Thứ Năm, 8 tháng 6, 2017

Youtube daily Jun 9 2017

S STATE OF

ADDICTIO

NANCY: BY THE LOOKS OF IT, HALEY

PATERNOSTER HAD IT ALL.

A BEAUTIFUL GIRL.

A FAMILY WHO ADORED HER, HER DAD

OWNS ONE OF ALBUQUERQUE'S MOST

SUCCESSFUL RESTAURANTS

BUT LOOKS CAN BE DECEIVING.

>> SHE WAS A GREAT GIR

ON THE FLIP SIDE OF THAT, SHE

HAD A HABIT THAT SHE COULDN'T

OVERCOME.

NANCY: HER DAD, STEVE, SAYS WHEN

HALEY WAS IN JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL

SHE WENT TO A PILL PARTY IN THE

FAR NORTHEAST HEIGHTS.

>> AT A CERTAIN POINT, A

STRATEGIC POINT, THE OPIATE

PILLS WOULD GET CUT OFF.

AND THEN THAT PERSON PROVIDING

THE PILLS, AN ADULT, WOULD

SWITCH THEM TO HEROIN.

NANCY: IT WAS 2008.

WHAT PATERNOSTER BELIEVES WAS

THE START OF SERIOUS OPOID AND

HEROIN ISSUES FOR SO MANY

ALBUQUERQUE TEENS.

HALEY WAS HOOKED.

SHE WAS ARRESTED FOR STEALING A

CAR FROM HER PARENTS

HER PUNISHMENT, A COURT ORDERED

TREATMENT PROGRAM.

IT WAS THERE,PATERNOSTER SAYS

HALEY MET OTHER TEENS., WHO WERE

REALLY STRUGGLING.

I SAID, HOW DO THESE GIRLS

MAKE IT?

AND SHE SAID, DADDY, THEY DON'T.

NANCY: PATERNOSTER SAYS MANY OF

THE GIRLS HALEY MET IN DRUG

TREATMENT, HAD BABIES.

MANY HAD BEEN ABUSED.

SOME WERE HOMELESS.

THEY HAD NO MONEY.

AND NO HOPE.

SO HALEY AND HER DAD BEGAN

COLLECTING CLOTHING, DIAPERS AND

TOILETRIES FOR TEENS GOING

THROUGH DRUG TREATMENT.

PATERNOSTER SAYS IN THE YEARS

FOLLOWING WHILE HALEY WORKED TO

HELP OTHERS, SHE STILL

STRUGGLED.

HEROIN HAD IT'S HOOKS IN HER.

IN APRIL, 2010 HALEY PATERNOSTER

DIED OF A HEROIN OVERDOSE.

SHE NEVER DREAMED FOR A

MOMENT IT COULD RESULT IN HER

DEATH.

NANCY: STEVE SAYS HE STRUGGLED

TOO.

HE DID THIS.

SAFE LACE TO STAY DURING THE

DAY FOR TEENS IN CRISIS.

A PLACE CALLED HALEY'S HAVEN.

>> THERE WILL ALWAYS BE FOOD

AVAILABLE.

NANCY: THERE IS A LAUNDRY ROOM

AND NURSERY.

THEY'LL BE COMPUTERS HERE TOO,

SO THEY CAN DO HOMEWORK, OR WORK

ON RESUMES.

AND PATERNOSTER SAYS THEY'LL

HAVE COUNSELORS, SOCIAL WORKERS,

AND ONCE A WEEK, A SALON

STYLIST.

>> SHOW THESE YOUNG WOMEN

SELF-ESTEEM WISE THEY BELONG

EVERYWHERE THEY SHOW UP TO.

NANCY: HALEY'S HAVEN IS

SCHEDULED TO OPEN LATER THIS

SUMMER.

>> ANYTHING I COULD DO BETWEEN

HERE AND WHEN I DRAW MY LAST

BREATH TO HELP ANOTHER PARENT

NOT HAVE TO GO THROUGH THE

FEELING OF LOSING A CHILD I

WOULD DO.

For more infomation >> Scalo owner uses daughter's heartbreaking death to help teens - Duration: 2:19.

-------------------------------------------

James Comey Testimony Grows Donald Trump Obstruction Case | Rachel Maddow | MSNBC - Duration: 22:45.

>> THANKS TO YOU AT HOME FOR JOINING US THI THIS HOUR.

RUN FOR OFFICE. RUN FOR SOMETHING.

PUBLIC SERVICE HAS GOTTEN A BAD RAP IN MY GENERATION AND I THINK

SUBSEQUENT GENERATIONS. I'M OLD.

PUBLIC SERVICE HAS GOTTEN A BAD RAP.

BUT FORGET THAT. JUST RUN FOR OFFICE.

WE ARE A SMALL "D" DEMOCRATIC COUNTRY.

OUR GOVERNMENT IS OF THE PEOPLE, BY THE PEOPLE.

WHY NOT YOU? WHY SOMEBODY ELSE?

WHY NOT YOU? BUT IF YOU WERE NEVER PERSUADED

BY THAT ARGUMENT BEFORE, IF YOU NEVER FELT MOEFLTD TO SERVE YOUR

FELLOW CITIZENS, IF YOU NEVER FELT THAT IMPULSE TO SHAPE THE

FUTURE OF OUR COUNTRY AND YOUR COMMUNITY, EVEN IF NONE OF THAT

STUFF MOVED YOU IN THE PAST, TODAY, WE ALL GOT ONE BIG FAT

NEW, VERY PER SWAISSIVE REASON WHY WE SHOULD RUN FOR OFFICE.

YOU SHOULD RUN FOR OFFICE IF YOU'RE NOSEY, BECAUSE IT'S THE

ONLY WAY TO SATISFY AN ACUTE SENSE OF NOSEYNESS.

ONLY PEOPLE WHO ONCE RAN FOR OFFICE AND WANT A SEAT IN THE

UNITED STATES SENATE AND GOT THEMSELVES ONTO THE INTELLIGENCE

COMMITTEE, ONLY THOSE PEOPLE GOT TO HEAR THE REALLY JUICY STUFF

TODAY. >> WHAT DO YOU KNOW ABOUT THE

RUSSIAN BANK V.E.B.? >> NOTHING THAT I CAN TALK ABOUT

IN AN OPEN SETTING. >> WAS THE FBI ABLE TO CONFIRM

ANY CRIMINAL ALLEGATIONS CONTAINED IN THE DOCUMENT?

>> MR. CHAIRMAN I DON'T THINK THAT'S A QUESTION I CAN ANSWER

IN AN OPEN SETTING. >> IS THE NOT TRUE MR. FLYNN WAS

AND IS A CENTRAL FIGURE IN THIS INVESTIGATION IN THE

RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN AND THE RUSSIANS?

>> I CAN'T ANSWER THAT IN AN OPEN SETTING, SIR.

>> WHEN YOU READ THE DOSSIER, WHAT WAS YOUR REACTION GIVEN IT

WAS 100% DIRECTED AT THE PRESIDENT-ELECT?

>> NOT A QUESTION I CAN NANCE OPEN SETTING, MR. CHAIRMAN.

>> DOES THAT MEAN THE DOSSIER IS NOT BEING REVIEWED OR

INVESTIGATING OR FOLD UP ON IN ANY WAY?

>> OBVIOUSLY CAN'T COMMENT EITHER WAY.

I CAN'T TALK IN AN OPEN SETTING ACT THE INVESTIGATION.

>> DID YOU HAVE AT THE TIME THAT STORY WAS PUBLISHED ANY

INDICATION OF ANY CONTACT BETWEEN TRUMP PEOPLE AND

RUSSIANS RUSSIAN INTELLIGENCE OFFICERS, GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS

OR ASSOCIATES OF THE RUSSIAN GOVERNMENT?

>> I CAN'T ANSWER SITTING HERE. >> DID YOU EVER COME CLOSE TO

CLOSING THE INVESTIGATION ON MR. FLYNN?

>> I DON'T THINK I CAN TALK ABOUT THAT IN OPEN SETTING

EITHER. >> ARE YOU AWARE OF ANY MEETINGS

BETWEEN THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION OFFICIALS AND RUSSIAN OFFICIALS

DURING THE CAMPAIGN THAT HAVE NOT BEEN ACKNOWLEDGED BY THOSE

OFFICIALS IN THE WHITE HOUSE? >> THAT'S NOT -- EVEN IF I

REMEMBER CLEARLY, THAT'S NOT A QUESTION I CAN ANSWER IN AN OPEN

SETTING. >> DO YOU BELIEVE TRUMP COLLUDED

WITH RUSSIA? >> IT'S A QUESTION I DON'T THINK

I SHOULD ANSWER IN AN OPEN SETTING.

>> I WANT TO KNOW. [ LAUGHS ]

ONLY ONE WAY TO FIND OUT. WHAT WE SAW TODAY WAS THE OPEN

SESSION, OBVIOUSLY. THE PUBLIC HEARING WHICH WE WERE

ALL ALLOWED TO WATCH. BUT AFTER THE PUBLIC SESSION

ENDED UP AT 2:00 P.M. TODAY, THAT SAME SMALL GROUP OF

SENATORS, THEY GOT TO QUESTION THE FIRED FBI DIRECTOR AGAIN,

EXCEPT IN THE AFTERNOON SERKS WE WEREN'T THERE.

IT WAS THE CLOSED SESSION, CLASSIFIED, AND PRESUMABLY HE

WAS ABLE TO GIVE THEM ANSWERS TO ALL THOSE QUESTIONS HE SAID HE

COULDN'T ANSWER IN THE OPEN SESSION WE GOT TO SEE ON TV.

EVEN IN THAT UNCLASSIFIED TESTIMONY THAT WEE ALL SAW THAT

WE DID LEARN A TON, I THINK THE MOST SURPRISING SUBSTANTIVE

THING WE LEARNED -- WE LEARNED A LOT OF GOSSIP THINGS, BUT THE

SUBSTANTIVE THING WE LEARNED TODAY WHICH I DEFINITELY DIDN'T

SEE COMING, AND IT HAS NOW TURNED INTO A STORY THAT IS

CONTINUING TO DEVELOP INTO THIS TEERNGS BIG SURPRISING

SUBSTANTIVE REVEAL TODAY WAS ABOUT THE CURRENT ATTORNEY

GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES, JEFF SESSIONS, ATTORNEY GENERAL

SESSIONS APPEARS TO BE IN THE CROSS HAIRS IN A WAY WE DIDN'T

PREVIOUSLY UNDERSTAND. YESTERDAY WE GOT AN ADVANCED

COPY OF DIRECTOR COMEY'S OPENING STATEMENT FOR HIS TESTIMONY TO

LISTEN TO WE GOT THAT IN WRITING.

AND PART OF THAT STATEMENT EXPLAINED JAMES COMEY'S

ALLEGATIONS ALLEGATION THAT PRESIDENT TRUMP TOLD JAMES COMEY

IN A ONE-ON-ONE MEETING IN THE OVAL OFFICE THAT THE FBI SHOULD

LET GO ITS ONGOING CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION INTO THE TRUMP

NATIONAL SECURITY ADVISER MIKE FLYNN.

THE INVESTIGATION INTO MIKE FLYNN AND HIS CONTACTS WITH THE

RUSSIAN GOVERNMENT. IN HIS WRITTEN TESTIMONY THAT WE

GOT YESTERDAY IN ADVANCE, COMEY SAID AFTER PRESIDENT TRUMP TOLD

HIM TO LAY OFF THE FLYNN INVESTIGATION, DIRECTOR COMEY

LEFT THAT MEETING AND IMMEDIATELY WROTE A MEMO ABOUT

WHAT HAD HAPPENED AT THAT MEETING.

HE ALSO TOLD HIS SENIOR STAFF AT THE FBI EXACTLY WHAT HAD

HAPPENED AT THAT MEETING AND WHAT THE PRESIDENT TOLD HIM TO

DO. BUT HE DID NOT TELL THE HEAD OF

THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT. HE DID NOT TELL HIS SUPERIOR OR

ATTORNEY GENERAL JEFF SESSIONS. AND THIS IS HOW HE EXPLAINED WHY

HE DIDN'T TELL JEFF SESSIONS. THIS IS WHAT HE PUT IN HIS

WRITTEN STATEMENT. QUOTE, WE CONCLUDED, IT MADE

LITTLE SENSE TO REPORT IT TO ATTORNEY GENERAL JEFF SESSIONS

WHO WOULD LIKELY RECUSE HIMSELF FROM INVESTIGATIONS.

HE DID SO TWO WEEKS LATER. WE GOT THAT IN WRITING FROM

JAMES COMEY YESTERDAY. AT THE TIME THAT STATEMENT CAME

OUT YESTERDAY, WE WERE ALL WONDERING, HOW DID THE FBI KNOW

TWO WEEKS IN ADVANCE THAT ATTORNEY GENERAL JEFF SESSIONS

WAS GOING TO HAVE TO RECUSE HIMSELF ON THE RUSSIA

INVESTIGATION? THERE'S AN ANSWER TO THAT.

DIRECTOR COMEY SOLVED THAT MYSTERY AND EXPLAINED THAT TODAY

AND HIS EXPLANATION, FRANKLY, MADE PERFECT SENSE.

>> WE WERE CONVINCED, IN FACT I THINK WE HEARD THE CAREER PEOPLE

RECOMMENDING THAT HE RECUSE HIMSELF, THAT HE WAS NOT GOING

TO BE IN CONTACT WITH RUSSIA RELATED MATTERS MUCH LONGER AND

THAT TURNED OUT TO BE THE CASE. >> THAT DOES MAKE SENSE.

THE FBI DIRECTOR IS SAYING THE PRESIDENT TOLD ME TO STOP THE

FBI INVESTIGATION INTO MIKE FLYNN CONCERNING FLYNN'S

CONTACTS WITH RUSSIA. COMEY TOLD MULTIPLE OTHER PEOPLE

ABOUT THAT DIRECTIVE FROM THE PRESIDENT, TOLD MULTIPLE OTHER

PEOPLE AT THE FBI. BUT HE AND HIS TOP TEAM AT THE

FBI DELIBERATELY DECIDED THEY WEREN'T GOING TO ALERT THE

ATTORNEY GENERAL BECAUSE ALL OF THIS PEOPLE AT THE FBI KNEW THE

ATTORNEY GENERAL WAS GOING TO HAVE TO RECUSE HIMSELF FROM

RUSSIA RELATED MATTERS AND SOON. HE EXPLAINS THE REASON HE KNEW

HE WAS GFGTS TO RECUSE HIMSELF IS BECAUSE A PROCESS WAS ALREADY

UNDERWAY AT THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT TO DECIDE ABOUT

WHETHER OR NOT HE WAS GOING TO HAVE TO RECUSE HIMSELF AND THE

CAREER PEOPLE AT THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT KNEW HE WAS GOING TO

HAVE TO RECUSE HIMSELF. THAT WAS KNOWN AT THE JUSTICE

DEPARTMENT. THE FBI PEOPLE HAD HEARD ABOUT

THAT. SO THAT MAKES SENSE.

IN SHORT ORDER, JEFF SESSIONS ISN'T ALLOWED TO KNOW ANYTHING

RELATED TO ANY INVESTIGATIONS SO DON'T TELL HIM ABOUT THE FLYNN

INVESTIGATION NOW IF HE'S GOING TO HAVE TO PRETEND TO FORGET

ABOUT IT TWO WEEKS DOWN THE LINE.

ALL MADE CLEAR BY TODAY'S TESTIMONY.

ALL MAKES SENSE, ALL IS WELL. EXCEPT FOR THE REASON YOU SHOULD

RUN FOR OFFICE. IN CASE YOU'RE NOSEY SO YOU CAN

GET INTO THAT FREAKING CLOSED SESSION.

BECAUSE IN ADDITION TO ALWAYS RECUSAL STUFF WHICH WAS PUT TO

BED AND EXPLAINED IN TOTALLY NORMAL TERMS TODAY, APPARENTLY

THERE'S SOMETHING ELSE GOING ON WE'RE NOT ALLOWED TO KNOW ABOUT

YET WITH REGARD TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND RUSSIA.

>> IN YOUR STATEMENT YOU SAID THAT YOU AND THE FBI LEADERSHIP

TEAM DECIDED NOT TO DISCUSS THE PRESIDENT'S ACTIONS WITH

ATTORNEY GENERAL SESSIONS, EVEN THOUGH HE HAD NOT RECUSED

HIMSELF. WHAT WAS IT ABOUT THE ATTORNEY

GENERAL'S OWN INTERACTIONS WITH THE RUSSIANS OR HIS BEHAVIOR

WITH REGARD TO THE INVESTIGATION THAT WOULD HAVE LED THE ENTIRE

LEADERSHIP OF THE FBI TO MAKE THIS DECISION?

>> OUR JUDGMENT AS I RECALL WAS THAT HE WAS VERY CLOSE TO AND

VEBL GOING TO RECUSE HIMSELF FOR A VARIETY OF REASONS.

WE ALSO WERE AWARE OF ENACTS I CAN'T DISCUSS IN AN OPEN SETTING

THAT WOULD MAKE HIS CONTINUED ENGAGEMENT IN A RUSSIA RELATED

INVESTIGATION PROBLEMATIC. >> SO IN ADDITION TO THE HE'S

GOING TO HAVE TO RECUSE HIMSELF WHICH IS NORMAL AND CAN BE

DISCUSSED ON TV. IN ADDITION TO THAT THERE'S

SOMETHING CLASSIFIED CONCERNING THE CURRENT ATTORNEY GENERAL

WHICH THE DIRECTOR OF THE FBI AND THE WHOLE TOP TEAM AT THE

FBI KNEW ABOUT IN FEBRUARY WELL BEFORE THE ATTORNEY GENERAL WAS

EVER RECUSED FROM THESE MATTERS. SOMETHING ABOUT THE ATTORNEY

GENERAL AND RUSSIA -- LET'S PLAY THAT BIT AGAIN.

THE WORD HE USED WAS PROBLEMATIC.

PLAY THAT PART AGAIN. >> WE WERE ALSO AWARE OF FACTS

THAT I CAN'T DISCUSS IN AN OPEN SETTING THAT WOULD MAKE HIS

CONTINUED ENGAGEMENT IN A RUSSIA RELATED INVESTIGATION

PROBLEMATIC. >> LIKE I SAID, RUN FOR OFFICE.

IT'S THE ONLY WAY YOU FIND OUT ON A DAY L LIKE TODAY WHATEVER

IS THAT CAN'T BE DISCUSSED IN AN OPEN SECHLGT WHAT HAPPENED NEXT

ON THIS MATTER CONCERNING THE ATTORNEY GENERAL IS THAT THESE

SENATORS WENT INTO A CLOSED SESSION, A CLASSIFIED SESSION

WITH DIRECTOR COMEY WHERE THEY GOT TO ASK HIM AGAIN ALL THESE

QUESTIONS THAT HE COULDN'T NANCE AN OPEN SETTING.

AFTER THEY HAD THAT CLASSIFIED CLOSED DOOR SESSION, SENATOR JOE

MANSION OF WEST VIRGINIA CAME OUT AND TALKED TO REPORTERS FROM

NBC NEWS AND TOLD THEM ESSENTIALLY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

NEEDS TO EXPLAIN, AT LEAST ONE OF HIS OWN MEETINGS WITH THE

RUSSIANS. >> JEFF COULD ADD A LOT OF LIGHT

TO IT IF YOU JUST WANT TO KNOW WHY HE RECUSED HIMSELF, OR HIS

MEETINGS HE HAD OR WHAT WAS SAID AND THIS AND THAT OR WHAT WE

DON'T KNOW OR YOU KNOW WE'VE PRETTY MUCH GOD GOTTEN PRETTY

GOOD RECORDS OF EVERYTHING. >> THERE'S ONE MEETING THAT HE

WON'T. THERE'S ONE MEETING THAT WE

DON'T. PEOPLE WOULD LIKE TO KNOW ABOUT

IT. WHAT'S THAT?

SO NOW WE ARE IN AN UNEXPECTED PLACE.

THE FBI, THE FIRED FBI DIRECTOR SAYS HE AND THE ENTIRE TOP

LEADERSHIP AT THE FBI WERE AWARE OF SOMETHING CLASSIFIED ABOUT

THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, SOMETHING THAT CANNOT BE DISCUSSED OPENLY

BUT MADE IT PROBLEMATIC FOR EVEN OTHER TOP LAW ENFORCEMENT

OFFICIALS IN FEBRUARY TO TALK WITH THE ATTORNEY GENERAL ABOUT

SOMETHING THAT RELATED TO RUSSIA.

AND THAT'S SEPARATE AND APART FROM THE ISSUE ISSUES FROM REAC

HIMSELF FROM THE RUSSIA INVESTIGATIONS A COUPLE WEEKS

LATER. I DID NOT SEE THIS COMING.

I HAVE NO IDEA WHAT THIS IS ABOUT.

PRESUMABLY, ADDITIONAL LIGHT WILL BE SHED ON IT AT SOME

POINT. BUT WHAT'S GOING ON WITH THE

ATTORNEY GENERAL HERE? THAT JUST CAME OUT OF NOWHERE.

WE MAY FIND OUT SOMETHING ABOUT THAT SOON, AT LEAST HE MAY FACE

QUESTIONS ABOUT IT SOON. THIS THAT I'M ABOUT TO SHOW YOU

HERE, THIS WAS NOT A VERY HIGH PROFILE THING BEFORE TODAY, BUT

NOW WITH THE REVELATIONS TODAY, IT'S NOW ALL OF A SUDDEN A BIG

RED LETTER ITEM ON THE CALENDAR THAT ATTORNEY GENERAL JEFF

SESSIONS IS EXPECTED TO GIVE TESTIMONY IN THE SENATE ON

TUESDAY. PREVIOUSLY SCHEDULED, IT'S AN

UNRELATED TOPIC, TUESDAY MORNING 10:00 A.M.

YOU WILL BE ALLOWED TO CALL IN SICK TO WORK THAT DAY ACCORDING

TO ME. I SHOULD NOTE THE ATTORNEY

GENERAL HAS A HISTORY OF GETTING SHY.

HE WAS DUE TO TESTIFY TO THE HOUSE AND TO THE SENATE A WEEK

BEFORE LAST AGAIN ON PREVIOUSLY SCHEDULED MATTERS UNRELATED TO

THE RUSSIA INVESTIGATION HE CANCELED BOTH OF THOSE

APPEARANCES AT THE LAST MINUTE. SOMETHING CAME UP.

SO WE'LL SEE IF HE KEEPS HIS DATE FOR NEXT WEEK.

RIGHT NOW HE'S SCHEDULED TO SPEAK TO A SENATE SUBCOMMITTEE

TUESDAY MORNING, 10:00 A.M. SO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL JEFF

SESSIONS I THINK WAS THE BIG

REVELATION TODAY. AND THEN WE HAVE WHAT I THINK IS

LIKELY TO CAUSE THE PRESIDENT HIMSELF THE MOST SERIOUS LEGAL

TROUBLE. >> DO YOU BELIEVE THE RUSSIA

INVESTIGATION PLAYED A ROLE? >> IN WHY I WAS FIRED?

YES. I WAS FIRED BECAUSE OF THE

RUSSIA INVESTIGATION, SOMETHING ABOUT THE WAY I WAS CONDUCTING

IT, THE PRESIDENT FELT CREATED PRESSURE ON HIM THAT HE WANTED

TO REVEAL. I WAS FIRED BECAUSE OF SOMETHING

OF THE WAY I WAS CONDUCTING THE RUSSIA INVESTIGATION WAS PUTTING

PRESSURE ON HIM AND IN SOME WAY IRRITATING HIM AND HE FIRED ME

BECAUSE OF THAT. I WAS FIRED BECAUSE OF THE

RUSSIA INVESTIGATION. I WAS FIRED IN SOME WAY TO

CHANGE OR THE ENDEAVOR WAS TO CHANGE THE WAY THE INVESTIGATION

WAS BEING CONDUCTED. IS THAT A "YES" A VERY BIG DEAL.

>> YES, THAT IS A VERY BIG DEAL. THE FBI DIRECTOR BEING FIRED BY

THE PRESIDENT TO TRY TO CHANGE OR STOP AN FBI INVESTIGATION

INTO THE PREHE PRESIDENT'S CAMP AND HIS TOP STAFFERS, THAT IS A

BIG FREAKING DEAL. EVEN IF THERE'S NO RUSSIA FACTOR

HERE, EVEN IF THIS INVESTIGATION WAS INTO CRIMINAL CHEATING AT

TIDDLYWINKS, THE PRESIDENT FIRING THE FBI DIRECTOR TO TRY

TO CHANGE OR STOP AN FBI INVESTIGATION INTO THE

PRESIDENT, HIS CAMPAIGN, OR HIS TOP STAFFERS, OR ANYTHING, THE

PRESIDENT TRY TO AFFECT AN ONGOING INVESTIGATION.

REGARDLESS OF THE BIG CONTEXT. AND IT'S VERY IMPORTANT FOR THE

PRESIDENT'S FUTURE THAT MOST OBSERVERS BELIEVE THAT POTENTIAL

OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE IS BEING INVESTIGATED BY THE SPECIAL

COUNSEL NOW. >> DO YOU BELIEVE THIS WILL RISE

TO OBJECT STUKS OF JUSTICE? >> I DON'T KNOW.

THAT'S BOB MUELLER'S JOB TO FIGURE OUT.

>> SPECIAL COUNSEL BOB MULLER IS INVESTIGATING NOT JUST RUSSIA,

NOT JUST THE QUESTION OF WHETHER OR NOT TRUMP COLLUDED IN THE

ATTACK. ACCORDING TO JAMES COMEY'S

TESTIMONY TODAY, HE IS INVESTIGATING WHETHER THERE WAS

A CRIMINAL EFFORT AFTER THE RUSSIAN ATTACK TO OBSTRUCT

JUSTICE AS THE RUSSIA AFFAIR STARTED TO COME UNDER

INVESTIGATION, HE'S INVESTIGATING WHETHER THERE WAS

AN EFFORT BY THE PRESIDENT OR OTHER PEOPLE IN THE

ADMINISTRATION TO OBSTRUCT JUSTICE HAS THOSE MATTERS WERE

BEING INVESTIGATED. AND HERE IS THE GIGANTIC THAT

THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES NOW HAS WITH THAT.

>> DID YOU AT ANY TIME URGE FORMER FBI DIRECTOR JAMES COMEY

IN ANY WAY, SHAPE, OR FORM?

>> NO. >> THAT WAS THE PRESIDENT LAST

MONTH, NO, NO, I DID NOT NOT URGE COMEY TO CLOSE DOWN THE

INVESTIGATION. DIRECTOR COMEY HAS NOW TESTIFIED

UNDER OATH THAT THE PRESIDENT DID URGE HIM TO CLOSE DOWN THE

FLYNN INVESTIGATION. HE ALSO TESTIFIED UNDER OATH

THAT WHEN THE PRESIDENT DENIED THAT, HE WAS LYING.

>> IN HIS PRESS CONFERENCE ON MAY 18th, THE PRESIDENT WAS

ASKED WHETHER HE URGED YOU TO SHUT DOWN THE INVESTIGATION INTO

MICHAEL FLYNN. THE PRESIDENT RESPONDED

NEW YORK CITY NEW YORK CITY NEXT QUESTION.

IS THAT AN ACCURATE STATEMENT? >> I DON'T BELIEVE IT IS.

>> THANK YOU. >> HERE'S WHAT THIS FIGHT IS

BOILING DOWN TO, THIS MAY BE WHAT THE PRESIDENCY ENDS UP

BOILING DOWN TO. DID THE PRESIDENT TELL THE FBI

DIRECTOR, JAMES COMEY, TO KILL THE MIKE FLYNN INVESTIGATION OR

DID HE NOT DO THAT? DID HE TRY TO KILL THE FLYNN

INVESTIGATION OR DIDN'T HE? THAT'S WHAT IT BOILS DOWN TO

EVEN IF THE RUSSIA THINGS NEVER HAPPENED.

THE PRESIDENT HAS A NEW PRIVATE SECTOR LAWYER NOW.

AS SOON AS JAMES COMEY'S TESTIMONY WAS OVER TODAY, THAT

LAWYER WENT INTO A PRESS AVAILABILITY AND DENIED THIS

CLAIM, DENIED THAT THE PRESIDENT EVER TRIED TO SHUT DOWN THE

FLYNN INVESTIGATION. HE DENIED IT ON THE PRESIDENT'S

BEHALF AGAIN IN NO UNCERTAIN TERMS.

THEY ARE DECLARING ESSENTIALLY THAT THIS IS THE HILL THEY WANT

TO DIE ON. >> THE PRESIDENT NEVER IN FORM

OR SUBSTANCE DIRECTED OR SUGGESTED THAT MR. COMEY STOP

INVESTIGATING ANYONE, INCLUDING THE PRESIDENT NEVER SUGGESTED

THAT MR. COMEY, QUOTE, LET FLYNN GO.

>> PRESIDENT IN FORM OR SUBSTANCE DID NOT DIRECT OR

SUGGEST, EVERYONE TOLD THE FBI DIRECTOR TO LET THE FLYNN

INVESTIGATION GO. THIS IS IT.

THIS IS THE NUT. IF THERE'S ONLY ONE THING THAT

EVERYBODY ON EARTH IS GOING TO REMEMBER ABOUT THIS -- THIS IS

WHAT IT'S BOILING DOWN TO. ON THE ONE HAND, THERE'S THE

PRESIDENT. PRESIDENT NOW AND THE

PRESIDENT'S LAWYER ON BEHALF OF THE PRESIDENT SAYING I NEVER DID

THAT. I NEVER TOLD THE FBI TO SHUT

DOWN THE FLYNN INVESTIGATION. ON THE OTHER HAND, THERE'S THE

FIRED FBI DIRECTOR WHO SAYS THE PRESIDENT DID DO THAT.

THERE'S THE MEMO THE DIRECTOR WROTE.

AND THERE'S THE PEOPLE AT THE FBI WHO THE FBI DIRECTOR TOLD

CONTEMPT RAINOUSLY RISER THAT CONVERSATION WITH THE PRESIDENT

HAPPENED. A LIST OF PEOPLE WHO THE FIRED

FBI DIRECTOR DESCRIBED TODAY AT LENGTH.

>> WHO ARE THOSE SENIOR LEADERS AT THE FBI YOU SHARED THESE

CONVERSATIONS WITH? >> AS I SAID, DEPUTY DIRECTOR,

MY CHIEF OF STAFF, GENERAL COUNSEL, DEPUTY DIRECTORS, CHIEF

COUNSEL, AND THEN MORE OFTEN THAN NOT, THE NUMBER THREE

PERSON AT THE FBI WHO'S THE ASSOCIATE DEPUTY DIRECTOR AND

QUITE OFTEN THE HEAD OF THE NATIONAL SECURITY BRANCH.

>> SO JUST TO SUMMARIZE HERE, THERE'S THE PRESIDENT SAYING I

NEVER TOLD THE FBI DIRECTOR TO STOP THE FLYNN INVESTIGATION.

SO THAT'S THE PRESIDENT. ON THE OTHER HAND, THERE'S JAMES

COMEY SAYING, YEAH, THE PRESIDENT DID THAT.

AND, BY THE WAY, I WROTE IT DOWN AT THE TIME AND, BY THE WAY, I

TOLD AT THE TIME THE FBI DEPUTY DIRECTOR, THE CHIEF OF STAFF,

THE GENERAL COUNSEL, THE ASSOCIATE DEPUTY DIRECTOR AND

PROBABLY THE HEAD OF THE NOBODY ELSE BRANCH AT THE FBI.

SO IT'S THEIR WORD AND THE WRITTEN DOCUMENTATION OF THE FBI

DIRECTOR ON ONE SIDE, AND ALSO MAYBE THEY'VE GOT TAPE.

>> DO YOU BELIEVE THERE WERE ANY TAPES OR RECORDINGS OF YOUR

CONVERSATIONS WITH THE PRESIDENT?

>> IT NEVER OCCURRED TO ME UNTIL THE PRESIDENT'S TWEET.

I'M NOT BEING FACETIOUS. >> BOTH OF YOU ARE IN THE SAME

FINDINGS. YOU BOTH HOPE THERE ARE TAPES

AND RECORDINGS? >> ALL I CAN DO IS HOPE THE

PRESIDENT SURELY KNOWS WHETHER HE TAPED ME.

IF HE DID, MY FEELINGS AREN'T HURT.

RELEASE ALL THE TAPES. I'M GOOD WITH IT.

I'VE SEEN THE TWEET ABOUT TAPES. LORDY, I HOPE THERE ARE TAPES.

>> EVEN IF THE WHOLE RUSSIA THING NEVER HAPPENED, THE RUSSIA

THING HAPPENED. THERE WAS A RUSSIAN ATTACK ON

OUR ELECTION. THERE'S A QUESTION WHETHER THEY

CONCLUDED OR HELPED. SET ALL THAT ASIDE.

THIS IS WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE IT'S COMING DOWN TO AS OF TODAY WITH

THE SPECIAL COUNSEL LOOKING INTO THE POSSIBILITY THAT THERE WAS

OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE. THIS IS WHAT IT'S COME DOWN TO.

THE PRESIDENT TRYING TO STOP AN ONGOING FBI CRIMINAL

INVESTIGATION IS A TEXT BOOK OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE.

THE EVIDENCE FOR WHETHER OR NOT HE DID THAT JUST ON THE TERMS OF

THE FLYNN INVESTIGATION, JUST IN TERMS OF MICHAEL FLYNN BEING

INVESTIGATED, THAT'S HOW IT BALANCES OUT AS OF TODAY.

ON THE ONE SIDE, THE PRESIDENT DENIES IT.

ON THE OTHER SIDE, JAMES COMEY SAYS HE DID IT AND HIS MEMO SAYS

HE DID IT AND HE HAS WITNESSES OF THE ENTIRE SENIOR STRUCTURE

OF THE FBI SAYING THEY WILL CORROBORATE THAT I SAID HE DID

IT THE NIGHT THAT I SAID HE DID IT.

AND MAYBE ALSO IT HAPPENED ON TAPE.

THAT'S THE BALANCE OF THE EVIDENCE.

PRESIDENT'S DENIAL VERSUS ALL OF THAT.

AND THAT IS WHY IT'S A PROBLEM FOR THE PRESIDENT THAT AS OF

TODAY HIS LEGAL DEFENSE DOESN'T APPEAR TO BE AWESOME.

WE HAVE MORE ON THAT AHEAD. PLUS, WE'VE GOT

"THE NEW YORK TIMES" REPORTER WHOSE STORY WAS ATTACKED BY

JAMES COMEY AND MY MULTIPLE REPUBLICAN SENATORS AT TODAY'S

HEARING. THE "TIM

For more infomation >> James Comey Testimony Grows Donald Trump Obstruction Case | Rachel Maddow | MSNBC - Duration: 22:45.

-------------------------------------------

James Comey: One Donald Trump Tweet May Have Led To Russia Special Counsel | The 11th Hour | MSNBC - Duration: 11:37.

>>> GOOD EVENING ONCE AGAIN FROM OUR HEADQUARTERS HERE IN NEW

YORK. DAY 140 OF THE TRUMP

ADMINISTRATION. PUT ANOTHER WAY, ELECTION DAY

WAS SEVEN MONTHS AGO TONIGHT. AND OUR ATTENTION ON THIS DAY

WAS CONSUMED BY THE WIDELY ANTICIPATED AND WIDELY WATCHED

TESTIMONY FROM JAMES COMEY, THE FORMER FBI DIRECTOR WHO WAS

FIRED BY THE PRESIDENT. COMEY SAID THE TRUMP

ADMINISTRATION LIED, PLAIN AND SIMPLE, ABOUT WHY HE WAS FIRED,

SAYING THE PRESIDENT CHANGED HIS STORY AND THAT IT REALLY WAS ALL

ABOUT RUSSIA. HE CONFIRMED TO FEEL PRESSURE TO

MAKE THE FLYNN INVESTIGATION GO AWAY.

COMEY ALSO SEEMS TO HAVE TAKEN THE PRESIDENT'S COMMENTS ABOUT

THE FBI AS A WHOLE VERY PERSONALLY.

>> EXPLANATIONS, THE SHIFTING SLGSS CONFUSED ME AND

INCREASINGLY CONCERNED ME. IT CONFUSED ME WHEN I SAW ON

TELEVISION THE PRESIDENT SAYING THAT HE ACTUALLY FIRED ME

BECAUSE OF THE RUSSIA INVESTIGATION.

ALTHOUGH THE LAW REQUIRED NO REASON AT ALL TO FIRE AN FBI

DIRECTOR, THE ADMINISTRATION THEN CHOSE TO DEFAME ME AND MORE

IMPORTANTLY, THE FBI, BY SAYING THAT THE ORGANIZATION WAS IN

DISARRAY, THAT IT WAS POORLY LED, THAT THE WORK FORCE HAD

LOST CONFIDENCE IN ITS LEADER. THOSE WERE LIES.

PLAIN AND SIMPLE. >> DO YOU BELIEVE THE RUSSIA

INVESTIGATION PLAYED A ROLE. ?

>> IN WHY I WAS FIRED? >> YES.

>> YES, BECAUSE THE PRESIDENT SAID SO.

'MY UNDERSTANDING I WAS FIRED BECAUSE OF THE RUSSIA

INVESTIGATION. I WAS FIRED IN SOME WAY TO

CHANGE -- THE ENDEAVOR WAS TO CHANGE THE WAY THE RUSSIA

INVESTIGATION WAS BEING CONDUCTED.

>> BEFORE WE DISCUSS TODAY'S COMMENTS FROM COMEY ABOUT PHILIP

AND WHETHER THE PRESIDENT PRESSURED HIM TO DROP THE

INVESTIGATION INTO FLYNN, RECALL THIS LINE FROM COMEY'S WRITTEN

THAT WE GOT A LOOK AT YESTERDAY. QUOTE, I HOPE YOU CAN SEE YOUR

WAY CLEAR TO LETTING THIS GO, TO LETTING FLYNN GO.

HE IS A GOOD GUY. I HOPE YOU CAN LET THIS GO.

THERE WAS A LOT MADE TODAY OVER THAT WORD "HOPE" AND WHAT IT

REALLY MEANT IN THIS CONTEXT. >> I HOPE -- THIS IS THE

PRESIDENT SPEAKING. I HOPE YOU CAN SEE YOUR WAY TO

LETTING THIS GO, TO LETTING FLYNN GO.

HE IS A GOOD GUY. I HOPE YOU CAN LET THIS GO.

NOW THOSE ARE HIS EXACT WORDS; IS THAT CORRECT?

>> CORRECT. >> AND YOU WROTE THEM HERE AND

YOU PUT THEM IN QUOTES? >> CORRECT.

>> THANK YOU FOR THAT. HE DID NOT DIRECT YOU TO LET IT

GO? >> NOT IN HIS WORDS, NO.

>> HE DID NOT ORDER YOU TO LET IT GO?

>> AGAIN, THOSE WORDS ARE NOT AN ORDER.

>> NO. HE SAID, I HOPE.

>> THE REASON I KEEP SAYING HIS WORDS IS, I TOOK IT AS A

DIRECTION. I MEAN THIS IS THE PRESIDENT OF

THE UNITED STATES, WITH ME ALONE, SAYING I HOPE THIS.

I TOOK IT AS THIS IS WHAT HE WANTS ME TO DO.

>> AS YOU PERCEIVED IT WHILE IT WAS A REQUEST THAT HE HOPED YOU

THAT DID AWAY WITH IT YOU PERCEIVED IT AS AN ORDER GIVEN

CONDITION AND SETTING AND OTHER LIKE CIRCUMSTANCES.

>> YES. >> YOU AND I ARE PROSECUTORS.

I'M NOT GOING TO REQUIRE YOU TO ANSWER.

I JUST WANT TO MAKE A STATEMENT THAT IN MY EXPERIENCE OF

PROSECUTING CASES WHEN A ROBBER HELD A GUN TO SOMEBODY'S HEAD

AND SAID I HOPE YOU WILL GIVE ME YOUR WALLET, THE WORD HOPE WAS

NOT THE MOST OPERATEDIVE WORD AT THAT MOMENT.

>> WHAT DID THE PRESIDENT REALLY MEAN?

RECALL THIS TWEET, QUOTE, JAMES COMEY HAD BETTER HOPE -- THERE

IS THAT WORD AGAIN -- THAT THERE ARE NO TAPES OF OUR

CONVERSATIONS BEFORE HE STARTS LEAKING TO THE PRESS.

COMEY SAYS IT WAS AFTER SEEING THAT TWEET FROM THE PRESIDENT

THAT HE DECIDED TO GET OUT HIS OWN VERSION OF THEIR MEETING IN

THE FORM OF HIS CONTEMPORARY NOTES.

AND HE DID THAT IN THE HOPES A SPECIAL COUNSEL WOULD BE

APPOINTED TO OVERSEE THIS INVESTIGATION.

>> LOOK, I -- I'VE SEEN THE TWEET ABOUT TAPES, LORDY, I HOPE

THEIR TAPES. >> DO YOU BELIEVE THERE WERE ANY

TAKE PLACE OR RECORDINGS OF YOUR CONVERSATIONS WITH THE

PRESIDENT? >> IT NEVER OCCURRED TO ME UNTIL

THE PRESIDENT'S TWEET. I'M NOT BEING FACETIOUS.

I HOPE THERE ARE, AND I'LL CONSENT TO THE RELEASE OF THEM.

>> BOTH OF YOU ARE IN THE SAME FINDINGS HERE.

YOU BOTH HOPE THERE'S TAPES AND RECORDINGS.

>> WELL, ALL I CAN DO IS HOPE. THE PRESIDENT SURELY KNOWS WHERE

HE TAPED ME. IF HE DID, MY FEELINGS AREN'T

HURT, RELEASE THE ENTIRE -- RELEASE ALL THE TAPES I'M GOOD

WITH IT THE PRESIDENT TWEETED ON FRIDAY AFTER I WAS FIRED I

BETTER HOPE THERE AREN'T TAPES. I MOLK UP MONDAY NIGHT MIDDLE OF

THE NIGHT THAT THERE MIGHT BE CORROBORATION FOR OUR

CONVERSATION, THERE MIGHT BE A TAPE AND MY JUDGMENT WAS THAT I

NEEDED TO GET THAT OUT IN THE PUBLIC SQUARE.

I ASKED THE FRIEND OF MINE TO SHARE THE CONTENT OF THE MEMO

WITH A REPORTER. I DIDN'T DO IT MYSELF FOR A

VARIETY OF REASONS BUT I ASKED HIM TO BECAUSE I THOUGHT THAT

MIGHT PROMPT THE APPOINTMENT OF A SPECIAL COUNSEL.

I ASKED A CLOSE FRIEND OF MINE TO IT.

>> OUR PANEL FEATURED THREE TOP-NOTCH CORRESPONDENTS,

KRISTEN WELKER, JULIE PACE, AND PETER BAKER.

AND HERE WITH US IN NEW YORK, JEREMY BASH CHIEF OF STAFF TO

THE CIA DIRECTOR. FORMER MEMBER OF THE HOUSE

INTELLIGENCE COMMITTEE. WELCOME TO ALL OF YOU AT THE END

OF THE A LONG INDICATE. KRISTEN I'LL START WITH YOU.

THE COVERAGE ON THE LEFT IS SLAM-DUNK OBSTRUCTION CASE.

THE CONVERSATION ON THE RIGHT, COMEY IS A LEAKER.

THE PRESIDENT WATCHED ABOUT 45 MINUTES OF THE HEARING IN THE

WHITE HOUSE. WHAT IS THE REACTION YOU ARE

HEARING FROM THE WHITE HOUSE? >> WELL, THAT SQUARES WITH MY

REPORTING AS WELL, BRIAN. LOOK, I THINK THE REACTION FROM

THE WHITE HOUSE IS THAT THEY ARE PICKING OUT WHAT THEY THINK

BENEFITS THEM FROM COMEY'S TESTIMONY.

THEY THINK THAT THERE ARE THINGS THAT HAPPENED TODAY THAT

ACTUALLY HELPED THE PRESIDENT'S ARGUMENT.

YOU ARE GOING TO HEAR HIS SURROGATES REPEAT THOSE THINGS

OVER AND OVER AGAIN. ONE, THAT HE CORROBORATED THE

FACT THAT THE PRESIDENT SAID THAT COMEY TOLD HIM HE WASN'T

UNDER INVESTIGATION. THE FACT THAT COMEY SAID TODAY

THAT THE PRESIDENT DIDN'T URGE

HIM TO DROP THE RUSSIA INVESTIGATION BROADLY.

AND THEN THAT POINT THAT YOU RAISE BRIAN, THE FACT THAT COMEY

ACKNOWLEDGED LEAKING OUT HIS OWN MEMO, THAT'S SOMETHING THAT I

THINK THE PRESIDENT AND HIS SURROGATES ARE REALLY GOING TO

BE FOCUSED OFTEN IN THE COMING DAYS AND WEEKS.

IN TERMS OF HOW THE PRESIDENT PROCESSED THIS ENTIRE HEARING

TODAY, I AM TOLD THAT HE WAS IN AND OUT OF A DINING ROOM IN THE

WHITE HOUSE. HE WAS WATCHING IT WITH HIS

LEGAL COUNSEL, WATCHING WITH SOME OF HIS TOP AIDES BUT THEY

REALLY TRIED TO KEEP HIM PREOCCUPIED TODAY, BRIAN.

THEY SCHEDULED A BIG SPEECH, HIS ADVISORS DID, HE STARTED OFF THE

DAY MEETING IN THE OVAL OFFICE WITH SOME OF HIS TOP OFFICIALS.

AND HE DIDN'T TWEET. THIS WAS A WHOLE NEW LEVEL OF

MESSAGE DISCIPLINE. THE QUESTION IS, IS HE GOING TO

BE ABLE TO KEEP THIS GOING? WHAT HAPPENS ON SUNDAY WHEN HE

WAKES UP TO ALL OF THE SUNDAY SHOWS?

WILL HE START TWEETING THEN? HE LEFT HIS MESSAGING TO HIS

OUTSIDE COUNSEL, MARC KASOWITZ TODAY, AND IT WAS REALLY A

REMARKABLE DISCIPLINE FROM A PRESIDENT WHO TYPICALLY WAKES UP

EVERYBODY MORNING AND STARTS TWEETING BEFORE 7:00 A.M.

>> JULIE, AS KRISTEN JUST SAID TONIGHT SAID HE WAS UNUSUALLY

DISCIPLINED DURING THE DAY. ALSO SAYS THEY DID STACK UP HIS

SCHEDULE. PART OF WHAT YOU WROTE TODAY WAS

ABOUT THE PRESIDENT'S RECORD ON TRUTH TELLING AND POTENTIAL

REVERSALS VERSUS COMEY, THE FORMER FBI CHIEF.

EXPAND ON THAT, IF YOU WOULD. >> I THINK WHAT WE SAW FROM

COMEY TODAY WAS ESSENTIALLY A CHALLENGE THAT HE LAID OUT TO

LAWMAKERS, TO THE PUBLIC, AND REALLY PERHAPS ULTIMATELY TO BOB

MUELLER WHO IS NOW THE SPECIAL COUNSEL HERE, WHICH IS WHICH

VERSION OF EVENTS DO YOU BELIEVE?

DO YOU BELIEVE THIS VERSION THAT I AM TELLING YOU I DETAILED IN

MEMOS, IN ESSENTIALLY REAL TIME AND THAT I AM DESCRIBING HERE IN

DETAIL UNDER OATH? OR DO YOU BELIEVE THE PRESIDENT

WHO HAS A TRACK RECORD FRANKLY OF SKIRTING THE TRUTH ON ISSUES

BIG AND SMALL. FROM THE VERY FIRST DAY IN

OFFICE, FIRST FULL DAY IN OFFICE, PRESIDENT TRUMP WAS

SENDING HIS ADVISORS OUT TO SKIRT THE TRUTH ABOUT THE SIZE

OF THE INAUGURATION CROWD. AND YOU SEE THIS IN POLL

NUMBERS. WHEN YOU ASK AMERICANS ABOUT THE

PRESIDENT'S ---- WHETHER THEY THINK HE IS HONEST AND

TRUSTWORTHY, HE'S AT A PRETTY LOW NUMBER THERE.

COMEY AGAIN LAYS OUT THIS CHALLENGE.

AND I THINK THAT -- THE ANSWER TO THAT QUESTION, WHO DO YOU

BELIEVE, MAY NOT RESULT IN ANYTHING THAT IS RELATED TO THE

INVESTIGATION OR ANY LEGAL IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PRESIDENT,

BUT IT'S CERTAINLY GOING TO HURT HIM POLITICALLY.

AND TO HAVE THAT KIND OF DAMAGE AT THIS POINT IN A PRESIDENCY, I

THINK WOULD BE PRETTY DIFFICULT TO OVERCOME.

>> PETER BAKER ALLOW ME TO QUOTE FROM PIECE BY PETER BAKER IN

TONIGHT'S "NEW YORK TIMES." HEADLINE FOR TRUMP, THE CLOUD

JUST GREW THAT MUCH DARKER. THANKS TO MR. TRUMP'S OWN

ACTIONS THE CLOUD DARKENED CONSIDERABLY ON THURSDAY, NOW

SEEMS LIKELY TO HOVER OVER HIS PRESIDENCY FOR POPTS IF NOT

YEARS. IN HIS ANGER AT MR. COMEY MR.

TRUMP MAY HAVE ACTUALLY MADE HIMSELF THE TARGET OF AN

INVESTIGATION. EXPAND ON THAT, PLEASE.

AND EXPLAIN HOW IT IS TO OUR AUDIENCE THE THROUGH LINE, HOW

ONE TWEET FROM THIS PRESIDENT RESULTED IN A SPECIAL COUNSEL.

>> WELL, THAT'S RIGHT EXACTLY. HE WAS UPSETTED A KEMME NOT

SAYING PUBLICLY THAT HE WAS NOT UNDER INVESTIGATION.

HE ACTUALLY HAD ASKED OF COURSE COMEY TO -- HE SAID HE HOPED

THAT COMEY WOULD DROP THE MICHAEL FLYNN INVESTIGATION.

BUT IN THE PROCESS OF THEN DECIDING TO FIRE HIM HE CREATED

A WHOLE BIGGER ISSUE THAN HE HAD TO BEGIN WITH, RIGHT?

WHATEVER WAS HAPPENING WITH THE RUSSIA INVESTIGATION HAD NOT LED

TO THE KIND OF SPECTACLE THAT WE SAW TODAY WITH THE PRESIDENT'S

OWN FORMER FBI DIRECTOR WAS ACCUSING HIM OF NOT BEING A

TRUTH TELLER. YOU KNOW, HE HAS CREATED A

PROBLEM FOR HIMSELF THROUGH HIS OWN ACTIONS.

WE NOW HAVE A VERY LIKELY SITUATION WHERE BOB MUELLER

COULD BE INVESTIGATED PRESIDENT TRUMP FOR OBSTRUCTION OF

JUSTICE. WE DON'T KNOW WHETHER THAT'S

TRUE OR NOT. THAT WAS ONE THIN THAT WE

LEARNED TODAY FROM JIM COMEY WHEN HE SAID HE HAD GIVEN OVER

HIS MEMOS OF THE CONVERSATIONS HE HAD WITH THE PRESIDENT TO BOB

MUELLER. THAT SUGGESTS AN INTEREST ON THE

PART OF INVESTIGATORS. IN ANY CASE HE SORT OF RAISED

THIS QUESTION ABOUT OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE OR IMPEDING AN

INVESTIGATION TO A POINT WHERE IT'S GOING TO BE DIDN'TED AND

HANG OUT THERE NOW FOR QUITE A LONG TIME.

RATHER THAN MAKING THE PROBLEM GO AWAY, RATHER THAN LIFTING THE

CLOUD WHICH IS THE PHRASE THAT JIM COMEY SAID HE USED THE CLOUD

AT THIS POINT IS HERE FOR QUITE A WHILE.

>> JEREMY BASH, WHERE WAS THE DAMAGE THE GREATEST, THE

POTENTIAL OBSTRUCTION CASE THAT COMEY CONTRIBUTED TODAY, OR

AGAIN AS SOME OF THE COVERAGE WOULD HAVE IT TONIGHT, COMEY'S

ADMISSION THAT HE LEAKED THOSE CONTEMPORANEOUS NOTES TO TRY TO

BRING ABOUT A SPECIAL COUNSEL. >> TWO PARTS.

JAMES COMEY, A MAN OF IMPECCABLE CREDENTIALS AND IMPECCABLE

RECOLLECT ATTITUDE STATING HE BELIEVED THE PRESIDENT OF THE

UNITED STATES ORDERED DIRECTED HIM, AFTER KPLEERG THE ROOM IF

THE OVALS TO SHUT DOWN AN INVESTIGATION IN

For more infomation >> James Comey: One Donald Trump Tweet May Have Led To Russia Special Counsel | The 11th Hour | MSNBC - Duration: 11:37.

-------------------------------------------

Colors For Children To Learn With Car Transporter - Learn Colors With Street Vehicles - Duration: 2:55.

Lalay Kids Tv

Black

Blue

Brown

Gray

Green

Orange

Pink

Purple

Red

White

Yellow

Thanks for watching!

Don't forget to like, subscribe, and share!

For more infomation >> Colors For Children To Learn With Car Transporter - Learn Colors With Street Vehicles - Duration: 2:55.

-------------------------------------------

Donald Trump Lawyer Botches NYTimes James Comey Memo Timeline | Rachel Maddow | MSNBC - Duration: 10:22.

>>> COUPLE DAYS AGO INVESTIGATIVE REPORTING MICHAEL

ISAKOFF HAD A SCOOP FROM YAHOO NEWS SAYING THE PRESIDENT WAS

HAVING A HARD TIME FINDING LAWYER.

LOTS OF BIG-NAME LAWYERS AND LAW FIRMS WERE ALL SAYING NO WHEN

THE WHITE HOUSE APPROACHED THEM OR THE PRESIDENT HIMSELF

PERSONALLY CALLED THEM TO ASK IF THEY WOULD REPRESENT THE

PRESIDENT ON THE RUSSIA ISSUE. THE PRESIDENT MAY NOT HAVE BEEN

ABLE TO GET BIG-NAME LAWYERS TO REPRESENT HIM BUT IT'S NOT LIKE

HE'S GOING WITHOUT. HE DID GET A LAWYER TO REPRESENT

HIM BUT WHAT HE GOT WAS ONE OF HIS OLD LAWYERS FROM NEW YORK

WHO REPRESENTED HIM IN HIS CASINO BUSINESS.

HE'S COME TO D.C. TO REPRESENT DONALD TRUMP IN THIS VERY

DIFFERENT MATTER. AND THAT DEFENSE STARTED OUT

TODAY WITH A SWING AND A MISS, WITH A TOTAL BASIC SCREWUP.

>> ALTHOUGH MR. COMEY TESTIFIED THAT HE ONLY LEAKED THE MEMOS IN

RESPONSE TO A TWEET, THE PUBLIC RECORD REVEALS THAT THE

"NEW YORK TIMES" WAS QUOTING FROM THOSE MEMOS THE DAY BEFORE

THE REFERENCED TWEET, WHICH BELIES MR. COMEY'S EXCUSE FOR

THIS UNAUTHORIZED DISCLOSURE OF PRIVILEGED INFORMATION AND

APPEARS TO BE ENTIRELY RETALIATORY.

>> THE DEBUT OF DONALD TRUMP'S NEW SLASH OLD LAWYER TODAY

ZINGING "THE NEW YORK TIMES" AND GETTING IT TOTALLY WRONG.

DID THE MATH WRONG OR BASICALLY SORT OF DID THE READING WRONG.

THIS IS AN EMBARRASSING ERROR. ABSOLUTELY 100% MISSED.

THIS IS THE WAY IT ACTUALLY HAPPENED.

THIS IS A STORY "THE NEW YORK TIMES" PUBLISHED

ON MAY 11th, TWO DAYS AFTER COMEY WAS FIRED.

IT'S A STORY ABOUT HOW THE PRESIDENT ASKED JAMES COMEY FOR

LOYALTY DURING A DINNER CONVERSATION THEY HAD.

THE DAY AFTER THAT STORY CAME OUT, THE PRESIDENT TWEETED THERE

MIGHT BE TAPES OF HIS CONVERSATIONS WITH JAMES COMEY.

THAT WAS MAY 12th. THEN IT WAS FOUR DAYS AFTER THE

PRESIDENT'S TWEET THAT THE "TIMES" PUBLISHED THIS SCOOP,

ASKING FLYNN TO KIBOSH THE INVESTIGATION AND HE WROTE A

MEMO ABOUT IT MEMORIALIZING IT AND MAKING A RECORD OF IT.

THAT'S THE WAY THIS HAPPENED. TODAY WE GOT AN EXPLANATION FROM

THE FIRED FBI DIRECTOR AS TO WHY THAT TIMELINE HAPPENED THE WAY

IT DID. >> I ASKED -- PRESIDENT TWEETED

ON FRIDAY THAT I BETTER HOPE THERE'S NOT TAPES.

I WOKE UP IN THE MIDDLE OF THE NIGHT ON MONDAY NIGHT BECAUSE IT

DIDN'T DAWN ON MY THAT THERE MIGHT BE CORROBORATION FOR OUR

CONVERSATION, THERE MIGHT BE A TAPE.

AND MY JUDGMENT WAS I NEEDED TO GET THAT OUT IN THE PUBLIC

SQUARE SO I ASKED A FRIEND OF MINE TO SHARE THE CONTENT WITH A

REPORTER. BUT I ASKED HIM TO BECAUSE I

THOUGHT THAT MIGHT PROMPT THE APPOINTMENT OF A SPECIAL

COUNSEL. >> SO THAT'S VERY

STRAIGHTFORWARD. FIRST, MAY 9th TRUMP FIRES

COMEY. TWO DAYS LATER "TIMES"

ACCOMPLISHES THAT STORY ABOUT THE PRESIDENT ASKING FOR COMEY'S

LOYALTY. AND FRIENDS WHO COMEY TOLD ABOUT

THAT DINNER AND THE LOYALTY REQUEST AT THE TIME.

THE NEXT DAY, THE PRESIDENT TWEETS THAT COMEY BETTER HOPE

THERE ARE NO TAPES. AND THEN THE FOLLOWING MONDAY

AFTER THAT WEEKEND, COMEY SAYS HE WAKES UP IN THE MIDDLE OF THE

NIGHT ASKS HIS FRIEND TO SHARE THE CONTENTS OF HIS MEMO ABOUT

THE MIKE FLYNN WITH A REPORTER. THE DAY AFTER THIS, HIS FRIEND

SHARES THE CONTENTS OF THAT MEMO AND THE "NEW YORK TIMES"

ACCOMPLISHES THEIR STORY BASED ON THE MEMO.

THE HEADLINE IS CLEAR. AND THAT'S THE TIMELINE.

THAT'S WHAT HAPPENED. TRUMP'S LAWYER COMPLETELY BLEW

THAT TODAY. >> ALTHOUGH MR. COMEY TESTIFIED

THAT HE ONLY LEAKED THE MEMOS IN RESPONSE TO A TWEET, THE PUBLIC

RECORD REVEALS THAT THE "NEW YORK TIMES" WAS QUOTING

FROM THOSE MEMOS THE DAY BEFORE THE REFERENCED TWEET.

>> NOPE. EXACTLY WRONG, NOT AT ALL, 100%

FAILURE. OBVIOUSLY A LOT OF THE

IMPORTANCE OF JAMES COMEY'S TESTIMONY TODAY AND THE

IMPORTANCE OF HIM IN A FIGURE IN THIS SCANDAL IS ABOUT WHAT HE

SAYS HAPPENED VERSUS WITH THE PRESIDENT SAYS HAPPENED.

BUT THIS FROM THE PRESIDENT'S BRAND NEW LAWYER, THAT THERE'S A

"NEW YORK TIMES" STORY PROVING JAMES COMEY LIED ABOUT WHEN HE

SHARED THE MEMO WITH THE PRESS AND WHY, THAT IS CATEGORICALLY

NOT TRUE, SWING AND A MISS. THAT DOES NOT BODE WELL FOR A

PRESIDENT THAT MAY NEED SERIOUS LEGAL HELP.

JOINING US SAKE PERSON WHO WAS NEVER NAMED IN THE SENATE

HEARING TODAY. HE'S THE REPORTER WHO BROKE THE

STORY ABOUT THE COMEY MEMO LAST MONTH.

HE IS ALSO THE REPORTER WHO WROTE THE STORY ABOUT REPORTED

EVIDENCE OF COMMUNICATION BETWEEN RUSSIA AND THE TRUMP

CAMPAIGN DURING THE CAMPAIGN. HIS NAME IS MICHAEL SCHMIDT.

YOU'VE HAD A WHEAL OF A DAY. THANK YOU FOR BEING HERE

TONIGHT. >> THANKS FOR HAVING ME.

I APPRECIATED THAT RUNDOWN. IT'S BEEN A BUSY MONTH, SO THANK

YOU. >> YOU'VE BEEN DOING A LOT OF

WORK. ON THAT LAST POINT FIRST, THAT

TIMELINE, DID I BASICALLY GET THAT TIMELINE CORRECT?

SEEMS TO ME THE PRESIDENT'S LAWYER JUST SORT OF BLEW IT, GOT

THAT BACKWARDS TODAY. IS THAT HOW YOU UNDERSTAND IT AS

WELL? >> I'VE TRIED TO MAKE THIS POINT

TURNOVER PAST FEW WEEKS. THIS REALLY I WILL ADMINISTRATES

IT. THE TWEET IS WHAT CAUSES WHAT

HAPPENED TODAY. COMEY SEES THAT TWEET AND SAYS,

WOW, THERE MAY BE A WAY TO BACK THIS UP.

I REALLY NEED TO GET THIS OUT THERE.

AND THAT IS THE REASON WHY WE KNEW THAT TRUMP ASKED HIM TO END

THE FLYNN INVESTIGATION, AND THAT'S WHY WE HAD THE HEARING

TODAY. IT'S JUST ANOTHER EXAMPLE OF THE

PRESIDENT'S TWEETS UNDERMINING HIM.

>> WHEN JAMES COMEY EXPLAINED TODAY HIS THINKING ABOUT THAT,

AND HIS DECISION TO ASK HIS FRIEND THIS LAW PROFESSOR TO

SHARE WITH YOU THE CONTENTS OF THAT MEMO THAT HE WROTE,

MEMORIALIZING THE QUESTIONS ABOUT FLYNN, LOOKS LIKE HE WAS

GOING OUT OF HIS WAY TO BE CLEAR THAT YOU WERE NEVER GIVEN THE

MEMO ITSELF. IS THAT TRUE?

IS THAT WHAT HE WAS INDICATING? >> WE DON'T HAVE THE COPIES OF

THE MEMOS. WE'RE NOT SITTING AROUND WITH

THEM ON OUR DESK. AND WE POINTED THAT OUT IN OUR

STORIES THAT PORTIONS OF THE MEMOS WERE READ TO US, BUT THAT

WE'VE NEVER ACTUALLY HAD THEM OURSELVES.

>> WHEN YOU RECEIVED THOSE MEMOS, CAN YOU TALK ABOUT HOW

YOU VERIFIED THEY WERE WHAT THEY APPEARED TO BE?

>> THERE'S DIFFERENT THINGS ABOUT WHETHER THE TIMES LINE UP.

WAS COMEY INDEED AT THE WHITE HOUSE ON THE 14th?

THAT WAS SOMETHING WE RAN DOWN PRETTY QUICKLY.

HE WAS THERE. THERE WAS A MEETING.

THERE ARE BASIC THINGS LIKE THAT THAT YOU CAN USE TO CORROBORATE

YOUR FACTS, AND WE DO. BUT THEN YOU HAVE TO TRUST YOUR

SOURCES AND YOU HAVE TO KNOW WHEN YOU'RE TALKING TO.

AND WE FELT COMFORTABLE WITH THE INFORMATION WE HAD.

>> MICHAEL, LET ME ASK YOU ABOUT THIS OTHER ISSUE TODAY WITH A

STORY YOU BROKE ON FEBRUARY 14th, ONE OF THE BIGGEST SCOOPS

OF THIS ENTIRE SCANDAL THUS FOR, MEMBERS OF THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN

HAVING CONTACTS WITH THE RUSSIANS FOR A YEAR BEFORE THE

ELECTION. DIRECTOR COMEY TODAY SAID THAT

THAT ARTICLE WAS ALMOST ENTIRELY WRONG.

HE REPEATED THAT ASSESSMENT A FEW DIFFERENT TIMES.

DO YOU KNOW WHAT HE'S ON THING TO AND DO YOU BELIEVE THERE'S

ANYTHING WRONG WITH THE REPORTING IN THAT PIECE?

>> NO. AND WE'VE POST ADD FULL STORY ON

OUR WEBSITE MYSELF AND MY TWO COLLEAGUES WHO DID THE OUTRAGE

STORY, THAT LAYS OUT WHY WE ARE STANDING BY THIS STORY.

COMEY DID NOT EXPLAIN TODAY WHY HE THINKS THIS STORY IS

INACCURATE. WE POINT OUT IN THE STORY THAT

SINCE IT RAN WE LEARNED ABOUT CONTACTS BETWEEN CARTER PAGE AND

RUSSIANS, JARED KUSHNER AND RUSSIANS, AND ABOUT DIFFERENT

THINGS THAT HAVE BEEN COLLECTED BY THE INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY.

THE ONE THOUGHT THAT WE THINK THE DISAGREEMENT MAY BE HERE ON,

WHICH WE POINT OUT IN THE STORY, IS ON THE USE OF INTELLIGENCE

OFFICIALS, THE FBI HAS A VERY NARROW DEFINITION OF THAT, FOLKS

IN THE INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY ABROAD HAVE A MORE LOOSER

DEFINITION OF THAT, ESPECIALLY WITH RUSSIA WHERE THE

INTELLIGENCE APPARATUS IS DEEPLY INGRAINED IN THE SOCIETY.

BUT WE'VE NEVER BEEN GIVEN AN EXPLANATION BY THE FBI.

WE WENT BACK TO THE FBI TODAY AND SAID PLEASE CLARIFY FOR US.

TELL US WHERE WE WERE WRONG, AND THEY DID NOT PROVIDE US THAT

INFORMATION. WE HAVE A STORY ABOUT THIS, AND

WE LAID OUT THE INFORMATION THAT WE HAVE.

WE STAND WHERE WE ARE. >> AS WE'VE NODE AND A LOT OF

OTHER PEOPLE HAVE AS WELL, AND YOU NOTE IN TONIGHT'S STORY,

MULTIPLE NEWS OUTLETS AFTER YOUR INITIAL REPORT HAVE CORROBORATED

VARIOUS ASPECTS OF THIS, CITING DIFFERENT SOURCES AND DIFFERENT

DALTZ. IT'S REALLY STRANGE THIS IS

HANGING OUT THERE WITH NOBODY EXPLAINING THE OBJECTION.

MICHAELS SCHMIDT, REPORTER FOR THE "NEW YORK TIMES" WHOSE

WRITING WAS

For more infomation >> Donald Trump Lawyer Botches NYTimes James Comey Memo Timeline | Rachel Maddow | MSNBC - Duration: 10:22.

-------------------------------------------

Vatertag - Learn Intermediate German for B1/B2 #19 - Deutsch lernen - Duration: 3:43.

Let me guess. In this video you will talk with yourself,

attempt to teach the viewers something and say something silly in order to make them laugh.

Cool music.

A: Haha. You recorded a video about Mother's Day, but not about Father's Day. Did you forget it?

B: No. I didn't forget it. Father's Day is on June 18th.

A: No. Father's Day is celebrated on Ascension Day. That is 40 days after Easter.

This year, Ascension Day falls on the 25th of May. That was 2 weeks ago. You forgot it.

B: I didn't forget it. I live in the USA. Father's Day is celebrated on the 3rd Sunday in June.

Lyndon B. Johnson signed a proclamation in 1966

that declared the 3rd Sunday in June as Father's Day.

A: I thought it was Nixon that signed the proclamation.

B: No. Nixon elevated Father's Day to an official holiday in 1974.

A: So, you really are making a video about Father's Day.

Let me guess. In this video you will talk with yourself,

attempt to teach the viewers something and say something silly in order to make them laugh.

B: No. I will drive to the golf course and record the video there.

While I am playing golf with my father, I will list the top 10 coolest gift ideas for Father's Day.

A: Rebekah Wing already made a video about that.

B: Who is Rebekah Wing?

A: A YouTuber with more subscribers than you.

B: That is a long list.

Ok. I will make a video about facts about Father's Day.

A: So, like this video by Faktastisch?

B: And who is that? Let me guess. A YouTuber with more subscribers than me?

A: Exactly. How did you know that?

B: As I said, that is a long list.

Maybe I won't make a video about Father's Day at all.

Why do we celebrate holidays like this?

Is it not enough to enjoy the pleasure every day with the children?

A: Father's Day isn't for fathers or fatherhood.

It is a day for the children and the family.

They celebrate the father in order to feel better about the fact that they do so little for him during the year.

There is nothing that I could do for my father in order to show my gratitude enough.

If it weren't for him, I wouldn't be the man that I am. My father means everything to me.

Playing a few rounds of golf and buying a new tie will never be enough

in order to show my love for my father.

B: In reality it is about something else.

It isn't so important that you do enough for your father.

Father's Day is a day for the relationship between the father and his children.

The gifts and the thankfulness only help in strengthening this relationship.

A; Couldn't we show our thankfulness on every other day?

Why do we have to have a special day for that?

B: We could do that, but life goes so fast

that we need this type of holiday in order to look within and appreciate our loved ones.

A: Wow. That is deep. I didn't know that you could think so much.

You aren't as dumb as I thought.

B: I am, too. You just have to wait.

For more infomation >> Vatertag - Learn Intermediate German for B1/B2 #19 - Deutsch lernen - Duration: 3:43.

-------------------------------------------

Щенячий патруль новые серии Развивающие мультики про машинки Игрушки Герои в масках Видео для детей - Duration: 6:08.

For more infomation >> Щенячий патруль новые серии Развивающие мультики про машинки Игрушки Герои в масках Видео для детей - Duration: 6:08.

-------------------------------------------

Now Lock Specific WhatsApp Chat only | WhatsApp Tricks 2017 - Duration: 4:05.

Privacy is a major concern for everyone . Your messages are likely to contain

information that might or might not be very important for you

but you would like to keep them private. In the situation that you lose your phone

you do not want a stranger to go through your messages. Even otherwise

you would not want your private messages to be seen by anyone

who has access to your cell phone.

Hello guys. My name is Fahed Zaman. In this video i am going to show you

how u can lock specific whatsapp chat. so before we get started make sure

to hit the subscribe button & bell icon to get the notification on all of future videos.

open the play store and search whatsapp chat locker.

The application is free of cost and all its features can be used by all users.

after installation open the app

Select Your language.

and than give a password to lock your any chat conversation.

The interface is extremely simple and user friendly and there is no likelihood of

becoming confused with respect to using the application.

you have to grant permission to this app first.

Tap the red plus icon down below. than select lock whatsapp chat

now grant the permission to this app.

now tap to red button again and select lock whatsapp chat

now it will take you to whatsapp. than select any chat conversation to lock.

ok you are done, your chat conversation is lock with your given passsword

lets see this locking app is working or not

so when i clicked on this chat its asking me for the password

if you give wrong password. it will not open.

if you want to remove the lock , just open the app by entering password.

tap on the contact, press ok, lock will be remove

so you can also lock any whatsapp group. tap on the red + icon

than select lock whatsapp chat and select the group which you want to lock.

now we open whatsapp.

it does not lock all of your contacts conversation, it only lock specific whatsapp

chat which you have protected.

so this is how u can lock any of your whatsapp chat conversation and protect it.

so no one can see except you . i hope this video is helpful to you.

Click on the Red Subscribe button for more amazing tips and tricks

comment down below what you think about this, i would love to hear your feedback

and thank u so much for watching!

For more infomation >> Now Lock Specific WhatsApp Chat only | WhatsApp Tricks 2017 - Duration: 4:05.

-------------------------------------------

How to sync folders in OneDrive and SharePoint - Duration: 1:37.

Hi, if you use OneDrive for Business, then you should watch this!

I have a good news for you who use OneDrive for Business to sync files from SharePoint

Microsoft has provided a new version of the sync tool that is stable

And additionally gives you the option to choose which folders you want to sync.

Before you had to synchronize entire document libraries, you can now select folders.

Glenn ...

Will show us how the new OneDrive for Business works

Yes I will do that

Don't miss this.

You may have experienced errors like this.

And then it can be very annoying when the files you save on your machine are not synced.

With the new client, simply tap the "sync" symbol in your library.

Then it will pop up a window that lets you choose which folders you want to sync.

You will find your document library in the folder marked with a building.

It was all for today, thank you for watching.

Did you like the video and wan't see more

Subscribe to our Youtube channel.

See you in another video.

For more infomation >> How to sync folders in OneDrive and SharePoint - Duration: 1:37.

-------------------------------------------

Thủ tướng mang về BÁU VẬT này của Nhật làm thay đổi VẬN MỆNH NƯỚC VIỆT - Duration: 25:31.

For more infomation >> Thủ tướng mang về BÁU VẬT này của Nhật làm thay đổi VẬN MỆNH NƯỚC VIỆT - Duration: 25:31.

-------------------------------------------

Urbex Vlog - Villa "Trinità" abbandonata - Duration: 15:32.

For more infomation >> Urbex Vlog - Villa "Trinità" abbandonata - Duration: 15:32.

-------------------------------------------

APÉRO ET CALORIES 10 CONSEILS POUR NE PAS GROSSIR - Duration: 6:52.

For more infomation >> APÉRO ET CALORIES 10 CONSEILS POUR NE PAS GROSSIR - Duration: 6:52.

-------------------------------------------

Modes on the electric bass - Part 4 - Duration: 10:12.

Hi Bass players i Hope you guys are alright and welcome to this fourth part of modes on the electric bass

In this video we will see the seveth chords and arpeggios

As we saw in the previous video a chord is a group of 3 or more notes played at the same time

and an arpeggio it´s the same thing but the notes are going to be played one by one

as we saw in the previous video every mode is link to a chord

so let´s analyze all the modes and their chords and arpeggios

Well bass players as in the previos videos this time i am going to use the C major scale

So let´s start with the Ionian mode also known as the Major mode

as we saw in the previous video the C major chord is made by the notes C which is the tonic, E wich is the 3rd major and G wich is the fifth

we also saw that the fifth can be replaced by an octave in the chord

so we can pass from this position to this position

The seventh chords are chords where we add the seventh note of a scale

so if we analyze the Ionian mode or C major scale

we will see this, we had C as the first grade, D as the major second, E as the major third, f as the fourth, G as the fifthm A as the Major sixth, B as the Major seventh and we get back to the octave

So we see the B is the seventh grade and it´s the note that we are interested

so to add this seventh to the chord we simply replace the octave for the seventh in this position so we will have this new chord´s position

in the previous video we saw this arpeggio for the C major chord

Now that we hace the C major 7 chord we simply add the seventh note to the arpeggio so this is the apreggio for the C major 7 chord

let´s continue with the Dorian mode and we already known it the key of C major it starts on the D and it´s chord is a minor chord

in the previous video we saw that we play this chord in this position

wich is similar to the C major chord shape but we a minor third

so in order to play the D minor 7 chord as in the previous case we simply replace the octva for the seventh, so we got this position.

for the D minor 7 arpeggio , as saw in the previous video we got this arpeggio for the D minor chord

D, F wich is the minor third and A wich is the fifth, so we simply add the seventh note wich is C

so we got this arpeggio

Let´scontinue with the next mode wich is the Phrigyan mode wich on the C major tonality starts on the note E and it has a minor chord

so in this mode we have the same chord´s shape and the same arpeggio´s shape than in the D minor 7 chord but starting on E

so we got this shape and this arpeggio

Let´s continue with the Lydian mode wich on the key of C major starts on F

in this mode we have the same chord´s shape and the same arpeggio shape that we saw in the C major 7 chord

so we have this position and this arpeggio

Let´s continue with the myxolidian mode and here we will see a change on it´s seventh arpeggio

because as we know here we got a minor seventh

so the notes for this chord wich is calle G Dominant 7 are G wich is the tonic, B wich is the major third and F wich is the minor seventh

so we got this position and this arpeggio

let´s continue with the Aolian mode wich in the key of C starts on A

and for this mode we got the same chord´s shape and the same arpeggio´s shape than in the D minor 7 and E minor seven chords

and this is the arpeggio

and finally we got to the Locrian mode wich on the key of C starts on B

as we known in the chords on the bass the fifth is the note that we always replace because it´s the note that less definition give to the chord

The exception comes when it´s a special fifth and in the case of the Locrian mode we have a diminished fifth

so in this case we keep the fifth inside the chord

so we have this note

B wich is the tonic, F wich is the diminished fifth and A wich is the minor seventh

so we got this position and this arpeggio

this chord is called B minor flat five, flat because it has a diminished fifth also known as flat fifth

so in resume we can see that when it come to the seventh chords we have 4 positions

major 7

minor 7

dominant 7

and minor 7 flat 5

and we also have 4 arpeggios

major 7 arpeggio

minor 7 arpeggio

dominant 7 arpeggio

and minor 7 flat 5 arpeggio

let´s practice the seventh arpeggios by doing the follow exercises (page 2 of the pdf)

well friends we reach the end of this fourth part i thank you a lot for watching the video

i hope that it has been useful to you, and if it was i ask you the favor of give it a like, share it and subscribe to the channel

in the near future a will be sharing more videos with musical theory, excercises and other themes related to the electric bass

i Thank you a lot for your kind attention and see you next time.

For more infomation >> Modes on the electric bass - Part 4 - Duration: 10:12.

-------------------------------------------

Lesson 8: (Missing Vocabulary): Phrasal Verbs Part 1 - Duration: 13:24.

Hi guys Patrick from Santa Barbara English. today's video is teaching five

useful phrasal verbs. okay so these are five daily life phrasal verbs that we

use every day. so we have: figure out, end up, find out, pick up, and drop off. so if

you know those five and you use those five everyday then you can skip this

video. if not, I have the slides for these below in the description, you can

download the PDF, and you don't have to write everything out. but here we go so

the first one is to figure out. okay to figure out. the definition is to

understand or solve something. okay to understand solve discover determine. this

is similar to 'know.' like I know but it's a little bit deeper than to know because

it means that you know, it but you know it because you solved it. you were

thinking, you were trying, you've figured it out. okay if you know something maybe

somebody told you, or maybe you saw the answer, but if you figured out then you

know but it's because you went through and you solved the problem. okay let me

give you some examples:

okay so I was looking at them at the the

timetable for the buses and I just couldn't figure it out, this one is the

...i don't know. so I asked the bus driver. okay I couldn't figure it out

okay so if I was watching a detective show in Japanese and suddenly I realized

who the bad guy was I would say, 'ah! 分かった。ぜたいあの人。'

I would say 'I figured it out.' okay I figured it out, like I solved this, now I know.

so if I say this it means that I went outside to my motorcycle this morning

and it wouldn't start and I tried to solve the problem. I was checking the

battery, I checked the gas, I was trying to fix it but I couldn't figure it out.

if I said this:

okay maybe I tried to figure it out or maybe I just don't know anything about

motorcycles. maybe I said it won't start. I don't know. What's wrong with your

motorcycle? I don't know. I don't know anything about motorcycles. What's wrong

with your motorcycle? I don't know I couldn't figure it out. I couldn't solve

the problem.

Do you want me to show you? No, I can figure it out. Like I

can.. I don't know but when I get there I will look at it and check the table and

I will figure it out. たぶん大丈夫。 I'll be okay, I'll figure it out.

okay so the next one is to end up. to end up means to eventually do something and

So to end up as a phrasal verb so it's 'I ended up doing'

subject-verb-object. And 'in the end' is a phrase. So, in the end I did this. Or, I

did this in the end. Or, I ended up doing this.

So the verb is to end up.

It wasn't my original plan but that's what I ended up doing. I ended up staying home. So it's to

end up ____ing. okay.

So for example, at class on Friday I was asking my friends 'what are you going to do this weekend?'

and my friend said 'I don't have a plan, I might go for a hike, I might see a movie,

I haven't decided.'

okay so Monday I say what did you end up

doing? What did you end up doing? Very common question when you see

your friends on Monday or if your friend says 'I'm going to see a movie tonight' 'oh

yeah? What are you going to see?' 'Um we haven't decided yet I'm going to let my

girlfriend decide.' okay tomorrow I will say 'Hey what did you end up seeing?'

What did you end up seeing?

So this is 'figure out' and 'end up.' So we do use these together so I couldn't figure out the Sunday bus

schedule, I was looking at the bus map and the times, but Monday to Friday is

very different than Sunday schedule, I just couldn't figure it out so I ended

up calling for a taxi. I ended up taking an uber. okay

A lot of Japanese think the word 'finally' is

used for used in this way, but we use 'finally' in a different way. we use

'finally' when you're waiting for a long time for something and you're like もうー

Finally! For example:

Game of Thrones is a really really popular TV show and they are several seasons long

and after one season ends everybody's waiting and waiting and

waiting and waiting and then finally the next season comes out. okay so if I'm

waiting in traffic and the traffic's not moving and it's not moving it's not

moving and then 'ah finally..' okay that's what 'finally' means. It's it's like 'もう' kind

of kind of a feeling. It's not the same as end up. I don't use end up that way. I

would never say 'the traffic ended up moving' like no. finally is finally and

'What did you end up doing?' is like けっきょく. okay so just be careful with

finally. One more example:

So I was waiting for two days and I couldn't wait I was waiting for her response

and finally she texted me back.

So I went shopping for a red shirt but they didn't

have a red shirt so I ended up buying this one.

okay so let me give you two examples that are similar here:

So, remember subject-verb-object so: In the end,

(SVO) I failed it. Or: I failed it in the end. You can move the phrase before after.

It's more common to say 'I ended up failing.' I use the phrasal verb 'to end up'

more than I say 'in the end.' In the end is useful also but it's just easier for me

to say 'I ended up staying home.' 'I ended up not going.' I ended up

not going. Okay so to end up. Next:

I found my pen. I found my phone.

okay so if I said あの人何歳?

えー知らないけどちょっと待って

見つかった。You wouldn't

say '見つかった' you would say '分かった.' In English is like 'to find out.' So, how old is she?

Right? Because you can't say 'I found how old she is.' For

information it's 'I found out.'

So we were going to have a surprise birthday for my dad, and it was

a secret, but my cousin called the house and left a message on the machine that

said 'Sorry I can't go to the party on Sunday.' So my dad ended up finding out.

けっきょく分かった. In the end he found out that he was going to have a

birthday party, a surprise birthday party.

okay so let's compare some here so very similar:

These are very similar, and in the end they have the same meaning. But if I say I figured out how

to change my ringtone, it means that I was playing with my phone, and I tried

this, and I tried that, and I tried this and I tried this menu, and I went here,

and then I figured it out. If I go and ask somebody, or I just Google how to

change ringtone on my phone: ah I found out. I found out. So, let me ask my friend,

my friend told me, 'hey I found out how to change my ringtone.' I figured out how to

change my ringtone. They end up meaning the same thing but it's just a little

bit different way of getting there. okay let me give you one more example of that:

So if I'm doing my homework

This is my Chinese homework and I said okay what is the

answer to number one? I found it.

Right? So I found the answer. If I say, what is the answer to number one? Hold on,

wait, I asked the teacher and I come back, I say, 'I found out the answer to number

one.' I didn't find it. I didn't figure it out. I found it out. okay so

they're similar and if you're not perfectly understanding the first time,

that's okay ,you will hear them every single day, and you'll start to

understand what they mean. okay so to find out. The next one:

So my friend is visiting they're going to arrive tomorrow at the

airport, and I will drive to the airport, pick them up, and come back home. okay so I

Come pick me up please.

So, 'pick up.' Very very common daily life word, and the other side of pick up is: 'to

drop off.'

So I take my friend to work, because he doesn't have a car, I leave

him there, I come home. I dropped my friend off at work. okay so for example:

Just drop off at the bus station. You can use

it for people, you can use it for things.

So, pick up and drop off, very very common daily life words. Okay so let me show you an

example something that I would say naturally using all five of these

together. And this is not a crazy sentence, this is something that I would

say in daily life:

Okay so those are some

some phrasal verbs I have many many phrasal verbs that I'm going to go

through, but I don't want to make a 20-hour video, so I'm going to try to do

these in short bursts here. If this is useful for you please subscribe, please

like, share with your friends who are studying

English and I will keep making more videos. Okay so thank you very much,

and I'll see you next video!

Không có nhận xét nào:

Đăng nhận xét