Youtube daily Apr 4 2018

Trey Gowdy Asked If He Backs Trump Sending Troops To Border, Nails It With 8 Words.

Trey Gowdy, the "Bulldog" from South Carolina, just gave Democrats a new reason to cry after

he was asked if he backs President Donald Trump's idea to send troops to the border.

The congressman nailed it with eight words.

Millions of American patriots will be sad to see Congressman Trey Gowdy (R-SC) leave

Congress after his term is up.

He has an uncanny ability for wrecking the liberal narrative on everything from political

corruption to immigration.

During a recent interview with Fox News host Stuart Varney of Varney & Co, Gowdy was presented

with the President's recent tweet about border security, which said, "Our Border

Laws are very weak while those of Mexico & Canada are very strong.

Congress must change these Obama era, and other, laws NOW!

The Democrats stand in our way – they want people to pour into our country unchecked….CRIME!

We will be taking strong action today."

"He wants to send troops, well the National Guard, to the border.

Do you approve?

Yes or No?"

Varney asked Gowdy to which the congressman firmly replied, "I do because no country

should ever apologize for border integrity."

Then, Trey Gowdy drove his point home.

"The President is right.

It's a misdemeanor to cross the border without permission — a misdemeanor.

It doesn't become a felony unless and until you re-offend, and it's not a crime at all

to overstay your Visa," Gowdy added.

"I don't know what gets weaker than not being a crime and a misdemeanor.

No sovereign nation should ever apologize for border integrity," Gowdy reiterated.

"By whatever means that needs to be accomplished."

"I think he's doing this — President Trump is taking a very hard line because he's

disappointed in what Congress did," Stuart Varney responded.

"You didn't give him a wall.

You didn't give him any wall funds.

You didn't give him any action on immigration," he added.

Trey Gowdy is absolutely correct.

No sovereign country should be apologetic about securing its borders and creating the

maximum level of security for its people.

Gowdy hit the nail on the head with his response.

The President should use whatever means he finds necessary to secure our borders, regardless

of what end of the country they are on.

President Donald Trump undoubtedly has the support of millions of American patriots who

agree with sending our military to secure the U.S.-Mexico border until a wall is built.

It's a shame that Congress did not include funding for the border wall Trump requested

in their recently passed obscene Omnibus spending bill.

Stuart Varney was right to call out members of Congress for doing nothing.

In part, RINO's like Paul Ryan (R-WI) and Mitch McConnell (R-KY) are responsible for

the colossal failure to fund the wall.

Many Americans cannot wait until Paul Ryan steps down from his position as Speaker of

the House and is replaced with a real conservative who will back President Trump and help send

him a new budget proposal which includes funding for the wall.

It's sickening that guys like Mitch McConnell will do everything possible to prevent Trump

from delivering on his campaign promise to build a wall.

It's even more infuriating that McConnell recently whined about the uphill battle Republicans

face in the midterms.

According to The Hill, McConnell predicted a storm for Republicans who are up for re-election

in November.

"This is going to be a challenging election year," McConnell said, during an interview

with Kentucky Today.

"We know the wind is going to be in our face.

We don't know whether it's going to be a Category 3, 4 or 5."

McConnell isn't as naive as he would like us to believe.

He knows very well that many members of the Senate and House of Representatives are all

involved in a massive act of failure theatre for the purpose of resisting Trump's agenda.

It's too bad that there aren't more people like Trey Gowdy in Washington, D.C., and fewer

like Senator Mitch McConnell.

I believe that those Republicans who have backed President Trump will see overwhelmingly

good results in November, and those who have been dead weight on important issues, such

as border security, will see the kind of storm that McConnell is talking about.

What do you think about this?

Please share this news and scroll down to Comment below and don't forget to subscribe

Top Stories Today.

For more infomation >> Trey Gowdy Asked If He Backs Trump Sending Troops To Border, Nails It With 8 Words - Duration: 4:32.

-------------------------------------------

Short term resolution reached to hold cost of health insurance premiums - Duration: 12:00.

For more infomation >> Short term resolution reached to hold cost of health insurance premiums - Duration: 12:00.

-------------------------------------------

Me Robó Mi Pelo 🙆😭✂ | Caso Cerrado | Telemundo - Duration: 17:43.

For more infomation >> Me Robó Mi Pelo 🙆😭✂ | Caso Cerrado | Telemundo - Duration: 17:43.

-------------------------------------------

Hoard Of Immigrant Invaders Just Released List Of DEMANDS From Americans - Duration: 6:17.

Hoard Of Immigrant Invaders Just Released List Of DEMANDS From Americans – Prepared

For War If They Don't Get It.

A nasty swarm of illegal immigrant invaders are storming through Mexico and headed straight

towards America like an angered army of people purposely trying to break the law by attempting

to traipse themselves into America and reap the benefits of being an immigrant.

They're trying to prove that they are people without borders, but unfortunately for them,

the countries all have borders.

Some countries have different laws pertaining to immigration, but the American laws are

intact and need to be followed.

The immigrants galavanting towards America have something waiting for them and it's

called the American military.

They will enforce the laws and keep the immigrants from breaking the laws.

The immigrants are traveling towards their inevitable denial into America and it was

just this week that a nasty list of demands was found.

Not only are these folks trying to break a major immigration law, but they also have

a list of demands that they expect the Americans to give them.

That's like someone breaking into your house and demanding that you make them a peanut

butter and jelly sandwich while rubbing their feet and letting them use your Netflix account.

There is no toleration of the hateration coming from these wicked people who have so many

demands.

Americans just want people to follow the laws, but everyone else wants to break the law.

The list of demands was posted on their Facebook page.

After posting the list, the public comments tore up the list and spit it right back at

them on account of most of the list requiring people to break laws.

America is a nation of laws, and even though many of us may be on the same page as immigrants

with certain aspects of the list and life in general, we must still adhere to the laws

of the land.

Once we allow people to break some laws, then everyone else thinks they can break other

laws.

At that point, you become socialist Venezuela and that's not the best direction for any

country to go in.

Let's examine the list of demands and see what's going on.

"We are a group of people from different nations, religions, genders, gender expressions,

and sexual orientations migrating and seeking refuge.

We seek to become one collective, supporting each other shoulder to shoulder and demonstrating

that by uniting we can abolish borders.

We Central Americans have formed a caravan of many united in struggle.

We leave Tapachula, Chiapas on March 25."

If they can gather this many people to march across the lands, then why can't they gather

that many people to build up and modernize the area that they live in?

If they work hard enough, then they'll have a wonderful place to live and perhaps they

can get some support from their government.

"If all goes well we will be in Puebla, Mexico from April 5 to 9 to participate in

legal preparation and workshops.

From there we will hope for the blessing of solidarity from the Mexican people and human

rights organizations, who we hope will join our struggle and assist us with the supplies

and resources that they have available.

We appreciate the support and collaboration of the people of Mexico and the United States.

We hope to be an example of solidarity and struggle to the world."

There's a lot of people who are willing to help, but thousands of people simply can't

show up in one location and expect there to be a welcoming party for them.

The problem is that there simply is no place to go and when thousands of people show up

at the doorstep of a country, then there's a good chance that chaos will break out like

in Germany, Sweden, and London where migrant refugees have plagued and destroyed the towns

with increased crime, trash, and overall filth that has people regretting the decision to

allow them entry.

To top off the illegal entry laws that people are breaking, the list of demands is nice,

but it's not the correct way to go about things.

"We demand of our Central American countries: -An end to political corruption

-An end to violence against women and the LGBTQIA community

-An end to failures of justice for victims of domestic violence, extortion, threats,

and homophobia -An end to corruption between gangs, the police,

and governments -An end to murder with impunity and gang recruitment

of youth"

We can be sure that just about everyone on the planet wants every one of these items.

You simply cannot show up as a migrant army and demand this.

These desires are only stymied by the ways of individuals who are not as interested in

living a peaceful lifestyle embraced by honesty.

There are evil people who balance out all the good in the world as a utopian society

is unobtainable.

"We demand of Mexico and the United States: -That they respect our rights as refugees

and our right to dignified work to be able to support our families

-That they open the borders to us because we are as much citizens as the people of the

countries where we are and travel -That deportations, which destroy families,

come to an end -No more abuses against us as migrants

-Dignity and justice -That the US government not end TPS for those

who need it -That the US government stop massive funding

for the Mexican government to detain Central American migrants and refugees and to deport

them -That these governments respect our rights

under international law, including the right to free expression

-That the conventions on refugee rights not be empty rhetoric"

Refugees have no rights because they are not citizens.

There are Americans who need work and if they lose a job to a refugee who breaks into the

country, then either they are really bad at the job or they were shafted extremely hard.

Deportations will not end.

America has immigration laws and procedures to follow in order to become a citizen.

Those who wish to come in must follow the laws or face deportation.

That's a rule that should always be followed.

When they state no more abuses against migrants, then that goes both ways.

How many illegal immigrants commit violent crimes against citizens of the United States?

Kate Steinle, need I say more?

Do they want dignity and justice?

Then stay home and build your own nation and follow your own laws.

You can't ask for justice if you're the one breaking the law on purpose.

What do you think about this?

Please share this news and scroll down to Comment below and don't forget to subscribe

Top Stories Today.

For more infomation >> Hoard Of Immigrant Invaders Just Released List Of DEMANDS From Americans - Duration: 6:17.

-------------------------------------------

Honoring Doctor Martin Luther King, Jr. - Duration: 1:49.

For more infomation >> Honoring Doctor Martin Luther King, Jr. - Duration: 1:49.

-------------------------------------------

¿Jencarlos Canela y Joy Huerta andan de romance? | Suelta La Sopa | Entretenimiento - Duration: 0:34.

For more infomation >> ¿Jencarlos Canela y Joy Huerta andan de romance? | Suelta La Sopa | Entretenimiento - Duration: 0:34.

-------------------------------------------

Boating crash victims dies - Duration: 1:40.

For more infomation >> Boating crash victims dies - Duration: 1:40.

-------------------------------------------

Quiet and not as cold tonight - Duration: 3:33.

For more infomation >> Quiet and not as cold tonight - Duration: 3:33.

-------------------------------------------

Geometry: Division of Segments and Angles (Level 2) | Examples I - Duration: 8:08.

Division of Segments and Angles.

Level 2.

In this video we will apply the concepts learned from the previous video to solve basic problems

related with division of segments and angles.

Let's go ahead and start with the first example.

In the following diagram segment RS is congruent to segment ST.

Can we conclude that point S is the midpoint of segment RT?

In this problem we are provided with a figure and are asked to determine if a point is the

midpoint of a segment.

Recall that a midpoint of a segment divides a segment into two congruent segments.

At first glance this seems to be the case since we are given that segment RS is congruent

to segment ST.

Unfortunately point S is not the midpoint of segment RT.

In order for a point to be considered a midpoint it has to be collinear with the endpoints

of the segment.

Looking at the diagram we see that point R, point S and Point T are not collinear so point

S cannot be a midpoint.

This is an example of a special case where two segments that share the same point are

congruent and yet the common point between the segments is not a midpoint.

All right, let's try the next example.

In the following diagram ray BD bisects angle ABC.

Can we conclude that ray DB bisects angle ADC?

In this problem we are provided with a figure and are asked to determine if a ray bisects

an angle.

We are given that ray BD bisects angle ABC this means that ray BD will split angle ABC

into two congruent angles.

In this case angle ABD is congruent to angle CBD.

Now just because it looks like ray DB is a bisector of angle ADC does not mean that it

is.

We cannot assume this from the diagram; we need to determine this with the given information.

Notice that segment AD, DC, CB and BA may or may not be the same length; we have no

way of determining this so the angle may or may not be bisected by ray DB.

So in the end we do not have enough information to reach that conclusion.

Ok let's take a look at the next example.

In the following diagram point B and point C trisect segment AD.

Can we conclude that ray EB and ray EC trisect angle AED?

In this problem we are provided with a figure and are asked to determine if two rays trisect

an angle.

We are given that point B and point C trisect segment AD.

In other words segment AB is congruent to segment BC, which is congruent to segment

CD.

Notice that it is true that segment AB is congruent to both segment BC and CD but the

fact that segment AD has been trisected does not mean that angle AED has also been trisected

we would need more information to draw a decisive conclusion.

So no we cannot conclude that ray EB and ray EC trisect angle AED.

Now let's take a look at some proof examples.

Given that ray PS bisects angle RPO.

Prove that angle RPS is congruent to angle OPS.

In this problem we are provided with some geometric relations and a diagram we are asked

to show or proof that two angles are congruent.

We are going to use a two-column proof to show that these two angles are congruent.

Let's start by marking the diagram with the given information in this case we are

given that ray PS bisects angle RPO, this means that angle RPS will be congruent to

angle OPS so let's mark these two angles with single arc marks.

Now that we have a labeled diagram, let's go ahead and prove the conjecture.

We will start with the given information, in this case ray PS bisects angle RPO and

the reason is because it is given.

With this statement we can conclude that angle RPS is congruent to angle OPS and the reason

is because if a ray bisects an angle, it divides the angle into two congruent angles.

This is essentially the definition of an angle bisector and this ends the proof.

All right let's try the next proof.

Given that line CM bisects segment AB.

Prove that segment AM is congruent to segment MB.

In this problem we are provided with a conjecture and a diagram.

We are asked to proof that two line segments are congruent.

We are going to once again use a two-column proof to show that these two line segments

are congruent.

Let's start by marking the diagram with given information, in this case we are given

that line CM bisects segment AB.

So we are going to draw a single tick mark on line segment AM and line segment MB.

Now let's proceed with the proof.

For our first statement we will write line segment CM bisects segment AB and the reason

is because it is given.

Now we can conclude that segment AM is congruent to segment MB because if a line bisects a

segment, it divides the segment into two congruent segments.

This is essentially the definition of a segment bisector and this ends the proof.

Let's move along to the final example.

Given that segment DH is congruent to segment HF.

Prove that point H is the midpoint of segment DF.

In this problem we are provided with a geometric relation along with a diagram.

We are asked to prove that a point is the midpoint of a line segment.

Similar to the previous examples let's first mark the diagram with the given information.

We are given that segment DH is congruent to segment HF so we draw a single tick mark

on each of these two segments in the diagram.

Next we will use a two-column proof to show that point H is the midpoint of segment DF.

We will start with the given information in this case segment DH is congruent to segment

HF and the reason is because it is given.

From here we can conclude that point H is the midpoint of segment DF because if a point

divides a segment into two congruent segments, then it is the midpoint of the segment.

This is essentially the definition of a midpoint and this ends the proof.

All right in our next video we will go over more basic examples involving division of

segments.

For more infomation >> Geometry: Division of Segments and Angles (Level 2) | Examples I - Duration: 8:08.

-------------------------------------------

East Camino Real Bridge to close for a year - Duration: 1:06.

For more infomation >> East Camino Real Bridge to close for a year - Duration: 1:06.

-------------------------------------------

Massachusetts ambulance company using Alexa to help treat patients - Duration: 1:27.

For more infomation >> Massachusetts ambulance company using Alexa to help treat patients - Duration: 1:27.

-------------------------------------------

Police: Jupiter Walmart worker charged with aggravated assault - Duration: 1:16.

For more infomation >> Police: Jupiter Walmart worker charged with aggravated assault - Duration: 1:16.

-------------------------------------------

Children found living in filth in Blanchester - Duration: 1:44.

For more infomation >> Children found living in filth in Blanchester - Duration: 1:44.

-------------------------------------------

VT updating car inspection rules - Duration: 1:34.

For more infomation >> VT updating car inspection rules - Duration: 1:34.

-------------------------------------------

Liverpool 3-0 Man City: Player Ratings - Duration: 8:34.

Liverpool 3-0 Man City: Player Ratings

The whole Liverpool team shone as the Reds produced an incredible collective performance to take a huge 3-0 first-leg lead against Man City.

Loris Karius – 8 (out of 10).

The German, somewhat incredibly, had precious little to do on a night he was under scrutiny with a City bombardment on his goal expected.

Did what he had to with minimal fuss and constantly looked to distribute quickly, which was helpful as the Reds stormed City in the first half.

The lack of distance on his kicks in the second half was slightly frustrating but nothing costly.

Trent Alexander-Arnold – 9.5 Man of the Match.

This was the biggest night of the teenager's career, especially under added pressure from recent struggles, but he put those behind him and rose to the occasion with a magnificent display.

Was pinpointed as the potential weak link pre-match but showed no such signs as he defended excellently, clever in his positional play and winning the one-on-one battle with Leroy Sane who saw his influence restricted.

Was also crisp in possession and picked his moments to support the attack with impressive maturity.

A man-of-the-match display on such a stage handed a timely reminder just what a talent this boy is.

Dejan Lovren – 8.5

Recalled to the lineup as the last centre-back standing, Lovren had an excellent night on his return as the Reds posted a vital clean sheet.

Was simple and effective with no-nonsense defending all night, clearing his lines decisively, winning key headers and making some vital blocks—one particularly crucial one as Kevin De Bruyne lurked to shoot.

Exactly the sort of simplified role that suits his game and deserves full credit for doing it brilliantly.

Virgil van Dijk – 8.5

It is games like these that the towering Dutchman was bought for and he delivered a fantastic performance leading the back line.

Won everything that came his way in air to defend the box with desire and determination, and showed great awareness to danger to cover well using his impressive recovery pace.

Most pleasing was undoubtedly his organisation and leadership at the back, particularly second half when the Reds were under the cosh.

Completely showed why the money was invested.

Andy Robertson – 9.

Robertson just continues to go from strength to strength, with this another fantastic performance from the left-back.

Shone in the league win over City in January and did again here as relentless marauding presence taking the game to Guardiola's side first half—one lung-bursting run and shot was incredible.

Defended impressively second half when on the back foot, doing a great job matching Raheem Sterling for pace and giving the ex-Red very little route into the game.

A complete performance from a complete left-back.

Jordan Henderson – 8.

The captain had a huge job on his hands trying to retain control of midfield and provide valuable protection to the back four, but he did the job well after a nervy start.

Backed up the sterling efforts of James Milner and Alex Oxlade-Chamberlain by buzzing around collecting second balls in midfield, and kept things simple in possession to get the danger men on the ball.

Picked up a yellow card which sees him miss the second leg, which was a blemish on an otherwise very good night.

James Milner – 8.5

There were a few concerns with whether Milner could cope with two starts in quick succession but the vice-captain put any fears to bed with a monstrous performance.

Set the tone for the midfield battle from the off as he constantly won the ball back with the Reds on the front foot, doing a particularly great job buzzing around to stop De Bruyne playing.

Played vital roles in the first two goals with a great ball to release Mohamed Salah for the first and winning a crunching tackle which landed at the feet of Oxlade-Chamberlain who rifled home.

Always a wise head and great influence on such occasions and was so again here.

Alex Oxlade-Chamberlain – 9.

A big performance was needed from the man becoming Liverpool's midfield driving force and boy did he deliver.

Was Man of the Match in the 4-3 league win over City and clearly took confidence from that display into this game.

Bulldozed through the visitors' midfield time and again first half to make things happen in the final third with some great runs, and hit an absolute thunderbolt of a goal to make it 2-0.

Also did his defensive duties impressively, providing key support to Alexander-Arnold with Sane and David Silva before moving into the attack second half where he filled in well.

Sadio Mane – 8.5

You always need your big players and main match-winners to perform on the big occasions and the Senegalese delivered at Anfield.

Scored the all-important third with a great header after some clever movement, but apart from his goal he impressed as he was a constant threat when the Reds were on top.

Had less influence after the break naturally, but still looked lively on the break and also never stopped working to dig in and contribute to the tireless defensive effort.

Mohamed Salah – 8.5

This was billed as a head-to-head between the Egyptian King and Player of the Year rival contender De Bruyne, and Salah outshone his main competitor at Anfield.

Pep Guardiola deployed Aymeric Laporte simply to stop Salah but the No.

11 was simply too sharp and too difficult to pin down as he ran riot drifting from the right.

Opened the scoring with a typical Salah goal being in the right place at the right time, and also provided a great cross for Mane's header.

A real dampener comes in the injury that forced him off after half-time—hopefully it is nothing serious.

Roberto Firmino – 8.

Needed the Brazilian to lead from the front to stop City settling into rhythm at Anfield, and he did so superbly with all of his typical industry and craft on show.

Incredible work rate was in full effect for Salah's opener as he made what was the most important toe-poke of his career to prod the ball in the Egyptian's direction.

Provided a great platform to spring attacks all first half while also working relentlessly, which makes him such a key component of Klopp's system.

Starting XI Average Rating: 8.6

Substitutes. Gini Wijnaldum (on for Salah, 52′) – 7.

On into midfield, Wijnaldum had a big responsibility to help solidify the middle of the park with Oxlade-Chamberlain moving into the attack.

Did a reliable job working hard to plug gaps City looked to exploit while also keeping things simple in possession.

Dominic Solanke (on for Firmino, 71′) – 6. One nice burst and dangerous ball across to find Mane who couldn't arrive in time to convert.

Manager. Jurgen Klopp – 10.

Had his hands tied from before the first whistle due to the untimely injury crisis, which made it a night all about making the best of what was at his disposal.

And he did so spectacularly, setting up the team perfectly tactically and mentally to produce the brave display called for one of the most astonishing for halves of football Anfield has likely ever witnessed.

Settled his side at half-time and reset the Reds to manage the game after the break, and used his limited subs well to help see the game out—with Wijnaldum shoring up midfield and Solanke and Moreno offering fresh legs.

It says everything about the way Klopp has this Reds team playing that Pep Guardiola changed what has led him to the Premier League title by going with a less expansive and gung-ho team.

A perfect night for the boss who we are incredibly lucky to have.

Make Your Ratings.