How PSYCHIC Are You? Paranormal Power Test
WHICH HAS CLICKED THE SUBSCRIBE BUT TO DO THE FAST SUCCESS
Đăng ký:
Đăng Nhận xét (Atom)
-------------------------------------------
Why the Golden Globes Were a Big Win for Netflix and Roku - Duration: 7:13.
Chris Hill: The Golden Globe Awards were last night. I don't know if they timed it this way,
but it certainly is working out well for Roku.
Roku this morning released preliminary data for its fourth quarter results, and the viewership
numbers are better than expected. Shares of Roku up 20% this morning.
Seth Jayson: 20%? That's good for me!
Hill: You're a shareholder? Jayson: Oh, yeah! I've been for a while.
I've been a big fan of Roku for a few months now.
Hill: Certainly, I understand why you're a fan today.
Jayson: I might actually be in the positive on that one now.
Roku is probably still almost down by half from its all-time high just a few months ago,
I'm guessing, if it's in the $35 range. I think we were up in the $60s at one point.
I didn't buy it there. It's interesting. Netflix was a big winner at the awards.
I saw articles saying, "Does this mean that things are great for their development strategy?"
I don't know that it does.
I tend to look at the winner in this entire cord cutting movement as Roku.
I don't mean that Roku is going to put Netflix out of business or something like that.
I mean, if you're looking for a company that stands to benefit from all the competition, Netflix isn't it.
The competition is coming for Netflix.
Netflix may continue to do fine, but it's going to have a big battle on its hands.
Roku is sort of the Switzerland of online streaming. They're agnostic.
They have apps for just about every service out there.
They're becoming kind of the default operating system for smart TVs and devices.
My smart TV in my basement, actually, I've got one.
What happens on smart TVs is, after a while, if it's a proprietary smart TV -- and this
was a Samsung, so a pretty big brand -- Netflix and others just quit making and updating the
apps for the smart TV. They only want to update their Roku app or maybe their Android app.
With Roku, you get all of that. Roku also sells advertising on its own channel.
They also have a payments platform, so you can pay for stuff that you're watching on
these other services through Roku. They can take cuts of that.
Roku is growing very quickly. I think it's a really interesting investment because of that.
They may be the ultimate winner in the cord cutting battle because they're one of the leading,
probably the leading platform in that space, I would say.
Hill: It's interesting, when you look at Netflix shares this morning, up about 5%.
Amazon up a couple of percentage points. They were both winners at the Golden Globes.
Jayson: That just makes me laugh so much. Do people really care about quality?
If we call Golden Globes award winners quality. This is what's crazy.
I had not heard of any of these Netflix winners, and I watch Netflix a fair amount.
How do they not bubble this up to me?
Hill: It's interesting.
We've seen this trend for the last decade, where the Golden Globes, you've got television
awards and movie awards, as well.
Particularly with the television awards, we've seen this very steady trend of broadcast television
dropping when it comes to the awards.
Whether it's Netflix, HBO, Amazon, Hulu has even gotten some old award nominations and
wins here and there, it's pretty surprising.
Jayson: It is and it isn't. Hill: Yeah, maybe it's not all that surprising.
Jayson: They've been going for, this is a loaded term, but a lowest common denominator sort.
Network television, I feel like, when I see the shows, still have the mindset of pie-in-the-face.
Stuff that my 70-year-old uncle would have laughed at when he was 50.
You know what I mean? That's just what I see from a lot of network TV.
Netflix, good for them, decided, "We're going to do some stuff," and originally, it was
stuff that had been rejected by the main studios. A lot of interesting stuff out there.
The problem for Netflix is, in order to be as big as they are, they have to
pretty much say yes to almost everything right now.
As a result, they send me e-mails to try to get me to watch Sabrina the Teenage Witch. Swear to God!
I don't get e-mails from anything, and they sent me, "New season of Sabrina!"
Hill: I don't know that you're the demo for that.
Jayson: No! Also, I thought it was creepy.
It was a Lolita kind of picture, she was sprawled out, this young girl, she was in Mad Men when she was little.
Like, I felt grossed out by it. So I don't understand.
What I do get from Netflix these days is, there's so much original material.
Some of it is amazing like the Lemony Snicket series on there.
Just incredible. Neil Patrick Harris, doing a great job.
And then there's a lot of stuff that's really not very good, I don't think. They've done so much.
And then you've got others coming in.
Apparently Walmart Vudu might be doing original programming.
You've Amazon doing some original programming, some of it pretty good.
But I mean, you've got some real problems if you're Netflix if you've got Disney coming out
with their service, you've got DC Comics doing their own service, you've got --
if I can read my tiny writing -- Time Warner doing one, you've got Facebook Watch coming
out with some original programming. I'm not sure what that will be.
Apple is doing something, which primarily is Reese Witherspoon and Oprah at this point,
which seems like a narrow demographic to me. I suppose they know what they're doing.
So, there's a lot of competition.
That's why, to circle back to Roku, I think that by going with a platform that is agnostic
and stands to carry all of these services to every TV, I think you probably have a very
interesting opportunity there.
Hill: If you just think about the basic business model of broadcast television --
we'll put basic cable aside for the moment -- the reason a company like Netflix is so attractive to
showrunners is because if you're doing a deal with CBS, ABC, NBC Fox, they're saying,
"Look, we're probably going to give you more money than Netflix.
In return for that, we're going to need 22 episodes.
You're going to have to go on this schedule."
With Netflix, Amazon Prime, Hulu, and others, they're not laying out as much cash per show necessarily,
but the amount of freedom and the fact that it's like, "You want to do 10 episodes?
You want to do eight episodes? That's fine." Jayson: Yeah. "We can find a price that works."
Broadcast television is never going to find a good price for an eight-episode [series].
-------------------------------------------
What Stocks Do Well in a Recession? And What Should Investors Stay Away From? - Duration: 5:14.
Chris Hill: Let's talk stocks.
Ron, whether it's an industry or a specific stock, what do you think is poised for upside this year?
Ron Gross: An industry I'm looking at, it's a sector/ industry.
I'm not ready to call the big r-word yet, recession. I'm not freaking people out yet.
Hill: You are a little bit, by saying that.
Gross: I think it's important to have some allocation to some defensive stocks in the
environment that we may be approaching.
So, when I think of companies in those sectors, I would say some utilities might be a good bet right here.
Some of the discounters, in fact, discount retailers.
Costco, Dollar Tree, Walmart would be some nice stocks, defensive stocks to have as we
enter an economy that might not be as robust as it has been.
Hill: What about you, Jason?
Jason Moser: I don't want to time when a recession might hit, because really, that's bad for everybody,
but I do think we are entering a period where banks are going to have some
opportunities to boost their earnings a little bit as interest rates continue to nudge upward.
In particular, I'm looking more at small banks, and one we've talked about before, Ameris Bancorp.
This stock has a tremendous risk-reward scenario playing out here.
The stock is now trading around 15X earnings.
They recently announced this merger with Fidelity Bank in Georgia. It's about a $750 million deal.
Given that Ameris is about a $1.5 billion company, you can see, it means a lot.
The market rightly sold the stock off. There's some skepticism there.
That's rolling in a big acquisition. But they're two very similar cultures.
It gives Ameris tremendous exposure to the valuable Atlanta market.
It's also going to help grow that asset and deposit base, particularly in a period where
a lot of these banks are competing for getting those deposit bases.
So, to me, this could play out like the McCormick thing. Remember when McCormick acquired RB Foods?
The market thought, "Whoa, this is a big one to digest here," and they held off for a couple
of quarters to see how things worked out. Lo and behold, it worked out pretty well.
The stock recovered nicely.
I think we could be looking at the same thing here with Ameris if they execute this acquisition well.
Hill: Ron, if defensive stocks have you interested, what's at the other end of the spectrum?
What are you avoiding this year? Gross: Specifically, I have one stock in mind.
I come back to it often. It's Fitbit.
I've really never been excited and probably will never be excited about this one.
They entered the smartwatch market in 2018. I give it to them, they've done pretty well.
But this is a formidably competitive market, with the likes of Apple, for one, right there behind them.
You even have some Chinese upstarts that could be a problem, as well.
I don't see Fitbit being the company that is constantly able to innovate, either take
market share or defend market share. I'd be really careful about this one.
Hill: What about you, Jason?
Moser: Zillow.
I've changed my tone on this company over the past year.
I used to be excited about the potential there.
I feel like they've failed to convince me of the sustainability here.
They're yet to become meaningfully profitable at all.
Now, in this most recent quarter, they put in their shareholder letter that Zillow Group
has entered a period of transformational innovation.
To me, that's code for, "We're not going to be profitable any time soon."
For a company like this, a company that's been around for a while in such a big market
opportunity as our housing market, they should not be entering this period.
They should be coming out of this period.
I think that's what they were trying to do over these past few years.
This instant offers business, it's not up their alley.
Buying homes and renovating them and selling them, it's not scalable.
There are a lot of people out there doing it.
I don't know that they have any real advantage there.
Good will now represents essentially half of the total assets on the balance sheet.
It's not a bad company. I'm just disappointed in the way they've executed.
They still have a ways to go before they get to meaningful profitability.
Hill: One of the things that ties these two businesses together, Fitbit and Zillow,
is the word "optionality" has been used in connection to both of these businesses.
They were seen as, "They have options, in terms of where they can go."
Optionality is something we like to see as investors, but Ron, it almost seems like optionality
works better if you've got one dependable cash cow in your portfolio.
Gross: You nailed it. Optionality is great for additional upside.
Maybe you can't even see the different options that a company might have three to five years down the road.
But if they don't have that profitable cash flow producing segment of the company,
then you're relying on all of the value of that company being in the optionality category,
and that's just too much risk for me.
-------------------------------------------
Trump STILL Refuses To Pay His Bills - Duration: 3:06.
Before Donald Trump ever even became president of the United States, we knew that this man
had a problem paying his bills, wasn't something he ever liked to do.
Your stories emerge.
Law suits emerged.
A old lawsuits that had been settled, emerged showing that he wasn't paying his workers.
He wasn't paying property taxes, he wasn't paying his contractors.
This guy does not like to pay his bills and sadly once he became president of the United
States, he did not change his ways and right now the White House owes $16,000,000 in back
water bills.
In fact, they owe so much and have failed to pay for quite so long that the DC water
board was joking recently.
About how long do we wait before we just shut off the water at the White House?
Here's the thing.
The a Treasury Department is in charge of paying these bills and it's not just for the
White House, it's for other government offices and agencies.
They pay their bill every quarter.
While this past quarter, which was before the end of the year, the Treasury Department
before the government shut down by the way, said we owe $60 million, we're gonna pay 11
million, we're not paying you that last $5 million.
So paying the partial bill rather than the bill in full, uh, to companies like this utility
companies that, that's pretty much the same as just not paying it at all.
You know, if we were to go and pay our water bill, but only pay half of it or two thirds
of it, they'd still shut our water off because that's what they do.
That's why they billed you for the full amount.
Instead of saying like, add, just pay what you can and then come back later when you
have it.
Yeah.
That's not how utilities work.
And that's why these people at the DC water board are actually kinda thinking like, do,
do we shut off the water for the White House and these government buildings because they
told us they're just not going to pay it.
That's not how it works.
But for Donald Trump, that's always been how it works.
That's why this man got soon, so much when he was in the private sector, he thought he
could get away with not paying people or maybe down the road, pay them less than what they
had earned as a result of a lawsuit, but that's not how it works.
When you're dealing with the federal government itself, they had the money to pay the water
bill.
This happened before the government shut down.
There are zero excuses.
However, members of the Dec waterboard have said that they're not going to shut off the
White House's water right now, but if this continues, you know, it may take up to a year
of not paying their bills, but if it hits that point than they are damn sure going to
shut off the water for the White House because Donald Trump won't pay the bill.
-------------------------------------------
The County Seat - Deaths In Jail - Duration: 28:51.
Hello everybody welcome to this
week's episode of The County Seat,
I'm your host Chad Booth. Today we
are going to have a conversation
about jails. The headlines have
talked a lot lately about death rates
in jails and it's been painted in the
public media that this is a
management problem or that this is a
humane interest problem there are a
lot of factors and moving levers in
this particular discussion and that is
what we are going to address today.
We first want to get a statistical look
at what is going on in the jail so here
is our story.
Senate Bill 205 was passed by the legislator and
given to the CCJJ to do a study on in custody
and mortality rates in jails in the State Prison.
For the years 2013 to 2017 in this five year
period for the study nearly 600,000 people
were booked into county jails across the state.
The report says that in county jails in a five year
period there were 70 deaths and 70 deaths is
too many deaths but some of those are un
preventable deaths, according to the CCJJ
report most in custody deaths happen within
the first 7 days of someone being incarcerated.
Part of the booking process when someone
comes to us is there is an initial medical and
mental health evaluation to every inmate who
comes to our facility. Even if they check out
medically and also mental health there are
classifications we just don't throw people into a
position or situation where they could be hurt.
It takes people quite a while to get back into
population so to speak inside a facility. If we
have any inkling or there is any information
whatsoever that somebody may be suicidal
those individuals are put in a cell by themselves.
Everything that they could use as a tool for
suicide is taken away from them and they are
watched anywhere from 24 to 48, 72 hours
however long it takes to determine they may
not commit suicide we call in mental health
professionals to come do evaluations we would
never willingly or knowingly put somebody in
any part of our facility if we thought there was
any possible issue that they would harm
themselves.
What you see behind me here is the medical
unit which has several different cells that are
monitored and the nursing station is in-
between all these cells so they are monitored
24 hours seven days a week. But our policy is if
somebody's on suicide watch they have 10 or
15 minute sometimes more checks on them
while they are in facility.
We do have 24 hour nursing staff so they are
very well aware of the problems the inmates
are having to add one extra layer of help and
security is we do label the doors for inmate if
they do have special needs not only the nursing
staff but also the jail staff and the deputies
know what the potential problems could be
with the inmates who are in these medical cells.
I know what our medical facilities and our
medical capabilities are at our jail and most of
the inmates in our jail get better medical
treatment and better medical care then when
they are out on the street and not in our jail.
I think one thing that the report came out and
its great information and its certainly something
that all of us counties sheriff's department of
corrections and legislators is because the
dynamics of someone who get a fresh arrest are
only going to be in the jail for only 12 hours the
dynamics with all this fresh arrest inmates and
newly sentenced inmates there not in custody
long enough to really get them into or even
start any type of program whether it be
alcoholics anonymous, drug rehab, mental
health evaluations and assessments, 20 days in
jail or 15 days in jail is not long enough to really
get somebody into the program that's going to
help them in their situation. I think the most
important part of this study is it certainly brings
some awareness to the jails and lets us look at
our policies and our practices and do better.
Moving forward I think all the stake holders
involved whether it be the legislature sheriffs
and law enforcement, department of
corrections and providers, need to figure out
how to get people the services they need
because they are not going to get those services
through the jail.
Now we have the let's talk about the
why what where and how we will do
that with our panel when we come
back on the County Seat.
Welcome back to The County Seat we
are talking about the situations in
jails there has been a fair amount of
attention lately about deaths in jails
and we have looked at the statistical
side of it now we are going to talk
about the problem side of it and the
opportunity side of it joining us for
the conversation is the president of
the Utah Sheriffs Association and
Tooele County Sheriff Paul Whimmer
and Representative and medical
doctor Edward Redd from Cache
Valley who also solves as a physician
in a jail two excellent people to talk
to about this thank you so much for
taking the time. This is portrayed I
have read 4 local articles in the last
month on four different things four
different opinions about death in jails
and one would assume from it that
one we are cruelly mistreating people
in our jails and 2 it is a growing
epidemic. So if I toss those things out
to you what you going to say?
Well deaths in jails are always a
concern it's like deaths on the
highway hoe many are acceptable.
There is not an acceptable number
but we have had some high years in
Utah that are difficult to overlook.
But I think it's also a mistake to make
any knee jerk reactions and throw
money at something unless you can
identify some solutions to it that you
believe will truly work. For example
we had 18 deaths in 2016 which was
relatively high quite high but in 2017
it dropped to 7 it's my belief that very
little change in how we did business
in jails from 2016 to 2017 so is
causing the drop from 2016 to 2017
or being increased from 2015 to 2016
as there was 11 deaths in 2015 and
we really need to just come up with
some sensible solutions to where we
can better treat it with suicide being
the leading cause I think that is where
we need to focus our efforts.
How hard is it to protect somebody
from hurting themselves Dr. Redd?
In a jail setting I first identify a person
that might be a high risk for doing
that is a challenge and there are a lot
of screening tools that are available
nationally that people can utilize to
try and identify and may be a high
risk for that. Again you have to
understand that when an inmate
comes into a jail especially first time
offender or a person who has
substance abuse problems or other
big issues going on in their lives
sometimes they get impulsively
hopeless as a sudden event they
suddenly got arrested and now they
are facing things they were not
thinking about 6 hours prior to that
and in a situation very dangerous and
precarious quite honestly especially
for people often times first time
arrested people that have never been
in the system before overwhelmed by
the whole issue and already suffering
from depression already having some
of the problems their lives are chaos
and things are not going well which is
often the case and they are high risk
for making impulsive decisions about
what does this mean and sometimes
may attempt to take their lives so the
jail setting we often times at least in
the jail I work at is we do screenings
of inmates right when they come in
and try to learn their medical
problems what are their suicide risk
factors and what kind of level of care
do they need to help them make it
through the first week or two until
they figure out what is going on in
their lives.
So this raises a question. We have
fluctuations year to year but are
there times in incarceration there is a
process you are arrested you are
charged you are held or bailed then
you come back to trial then a
sentence and then there is jail time
anywhere from 30 days to 3 years I'm
not sure what a top end is at a jail but
are there windows within that period
of time that are high risk than others?
Yes, the bureau of justice statistics as
well as the recent CCJJ report that
came out indicates that the first 2
weeks are the most dangerous of an
inmates stay and in Utah we book
100,000 inmates a year and when
you look at the average stay is usually
less than 2 weeks we are processing
in and out people during a very
dangerous time which is the initial
booking and the days that follow in
the initial days. That is just a
traumatic event to people's lives and
difficult for them to overcome.
Somebody on the outside would look
at this and say these people are
incarcerated you have jailers there
they are in cells with bars they are
thinking of Mayberry jail most
recognizable jail cell in the world but
they are saying somebody is there
they should be able to prevent this
stuff from happening. How is that a
misperception obviously it is.
Sure for first off the cells that we
have in our jails are not like the
Mayberry jails. So the biggest
problem is when inmates are not
being observed for example most
cells there is partial privacy for
bathroom type activities even in a
single cell for a single inmate whether
they are being closely observed and
likewise there is not necessarily a
deputy looking at them 24 hours a
day sometimes they can pull off in a
corner especially at nighttime when
its dark and use their own clothes to
attempt to take their lives it's a very
serious problem when that happens
even attempt to happen during those
first several days of incarceration and
during the first couple of weeks we
take special care to try and make sure
the inmates watch more closely
rather than if they have been there
for several months that is a high risk
time first couple of days during the
first week or two when they are
facing charges but not necessarily
been convicted yet they are trying to
arrange for bail sometimes
sometimes their crime is horrendous
problem and its very embarrassing to
them or feel oh my gosh I have been
caught and family and public is going
to find out all those kind of things
add up we are very careful about
trying to put them in a situation and
keep closer tabs on them at the time.
It sounds like screening is really the
key to have this work right.
Absolutely.
We are going to take a quick break
and when we come back tie that up
to JRI which was supposed to
overhaul all this. We will be right
back on the County Seat.
Welcome back to The County Seat we
are having a discussion about the
mortality rate in jails across the state.
Are we in a trend, Dr. Redd are we
going down a path that is going to
become catastrophic require us to do
something major and huge?
I think when we look at the numbers
of death in the jails we look at
outcomes and look at numbers from
year to year we see it go from 16 to
19 to 18 to 7 some people think
something happened to cause it to go
from 11 to 18 or from 18 to 7 if you
look at it statistically and get a
statistician and get the number and
look at the total number of people
dealing with I don't know that you
can arrive at any conclusion about
whether we are getting better or
worse based on these numbers I
think the important thing in the
discussion is to look at what we can
do to improve and reduce the
numbers rather than look at the
absolute numbers that is my take on
it.
Are we talking about 100,000 plus
per year?
We are talking about people who
enter and leave the jail again most of
those inmates stay for less than a
couple weeks they sometimes get
charged with a crime and they get
bailed out or released on their own
recognizance until they go to court
sometimes they do a few months or
something like that but we are talking
about a large number of people going
through the system and they are
talking about a very small number of
real bad outcomes.
Every one of those is less than one
percent.
Yes, so the important thing to
understand here is that the goal of
even looking at these numbers is to
try and understand where can we do
a better job not necessarily that we
are getting worse or a catastrophe is
going on I think we look at the
numbers with the suicide data I think
is very compelling but we need to do
a better job for screening inmates or
suicide risks and then doing
interventions that reduce their risk of
suicide jail that is kind of how I look
at it.
When we originally passed JRI and
the Justice Reinvestment Act first
came about screening was a big part
of it was it not how is that screening
not working Sheriff?
It was largely underfunded when they
came out with the amount of money
they were going to invest into the
screening process the Sheriffs quickly
identified that we are a 24/7
operation you need screeners on
duty 24/7 in order to staff that and
basically in 26 jails you are talking
about a significant cost so they set up
a system where I was linked in with
Weber county my jail is so we sit in
front of a computer and their
screener through technology would
screen that inmate. The unfortunate
thing was no one knew where the
screening went it did not influence
the path in which we put that inmate
on to recovery or do they need some
critical mental health attention.
Quite honestly we did not know
where those screenings were going
and they went pretty much by the
way side.
Is this the same issue in Cache County
as well?
We had a little different system up
there and our jail JRI passed the
nurses that were working that time
did the screenings but the nurses
were there about 17 hours a day and
6 hours a day when they weren't
there although in the point in time in
the jail I work in and the screenings
were being done but the next step
after the screenings is what you do
with the information. If you find a
person that is high risk the screenings
important to do but if you don't do
something with the screening
information and do not act on the
screening information and intervene
with some sort of a evidence based
intervention that might reduce the
risk of suicide then the screening is
the first step of what we need to do
so the next step after the screening is
try to come up with interventions
that actually reduce the risk of
suicide or the risk of death from
other causes like drug and alcohol
withdrawal which is significant.
Or medication that you are not aware
that they are taking.
There are so many variables in this
equation when people come to jail
sometimes they don't always tell you
what is really wrong too.
You bring up an interesting point
Sheriff Whimmer you say that the
problem is largely that it is
underfunded is the architecture of JRI
good for managing and rehabilitating
patients generally if it was funded
properly?
I think there is some value in funding
the initial screening of inmates
almost every jail is going to screen
physically have a nurse come down
and screen them within 24 hours of
being booked in but unless they make
some sort of statement we are not
necessarily screening them their
mental health at the time and so an
initial screening they are asked upon
booking are you suicidal have you
ever been then a series of questions
are asked by a corrections deputy but
again are they being truthful in their
statements.
Good point inmates that have been
through the system more than once
and admitted to being suicidal in the
past sometimes interventions in jail
that they get put in a cell and
watched 24/7 and sometimes the
inmates they don't want that they
want to be back in the general
population sometimes and so
sometimes they won't tell you the
truth about how they actually feeling
and what they are doing and often
times they won't tell you about even
the medications they are taking.
That is exactly right to have a uniform
ask someone who is an addict when
you lasted use.
They are not going to tell you.
We cannot get accurate information
from them because they believe we
will use that against them in fact the
reality is we want to use it to help
access their treatment what needs do
they have while they stay.
That is why outside screeners
become so important.
Yes a trained civilian would be a
much better direction to go.
In our jail we use nurses to do that
and nurses are bound by the same
HIPPA laws inside as outside jails so
inmates are more likely to tell nurses
and physicians health care providers
more truth then they would with the
deputies but sometimes they just
don't tell you what is going on with
their lives.
It sound to me one of the biggest
hurdles now in what I have accessed
from this conversation is we need to
have some clarity and a pipeline to
get screening information to the
proper place beef up screening and
we need to create some sort of
archive like when you go into a
pharmacy doesn't matter where you
go they have the goods on what you
are taking and where you are taking
that shouldn't that screening
database be there as well? So that
past screenings when the guy comes
in at 2011 said he was suicidal and he
is not today.
Inside most jails there is electronic
medical records that the screenings
are store in or kept that is what we
do up in Cache county we often time
go back to old screenings and try to
understand but we always repeat the
screening not just use the old one.
Still to understand if the inmate feels
like they can trust the person
screening them they might be more
honest and forward and open about
how they actually are doing I think
we can come up with better
interventions to help them not die
during the first 2 weeks of their stay.
We will take a quick break and be
right back on The County Seat.
Welcome back to The County Seat it's
been a most enlightening
conversation I do want to ask about
final thoughts where do we go what's
the best solution Sheriff you are a
hands on guy and in the trenches.
It's hard to argue with aggressive
screening upfront during that
dangerous period of time in which
they are booking into a jail but again
it goes back to the dollar. Who is
going to fund it will the legislature
appropriate some funds to see that
we can accomplish that in our jails.
Is that a tough hurdle to cross?
Funding is a big issue during an
economic down turns and I think this
is really important part of what we do
for our correctional efforts in the
state we don't want people dying in
jail because we did not do an
adequate job and I think every sheriff
and every medical team in the jails
our goals are to make sure the
inmates have the best health care
they can get and make sure they have
good outcomes and I think that is the
goal of JRI is to help people make it
through their problems and get back
into the life and not just recidivate
back in jail and the process and
hopefully not die in the process. The
goal we have to focus on and drill
down on some of these data
outcomes and inputs more carefully
and see if we can figure out what else
needs to be done beside the
screening and intervention.
Excellent, gentlemen thank you so
much for joining us thank you there is
a lot more information I encourage
you on this particular topic to read up
and try and find information that will
help you and we look for you next
week on The County Seat.
-------------------------------------------
20 Peruvian names for baby boys - the best baby names - www.namesoftheworld.net - Duration: 1:26.
20 peruvian baby boy names
OSCAR
DANIEL
DIEGO
ANGEL
DAVID
JOHN
SEGUNDO
SANTOS
MANUEL
PEDRO
JESUS
JULIO
MIGUEL
CESAR
VICTOR
JORGE
CARLOS
LUIS
JUAN
JOSÉ
Namesoftheworld .net, the web with all the names in the world: baby names, pet names, business names and boat names.
-------------------------------------------
Then And Now Marvel Superhero Characters - Duration: 10:07.
Then And Now Marvel Superhero Characters
-------------------------------------------
20 nombres peruanos para niños - los mejores nombres de bebé - www.nombresparamibebe.com - Duration: 1:26.
20 peruvian baby boy names
OSCAR
DANIEL
DIEGO
ANGEL
DAVID
JOHN
SEGUNDO
SANTOS
MANUEL
PEDRO
JESUS
JULIO
MIGUEL
CESAR
VICTOR
JORGE
CARLOS
LUIS
JUAN
JOSÉ
Namesoftheworld .net, the web with all the names in the world: baby names, pet names, business names and boat names.
-------------------------------------------
Arsenal fans clash over Juventus swap deal for Aaron Ramsey - Duration: 3:25.
Last week it was Sami Khedira, this week it's Medhi Benatia and the response amongst some Arsenal supporters has altered
In a bid to tempt the Gunners into doing business over Aaron Ramsey during the January transfer window, Juventus were said to be offering German international midfielder Sami Khedira as part of the deal, according to Calciomercato
But, judging by the reaction on social media , that did not go down well with some fans
Fast forward a week and the latest rumours doing the rounds is that Juve are weighing up another swap deal proposal as they look to bring Ramsey to the club six months earlier, amid claims he's signed a pre-contract agreement which would come into effect on July 1, 2019
Gazzetta dello Sport reports that they could offer out-of-favour centre-back Mehdi Benatia in exchange to fast-track this deal before the transfer window closes on January 31
The injury to Rob Holding against Manchester United last month has left the north London outfit a little short in central defence and head coach Unai Emery did hint at wanting to bring in reinforcements if possible
"I think the club is working for the possibility to bring in some players who can help us during this next four months of competition," the Spaniard told reporters after the 3-0 win over Blackpool in the FA Cup
"It's a different situation. "If the transfer market can help us find a centre back, the possibility to bring them in is not easy because we also have Mavropanos coming back from injury
" However, links to Benatia has caused a divide amongst some Arsenal fans on social media
Take a look at what's been said on Twitter. These Arsenal fans would be happy if the Morocco international signed
But others aren't too impressed and have offered some alternatives to Benatia
Arsenal's transfer plans for January With the January transfer window in full swing, football
london want to hear from Arsenal fans on the business they want to see from the club in the first month of 2019 and their view on the season so far under Unai Emery
Take part by completing our survey below or click here if you cannot see the form
Keep up to date with the latest news, features and exclusives from football.london via the free football
london app for iPhone and Android . Available to download from the App Store and Google Play
-------------------------------------------
Happy Birthday Maryam Song - Duration: 1:09.
wishes ready
happy birthday maryam
happy birthday maryam status
-------------------------------------------
Masum And Eliyas অভিনিত রাসেল খানঃ ফ্লিম - Duration: 4:48.
What
Whose
Why
Oky
Failed
Got
Not Replying
Music Video
Flow Afran Niso
Oky
Thanks
Kaisa fanny কাইশা ফানি ভিডিও: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6-BhOQ6up3fmVbKJbfFGytMnDzbo1v0A
-------------------------------------------
WANITA INI NIATNYA MARAHI PACARNYA NAMUN BERUJUNG FATAL !!! - Duration: 3:27.
WHICH HAS CLICKED THE SUBSCRIBE BUT TO DO THE FAST SUCCESS
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét