Thứ Tư, 28 tháng 3, 2018

Youtube daily Mar 28 2018

In a follow-up from the Cambridge Analytica files, it appears that Facebook leaking private

data of 50 million American voters to Trump Campaign was neither accidental nor a breach of trust.

Additional revelations confirm that this happens regularly.

New coverage shows that Facebook has no control over the data of its users.

However, what we learn about as scandals are most likely ways things are actually supposed to be.

Mark Zuckerberg built Facebook in a privacy-invasive way intentionally with the aim to turn into

a multi-billion dollar conglomerate.

New leaks by Facebook's former operations manager Sandy Parakilas reveal that the feature

Cambridge Analytica exploited in 2014

was also abused by tens of thousands of other app developers.

Hundreds of millions of Facebook users are likely to have had their private information

harvested by companies that exploited the same terms as the firm that collected data

and passed it on to Cambridge Analytica, according to a new whistleblower.

Parakilas said Facebook had terms of service and settings that "people didn't read

or understand" and the company did not use its enforcement mechanisms, including audits

of external developers, to ensure data was not being misused.

During the time he was at Facebook, Parakilas said the company was keen to encourage more

developers to build apps for its platform and "one of the main ways to get developers

interested in building apps was through offering them access to this data".

Shortly after arriving at the company's Silicon Valley headquarters he was told that

any decision to ban an app required the personal approval of the chief executive, Mark Zuckerberg,

although the policy was later relaxed to make it easier to deal with rogue developers.

"Kogan's app was one of the very last to have access to friend permissions," Parakilas

said, adding that many other similar apps had been harvesting similar quantities of

data for years for commercial purposes.

Academic research from 2010, based on an analysis of 1,800 Facebooks apps, concluded that around

11% of third-party developers requested data belonging to friends of users.

If those figures were extrapolated, tens of thousands of apps, if not more, were likely

to have systematically culled "private and personally identifiable" data belonging

to hundreds of millions of users, Parakilas said.

At this point it is safe to assume that most people on Facebook had their private data

leaked to third parties and are now most likely floating around on the black market ready

to be abused by campaigners, manipulators, hackers or other malicious people.

In the first years of Facebook this appears to have been major

source of platform growth and revenue.

Facebook took a 30% cut of payments made through apps, but in return enabled their creators

to have access to Facebook user data.

Advertisers have been willing to go great lengths to acquire personal and private information

of Facebook users.

Most people outside of the industry, however, are oblivious to the fact how effective an

advertising or a political campaign can be when they hold millions of profiles with private information.

Parakilas estimates that "a majority of Facebook users" could have had their data

harvested by app developers without their knowledge.

The company now has stricter protocols around the degree of access third parties have to data.

In the fallout, Facebook behaves exactly like any

other major tech company that holds users' private data.

They're incentivized to do as little as possible, because as long as they can argue

they didn't know about breaches or leaks of user data, they can get away with it easily.

This is precisely what Mark Zuckerberg and Alexander Nix, the CEO of Cambridge Analytica argue.

That they didn't know data were leaked/acquired improperly.

They both blame Aleksandr Kogan, just some little guy at the bottom of the corporate

food chain who was hired by Wylie and Nix to do exactly what happened.

So why did Facebook all of a sudden terminated a feature that attracted a lot of developers

on the platform and made overall user experience with Facebook rich with content?

Parakilas said he was unsure why Facebook stopped allowing developers to access friends

data around mid-2014, roughly two years after he left the company.

However, he said he believed one reason may have been that Facebook executives were becoming

aware that some of the largest apps were acquiring enormous troves of valuable data.

He recalled conversations with executives who were nervous about the commercial value

of data being passed to other companies.

"They were worried that the large app developers were building their own social graphs, meaning

they could see all the connections between these people," he said.

"They were worried that they were going to build their own social networks."

This seems to be true as far as we replace social for advertising networks.

Zuckerberg definitely feared that Facebook was loosing a lot of money for giving essentially

free access to its pool of private information.

They definitely realized that there is lot to be made in this industry.

So this is when Mark Zuckerberg decided to turn his company from a social media platform

to an advertising network and a data broker.

In February 2013 Facebook announced it would acquire Atlas Advertiser Suite from Microsoft.

Atlas allows advertisers to plan campaigns, buy ads on sites across the web,

and measure their impact.

It can handle search, rich media and in-stream video, and display ads, as well as offer APIs

for programmatic control of big campaigns.

This was a major shift of business strategy for Facebook.

Launching an advertising network like Atlas could help Facebook get ahead of

Google in online advertising.

So offering app developers direct access to its pool of user data was directly counterproductive

to the new strategy of creating their own ad network.

Any of those developers could acquire Facebook data and sell them to the advertisers or launch

their own ad networks.

This was how Facebook could eliminate their competition.

Facebook describes its approach as "people-based marketing," where advertisers can follow

users across devices.

Presumably that means Atlas can tell advertisers if someone saw their ad on, say, their smartphone

and then made a purchase from their laptop, or vice versa.

The blog post doesn't go into much detail about how Facebook is doing this, but the

Journal reported that the platform will be "linking users' ad interactions to their

Facebook accounts," not just on Facebook itself, but on other websites and apps.

Perhaps most importantly, the company says it has improved the platform's cross-device capabilities.

The post points out the limitations in relying on cookies to track users and determine whether

an ad is effective: "Cookies don't work on mobile, are becoming less accurate in demographic

targeting and can't easily or accurately measure the customer purchase funnel across

browsers and devices or into the offline world."

The company also says that it will be able to connect online ad impressions with offline

sales — an area where Facebook has previously been working and developing partnerships.

After Facebook acquired Atlas, Zuckerberg rebuilt it from ground up for smoother implementation

with its immense amount of user data.

They were able to connect online ad impressions to offline purchases in brick-and-mortar stores

two years before Google could offer such a feature to advertisers.

Atlas opens up two new and extremely powerful capabilities for brands and agencies: It lets

them measure ad campaigns across screens by solving the cookie problem; and it lets them

target real people across mobile and the web.

On average, cookies have a 59% tracking success rate, and they overstate frequency by 41%,

according to executives on an Atlas launch panel at Advertising Week.

What's worse, as the internet shifts to mobile, cookies fail to connect users across devices

and do nothing to solve the challenge of mobile conversion tracking.

According to Erik Johnson, managing director of Atlas, 41% of all purchases start on one

device and move to another (typically moving smaller to larger -- phone to tablet or laptop).

It uses Facebook's persistent ID rather than a cookie, allowing Atlas to measure user activity

on mobile and desktop, including mobile conversion and desktop conversion tracking.

Atlas also enables media mix modeling, helping advertisers understand how to allocate their

budgets across devices.

This may have the most impact we've seen in years for solving cross-device reporting and

cross-channel issues, dramatically opening up the mobile market.

Facebook strategy to integrate Atlas into its data advertising network was appraised

by advertisers and data brokers in 2014: While the tracking is fantastic, Facebook's

ability to target real people across devices is even more powerful.

This opens up a tremendous opportunity for brands and their agencies.

Facebook's Audience Network already enables advertisers to find appropriate audiences

on a whole new set of inventory by using signals such as demographic, psychographic and behavioral data.

Now, Atlas gives advertisers access to Facebook's targeting precision across the entire web,

wherever consumers access it.

Facebook is pushing beyond the restrictive label of "social" and rewriting the rules

of the game in digital marketing along the way.

The new Atlas capabilities are a substantial step in t his direction.

If nothing else, it highlights that social is not just a channel.

Rather, social is a fundamentally different way to understand and execute digital marketing.

It is far more about data than platform, and Facebook is making this vision a reality.

Success in digital marketing should be about finding precise consumer audiences and identities,

not abstractions like campaigns and line items.

Atlas is making Facebook more people-focused than ever before, and brands and agencies

would be smart to follow suit.

It's pretty incredible that a 20-something-year-old college drop-out managed to come up with such

an impressive strategic thinking.

This is what sets Facebook apart from other social media: it is its ability to track people

on the Internet and even in the real world, across devices, platforms, and with no boundaries.

Zuckerberg's coding determination created one of the most attractive advertising and

tracking tools that is now exploited by manipulative campaigns, advertisers, and governments worldwide.

Despite being well over a decade younger than its competitors like Google or Yahoo, Zuckerberg

was able to create a monster that is literally everywhere and silently watches and records

everyone's move anywhere they go.

One question that remains unanswered is why did Facebook delete Cambridge Analytica app

after the whistleblower breakout in March 2018, more than two years after it terminated

the data harvesting feature for all the other apps?

Facebook clearly didn't like how Cambridge Analytica accessed the data of 50 million

users when they found out about it almost immediately after it happened in 2014.

Facebook even asked Cambridge Analytica to delete all Facebook data but they never enforced

it.

What motivation did Mark Zuckerberg have to not use the power of his multi-billion dollar

global conglomerate against one data firm?

Zuckerberg's apology is anything but sincere.

He knew what was happening, he was aware everything was going by design, and he decided to keep

quiet about it.

This is another major case since the Snowden leaks of how abusive companies are with people's privacy.

Things would have continued uninterruptedly if it wasn't for the current public outrage

and the sort of fake outrage by the mainstream media.

Because established outlets are so motivated to push the Russia gate narrative.

They push Facebook into the corner not because of how abusive and intrusive Mark Zuckerberg's

company fundamentally is, but because he was cooperating in manipulation and intrusion

with the wrong political campaign.

The problem is that because much of this coverage is politically driven, as soon as seats in

the government are switched between the right people, the outrage will fade out and Facebook

with its advertising and campaign partners like Cambridge Analytica will resume their

intended strategy.

This is where Channel 4 news otherwise excellent coverage loses a lot of its credibility.

They shouldn't have used this scandal to give Hillary a platform to portray herself as a scapegoat.

Hillary Clinton is just as a puppet of her campaign team, Wall Street, military

industrial complex, and oil donors and lobbyists.

She had all media, economic, and political establishment on her side and her campaign

team rigged Democratic Party primaries against Bernie Sanders.

If anyone deserved a voice, it should have been Bernie because he was the one that tried

to win the argument through reason and not manipulation and emotion.

So you knew Cambridge Analytica was behind the leak.

You knew they were going to use the data for a political campaign in 2014 and you could

have done everything to stop it yet you decided to do nothing.

You know the ones who created Cambridge Analyitica monstrosity are Christopher Wylie and Alexander Nix.

And you dare to blame this nerd?

I mean sure he should have exhibited some level of ethical codex since he was an academic

at the time.

But since when do we blame soldiers for being sent to wars declared by their commanders?

The blame is on you, Mr Zuckerberg, Christopher Wylie, and Alexander Nix.

You are the puppet masters.

Mark Zuckerberg, you created this monster that you now can't even control.

And you did this with an intention.

Now you have the power to decide the results of every election in the world.

Live with that.

For more infomation >> How Zuckerberg turned Facebook into an empire of evil | Manipulation, surveillance, political agenda - Duration: 18:50.

-------------------------------------------

Just Drink Every Morning a Glass of Hot Water On An Empty Stomach,This Is What Happens To You Health - Duration: 3:06.

Just Drink Every Morning a Glass Of Hot Water On An Empty Stomach This Is What Happens To You | HealthPedia

For more infomation >> Just Drink Every Morning a Glass of Hot Water On An Empty Stomach,This Is What Happens To You Health - Duration: 3:06.

-------------------------------------------

BREAKING: Trump Just Ended Welfare For One HUGE Group For 5 Years! – Let The Riots ERUPT! - Duration: 6:04.

BREAKING: Trump Just Ended Welfare For One HUGE Group For 5 Years!

– Let The Riots ERUPT!

President Trump is about to end the longstanding abuse of the American welfare system, and

ban migrants from getting free money and handouts for five years.

The immigration rules will prohibit migrants from coming to the country, and taking advantage

of free American welfare money right away.

It will slow down, or stop, chain migration while protecting American workers and potentially

saving taxpayers money.

What used to happen is that people would migrate to America and just live on the free money

they received.

That's called welfare abuse.

America is open to migrants, but perhaps we don't want migrants who can't fend for

themselves.

Maybe it's better if people who are self-sufficient migrate to the country so that we can reduce

the amount of citizens living off the system.

President Trump wants to introduce a merit-based Green card system in which migrants compete

for Visas.

Migrants can earn points for themselves by learning to speak English, gaining job training

or job offers, or doing something else that is considered a benefit to the America.

The idea seems to be that in order for America to grant Visas or citizenship, the migrant

has to give something back to the country.

It's as though the government wants to stop people coming to America, and living off the

system and would prefer people coming to the country to be contributors.

Do something for America and America will do something for you.

Migrants to those countries must compete for a limited number of visas by gaining points

for English proficiency, competitive training, a job offer or another major achievement that

benefits the host country.

The concept, which is modeled after similar programs from Australia and Canada, is taking

harsh criticism from activists.

It's like they want an open border policy where everyone gets free welfare money, but

that would just be the downfall of America.

If we observe what's happening in Germany, with Merkel's "come on in" policy, then

we see a mass increase in horrible crimes like gang rape.

Do we want mass amounts of migrant gang rape in America?

There's already enough trouble with crime in sanctuary cities that protect illegal immigrant

criminals.

Those folks should be deported because of their bad behavior and often violent crimes

they commit on American people and even other immigrants.

If America prevents immigrants from getting free benefits for five years, then that makes

people think twice about coming here.

If a family who thinks about crossing the border to start a new life knows that they

cannot live for free, then they may not come at all.

If they have possible jobs lined up and will be almost instantly integrating successfully

with society, then that's a great match.

America is the land of the free, but not the land of the free money.

Migrants who enter the United States cannot receive welfare during their first five years

in the country, President Trump revealed from his upcoming immigration overhaul.

"Just this week, we announced a historic immigration bill to create a merit-based Green

Card system that ends the abuse of our welfare system, stops chain migration, and protects

our workers and our economy," he stated on his weekly radio address.

"As an example, you cannot get welfare for five years when you come into our country."

"You cannot just come in like in past weeks, years, and decades, you come in immediately

and start picking up welfare.

For five years, you have to say you will not be asking or using our welfare systems."

Compare that to Germany, where Chancellor Angela Merkel opened the border to millions

of unvetted migrants who can't speak German and lack employable skills, which dooms them

to perpetual welfare paid by German taxpayers, and boredom that manifests into terrorist

attacks against, once again, German taxpayers.

Last year the German government admitted that only 2.8% of over 1.2 million migrants had

gotten a job – but even then those statistics might be exaggerated, according to journalist

Chris Menahan.

"They said back in July only 55 out of one million migrants had got jobs with any major

firms and 50 of those jobs were working at the post office," he reported.

"Two-thirds or more of these migrants are illiterate in their own languages."

"They came because Merkel promised them free money if they can just make it into the

country."

What in tarnation would be a good reason for any country to accept illiterate people who

don't work?

There is literally no benefit to the host country to admit people like that.

I know it sounds mean to say this, but they don't offer anything to the country other

than leeching the system of funds and it's a complete downgrade to the population.

If you let too many low illiterate people into the country, then they have kids who

could be illiterate, then over time, it would only decrease the overall intelligence of

the country and civilization in America would suffer.

We need hard working and intelligent people who bring promise and productivity to further

the advancement of Americans and mankind.

That sounds like quite a stretch but think of the impact of accepting one million people

who mostly can't read or don't work.

Now the government has to pay for them.

Let's say one million immigrants each get $30,000 worth of welfare benefits per year.

That's $30,000,000,000 of free welfare money sucked out of the American budget for people

who put NOTHING back into our society, culture, or anything at all.

That is literally a $0.00 return on investment.

Not that people are a business, but that's really bad business.

And as you can see, Germany has turned into a cesspool from all the migrants flooding

the gates and ruining their nation.

Prepare for a massive backlash from liberals, democrats, and activists.

There's sure to be protests regarding Trump's potential immigration policy.

What do you think about this?

Please share this news and scroll down to Comment below and don't forget to subscribe

Top Stories Today.

For more infomation >> BREAKING: Trump Just Ended Welfare For One HUGE Group For 5 Years! – Let The Riots ERUPT! - Duration: 6:04.

-------------------------------------------

This breed is again America's favorite dog - Duration: 0:27.

For more infomation >> This breed is again America's favorite dog - Duration: 0:27.

-------------------------------------------

Cost of hosting an event at Mar-a-Lago - Duration: 1:04.

For more infomation >> Cost of hosting an event at Mar-a-Lago - Duration: 1:04.

-------------------------------------------

Woman gets eight years for attack on teen - Duration: 1:41.

For more infomation >> Woman gets eight years for attack on teen - Duration: 1:41.

-------------------------------------------

La nueva conquista de Luis Miguel | Suelta La Sopa | Entretenimiento - Duration: 2:07.

For more infomation >> La nueva conquista de Luis Miguel | Suelta La Sopa | Entretenimiento - Duration: 2:07.

-------------------------------------------

Local businesses closing in New Albany - Duration: 1:33.

For more infomation >> Local businesses closing in New Albany - Duration: 1:33.

-------------------------------------------

Candidates have much to say about infrastructure - Duration: 2:09.

For more infomation >> Candidates have much to say about infrastructure - Duration: 2:09.

-------------------------------------------

Osprey nest goes live in Severna Park - Duration: 0:41.

For more infomation >> Osprey nest goes live in Severna Park - Duration: 0:41.

-------------------------------------------

Noticias Telemundo Mediodía, 28 de marzo de 2018 | Noticiero | Telemundo - Duration: 19:14.

For more infomation >> Noticias Telemundo Mediodía, 28 de marzo de 2018 | Noticiero | Telemundo - Duration: 19:14.

-------------------------------------------

Sinkhole near Seminole County bus stop - Duration: 2:00.

For more infomation >> Sinkhole near Seminole County bus stop - Duration: 2:00.

-------------------------------------------

Students lobby for gun control bill in Massachusetts - Duration: 1:47.

For more infomation >> Students lobby for gun control bill in Massachusetts - Duration: 1:47.

-------------------------------------------

Could dogs soon be allowed on parts of Cocoa Beach? - Duration: 1:09.

For more infomation >> Could dogs soon be allowed on parts of Cocoa Beach? - Duration: 1:09.

-------------------------------------------

Stick Man creates handmade canes, walking sticks for veterans - Duration: 1:46.

For more infomation >> Stick Man creates handmade canes, walking sticks for veterans - Duration: 1:46.

-------------------------------------------

Noor Salman Trial: No Verdict Yet - Duration: 1:20.

For more infomation >> Noor Salman Trial: No Verdict Yet - Duration: 1:20.

-------------------------------------------

Strong storms could reach Alabama late tonight - Duration: 2:08.

For more infomation >> Strong storms could reach Alabama late tonight - Duration: 2:08.

-------------------------------------------

Locals rally for Child Abuse Prevention month - Duration: 1:30.

For more infomation >> Locals rally for Child Abuse Prevention month - Duration: 1:30.

-------------------------------------------

日本語学ぶ Yakuza Kiwami 2龍が如く極2 - Duration: 13:18.

おす!皆さま! "Hey, everyone!"

今回は龍が如くを遊びます "This time, we I am playing Yakuza."

われわれはたくさんの漢字を学びつもりです [We are going to learn lots of kanji.]

じゃ!先ずの漢字は調べる [The first word is shiraberu.]

わああああ〜 日本語できないな! [I can't speak Japanese!]

とにかく [Anyway]

歌ましょう! [Let's sing!]

この音楽が好き。。。[I like this song...]

。。。だけど [But]

おおいしいですか?桐生さん [Is it good, Kiriyu?]

何を買いますか~ [What am I going to buy?]

じゃ!

戦闘開! [Let the battle begin!]

本当に。。。[Really...]

Weird [strange as fuck]

日本語できないな! [I can't speak Japanese!]

面白いビデオあります (The store) has interesting videos."

面白い。。。[Interesting]

本当に面白いな~ [REALLY interesting videos.]

わあああ! (Screams in Asian)

大丈夫か?桐生さん! [Are you ok, Kiriyu?!]

ビデオを作ります続ける [I hope to continue making videos.]

俺の最後ビデオはキャサリンについてだった [My last video was on on Catherine.]

じゃ [Well..]

戻りますかな~ Wonder if you'll return :)

Không có nhận xét nào:

Đăng nhận xét