Thứ Năm, 19 tháng 4, 2018

Youtube daily Apr 19 2018

- If you think for one second I'm gonna spend

one more minute of my adult life watching another season

of Jersey Shore you're damn (bleep) right I am.

It's (bleep) T-shirt time baby.

What's up everyone?

It's Ronnie from Jersey Shore Family Vacation.

Today we're gonna read some of these

wacky, crazy ass comments that I get on my Instagram.

Figured I'd share 'em with you

since they're so interesting.

Abbadabbadoo26.

Need to change your screen name man.

I'm mother (bleep) lit for this show.

I like STG.

This is my childhood (bleep) iCarly.

It's Jersey Shore bitch.

What the (bleep) is STG mean first of all?

There was FTD fresh to death.

I like this guy.

I'd invite him to Christmas dinner.

Vanillathunder1999.

I wonder what you look like.

I'm gonna go look at your profile picture.

Paul and Ronnie look like they got stuck babysitting

their younger brother Vinny.

We do. It's true.

Ronnie I've only been following you for one day

and your hashtags are giving me a gnarly headache.

Chill bro, please?

That comment gave me a gnarly headache just now.

Team no legs.

(sighing)

No comment to that 'cause I really have no legs.

No legs, no comment.

That's the way it works.

It's from Vinny Guardagnino.

Yo I deadass was about to like,

thanks for leaving me out of the pic Ron.

He's actually in the pic

he's just really, really pale

standing next to me, Pauly, and Mike.

Here's another one from Mike, The Situation.

He's on the show if you guys didn't know.

I legit didn't know Vinny was in the pic

until I saw his comment.

That tan though.

So funny, right?

He got into a fight with the sun.

Damn hot as (bleep).

100 million percent fine man.

Your body is f-ing banging dude.

Thank you.

You have good taste.

You were raised the right way.

You should thank your mother.

For more infomation >> Ronnie Reads His Fans' Wackiest Comments | Most Extra | MTV - Duration: 1:47.

-------------------------------------------

Asesinan a sacerdote dentro de su propia iglesia en México | Noticiero | Telemundo - Duration: 1:40.

For more infomation >> Asesinan a sacerdote dentro de su propia iglesia en México | Noticiero | Telemundo - Duration: 1:40.

-------------------------------------------

Indocumentado choca y hace volar una casa por los aires | Noticiero | Telemundo - Duration: 0:46.

For more infomation >> Indocumentado choca y hace volar una casa por los aires | Noticiero | Telemundo - Duration: 0:46.

-------------------------------------------

Peligra el encuentro entre Trump y Kim Jong-un | Noticiero | Telemundo - Duration: 0:46.

For more infomation >> Peligra el encuentro entre Trump y Kim Jong-un | Noticiero | Telemundo - Duration: 0:46.

-------------------------------------------

California acepta a la Guardia Nacional para la seguridad fronteriza | Noticiero | Telemundo - Duration: 2:17.

For more infomation >> California acepta a la Guardia Nacional para la seguridad fronteriza | Noticiero | Telemundo - Duration: 2:17.

-------------------------------------------

¿Se puede solicitar residencia por hijos con necesidades especiales? | Noticiero | Telemundo - Duration: 3:39.

For more infomation >> ¿Se puede solicitar residencia por hijos con necesidades especiales? | Noticiero | Telemundo - Duration: 3:39.

-------------------------------------------

Se conocen más detalles del accidente del avión de Southwest | Noticiero | Telemundo - Duration: 2:51.

For more infomation >> Se conocen más detalles del accidente del avión de Southwest | Noticiero | Telemundo - Duration: 2:51.

-------------------------------------------

Joven independiente busca un escaño en el senado mexicano | Noticiero | Telemundo - Duration: 3:33.

For more infomation >> Joven independiente busca un escaño en el senado mexicano | Noticiero | Telemundo - Duration: 3:33.

-------------------------------------------

Las telas guatemaltecas luchan por derechos de autor | Noticiero | Telemundo - Duration: 2:13.

For more infomation >> Las telas guatemaltecas luchan por derechos de autor | Noticiero | Telemundo - Duration: 2:13.

-------------------------------------------

Menudo susto: oso se pasea por el patio de una casa en California | Noticiero | Telemundo - Duration: 0:36.

For more infomation >> Menudo susto: oso se pasea por el patio de una casa en California | Noticiero | Telemundo - Duration: 0:36.

-------------------------------------------

La solución para el plástico podría estar en una enzima | Noticiero | Telemundo - Duration: 0:58.

For more infomation >> La solución para el plástico podría estar en una enzima | Noticiero | Telemundo - Duration: 0:58.

-------------------------------------------

Colorado: indocumentados podrán renovar licencia por internet | Noticiero | Telemundo - Duration: 0:45.

For more infomation >> Colorado: indocumentados podrán renovar licencia por internet | Noticiero | Telemundo - Duration: 0:45.

-------------------------------------------

ICE libera a indocumentado con discapacidad mental | Noticiero | Telemundo - Duration: 0:37.

For more infomation >> ICE libera a indocumentado con discapacidad mental | Noticiero | Telemundo - Duration: 0:37.

-------------------------------------------

Miguel Díaz-Canel ratificado como nuevo presidente de Cuba | Noticiero | Telemundo - Duration: 0:46.

For more infomation >> Miguel Díaz-Canel ratificado como nuevo presidente de Cuba | Noticiero | Telemundo - Duration: 0:46.

-------------------------------------------

CZ Jak na iPhonu, iPadu nebo iPodu touch udělat snímek obrazovky - Duration: 0:44.

How to take a screenshot on your iPhone, iPad, and iPod touch.

On an iPhone 8 or earlier, iPad, or iPod touch, press and hold the Top or Side button.

Immediately click the Home button, then release the Top or Side buttons.

In iOS 11, a thumbnail of your screenshot appears in the lower-left corner of your device.

or press and hold the thumbnail to share the screenshot. Swipe left on the thumbnail to dismiss it.

Thank you, for watching Fawzi academy. Please, like. Subscribe, share, this video, and visit, our website, fawziacademy.com.

For more infomation >> CZ Jak na iPhonu, iPadu nebo iPodu touch udělat snímek obrazovky - Duration: 0:44.

-------------------------------------------

Machiavelli, Discourses, Book I, Chapter VII - Duration: 7:16.

BookI, Chapter VII.—That to preserve Liberty in a State there must exist the Right to accuse.

To those set forward in a commonwealth as guardians of public freedom, no more useful

or necessary authority can be given than the power to accuse, either before the people,

or before some council or tribunal, those citizens who in any way have offended against

the liberty of their country.

A law of this kind has two effects most beneficial to a State: first, that the citizens from

fear of being accused, do not engage in attempts hurtful to the State, or doing so, are put

down at once and without respect of persons: and next, that a vent is given for the escape

of all those evil humours which, from whatever cause, gather in cities against particular

citizens; for unless an outlet be duly provided for these by the laws, they flow into irregular

channels and overwhelm the State.

There is nothing, therefore, which contributes so much to the stability and permanence of

a State, as to take care that the fermentation of these disturbing humours be supplied by

operation of law with a recognized outlet.

This might be shown by many examples, but by none so clearly as by that of Coriolanus

related by Livius, where he tells us, that at a time when the Roman nobles were angry

with the plebeians (thinking that the appointment of tribunes for their protection had made

them too powerful), it happened that Rome was visited by a grievous famine, to meet

which the senate sent to Sicily for corn.

But Coriolanus, hating the commons, sought to persuade the senate that now was the time

to punish them, and to deprive them of the authority which they had usurped to the prejudice

of the nobles, by withholding the distribution of corn, and so suffering them to perish of

hunger.

Which advice of his coming to the ears of the people, kindled them to such fury against

him, that they would have slain him as he left the Senate House, had not the tribunes

cited him to appear and answer before them to a formal charge.

In respect of this incident I repeat what I have just now said, how useful and necessary

it is for republics to provide by their laws a channel by which the displeasure of the

multitude against a single citizen may find a vent.

For when none such is regularly provided, recourse will be had to irregular channels,

and these will assuredly lead to much worse results.

For when a citizen is borne down by the operation or the ordinary laws, even though he be wronged,

little or no disturbance is occasioned to the state: the injury he suffers not being

wrought by private violence, nor by foreign force, which are the causes of the overthrow

of free institutions, but by public authority and in accordance with public ordinances,

which, having definite limits set them, are not likely to pass beyond these so as to endanger

the commonwealth.

For proof of which I am content to rest on this old example of Coriolanus, since all

may see what a disaster it would have been for Rome had he been violently put to death

by the people.

For, as between citizen and citizen, a wrong would have been done affording ground for

fear, fear would have sought defence, defence have led to faction, faction to divisions

in the State, and these to its ruin.

But the matter being taken up by those whose office it was to deal with it, all the evils

which must have followed had it been left in private hands were escaped.

In Florence, on the other hand, and in our own days, we have seen what violent commotions

follow when the people cannot show their displeasure against particular citizens in a form recognized

by the laws, in the instance of Francesco Valori, at one time looked upon as the foremost

citizen of our republic.

But many thinking him ambitious, and likely from his high spirit and daring to overstep

the limits of civil freedom, and there being no way to oppose him save by setting up an

adverse faction, the result was, that, apprehending irregular attacks, he sought to gain partisans

for his support; while his opponents, on their side, having no course open to them of which

the laws approved, resorted to courses of which the laws did not approve, and, at last,

to open violence.

And as his influence had to be attacked by unlawful methods, these were attended by injury

not to him only, but to many other noble citizens; whereas, could he have been met by constitutional

restraints, his power might have been broken without injury to any save himself.

I might also cite from our Florentine history the fall of Piero Soderini, which had no other

cause than there not being in our republic any law under which powerful and ambitious

citizens can be impeached.

For to form a tribunal by which a powerful citizen is to be tried, eight judges only

are not enough; the judges must be numerous, because a few will always do the will of a

few.

But had there been proper methods for obtaining redress, either the people would have impeached

Piero if he was guilty, and thus have given vent to their displeasure without calling

in the Spanish army; or if he was innocent, would not have ventured, through fear of being

accused themselves, to have taken proceedings against him.

So that in either case the bitter spirit which was the cause of all the disorder would have

had an end.

Wherefore, when we find one of the parties in a State calling in a foreign power, we

may safely conclude that it is because the defective laws of that State provide no escape

for those malignant humours which are natural to men; which can best be done by arranging

for an impeachment before a sufficient number of judges, and by giving countenance to this

procedure.

This was so well contrived in Rome that in spite of the perpetual struggle maintained

between the commons and the senate, neither the senate nor the commons, nor any single

citizen, ever sought redress at the hands of a foreign power; for having a remedy at

home, there was no need to seek one abroad.

Although the examples above cited be proof sufficient of what I affirm, I desire to adduce

one other, recorded by Titus Livius in his history, where he relates that a sister of

Aruns having been violated by a Lucumo of Clusium, the chief of the Etruscan towns,

Aruns being unable, from the interest of her ravisher, to avenge her, betook himself to

the Gauls who ruled in the province we now name Lombardy, and besought them to come with

an armed force to Clusium; showing them how with advantage to themselves they might avenge

his wrongs.

Now, had Aruns seen that he could have had redress through the laws of his country, he

never would have resorted to these Barbarians for help.

But as the right to accuse is beneficial in a republic, so calumny, on the other hand,

is useless and hurtful, as in the following Chapter I shall proceed to show.

For more infomation >> Machiavelli, Discourses, Book I, Chapter VII - Duration: 7:16.

-------------------------------------------

Legacy of Kain Soul Reaver Review - St1ka's Retro Corner (PS1 / Dreamcast) - Duration: 14:23.

For more infomation >> Legacy of Kain Soul Reaver Review - St1ka's Retro Corner (PS1 / Dreamcast) - Duration: 14:23.

-------------------------------------------

Love, Simon: Book vs. Movie - Duration: 8:50.

Oh hi!

There's a moment in the film Love, Simon where the title character sits by himself

on a ferris wheel hopeful that the guy he's fallen in love with through email will finally

show his face.

It's cinematic, and ends in a first kiss as only a romantic comedy can, and it absolutely

doesn't happen in the book.

Not that that's a bad thing.

As with any adaptations there are things that need to be changed, should be changed, and

matters of taste.

Today we're going to discuss some of the differences between the book and film and

whether they were beneficial or not.

The plot of Love, Simon and the book it was based on Simon vs The Homo Sapiens Agenda,

are generally similar.

That is our protagonist, Simon Spier, has a secret.

He's gay.

Shocker!

After a fellow anonymous classmate posts on the school's Tumblr that they are also gay,

he starts an email correspondence with him and soon falls in love.

Meanwhile, another classmate named Martin, stumbles upon these emails after Simon forgets

to log out on a school computer.

Martin decides to blackmail Simon in the hope that he can date the new girl Abby.

So that basic plot is the same.

It's the specifics that are changed.

In fact the last half of the book is so different from the movie that it changes some of the

themes of the story.

The appearance of the Dalkes was definitely a surprise.

Before we get there, though, let's discuss the key similarities between the book and

film.

Number one, Simon is kind of bland.

And this feels really mean to say.

But there's not a whole lot of turmoil that Simon goes through.

In both book and movie Simon explicitly says that he knows his family is going to be fine

with him coming out.

He knows his friends will be OK with it as well.

Because of that there is no inherent suspense.

Don't get me wrong, coming out is still not a simple thing but if there was even a

shred of a chance that he felt like he wasn't able to then it would have added to the story.

More than that he's liked by most everyone, he has a great relationship with his parents

and sisters, and he's a fairly good student.

There's nothing there that makes it feel like a real struggle.

I mean except for the blackmail.

I guess I shouldn't forget about the blackmail.

Regardless, the fact that Simon is sort of bland permeates both book and movie.

The second similarity is that they keep the idea that Bram and Simon are interacting via

email.

If you want a fancy $5 word that you can say the book is sort of an epistolatory novel.

At least it's half like that.

Epistolatory is the name they give to books that are written as if characters are writing

letters back and forth.

Dracula is probably the best example of this.

In this case, it's just the 21st century update.

Just with … less vampires.

It's a conceit that works really well in the book.

You can see the time stamp at the beginning of their emails.

You can beautifully see how the relationship grows over time.

First with them being nervous and then eventually them feeling very safe with one another.

I thought that in the movie it doesn't work as well.

In much the same way as talking with an author about their process is much more interesting

than watching somebody write.

Which now that I think of it, maybe launching that new YouTube channel called Watch People

Write Emails was not the best of ideas.

The book uses multiple different actors as the "voice" of the unseen boyfriend.

But it gives the wrong impression that this is exactly who the person writing to Simon

is.

At least at first.

I think by just having text on the page it gives it more mystery as to who it could be,

so that when it is revealed it truly is a shock.

Emo Phillips!

Who would have guessed?

That's a joke.

I have to say quickly, this is number 3, that I'm glad they kept Bram as a black character.

Yes, this is partly me signalling how woke I am.

But occasionally you'll still see book adaptations where they change people's ethnicities for

no apparent reason.

They definitely could have done that here and they chose not to, which I commend them

for.

Let's get into the differences.

I mentioned before how I felt that the last half of the book and film are entirely different.

To the point where they feel like different stories.

I discussed Call Me By Your Name last month.

While there are certainly differences between the book and film.

There are things left out and characters that are combined.

But it was still, essentially, the same story.

In Love, Simon although the end is the same how they get there drastically changes the

themes and the message.

Here are just a few of the things that happen in the book: Simon goes to a gay bar where

he gets drunk instead of just a house party.

Leah is not shown to be attracted to him.

Simon has an older sister.

Martin almost completely disappears after blackmailing Simon, only showing up to write

an email and to be seen briefly as Simon walks past a car.

Leah and Nora are in a band.

And we get to see Simon and Bram's relationship in more detail.

What is hammered home is how much Simon doesn't want to change the personal dynamics between

himself and his friends and family.

He wants to be able to be himself without announcing to the world that something is

different.

I would argue this is the main theme of the book.

Whereas the movie is really focused on the blackmail and how Simon overcomes that by

accepting himself as he is.

Early on in the book there's this passage.

Which I completely relate to.

Especially with people who you have known for years.

Maybe you change your opinion on something.

You stop drinking coffee.

You enjoy the gentle caress of a man.

You need to make a statement that this is the new you when it doesn't necessarily

feel like it warrants that.

You are still you but for a small thing.

But Simon's mother has a great counterpoint to that.

Near the end of the book she says...

It's great to see that parental love so fully realized.

Simon is guilty of this as well.

When it's revealed that Nora and Leah are in a band he asks why nobody told him.

And Nick responds, "because you would have made a big deal."

This is a specifically human reaction to these types of small revelations and I'm not sure

I've ever seen a story try to tackle that topic before.

Really by the end Simon is realizing that these tiny changes aren't a burden but something

to celebrate.

That each of us have unique quirks that make us, us.

The final passage of the book is about Simon introducing his boyfriend Bram to his parents.

He's finally come around to truly revealing all the aspects of himself.

Last thing, and it's a small nitpick, I'm curious why the book uses Oliver! as the school

musical that Simon is in and the film uses Cabaret.

I'm guessing it's a rights issue thing, but I'm still curious.

So, what works better?

I think the movie, quite rightly, made the group of friends much tighter and therefore

when the blackmail is revealed it does feel like betrayal.

In the book it's revealed and resolved within a chapter and so it doesn't carry as much

weight.

I also liked how they treated the character of Martin better in the movie.

It's suggested in the novel, but it's made more plainly in the film that this is

a guy who definitely made the wrong decision in blackmailing someone but he isn't this

terrible monster of villain.

He's human and is comfortable with himself.

Which is more than Simon can say.

For everything else the book does a far better job of delving into the characters because

it has the time to and the themes can be expanded upon.

But here's the bad thing that I need to admit to.

While I don't find either the book or movie bad, I also don't find them great.

The kernel of the story is interesting to me, and the themes it explores feel new, but

I need a more interesting, or perhaps flawed, main character to really feel drawn in.

And this is not a knock on Young Adult literature.

I'm a big fan of a lot of it.

I mean I've read every John Green book and I loved his latest Turtles All the Way Down.

So it's not the genre that turns me off.

Even with me saying that, I think that it is important to tell LGBTQ+ stories.

I think it's good to include that in Young Adult novels.

I just wanted more.

I wanted something that was more than an OK story.

But I could be wrong.

What did you like?

What didn't you like?

Do you prefer the book or the movie?

Why am I so old that I can't enjoy anything?

Let me know down in the comments below.

Thank you so much for watching!

My name is Kyle.

I upload videos every Monday and Thursday.

Liking, commenting, and subscribing do help, but if you want to support me even more you

can do so by becoming a Patreon supporter for $1 per month.

Now I need to look to see the next book and movie comparison to make.

Was Super Troopers 2 adapted from a book?

For more infomation >> Love, Simon: Book vs. Movie - Duration: 8:50.

-------------------------------------------

Beneficios que aporta la espirulina a nuestro organismo - Duration: 3:54.

For more infomation >> Beneficios que aporta la espirulina a nuestro organismo - Duration: 3:54.

-------------------------------------------

★ The Sims Mobile Hack Cheats - Unlimited Simoleons & Simcash ✔ [iOS Android] - Duration: 4:28.

how to hack the sims mobile game

Không có nhận xét nào:

Đăng nhận xét