEA BREEZE FROM
10 TO 20 MILES PER HOUR.
WE WILL GO FROM TEMPERATURES IN
SAN FRANCISCO 83.
AND SOUTH BAY THE NUMBERS IN THE
MID TO UPPER 80'S THROUGH THE
SANTA CLARA VALLEY.
A NICE SPOT TO SEE A LITTLE WARM
AND WINDS YOU WILL GET MORE HEAT
PUMPING UP THROUGH THERE.
90 IN KING CITY.
AND SALINAS 78 DEGREES.
IS GETTING TO 71 IN CARAMEL BY
THE SEA.
AND THE BEACHES BY MONTEREY
UPPER 60'S AND AROUND THE LOW
70'S
THE LOW 80'S TO MID 8PY'S ON
THE -- 80'S TODAY.
AND TONIGHT, CLEAR PATCHY FOG.
THE TEMPERATURES 47 DEGREES.
AND THEN THE COAST AND
TEMPERATURES ARE GOING TO
-------------------------------------------
Brockmire | 'The Wrong Line' Official Clip | IFC - Duration: 1:46.
[Upbeat music plays]
Pre-gaming this abortion, darling --
it was the best idea that you ever had.
Jules: I know.
I've been cutting back so much.
Now we have to celebrate.
Oh, I agree. [Sniffles]
And don't mind if I do!
Ooh, that's got a kick.
[Sniffles] Oh, what the hell?
What the hell?
[Sniffing]
[Groaning]
Ooh!
Okay.
Hello!
[Chuckles]
Baby! Oh!
Thoughtful.
Mm-hmm.
Look at how nice that is.
Cheers.
Let's do this.
Yeah.
Wait, where's my pill?
I don't know. Where is your pill?
I chopped it up so I could toot it.
You know I don't like swallowing lumps of medicine.
[Distorted music plays]
You snorted my abortion.
Oh! Oh, you should know better than to --
First of all, greedy!
Second of all, are you freaking kidding me?
All right, all right, all right.
Okay, I'm -- I'm gonna die, right?
Am I gonna die?
I don't know.
Am I going to die?
I don't know!
Well, let's find out.
Oh, my God. Oh!
What should we do? All right.
What are we gonna do?
Okay, it burns. I -- [Stammers] Oh, it burns.
-------------------------------------------
Brockmire Meets Mr. Met | IFC - Duration: 3:07.
♪♪
Okay, so, Mr. Met, first question.
What are you?
Seriously. What-what are you?
You're Mr. Met. I see that.
Double zero, Mr. Met.
But what are you?
Are ya-are you a baseball
that a child wished to become his only friend,
and then you're the result?
Maybe? Was that your origin?
Could be. Somebody like--
You ever see that movie, "Big", with Tom Hanks?
Right. You seen that?
Yes, he made a wish and it came true.
I think a child mighta made a wish,
and some Christmas magic got involved,
and then you were the result.
Uh, well, are you...
are you kinda like Frankenstein's monster?
Are you the result of-of a science experiment
that went just too far?
Was somebody messin' around-- Exactly!
Oh, maybe you were.
Look at that. Terrifying, Mr. Met.
Terrifying.
Can I do somethin' I've always wanted to do?
Boop!
Oh, look at that. Delightful.
Maybe one more time. Ready?
Boop!
Oh, Mr. Met, he got all coy.
(chuckling)
Now, you know what, I'm just noticing something.
They give ya, well, it's an enormous hat,
but it's still not big enough for ya, Mr. Met.
Ya ever ask for a bigger hat?
Yeah, one that fits, right?
Must be uncomfortable.
'Cause I imagine they-they have to glue that one on,
or staple it onto your head.
Which is it, staple or glue?
Either way? Doesn't matter to you.
As long as it stays.
I under-- I now understand Mr. Met,
which is makin' me worry.
Now, here's--
If I can get serious with ya for a moment.
Why are you so emotionally shallow
that you require the affection of children?
What's that all about?
Ah, ya see? Uh-oh.
Yeah, we had a-we had a moment here.
It's like a Barbara Walters thing now.
I made Mr. Met cry.
So what is that all about?
Oh, you're better now? He got better.
He wiped the tears away.
You know what, I usually--
I call baseball games,
but ya know what I'm enjoyin' more,
calling what you do.
I'm really-- Yeah, you're pointing at me.
Yeah, you got it. Yes, thumbs up.
See, it's-it's fun. Try it at home.
All right, well, thank you, Mr. Met.
It's been fantastic. Yeah, no, I enjoy--
Oh, you wanna hug again?
All right.
All right, well, let's hug it out.
Okay, Mr. Met.
Okay, all right. Mr. Met.
Oh-- All right.
No, we're do-- Okay, we're done.
Ah, man, he's doin' it again.
I can't-- You know, fool me twice,
shame on me, Mr. Met.
What do ya-- Let it go!
It's creepy now. It's weird!
Mr. Met!
Ah, you see, that's why I don't like Mr. Met.
He's all over me. You're handsy, Mr. Met.
Oh, look at him now.
He's celebrating his victory.
Yeah, terrible.
Mr. Met. Double zero, Mr. Met.
Give it up for him.
♪♪
-------------------------------------------
Schiff: House Is Investigating "Tactics Russia Used Elsewhere" | MSNBC - Duration: 10:39.
OKAY. >> Reporter: HUGE
RESPONSIBILITY. >>> LET'S BRING IN DEMOCRATIC
CONGRESSMAN ADAM SCHIFF. GLAD TO HAVE YOU CONGRESSMAN.
LET'S GET TO THE TOP OF THE HOUR.
WE HEARD THE PRESIDENT'S RESPONSE TO NORTH KOREA'S LATEST
PROVOCATIONS. HE'S NOT TAKING MILITARY ACTION
OFF THE TABLE. DO YOU THINK WE'RE HEADED DOWN
THAT PATH? >> I CERTAINLY HOPE NOT BECAUSE
THERE REALLY ARE NO GOOD MILITARY OPTIONS.
THE NORTH KOREANS CAN DEVASTATE SOUTH KOREA BY THE USE OF
CONVENTIONAL ARTILLERY. IT'S APPROPRIATE FOR THE
ADMINISTRATION TO PUT PRESSURE ON CHINA.
CHINA IS A REAL KEY TO CHOKING OFF THE ECONOMIC LIFELINE FOR
NORTH KOREA. BUT AN EXCESS OF SABER RATTLING
IS VERY DANGEROUS. WE HAVE AN UNPREDICTABLE LEADER
IN NORTH KOREA. WE DON'T WANT TO PROVOKE A
CONFRONTATION THAT COULD RESULT IN A TREMENDOUS LOSS OF LIFE.
AND WE ALSO DON'T WANT TO SEE THE PRESIDENT BACK HIMSELF INTO
A CORNER WHERE IF THE NORTH KOREAN LEADER GOES FORWARD WITH
A NUCLEAR TEST OR SOME OTHER PROVOCATION THAT THE PRESIDENT
FEELS HE NEEDS TO USE MILITARY FORCE OR ESSENTIALLY LOSE FACE.
SO IT'S A VERY TREACHEROUS SITUATION AND I WOULD URGE THE
PRESIDENT TO WALK SOFTLY AND CARRY A BIG STICK.
HE DOESN'T NEED BE BRANDISHING THE MILITARY OPTION IN A WAY
THAT COULD PROVOKE AN UNEXPECTED ESCALATION.
>> I WANT TO GET YOUR INTERPRETATION, SIR, INTO WHAT
WE HEARD FROM JOHN McCAIN WHICH WAS REACTION TO THE PRESIDENT'S
TWEET SAYING THE MISSILE TEST WAS DISRESPECTFUL TO CHINA.
IS THERE A STRATEGIC REASON WHY THE PRESIDENT SAID THAT?
COULD HE BE TRYING DISTANCE HIMSELF FROM THIS SITUATION?
>> I THINK WHAT HE'S TRYING TO DO IS APPEAL TO THE CHINESE
PRESIDENT TO DO MORE AN BY SAYING THIS ISN'T REALLY
CRITICISM OR REFLECTION ON THE UNITED STATES, IT'S A REFLECTION
ON THE CHINESE LEADER. I DON'T THINK THAT WILL WORK.
IT MAY BE BETTER THAN GETTING OUT AND CACASTIGATING THE CHINE
LEADER. I THINK WHAT WILL RESONATE WITH
CHINA FRANKLY MORE THAN A TWEET SUGGESTING THIS IS A HUMILIATION
FOR THE CHINESE PRESIDENT IS TO VERY MATTER OF FACT MAKE IT
CLEAR TO CHINA THAT IF THEY DON'T CRACKDOWN ON NORTH KOREA
WE'LL BE FORCED TO TAKE STEPS TO DEFEND OURSELVES, DEFEND OUR
ALLIES IN THE REGION THAT CHINA ISN'T GOING TO WANT TO SEE
HAPPEN IN TERMS OF AN ACCELERATION OF MISSILE DEFENSE,
GREATER NAVAL PRESENCE AND MOST POTENT OF ALL IMPOSITION OF
SECONDARY SANCTIONS. >>> LET'S GET TO THE PRESIDENT'S
LATEST COMMENTS NOW ABOUT THE TRUMP-RUSSIA INVESTIGATION.
LET'S WATCH WHAT HE SAID FIRST IN AN INTERVIEW ON FRIDAY.
>> THEY CALLED THE FAKE RUSSIA STORY.
RUSSIA STORY WAS MADE UP BECAUSE THEY WERE EMBARRASSED BY THEIR
LOSS AND THIS TREMENDOUS LOSS, A LOSS LIKE NOBODY HAS EVER SEEN
BEFORE. AND NOT ONLY DID I WIN, I WON
EASILY. THEY MADE UP THIS RUSSIA THING
TO TRY TO DEFLECT BECAUSE THEY ARE EMBARRASSED BY WHAT
HAPPENED. >> CONGRESSMAN, HAVE YOU SEEN
ENOUGH THAT YOU'RE CONFIDENT THAT STATEMENT WILL BE PROVE
CONVENIENT FALSE THROUGH HARD EVIDENCE?
>> I THINK THERE'S NO QUESTION ABOUT IT.
THE INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY IS QUITE UNIFORM IN ITS CONCLUSION
THAT RUSSIA WAS INVOLVED IN HACKING THE ELECTION.
I'LL TELL YOU WHAT'S MOST STRIKING TO ME ABOUT THE 100
DAYS AND THE COMMENTS HE'S MADE JUST WITHIN THE LAST 24 TO 48
HOURS IS DAY 101 LOOKS A LOT LIKE DAY ONE.
DONALD TRUMP STILL IN DENIAL RUSSIANS WERE INVOLVED IN
HACKING OUR ELECTIONS. HE SAID ON "FACE THE NATION" IT
COULD HAVE BETWEEN CHINESE. HE'S REFUSING TO RELEASE HIS TAX
RETURNS. HE'S STILL BLAMING OBAMA FOR
THINGS OPINION HE'S STILL BAGGING ABOUT THE SIZE OF HIS
ELECTORAL COLLEGE WIN. THIS IS ALL THE SAME STUFF WE
HEARD ON DAY ONE. THIS IS VERY DISCOURAGING
BECAUSE IT SUGGESTS, MORE THAN SUGGESTS THAT THIS PRESIDENT IS
NOT GROWING WITH THE JOB AND WE CAN EXPECT THE SAME THING ON THE
FIRST DAY OF THE ADMINISTRATION, ON THE LAST DAY OF THIS
ADMINISTRATION. AND THAT, I THINK, IS DEEPLY
DISCOURAGE. >> WHERE DO YOU THINK THE
INVESTIGATION INTO RUSSIA, THOSE STANDS RIGHT NOW BASED ON
EVERYTHING YOU'VE LEARNED IN THE INVESTIGATION?
>> I CAN PROBABLY ONLY TALK ABOUT PROCESS AT THIS POINT.
I CAN REPORT, I THINK, AND PLEASED TO DO SO, WE'RE BACK ON
TRACK IN THE HOUSE INTELLIGENCE COMMITTEE.
WE'RE BACK TO SCHEDULING WITNESSES.
WE'RE REVIEWING ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS.
WE'RE REQUESTING ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS.
WE'RE DOING THE STEPS WE SHOULD BE TAKE STEPS WE SHOULD BE
TAKING. THAT'S VERY POSITIVE.
WE'RE LOOKING INTO A RANGE OF ISSUES INCLUDING, OBVIOUSLY,
ISSUE OF ANY COORDINATION BETWEEN THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN AND
RUSSIA BUT ALSO THE U.S. GOVERNMENT RESPONSE TO THE
HACKING. WERE WE TOO LETHARGIC HOW WE
DEALT WITH IT. WE'RE LOOKING AT THE ISSUES OF
WHETHER THE INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY WAS RIGHT IN ITS
CONCLUSION ABOUT WHY RUSSIA GOT INVOLVED IN TERMS OF HURTING
SECRETARY CLINTON AND HELPING DONALD TRUMP.
SO I THINK WE'RE PROCEEDING MUCH AS WE SHOULD BE.
>> I'M GOING TO TRY AND SEE IF I CAN GET YOU IN A DETAIL.
BASED ON SOMETHING YOU SAID IN AN EARLIER INTERVIEW WHEN YOU
SAID THEY USED, FOR EXAMPLE, THEY USED BLACKMAIL,
COMPROMISING MATERIAL, USED FINANCIAL ENTANGLEMENT, HACKING,
DUMPING, THEY'VE USED PAID MEDIA TROLLS.
SOME OF THESE THINGS WE KNOW THEY HAVE USED HERE.
CAN YOU BE SPECIFIC AS TO WHAT YOU KNOW THEY'VE USED HERE?
>> I THINK IT'S QUITE CLEAR FROM THE PUBLIC RECORD THAT,
OBVIOUSLY, THEY WERE DEEPLY INVOLVED IN HACKING DEMOCRATIC
INSTITUTIONS. THAT THEY WERE INVOLVED IN THE
DUMPING OF THESE DOCUMENTS THROUGH CUT-OUTS LIKE WIKILEAKS,
DC LEAKS. WE KNOW THEY HAD A VERY
EXTENSIVE MEDIA OPERATION. WE'RE INVESTIGATING SOME OF THE
OTHER TACTICS THAT THE RUSSIANS HAVE USED ELSEWHERE IN TERMS OF
WHETHER THEY HAVE THE EXPLICIT HELP OF U.S. PERSONS, WHETHER
THEY HAD COMPROMISING MATERIAL, WHETHER THEY USED FINANCIAL
ENTANGLEMENT TO GET PEOPLE TO, YOU KNOW, SUPPORT POLICIES THAT
ARE FAVORABLE TO RUSSIA. SO THESE ARE ISSUES THAT WE'RE
PROPERLY LOOKING INTO. THERE ARE STRATEGEMS THAT THE
RUSSIANS HAVE USED ELSEWHERE. >> HOW ABOUT THE HEARINGS.
SALLY YATES IS TESTIFYING FOR THE FIRST TIME ALONG WITH OTHERS
THAT INCLUDE THE FORMER DIRECTOR OF NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE, JAMES
CLAPPER AND JAMES BRENNAN. WHAT DO YOU EXPECT TO COME OUT
OF THESE HEARINGS? >> WE HAVE A COUPLE OF HEARINGS
THAT WE HAVE SCHEDULE OR TRYING TO SCHEDULE.
WE HAVE ONE, A CLOSED HEARING WITH DIRECTORS COMEY AND REMARKS
THE DIRECTOR OF THE FBI AND DIRECTOR OF THE NSA.
THEY TESTIFIED IN OPEN SESSION. WE'LL HAVE A CLOSED HEARING LATE
NEXT WEEK WITH THEM SO WE CAN ASK QUESTIONS THEY WEREN'T ABLE
TO ANSWER IN OPEN SESSION. WE ALSO ATTEMPTED TO RESCHEDULE
THE OPEN HEARING WITH SALLY YATES AND CLAPPER AND BRENNAN.
WE'RE IN THE PROCESS OF TALKING WITH THEIR TEAM TO TRY TO SET
THAT UP. OF COURSE, THERE'S ALSO A
HEARING THAT'S GOING TO GO ON WITH AT LEAST A COUPLE OF THOSE
WITNESSES IN THE SENATE. WE'RE DOING OUR BEST TO
COORDINATE. I THINK WE'LL LEARN MORE ABOUT
WHAT WENT INTO MICHAEL FLYNN'S FIRING.
I THINK THE PUBLIC WILL LEARN A LOT MORE ABOUT THE NATURE OF THE
RUSSIAN INTERVENTION IN OUR ELECTION AND ONE OF THE REASONS
WHY I THINK THE OPEN HEARINGS ARE SO IMPORTANT IS WE CAN'T
CONDUCT THIS INVESTIGATION SOLELY IN PRIVATE SESSION AND AT
SOME LATER POINT THROW OPEN THE DOORS HERE'S OUR REPORT,
AMERICA, BELIEVE IT. WE NEED TO BRING THE COUNTRY
ALONG WITH THE INVESTIGATION. LET THEM UNDERSTAND IN GENERAL
OUTLINE WHO WE'RE TALKING TO, WHAT ISSUES WE'RE EXPLORING,
WHAT PROGRESS WE'RE MAKING TO THE DEGREE WE CAN, OBVIOUSLY
SOME WILL HAVE TO BE DONE IN CLOSED SESSION.
IT'S VERY IMPORTANT TO KEEP THE PUBLIC INFORMED THE BEST WE CAN.
>> ANOTHER BIG ISSUE ON YOUR AGENDA YOU INTRODUCED A BILL IN
CONGRESS THIS WEEK WHICH IS AIMED AT FORMALLY AUTHORIZING
MILITARY FORCE AGAINST ISIS, AIG AND THE TALIBAN.
IS THIS IN RESPONSE TO THE 2001 UMF.
IS THAT OUTDATED. >> ABSOLUTELY.
THIS IS SOMETHING I'VE BEEN TRYING TO GET A VOTE ON FOR
SEVERAL YEARS. TIM KAINE HAS BEEN WORKING ON
THE SAME ISSUE IN HIS RESPECTIVE HOUSE.
BUT, UNFORTUNATELY, YOU KNOW, I THINK YOU HAVE TO LAY A LOT OF
THE RESPONSIBILITY HERE WITH THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION.
WE'RE STILL USING THESE OLD AUTHORIZATIONS THAT DON'T FIT
THE CONFLICT WE'RE IN. INDEED BEING USED TO USE FORCE
AGAINST ISIS WHICH DIDN'T EVEN EXIST AT THE TIME OF 9/11 AND
THE AUTHORIZATION WE PASSED AFTER 9/11 AUTHORIZED FORCE ON
THOSE THAT ATTACKED US. ORGANIZATION THAT DIDN'T EXIST
AT THE TIME DOESN'T FIT. BECAUSE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION
MASSACRE PRETTY IT THAT WAY GIVES THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION
FREE REIGN TO DO THE SAME THING WHICH PUTS LITTLE LIMIT ON THE
PRESIDENT'S USE OF FORCE AGAINST ANYONE ASSOCIATED WITH AL QAEDA
OR ISIS. THAT'S A REAL PROBLEM IN TERMS
OF PROVIDING A REAL CHECK AND BALANCE BY THE CONGRESS ON THE
EXECUTIVE BRANCH AND ITS ABILITY TO MAKE WAR.
I WOULD HOPE WE CAN TAKE THIS UP OR SOMETHING LIKE IT THAT WOULD
REPEAL THESE OLD AUTHORITIES THAT WOULD SET A NEW MORE
LIMITED AUTHORITY AND RE-ESTABLISH CONGRESS'S ROLE IN
DECLARING WAR OR REFUSING TO AUTHORIZE WAR.
>> DO YOU AT ALL WORRY THAT CAN ALSO TIE THE HANDS OF A
PRESIDENT IN AN EMERGENCY SITUATION?
DOES IT CONCERN YOU AT ALL? >> YOU KNOW, IT DOESN'T BECAUSE
IN AN EMERGENCY THE PRESIDENT HAS THE ARTICLE II POWER TO DO
ANYTHING NECESSARY TO DEFEND THE COUNTRY OR TO DEFEND OUR TROOPS
OVERSEAS. SO HE HAS THAT INHERENT POWER.
FRANKLY FAR MORE WORRIED WE'VE GIVEN THIS PRESIDENT A BLANK
CHECK. WHILE I HAVE MORE CONFIDENCE IN
THE LAST PRESIDENT, THE LAST PRESIDENT WOULDN'T ABUSE THE
BLANK CONNECT I WOULDN'T WANT THE LAST PRESIDENT TO OPERATE IN
THAT OPEN ENDED AUTHORITY. I CERTAINLY DON'T WANT THIS
PRESIDENT TO DO SO. I HOPE MANY OF MY REPUBLICAN
COLLEAGUES WOULD FEEL THE SAME WAY AND WE CAN MAKE THIS A
STRONG BIPARTISAN
-------------------------------------------
Deadly motorcycle crashes on the rise - Duration: 1:52.
OU TO DO.
SANDRA: DEADLY MOTORCYCLE
CRASHES THIS YEAR ARE NEARLY
DOUBLE WHAT THEY WERE AT THE
LAST -- AT THE SAME TIME LAST
YEAR.
AND THE WORST PART IS SOME OF
THESE CRASHES COULD HAVE BEEN
AVOIDED.
MANY OF US HAVE DRIVEN RIGHT
PAST THIS, A MANGLED MOTORCYCLE
IN THE MIDDLE OF THE STREET, A
MOTORCYCLIST INJURED, OR WORSE,
KILLED.
PAUL PADILLA DIED IN THIS SANTA
FE CRASH EARLIER THIS MONTH.
POLICE SAY THE DRIVER THAT HIT
HIM WAS DRUNK.
>> TEXTING WHILE DRIVING, THE
DUI PROBLEM IN THE STATE.
SANDRA: RAYMOND GALLEGOS DIDN'T
KNOW THE VICTIM BUT UNDERSTANDS
WHAT HIS LOVED ONES ARE GOING
THROUG
>> I HAVE LOST FRIENDS AND
FAMILY MEMBERS TO THE ROAD.
SANDRA: I FOUND OUT SERIOUS
MOTORCYCLE CRASHES ARE ON THE
RISE.
NUMBERS FROM THE NEW MEXICO
MOTORCYCLE SAFETY FOUNDATION
SHOW THERE HAVE BEEN 81 CRASHES
SO FAR THIS YEAR.
THAT'S COMPARED TO 46 AT THIS
TIME LAST YEAR.
12 OF THIS YEAR'S CRASHES HAVE
BEEN DEADLY.
COMPARED TO 5 LAST YEA
A SPIKE IN CRASHES HAS SOME
WRITERS WONDERING IF THE RIGHT
IS EVEN WORTH IT.
>> SOMETIMES A GET A FEELING
TODAY IS NOT A GOOD DAY TO RIDE.
SANDRA: THESE BIKERS TELL ME
THEY KNOW THE RISK EVERY TIME
THEY GET ON.
>> SOMEBODY IS GOING TO BE
SUFFERING AND SOMEBODY IS NOT
COMING HOME TONIGHT.
THAT COULD BE ANY ONE OF US.
SANDRA: THEY ARE EXTRA SAFE ON
THE ROADS NOW.
AND THEY WANT YOU TO DO THE SAME
TO AVOID SOMETHING LIKE THIS.
GALLEGOS TELLS ME HE THINKS PART
OF THE PROBLEM IS THERE AREN'T
ENOUGH TRAFFIC OFFICERS LOOKING
FOR SPEEDERS DRUNK DRIVERS OR
-------------------------------------------
Ohio Quadruplets Choose Between Harvard And Yale And Reveal Their Decision On Air | TODAY - Duration: 1:58.
>>> THIS IS TIME WHEN WE TREND. >> REMEMBER WHEN WE INTRODUCED
YOU TO THE QUADRUPLETS OF OHIO. ALL FOUR OF THE BROTHERS WERE
ACCEPTED TO HARVARD AND YALE AND A BUNCH OF OTHER GREAT COLLEGES.
WE HAVE INFORMATION NOW. THEY'RE FACETIMING US.
THEY HAVE SOME EXCITING NEWS. THEY HAVE THEIR A.P. EXAMS, TOO.
ARE YOU WITH US? NIGEL, ZACH, AARON AND NICK.
GOOD MORNING TO YOU. WE HEAR YOU.
WE DON'T SEE YOU. OKAY.
WE LOST THE SHOT. BUT CAN YOU HEAR US?
>> DO WE HAVE THE AUDIO? >> I THINK IT'S GONE.
>> MY GOSH. WELL, THAT WENT WELL.
>> THAT WOULD HAVE BEEN SO GOOD. I'M NOT GOING TO TELL YOU GUYS
IN CASE WE GET THE SHOT BACK. >> THERE THEY ARE.
>> ALL RIGHT, GUYS, TELL US -- I KNOW YOU WERE GOING TO GO TO
DIFFERENT SCHOOLS. WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO DO?
WHERE ARE YOU GOING TO GO? >> WE'RE ALL GOING TO YALE.
>> I LOVE IT. [ APPLAUSE ]
>> THAT'S AMAZING. >> NOW, WILL YOU ALL ROOM
TOGETHER? >> HOW DID YOU DECIDE ON YALE?
>> WELL, IT REALLY WHAT DECIDED FOR US WAS THE BULLDOG DAYS.
AND SO, WE REALLY ENJOYED AND HAD A GREAT TIME THERE.
WE FELT IT WOULD WORK BEST FOR ALL OF US TO GO TO YALE.
>> THEY WERE GENUINELY NICE AND WANTED TO HAVE US.
>> WE LOVE YOUR CAMERAMAN, TOO. >> I WAS ABOUT TO ASK.
IS THAT MY MOM SHOOTING THAT VIDEO?
GUYS, CONGRATULATIONS TO YOU. >> THAT'S GREAT.
>> SO HAPPY FOR YOU. THEY WERE CUTE.
MAYBE WE SHOULD GO TO THE SAME SCHOOL SO OUR PARENTS DON'T HAVE
TO GO TO
-------------------------------------------
Brockmire Meets The Mets | IFC - Duration: 2:08.
♪♪
(Brockmire) The Majors. The Bigs.
The Show. So many names.
They all mean the same thing.
Go Mets!
It's the pinnacle of a baseball world.
What is a Met?
What is it? What's a Met?
What is a Met?
A city person, right?
You know, that's a good question.
I've lived here all my life,
and I still can't even give you that answer.
Metropolitanos.
Si.
Mets is one-- It's like a person, Mets.
It's a person?
A person, yeah.
So the New York... people.
Yeah, I-I probably shoulda done
some homework before I came in here.
A baseball team.
Yeah, exactly! That's my favorite answer.
(chuckling)
♪♪
How naked does it get in there?
I mean, like, are some guys more naked than others?
Yeah, I would have to say there's guys
that are more naked than others.
Will ya name names?
I won't name names.
(speaking Spanish)
(woman) A siren.
Who does that?
Is there a guy or two that's, like,
the old guy at the "YMCA," that you're like, "Oh, man.
(chuckling)
"It's just as easy to put a towel on
"as it is to flop your junk at me right now."
You'll get your occasional guy
that-that decides, hey, you know,
I wanna try to show off.
At the YMCA, that's always the old guy.
♪♪
What's a fart protocol in there?
Is it just the Wild West in there?
Anything goes, or are there rules?
I think it's the Wild West, anything goes.
(chuckling)
You can fart anywhere.
Is it just whatever happens?
It's just whatever happens.
Nice.
There's no rules.
I'm sorry. I'm sorry.
Do ya cropdust?
Do ya purposely--
You got-you got one in the chamber,
and ya let it go and then come back?
Yeah. Yeah.
Yeah, ya do?
Oh, yeah.
Ah, thanks for being honest, Neil Walker.
(laughing)
♪♪
-------------------------------------------
自我价绍#1 - Duration: 1:51.
-------------------------------------------
Brockmire on the Field | IFC - Duration: 2:08.
♪♪
(Brockmire) The Majors. The Bigs.
The Show. So many names.
They all mean the same thing.
Go Mets!
It's the pinnacle of a baseball world.
♪♪
All right, here we are with five of our favorite
New York Mets.
Now... oh, no.
Wait, time out.
Here we are at City Field,
which means that we're basically
in the flight plan of JFK.
Does that drive you crazy?
Does that get annoying?
(plane soaring above, muffled chatter)
All right, part of being a major league baseball player
is signing a baseball.
Ya gotta do it quick, and ya gotta do it well.
So we're gonna have a little contest here.
We're just gonna toss you a ball
at the same time.
You sign it as fast as you can.
You hold it up when you're done.
I will check your ball to see who does it the quickest,
but I have to be able to read it.
We ready?
You bet.
Let's get the ball toss.
On your mark, get set, go!
My goodness, they're signin' away.
Who's gonna take it?
Oh, it's Walker.
Come on, Walker.
Followed quickly by deGrom, Wilmer,
and Jeurys brings up the rear.
All right, let's check your work.
See, I don't know who that is.
Steven Mat-- Steven Matz. All right.
All right, well, that counts then.
This is like a doctor wrote me a prescription.
I don't know what it is.
That's me!
Oh, Neil, come on! No, Walker's disqualified.
Oh!
Look at that. It's--
It-it-it's Aramaic.
It's not even a current language.
Wilmer? This Wilmer Flores?
This you?
Yeah.
All right, Wilmer.
Oh, boy...
Oh, boy.
Uh-oh.
Is that you?
(Jeurys) That's me.
Jeurys, yeah, see, I didn't know that.
Jeurys is disqualified.
That's you?
(Jacob deGrom) That's me.
It's very pretty.
See, it's got kind of a sweep there
and a sweep there,
but Jacob deGrom, I don't know that it says that.
So, who-who wins then?
(man) No one wins.
All right, I'm gonna give it to Matz.
All right, thanks, fellas.
Go Mets! Let's go Mets!
♪♪
-------------------------------------------
Hackers Leak 'Orange Is The New Black,' Threaten Other Studios | TODAY - Duration: 2:12.
MIGUEL ALMAGUER HAS THIS STORY. >> Reporter: THE HACKERS
RELEASED "ORANGE IS THE NEW BLACK" AND UPLOADED THE VIDEOS
TO THE FIRE SHARING SITE, WHEN NETFLIX REFUSED TO MEET DEMANDS.
HACKERS USING THE TWITTER HANDLE, THE DARK OVERLORD,
CLAIMED THEY UPLOADED MOST OF THE SEASON TO A SITE OVER THE
WEEKEND, WHEN NETFLIX REFUSED TO PAY THE RANSOM.
NOW, THREATENING MORE DAMAGE. WHO IS NEXT ON THE LIST?
FOX? IFC, NAT GEO OR NBC?
WHAT FUN WE'RE GOING TO HAVE. NETFLIX, DECLINING TO BE
INTERVIEWED, ONLY RELEASING A STATEMENT.
A PRODUCTION VENDOR USED BY SEVERAL MAJOR TV STUDIOS HAD ITS
SECURITY COMPROMISED. IT'S THE HIGHEST PROFILE CYBER
ATTACK SINCE THE SONY HACK IN 2014, WHEN SENSITIVE E-MAILS,
CELEBRITY GOSSIP AND THE MOVIE "ANNIE" WERE STOLEN AND MADE
PUBLIC. SINCE THEN, THE MAJOR STUDIOS
HAVE BEEFED UP THEIR CYBER SECURITY.
BUT SOME INDEPENDENT VENDORS REMAIN A WEAK LINK, ACCORDING TO
EXPERTS. >> THIS MOVE THE HACKERS MADE
WITH "ORANGE IS THE NEW BLACK" IS A WARNING SHOT.
AND PERHAPS, WE COULD SEE MORE SUCH INCIDENTS WITH OTHER
NETWORK AND OTHER SHOWS. >> Reporter: IT APPEARS THE
HACKERS MAY HAVE MORE SHOWS AND MOVIES.
THE CRIMINALS POSTING, AND TO THE OTHERS, THERE'S STILL TIME
TO SAVE YOURSELVES. OUR OFFERS ARE STILL ON THE
TABLE FOR NOW. THIS MORNING, STUDIOS ARE UNDER
ATTACK. AND THAT THEY NOT BE THE
HOLLYWOOD ENDING THEY WERE HOPING FOR.
HOLLYWOOD STUDIOS ARE ALREADY ON-EDGE BECAUSE OF THE THREAT OF
A WRITER'S STRIKE, WHICH COULD COME AS EARLY AS TOMORROW.
THE LAST TIME THERE WAS A STRIKE, IT COST THE INDUSTRY
MORE THAN 2 BI
-------------------------------------------
Countering North Korea's Rogue Regime | Morning Joe | MSNBC - Duration: 8:18.
AFFORDABLE CARE ACT AS CURRENTLY EXISTS.
>> LET'S TURN TO FOREIGN POLICY. WE'RE LEARNING CIA DIRECTOR MIKE
POMPEO IN SOUTH KOREA DAYS AFTER NORTH KOREA CARRIED OUT ANOTHER
FAILED MISSILE LAUNCH. OFFICIALS TELL NBC NEWS POMP I
DON'T IN SEOUL WITH HIS WIFE AND HAS MEETINGS SCHEDULED WITH U.S.
EMBASSY AND MILITARY OFFICIALS STATIONED THERE.
SOUTH KOREAN OFFICIALS ANNOUNCED FRIDAY THAT NORTH KOREA LAUNCH
ADD SHORT RANGE MISSILE FROM AN AIRFIELD NORTH OF PYONGYANG.
THEY SAY THAT MISSILE DID NOT LEAVE NORTH KOREAN TERRITORY
EXPLODING JUST AFTER LAUNCH. IN THAT INTERVIEW WITH CBS
PRESIDENT TRUMP DISCUSSED WHETHER OR NOT MILITARY ACTION
MAY BE THE NEXT STEP IN DEALING WITH KIM JONG-UN WHILE OFFERING
AN EYEBROW RAISING TAKE ON THE YOUNG LEADER.
>> MR. PRESIDENT YOU SAID DON'T TEST A MISSILE, THEY DID TEST A
MISSILE. IS THE PRESSURE NOT WORKING?
>> I DIDN'T SAY DON'T TEST. HE HAS TO DO WHAT HE HAS TO DO,
BUT WE WILL NOT BE HAPPY. >> WHAT DOES THAT MEAN?
>> IF HE DOES A NUCLEAR TEST I WON'T BE HAPPY.
I DON'T BELIEVE THE PRESIDENT OF CHINA, WHO IS A VERY RESPECTED
MAN WILL BE HAPPY EITHER. >> NOT HAPPY MEANING MILITARY
ACTION. >> I DON'T KNOW.
WE'LL SEE. >> WHAT DO YOU MAKE OF THE NORTH
KOREAN LEADER? >> I REALLY HAVE NO COMMENT ON
HIM. PEOPLE ARE SAYING IS HE SANE?
I HAVE NO IDEA. I CAN TELL YOU THIS, AND A LOT
OF PEOPLE DON'T LIKE WHEN I SAY IT.
HE WAS A YOUNG MAN OF 26 OR 27 WHEN HE TOOK OVER FROM HIS
FATHER, WHEN HIS FATHER DIED. HE'S DEALING WITH OBVIOUSLY VERY
TOUGH PEOPLE, IN PARTICULAR THE GENERALS AND OTHERS.
AND AT A VERY YOUNG AGE HE WAS ABLE TO ASSUME POWER.
A LOT OF PEOPLE I'M SURE TRIED TO TAKE THAT POWER AWAY, WHETHER
IT WAS HIS UNCLE OR ANYBODY ELSE, AND HE WAS ABLE TO DO IT.
SO OBVIOUSLY HE'S A SMART COOKIE.
>> ALL RIGHT. JOINING US NOW COLUMNIST FOR
"THE DAILY BEAST," AUTHOR OF "NUCLEAR SHOWDOWN, NORTH KOREA
TAKES ON THE WORLD." JUST THE WAY PRESIDENT TRUMP HAS
BEEN TALKING ABOUT KIM JONG-UN IN THE LAST COUPLE OF DAYS SORT
OF TELLING HIS BACK STORY AND HOW DIFFICULT IT MUST HAVE BEEN,
HOW IMPRESSED HE IS A 27-YEAR-OLD COULD RUN NORTH
KOREA THAT WAY. WHAT DO YOU MAKE OF THE
RHETORIC? IS THERE SOMETHING STRATEGIC
THERE WITH THAT FLATTERY? >> I THINK THERE PROBABLY IS.
I THINK THEY WANT TO TALK TO KIM JONG-UN EVENTUALLY.
THEY FIGURE THE BEST THING TO DO IS FLATTER HIM.
I DON'T THINK THAT WILL WORK. WE SHOULDN'T BE DOING IT.
IT'S OKAY FOR ANALYSTS TO SORT OF TALK ABOUT KIM JONG-UN'S RISE
TO POWER AND WHAT HE DID TO STAY THERE BUT I DON'T THINK THE
PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES SHOULD DO THAT.
WE SHOULD BE BEING A VERY TOUGH POSITION RIGHT NOW LARGELY
BECAUSE DIPLOMACY IS ONLY GOING TO WORK WHEN KIM JONG-UN FEELS
HE HAS NO CHOICE BUT TO DISARM. >> GORDON, ON THAT POINT, NORTH
KOREA AND ITS LEADER ARE SO ISOLATED.
THOSE WORDS THAT THE PRESIDENT SPOKE IN DESCRIBING THE
PRESIDENT OF NORTH KOREA, I MEAN, IT IS LITERALLY LIKE
LISTENING TO A PROFILE OUT OF LANGLEY HAVING PROVIDED THE
PRESIDENT FOR THE RHETORIC TO USE.
DON'T YOU THINK THAT MIGHT AT SOME LEVEL HAVE SOME IMPACT ON
THE LEADERSHIP OF NORTH KOREA? >> IT MIGHT.
BUT THE MOST IMPORTANT THING TO REMEMBER ABOUT THE NORTH KOREAN
LEADERSHIP IT ACTS UNDER CERTAIN CONSTRAINTS AND INCENTIVES.
I DON'T THINK THOSE INCENTIVES AND CONSTRAINTS ARE GOING TO
CHANGE BECAUSE OF THE PRESIDENT CHARACTERIZING KIM JONG-UN.
KIM JONG-UN IS GOING TO MAKE CERTAIN DECISIONS.
HE'LL DO THAT. I THINK PRETTY MUCH WILL BE
DIVORCED FROM WHAT TRUMP SAYS ABOUT HIM, WHETHER IT'S FLATTERY
OR WHETHER IT'S CRITICISM. >> GORDON, ELISE JORDAN HERE.
I'VE BEEN PERSONALLY CONCERNED ABOUT PRESIDENT TRUMP'S RHETORIC
CONCERNING SOUTH KOREA. HE'S MENTIONED HE WANTS TO
RE-EVALUATE THE FREE TRADE AGREEMENT WITH SOUTH KOREA WHILE
HIS TALK ON CHINA HAS BEEN MORE CONCILIATORY ON TRADE AFTER
HEATED RHETORIC ON THE CAMPAIGN
TRAIL. THE BILLION DOLLAR DEFENSE IN
KOREA, SUGGESTED SOUTH KOREA SHOULD PAY FOR IT.
HOW DAMAGING IS THIS TO OUR RELATIONSHIP WITH SOUTH KOREA AT
A TIME WHEN WE DO NEED A ELECTRONIC ALLIANCE.
>> YOU PUT YOUR FINGER ON IT, WHAT I THINK IS THE WORST
MISTAKE THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION MADE IN THEIR FIRST 100 DAYS.
WE HAVE A POSITION WHERE WE'RE GOING EASY ON CHINA ON TRADE
BECAUSE WE WANT THEIR COOPERATION ON NORTH KOREA.
WE NEED SOUTH KOREA'S COOPERATION JUST AS MUCH. HERE
WE ARE CRITICIZING THE U.S. TRADE AGREEMENT WITH SOUTH
KOREA. WE SHOULDN'T DO THAT.
NOTHING GOOD HAPPENS WHEN SOUTH KOREA AND UNITED STATES ARE ON
DIFFERENT PAGES WHEN IT COMES TO NORTH KOREA.
WITH THOSE KMEBS ABOUT THE FREE TRADE AGREEMENT AND PAID FOR
ANTI-MISSILE DEFENSE SYSTEM, THAAD, WE HAVE CAUSED DAMAGE IN
SOUTH KOREA AT A TIME WHEN THERE'S AN ELECTION.
THERE'S A MAY 9th ELECTION, THESE COMMENTS HELP THE
ANTI-AMERICAN CANDIDATE. NO GOOD WILL COME FROM THESE
COMMENTS. I HOPE OVER TIME WE'LL BE ABLE
TO REPAIR DAMAGE. IF WE GET AN ANTI-AMERICAN
PRESIDENT IN SOUTH KOREA, THAT WILL CAUSE US PROBLEMS FOR
YEARS. >> TO YOUR POINT, ELISE,
PRESIDENT TRUMP'S RHETORIC ON SOUTH KOREA, THE NATIONAL
SECURITY ADVISER BROKE WITH THE PRESIDENT OVER COMMENTS SOUTH
KOREA SHOULD PAY FOR THE MISSILE DEFENSE SYSTEM TO ATTACK NORTH
KOREA FROM THE NORTH. >> WHAT I TOLD OUR COUNTERPART
UNTIL ANY NEGOTIATION THE DEAL IS IN PLACE.
WE'LL ADHERE TO OUR WORD. WHAT THE PRESIDENT HAS ASKED US
TO DO IS LOOK ACROSS ALL OF OUR ALLIANCES AND HAVE THE
APPROPRIATE BURDEN SHARING, RESPONSIBILITY SHARING.
WE'RE LOOKING AT THAT WITH OUR GREAT ALLY SOUTH KOREA.
WE'RE LOOKING AT THAT WITH NATO. WHAT YOU'VE SEEN, BECAUSE OF THE
PRESIDENT'S LEADERSHIP, MORE AND MORE NATIONS ARE CONTRIBUTING
MORE TO OUR COLLECTIVE DEFENSE. >> THE QUESTION IS DURING THIS
TIME OF HEIGHTENED TENSION WITH NORTH KOREA, WHY ARE WE ALSO
PUTTING SOUTH KOREA ON EDGE, OUR ALLY IN THIS FIGHT?
>> PERSONALLY IT JUST MAKES ABSOLUTELY NO SENSE.
IT SEEMS LIKE THIS IS A TIME WHEN WE NEED A STRONGER ALLIANCE
WITH SOUTH KOREA REALLY AT ANY OTHER POINT IN HISTORY.
YET PRESIDENT TRUMP SEEMS TO BE GOING OUT OF HIS WAY TO ALIENATE
SOUTH KOREANS. H.R. McMASTER'S COMMENTS ARE
INTERESTING JUST BECAUSE THEY ARE SO DIVERGENT.
WE'VE SEEN THIS CONSISTENTLY WITH THE TRUMP FOREIGN POLICY
WHERE ADVISERS ARE GOING AROUND ON DAMAGE CONTROL AND HAVE A
MESSAGE THAT'S CONTRADICTORY TO THE COMMANDER IN CHIEF.
AT THE END OF THE DAY, THE PRESIDENT IS THE COMMANDER IN
CHIEF. SO WHO IS REALLY RUNNING THE
FOREIGN POLICY OF THIS COUNTRY? >> SO GORDON CHANG, LET'S TALK
ABOUT THE RHETORIC AS WELL TOWARD CHINA FROM PRESIDENT
TRUMP, THE WAY HE SORT OF SINCE THAT MEETING, IT SEEMS TO ME
WITH PRESIDENT XI AND MAR-A-LAGO, PRAISED CHINESE
PRESIDENT, CHANGED HIS TONE COMPLETELY FROM THE CAMPAIGN.
IS THAT SORT OF RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PRESIDENT TRUMP AND
PRESIDENT XI HAVING AN IMPACT HERE OR WILL IT HAVE AN IMPACT
ON THE RELATIONSHIP WITH NORTH KOREA?
>> I THINK IT WILL HAVE AN IMPACT.
BUT WHAT ALSO HAD AN IMPACT WAS TRUMP AUTHORIZING MISSILE STRIKE
ON SYRIA, CHINESE FRIEND, WHEN XI JINPING WAS NEXT TO HIM.
I THINK THAT STUNNED THE CHINESE.
I CAN'T PROVE IT, BUT I THINK WHAT HAPPENED IS IT INTIMIDATED
CHINESE AND THEY WENT OVER AND TOLD NORTH KOREANS DON'T CONDUCT
YOUR SIXTH NUCLEAR TEST. THAT'S THE THING THAT HASN'T
HAPPENED IN ALL OF THIS. YES, THERE HAVE BEEN TESTS OF
SHORT RANGE AND INTERMEDIATE MISSILES BUT THEY HAVEN'T SET
OFF A NUKE. THAT'S WHAT WE'RE REALLY
CONCERNED ABOUT. HERE WHAT WE HAVE WITH TRUMP AND
XI JINPING AND TRUMP AND UTERTE AND THAILAND IS COALITION
BUILDING. WE NEED TO DO THAT.
OF COURSE COALITION BUILDING WITH OUR ALLIES SOUTH KOREA.
ALL THESE THINGS HAVE TO BE DONE IN COORDINATED FASHION.
I THINK "TRIUMPH" WAS TALKING OFF THE RANGE IN THE REUTERS
INTERVIEW WHEN HE MENTIONED THAAD AND FREE TRADE AGREEMENT.
I THINK HE WILL NOT TRY TO
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét