Hi everyone! Today we're gonna get a new perspective on the term "grooming"
Leftist morality is the worst morality. The media recently made a teenager famous just for having opinions about climate change.
Oh yeah, she cut class to sit with a sign outside of Parliament. So she did that too.
Countless articles were published about what a hero and role model she is.
It even spread to other countries, where further journo-salutes continue.
She even wound up on Time Magazines list of most influental youngsters that year.
Along with a K-pop band and a Palestinian nationalist.
Clearly hipsters are writing these articles.
Would Greta get this celebrated if she skipped class to protest tax increases?
Even SvD (somewhat right-wing) declared her a saint, with the conclusion: "Even the young can play prominent roles in our time."
Aaaah, so it's important to listen to kids? Good you brought that up.
Then we should lower taxes and make it mandatory to deport criminal migrants, since that's what a class of 5th-graders wanted (PM) Stefan Löfven to do.
But that didn't get much media headlines?
Even though children are prophetic truth-tellers who play prominent roles in our time.
But then again, would our good media describe kids that way had they been protesting the rape import or the great displacement?
I don't know! So one could only hope a bunch of teens get the idea to do that...
Call both mainstream- and alternative-media there, theoretically speaking that would be best...
to get BOTH and see who shows up.
Otherwise I'm forced to just speculate on this, and so all of this is really just.... theoretical.
(Jokes aside) The climate is a legitimate issue we all should take more seriously.
So it's annoying with the intellectual shallowness that's so mandatory with the Swedish debate.
Which ties into how politics is generally done in Sweden.
Media's hyping how an American celebrity supports 16-year old Greta, which is ironic.
Since DiCaprio took a private jet to pick up an award, then flew back to France to continue partying.
Not the first time he's been criticized over his environmental habits.
He messes up the climate far worse than any Swedish working man.
But Greta describes him as environmentally aware and just thinks it's "awesome" to get his attention.
Of course, she's a 16-year old girl!
I'm not gonna judge a teenager for having undeveloped opinions and hormones.
But we SHOULD judge Swedish media for using children as political shields.
"LISTEN TO GRETA - OR WE WILL DIE"
YOU'RE ALL GONNA DIEIEEEE GET IT
Then Aftonbladet continues: "It's been told that you get the truth from children and drunks."
"Rarely has that proverb applied better to anyone than Greta Thunberg."
Ok not a kid, but I AM a drunk
And since Jonna Sima just described me as a truth-teller I'ma fill you in on dat truth
But first I wanna analyze this headline more since it's so archetypically media.
I know the Left is usually desperate, but "agree with me or DIE" has to be a new record low.
One might wonder how the Left would've reacted if someone wrote a debate article headlined:
"Listen to Jimmie, otherwise mooslims will RAEP UR DAUGHTERS"
Would you call that HORROR propaganda maybe? Hm, oh, well, I don't know!
It's not like the Left constantly does what they accuse others of doing.
Notice how it's okay to talk "apocalypse" and "social collapse" when it comes to their issues,
But when Swedes notice how multiculturalism made their country worse, they're just "paranoid stingy racists".
PEASANTS so uneducated they can't understand that resources are actually infinite!
Also contemplate the following hypocrisy: Scientists at Lund concluded having children is worse for the climate than car and flying.
At the same time Africans and Afghanis are having 5 kids per family, some Arab countries are higher than Swedes too.
Yet the climate debate focuses more on white men driving cars. Why are only whites expected to be socially responsible?
The Left says the apocalypse will reach us in mere decades,
while attacking Hanif Bali, because he insulted a Somali for having 2 children.
When he already has 9 kids, and has been on welfare for 6 years.
Either the Left doesn't believe their own values, or they just hate white people.
So the message here is that blacks should procreate at expense of the climate, while whites die out and become the minority instead.
And since the Left complain about the structural racism that arises, when a majority lives side-by-side with minorities,
That clearly isn't a desirable position to be in. So antiracism is just a code-word for anti-white. Good to know.
And when it comes to Greta there's reason to doubt the hype. She started striking the 20th of August.
The same day Aftonbladet wrote an article, probably due to Ingmar Rentzog. After that every paper picked up.
And just 4 days later Greta "accidentally" releases a book she wrote with her celebrity mom, Malena Ernman.
Famous PC-profile and media pet. Therefore shouldn't surprise anyone when DN give them gratious advertisement with a longer interview.
But I do wonder how much of the book is the mothers opinions, and how much is the childs.
The mothers stardom isn't the only factor to success tho, Ingmar Rentzhog is the one who "discovered" Greta.
His PR-company brag about playing a "central part" in making Greta a national and global celebrity.
In accordance with the company's business model, which is digital advertisement.
Rentzog is also CEO of GU, a leftist think-tank who've written opinion pieces for DN together with Malena Ernman.
Rentzhog and Ernman have also been to climate conferences together.
Thus I'm forced to wonder how organic the hype is. The last straw was when the "top meeting" where "Greta spoke to world leaders",
Took place in an empty lot. Not many world leaders.
Yet state media want people to think the whole world is super-interested in what Greta has to say.
They describe her as a superstar constantly forced to write autographs, and how "everyone wants to associate with the 15-year old from Sweden".
Really? I can't tell from your recordings.
But when people point out empty chairs, SVT's tax-funded journalist screeches about conspiracy theories.
And accuses investigators of "poisoning the social climate".
NO, your lies are poisoning the social climate.
That's such a cowardly accusation. You take 8 billion (SEK) of our tax-money for your lousy reports,
Then exercise contempt towards those who question how that money is spent, with full validity.
There's difference between news and marketing. And in the fairy tale of Climate-Greta, journalists clearly transcended.
Nobody asked you to write so much about a teenager whose opinions you like,
And nobody asked you to exaggerate how popular she is. (Or?)
But it's true she held a speech for UN general secretary that same day, which was uploaded to the PR-firms Youtube channel.
It took place in a small conference room and didn't look as bombastic as they presented it.
"FULL CONSERT HALL WITH WORLD LEADERS"
Then this image doesn't work as well. So assumingly you got greedy, trying to work the collective associations.
Also doesn't seem to be hard to get a meeting with the UN, if you got mainstream opinions.
Gaming feminists Anita Sarkeesian and Zoe Quinn got to talk about how the internet should be censored.
So feminists don't have to deal with critique over disgusting behavior or extreme opinions.
So it's not like the UN has high demands on strong integrity.
The media has exaggerated how popular Greta is, because she represents their opinions in addition to her own.
And by putting their ideas in a young persons body, then presenting them as a prophetic truth-teller,
You accomplish two things: 1) Play on the fact that children are unusually honest.
Thus it's implied they know better, so shut up.
2) Play on the fact that children are children, they're so innocent and fragile. They know nothing of the world.
And so it's mean to criticize their opinions - which happen to be the journalists opinions.
So just let them think whatever, stop being so CYNICAL and adult, stop being MEAN
"SHUT UP, JUST STOP BEING MEAN"
Not kidding, that's the reasoning of Sweden's biggest paper.
When a right-winger complains about having to pay taxes so SVT can present a teenager as climate expert,
It's reinterpreted as "bullying and attempts to silence".
OK! So according to you this teenager is super-intelligent, if we don't listen to her we ALL DIE, and she's way more intelligent than MOST adults,
But she's not intelligent enough to handle people questioning her on the internet.
Interesting definition of intelligence you got there. So the kid knows better than all adults, and especially those who vote right-wing,
But it's still a kid, y'know. Not an adult.
So they don't have the emotional development and strength to handle criticism, y'know.
CAN'T cRiTiCiZE THEM, NOT COOL
NOT COOL, IT's MEAN
It shouldn't surprise anyone the Left has children as role models.
It's been clear all these years they've poisioned the public debate.
It's about manipulation.
The Left uses children as shields for their ideas, since they noticed how tired people are of their ideas.
Or to quote a Swedish archlibertarian: "Climate-Greta has to be the years most cynical example of child labor."
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét