DURING THE 2016 ELECTION BOTH GOOGLE AND FACEBOOK GOT A
CONSIDERABLE AMOUNT OF CRITICISM FOR NOT DOING ENOUGH TO
STOP THE SPREADING OF FAKE NEWS.
NOW GOOGLE AND FACEBOOK HAVE BOTH IMPLEMENTED CERTAIN
POLICIES THAT GO AFTER WEBSITES OR PAGES THAT HAVE MISLEADING OR
INTENTIONALLY MISLEADING INFORMATION ABOUT CERTAIN
PEOPLE.
THEY ALSO ARE TARGETING WEBSITES THAT TRIED TO POSE AS
OTHER MEDIA OUTLETS.
IT IS GOOD THAT IT IS NOW ON THEIR RADAR AND THEY WANT
TO DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT, BUT SOME OF IT, SOME OF THOSE
POLICIES MIGHT HAVE SOME ISSUES.
GOOGLE JUST ANNOUNCED THAT IT TOOK ACTION AGAINST 340
SITES THAT DECEIVE PEOPLE WITH THEIR CONTENT INCLUDING
PURVEYORS OF FAKE NEWS IN 2016.
CLOSE TO 200
OF THESE SITES ARE NO LONGER ALLOWED TO USE GOOGLE ADS.
THEY HAVEN'T BEEN BANNED.
THEY WILL STILL POSSIBLY POP UP IN THE GOOGLE SEARCH ENGINE,
THAT THEY ARE NOT ALLOWING ADSENSE WHICH MONETIZES THESE
PAGES TO BE UTILIZED ON THE PAGES.
GOOGLE DOES NOT CONTROL THE INTERNET.
GOOGLE DOESN'T OWN THE INTERNET, IT MIGHT SEEM LIKE IT AT
TIMES BUT IT DOESN'T. WHAT IT DOES DO IS IT POWERS THE
INTERNET THROUGH MONETIZING IT AND IT IS THROUGH ADSENSE.
WHEN THEY TURN THAT OFF, WE WILL SEE HOW MUCH IT AFFECTS THINGS
BECAUSE IF THEY WERE USING AS A BUSINESS MODEL GOOGLE MIGHT'VE
JUST KILLED THEIR BUSINESS MODEL SO THAT MIGHT HELP IN BRINGING
DOWN THE NUMBER OF FAKE NEWS SITES BUT IF IT TURNS OUT PEOPLE
ARE USING IT TO FOR PROPAGANDA, THEY WOULD PAY FOR THAT ANYWAY
BECAUSE FOR THEM, THE OBJECTIVE IS NOT TO MAKE MONEY, IT IS TO
INFLUENCE ELECTIONS OR POPULAR CULTURE OR THE MEDIA.
SO THEY ARE ESSENTIALLY SQUEEZING SOME OF THE
REVENUE THAT THESE PAGES COULD GET.
UNDERSTAND, THE ONLY OTHER WAY THAT SOME OF THESE PAGES
COULD GET THE REVENUE AS IF THEY FIND SPONSORS AND I THINK A LOT
OF ADVERTISERS STAY AWAY FROM THESE TYPES OF WEBSITES ANYWAY.
NO ADVERTISER IS GOING TO GO NEAR THAT DOCK
NO INVESTOR IS GOING TO INVEST IN THAT, LET'S KEEP IT 100.
THERE WAS A PERIOD ON THE INTERNET WHEN PEOPLE WOULD
INVEST IN CLOWNISH THINGS LIKE SOME WEBSITES WOULD TAKE
OTHER PEOPLE'S ARTICLES AND JUST JUMBLE THE WORDS THAT
PEOPLE WOULD SEARCH WERE BECAUSE THEY WERE LOOKING FOR THE
SAME WORDS AND THEN THEY WOULD ACCRUE SOME MONEY AND THEY
WOULD GET ADS AND PEOPLE PAID MONEY TO BUY THOSE
COMPANIES THAT I THOUGHT THEY WERE MENTAL AND I WAS RIGHT.
HERE AFTER BUYING ONE OF THOSE COMPANIES, ONE OF THE MAJOR
MEDIA COMPANIES IMMEDIATELY SOUGHT IT DOWN TO IT AS
WORD SALAD.
SHOCKINGLY ENOUGH, IT TURNS OUT NOT ALL MEDIA COMPANIES ARE
GENIUSES AND DON'T SEEM TO MAKE THE RIGHT DECISION EVERY
TIME BUT THIS IS DIFFERENT THAT NOBODY IS GOING TO GO INTO
AN INVESTOR MEETING AND SAY OUR GUYS, WE HAVE A BUNCH OF FAKE
NEWS AND WE TREAT PEOPLE WITH THAT WE LIVE THEM ALL THE TIME.
YOU GUYS WANT TO INVEST?
BY THE WAY, I WANT TO BE CLEAR ABOUT SOMETHING.
THEY'RE NOT ONLY TARGETING FAKE NEWS AND BY THE WAY, GOOGLE
WAS VERY CAREFUL NOT TO USE THE PHRASE FAKE NEWS WHEN THEY
MADE THEIR ANNOUNCEMENT THAT THEY ARE GOING AFTER
INDIVIDUALS WHO ARE INTENTIONALLY MISLEADING
THE PUBLIC AND ALSO ADVERTISING SCAMMERS.
ADS THAT SCAM PEOPLE ABOUT WEIGHT LOSS PRODUCTS AND
THINGS LIKE THAT DOCK
AND PEOPLE PRETENDING TO BE THINGS THAT THEY ARE NOT, LIKE
STAR BOOKS.
WE SELL COFFEE AND WE HAVE A MERMAID WITH THREE THINGS
THAT DOCK
HE IS JUST USING THAT AS A HYPOTHETICAL.
THAT IS NOT AN ACTUAL THING.
AT LEAST NOT THAT I KNOW OF.
HERE IS THE ONLY PROBLEM, AND I DON'T KNOW, MAYBE YOU
DISAGREE WITH ME ON THIS.
200 OF THESE PAGES HAVE NOW BEEN PERMANENTLY BANNED FROM
USING GOOGLE ADSENSE AND MAKING REVENUE THROUGH THAT PLATFORM.
WE DON'T KNOW WHO THE ARBITERS ARE BEHIND-THE-SCENES AND
WE ALSO DON'T KNOW WHICH WEBSITES HAVE NOW BEEN
PERMANENTLY BANNED AND SO THAT WORRIES ME A LITTLE BIT.
I HEAR YOU.
IF IT GOES FURTHER, I START GETTING DEEPLY CONCERNED
BECAUSE REMEMBER, THE MEDIA THINKS, THE MAINSTREAM
MEDIA THINKS THAT THEY DON'T HAVE A BIAS, BUT THEY DO.
IT'S NOT A CONSERVATIVE OR LIBERAL ONE, IT IS AN
ESTABLISHMENT BY US.
THEY VIEW THE WORLD THROUGH THE PRISM OF INSIDERS AND
BASICALLY THE MAJOR CITIES THAT THEY LIVE IN WASHINGTON NEW
YORK LA IN SEPARATE CISCO.
THEY THINK THAT THE SYSTEM IS FINE AND THE STATUS QUO IS
FINE AND THE GOVERNMENT LARGELY TELLS THE TRUTH ARE ALMOST
ALWAYS TELLS THE TRUTH UNTIL TRUMP CAME AND THAT THE
PENTAGON IS WONDERFUL, ETC.
IF YOU WERE TO SAY I DON'T BELIEVE THE GOVERNMENT ON
CERTAIN THINGS THEY MIGHT SAY, CONSPIRACY THEORISTS.
THAT IS THEIR WORLDVIEW.
NOW THEY START BANNING THAT STUFF, THAT IS CRAZY TALK.
BECAUSE THEIR PERSPECTIVE IS NOT THE ONLY CORRECT
PERSPECTIVE, EVEN FOR GUYS THAT ARE MENTAL LIKE ALEX JONES.
HE IS B MENTAL.
I JUST REALIZED SOMETHING.
INFO WARS PEDALS RIDICULOUS CONSPIRACY THEORIES THAT
ARE NOT BASED ON FACT IT ALL.
THE WHOLE PIZZA GATE THING, THEY WERE ESSENTIAL IN SPREADING
THAT RIDICULOUS CONSPIRACY THEORY THAT COULD'VE GOTTEN
PEOPLE KILLED BY THE WAY.
THINK ABOUT WHERE INFO WARS MAKE SOME REVENUE OR
CONSIDERABLE MATTER OF REVENUE.
YOUTUBE WHICH IS OWNED BY YOU GOOGLE.
I HEAR YOU.
HOPE THEY DON'T GO IN THAT DIRECTION BECAUSE AS MUCH
OF A LIMIT TAKE AS ALEX JONES IS AND IS MUCH AS MOST OF HIS
PROGRAM WITH OUTRIGHT FABRICATIONS, THAT IS LIKE
THEIR OPINION MAN THOUGHT TO ME THERE IS A DIFFERENCE
BETWEEN I PUBLISHED A STORY THAT I KNEW TO BE INCORRECT LIKE
HARRY REID IS NOW AN ELVIS PERSON EIGHT ARE IN VEGAS.
FUN, BUT NOT SURE.
ON THE OTHER HAND ANA, THAT IS WHY THIS IS A LITTLE BIT
DANGEROUS AND A VERY CHALLENGING QUESTION BECAUSE IN THE
MIDDLE OF SAYING THAT I REMEMBERED, ALEX JONES TOLD
A LIE ABOUT HARRY REID THAT WAS MUCH WORSE.
HE SAID HE WAS BEHIND SANDY HOOK BEING A FALSE FLAG OPERATION.
THAT IS WHAT I'M SAYING THOUGH.
HAS ALEX JONES AT SOME POINT REPORTED STORIES THAT MIGHT
BE ACCURATE?
SURE.
BUT HE ALSO INTENTIONALLY MISLEADS THE PUBLIC ABOUT
THINGS THAT ARE DANGEROUS.
THAT IS THE OTHER PROBLEM AS TO WHY THIS IS A TRICKY ISSUE,
BECAUSE I DON'T KNOW WHERE ALEX JONES ACTUALLY THINKS.
HE IS THE RAVINGS OF A LUNATIC MY DOC LIKE SEEN WHAT HE THINKS.
SORRY TO BRING IT UP, BUT THINK ABOUT WHAT HAPPENED AT THE
RNC AND HOW HE THEY PREMEDITATED AND PLAN THAT OUT.
THEY COMPLETELY MANIPULATED THE DISCUSSION IN THE MEDIA
ABOUT WHAT THEY DID.
THEY HAD ONE OF THEIR PEOPLE LEAD THEM ONTO A STAGE IN
PERSON LIKE THAT INDIVIDUAL WAS ONE OF OUR PRODUCERS AND
THAT THEY WERE INVITED ONTO A STAGE.
THEY DO INTENTIONAL THINGS TO LIE TO PEOPLE TO
YOU ARE ABSOLUTELY RIGHT ABOUT THAT.
LET ME MAKE THE DISTINCTIONS.
WE KNOW THEIR PERSONAL EXPERIENCE THAT THEY ARE BRAZEN
LIARS AND THEY HAVE NO ATTACHMENT TO THE TRUTH BECAUSE
AS ANA POINTED OUT, THEY PRETENDED THAT ONE OF THEIR OWN
PRODUCERS WAS A PRODUCER AND INVITED THEM ONTO THE STAGE AND
AFTERWARD THEY SAID WITH A STRAIGHT FACE, THEY INVITED
US ON.
CABLE THEY DID THIS, I'M GOING TO TAKE MY SHIRT OFF.
AND THEN THEY REFERRED TO, AND YOU SEE ON THE VIDEOTAPE,
IT IS THEIR PRODUCER, NONE OF OUR PRODUCERS ASKED THEM TO
BEYOND THAT YOU SEE WHO IT IS.
ANYWAY, WHETHER YOU BELIEVE US OR THEM, A POINT IS WE KNOW
AND WE KNOW THAT HE KNOWS.
HE KNOWS IT IS HIS OWN PRODUCER AND HE LIES ABOUT IT
WITHOUT BLINKING.
THE FLIPSIDE IS HE IS FULL-BLOWN MENTAL.
REMEMBER THE THINGS THAT HE SAID I WANT TO GO TO SPACE.
WE ARE UNDER ATTACK.
IT IS AN ALIEN FORCE NOT OF THIS WORLD.
IT'S THE DEVIL, OKAY?
IF YOU WATCH THE WHOLE CLIP THAT WE SHOWED, HE REALLY
BELIEVES THAT THE EARTH IS UNDER ATTACK BY ALIENS AND THE DEVIL.
CUCKOO FOR COCOA PUFFS.
ON THE OTHER HAND, IT'S A FREE COUNTRY AND YOU'RE ALLOWED
TO BE MENTAL.
I WOULDN'T WANT THEM SITTING DOWN INFO WARS, I THINK
THAT IS VERY SCARY TALK.
OF COURSE YOU ARE ALLOWED TO BE MENTAL, YOUR MENTAL
STATEMENTS, AS LONG AS THEY DON'T SAY VIOLENCE AND I'M THINK
AT SOME CASES HE DOESN'T SAY VIOLENCE, GOOGLE IS A
PRIVATE COMPANY.
THEY CAN MAKE WHATEVER BUSINESS DECISION THEY WANT TO MAKE DIVE
THEY WATCH INFO WORSE COVERAGE AND THEY REALIZE THAT THIS IS
ACTUALLY DANGEROUS, MISLEADING, GOOGLE CAN MAKE THAT DECISION.
GOOGLE CERTAINLY CAN'T DIE IF I WAS ADVISING GOOGLE, I
THINK I WOULD TELL THEM NOT TO, BUT I AM NOT ADVISING THEM
AND THAT IS LIKE MY OPINION, MAN THOUGHT THAT IS WHY YOUR
ORIGINAL POINTS IS A GREAT ONE.
IF THEY ARE JUST GETTING RID OF THINGS THAT ARE OBVIOUSLY
FAKE IT SEEMS LIKE IT'S A GOOD THING AND I AGREE WITH IT,
BUT IT DOES START TO GO DOWN THE SLOPE THAT IS A LITTLE DANGEROUS
AS TO WHO'S THE ARBITER OF WHAT'S REAL AND WHAT'S NOT.
THEY CERTAINLY DON'T HAVE TO GIVE MONEY THROUGH ADSENSE
TO PEOPLE THAT THEY THINK ARE MAKING THINGS UP AND ARE
IMPERSONATING OTHER PEOPLE IN ALL OF THE OTHER THINGS
THAT THEY POINT OUT HERE.
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét