>>> THE SENATE HEALTH CARE BILL IS A REPUDIATION OF NEARLY EVERY
PROMISE THE PRESIDENT MADE. NO CUTS TO MEDICAID, VERY
EXPLICIT ON THAT, LOWER PREMIUMS AND DEDUCTIBLES AND INSURANCE
COVERAGE FOR EVERYONE. >> I'M NOT GOING TO CUT SOCIAL
SECURITY LIKE EVERY OTHER REPUBLICAN AND I'M NOT GOING TO
CUT MEDICAID OR MEDICARE. SAVE MEDICAID, MEDICARE AND
SOCIAL SECURITY WITHOUT CUTS. >> WE'RE GOING TO HAVE A HEALTH
CARE THAT IS FAR LESS EXPENSIVE AND FAR BETTER.
>> YES, PREMIUMS WILL BE COMING DOWN.
YES, DEDUCTIBLES WILL BE COMING DOWN.
>> EVERYBODY HAS TO BE COVERED. I DON'T CARE IF IT COSTS ME
VOTES OR NOT. MUCH BETTER THAN THEY'RE TAKEN
CARE OF NOW. >> I'VE BEEN TALKING ABOUT A
PLAN WITH HEART. I SAID ADD SOME MONEY TO IT.
A PLAN WITH HEART. >> STRICTLY SPEAKING THE BILL
DOESN'T EVEN FULFILL THE PRESIDENT'S PROMISE TO REPEAL
THE AFFORDABLE CARE ACT. IT MERELY AMENDS THE ACA.
THE DEPUTY WHITE HOUSE PRESS SECRETARY WAS ASKED SPECIFICALLY
ABOUT THE PRESIDENT'S MEDICAID PROMISE.
>> SO IF CUTTING MEDICAID WAS WRONG WHEN HE WAS A CANDIDATE,
WHY IS IT RIGHT IN THE NEW REPUBLICAN SENATE BILL?
>> I DON'T BELIEVE THE PRESIDENT HAS SPECIFICALLY SAID THAT IT IS
RIGHT TO CUT MEDICAID. >> DOES THE PRESIDENT STILL
BELIEVE THAT THERE SHOULD BE NO CUTS?
>> I DO KNOW THAT HE WANTS TO PROTECT AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE.
>> BUT THERE HAS BEEN AN UPDATE. THE NEW POSITION IS, I LIKE
CUTTING MEDICAID SO MUCH, I'LL GOING TO THROW A PARTY IN THE
ROSE GARDEN WITH HOUSE REPUBLICANS.
ON TV IN FRONT OF THE WHOLE COUNTRY WHILE WE ALL WATCHED.
IF THERE WAS ANY DOUBT, THE PRESIDENT JUST TWEETED, I AM
VERY SUPPORTIVE OF THE SENATE HEALTH CARE BILL.
I'M JOINED BY THE EDITOR-IN-CHIEF.
THIS WAS YOUR SUMMATION. POOR PEOPLE PAY MORE FOR WORSE
INSURANCE. I FIND THE BAIT-AND-SWITCH HERE
PRETTY REMARKABLE GIVEN THE WAY THE PRESIDENT HE SEPARATED
HIMSELF IN THE PRIMARY AND THE PROMISE TS THAT HE MADE.
>> THIS IS A REALLY BAD DAY IN AMERICAN POLITICS.
IT ISN'T SUPPOSED TO WORK LIKE THIS.
THERE IS THIS LINE THAT YOU'RE HEARING WHEN YOU TALK TO
REPUBLICANS ABOUT THIS BILL. GOT TO PASS IT.
WHAT THEY PROMISED TO DO WAS REPEAL AND REPLACE.
THEY HAVE TO KEEP THEIR PROMISE. THEY MADE A PROMISE TO PEOPLE
AND YOU HEARD IT. THEY UNDERSTOOD WHAT PEOPLE
DIDN'T LIKE ABOUT OKLAHOMA. IT LEFT A LOT OF PEOPLE
UNCOVERED. MITCH McCONNELL SAID ABOUT 25
MILLION PEOPLE UNCOVEREDFUL PREMIUMS WERE TOO HIGH, CO-PAYS
TOO HIGH, PEOPLE ENDED UP WITH INSURANCE THEY COULDN'T AFFORD
TO USE. SO THEY SAID THEY WOULD REPEAL
AND REPLACE OBAMACARE SOMETHING THAT FIX THESE PROBLEMS.
THIS MAKES EVERYONE OF THEM WORSE.
HIGHER DEDUCTIBLES, HIGHER PREMIUMS.
HIGHER CO-PAYS, FEWER PEOPLE COVERED.
YOU'RE SUPPOSED TO BE ABLE TO TRUST THAT PEOPLE WANT TO GO IN
THE DIRECTION THEY TOLD YOU. MAYBE THEY'RE SAYING IT WILL DO
MORE THAN THEY SAY. THE BASIC DIRECTION.
THAT'S NOT WHAT THIS IS. THEY'RE GOING THE EXACT
OPPOSITE. >> PART OF THIS COMES BACK TO
THIS. THE DISTRIBUTIONAL IMPACT OF THE
MEDICAID CUTS. IT WAS 48% OF THE PEOPLE IN
EXPANSION MEDICAID THERE. TO ME THIS IS SUCH A TELL OF WLL
THEY TALKED ABOUT WHAT THEY'RE DOING TAKE.
A LIBERTY. >> SO MEDICAID.
SENDING IT BACK TO THE STATES. DAPG GROWTH RATE.
WE'VE BEEN DREAMING OF THIS SINCE YOU AND I WERE DRINKING
OUT OF A KEG. >> I WAS THINKING ABOUT
SOMETHING ELSE. I WAS THINKING ABOUT R
MEDICAID
EVER PAY MORE FOR LESS CARE.
I HEARD IT BEFORE. A LOT WAS GETTING ALIGHTED.
THERE ARE STATES THAT HAVE REFUSED TO EXPAND MEDICAID BY
CHOICE. THEY DON'T WANT POOR PEOPLE TO
HAVE THAT. IF YOU MOVE ALL THE PEOPLE WHO
COULD GET MEDICAID ON TO THESE PRIVATE PLANS AND THE.
CHEAPER PLANS, WHAT THEY GET IS HEALTH INSURANCE MUCH WORSE.
THEY HAVE TO PAY QUITE A BIT MORE FOR IT.
THERE IS THIS PIECE THAT PEOPLE WON'T REPORT THIS MUCH ON IT.
IT IS REALLY IMPORTANT. THE AFFORDABLE CARE ACT TIES
SUBSIDIES TO HEALTH INSURANCE PLANS THAT COVERS 70% OF YOUR
COSTS. THIS MOVES IT TO 58%.
YOU'RE LOOKING AT A 7,000 DEDUCTIBLE.
IF YOU WANTED TO ENCAMPUS LATE IT.
YOU MOVE FROM HEALTH INSURANCE, A 7,000 OR MORE DEDUCTIBLE.
AND SUBSIDIES, THAT'S ALL YOU CAN GET IT FOR.
IT IS A REALLY PRO FOUND CHANGE. >> THEY'VE BEEN ESSENTIALLY
OSTENSIBLY PUBLICLY NEUTRAL ON THIS.
AND PART OF WHAT IS INSIDIOUS ABOUT THIS, WHAT YOU'RE POINTING
TO. THIS SORT OF SHOS A LOT OF MONEY
TOWARD THE INSURANCE COMPANIES TO KEEP THEM NEUTRAL.
>> IF YOU LOOK AT THE AFFORDABLE CARE ACT, THEY TRY TO PUT
HEALTHY PEOPLE INTO THE INSURANCE MARKETS.
IN THIS ITERATION OF THE BILL, THERE IS NOTHING THAT REPLACES
THE MANDATE. THE HOUSE BILL HAD SOMETHING
CALLED CONTINUOUS COVERAGE. IT WAS A SHOT.
THIS HAS NOTHING. I ASKED PEOPLE, HOW WILL YOU
KEEP INSURANCE MARKETS STABLE? AND THEY HAVE THIS MULTI-BILLION
DOLLAR FUND. IT IS NOT A BAILOUT.
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét