A senior research psychologist at the American Institute for Behavioral Research and Technology
is now claiming that Google did, in fact, favor positive results in searches for Hillary
Clinton above those of President Trump . Both now and during the 2016 campaign.
Robert Epstein continued his Breitbart Town Hall lecture by explaining the intricate power
of tech companies , when it comes to elections and the way they use the trust people put
in them to influence voters.
He added that , he had been studying the phenomenon of people changing their minds during elections
just by how ! internet search engines manipulate their searches for more than 5 years with
what, he referred to as 'Controlled Experiments" around the world during national elections
using tens of thousands of people who voted.
Epstein explained: "Epstein discussed his work surrounding the power of tech companies
on elections and their influence on voters saying, "I have been studying for more than
five years with controlled experiments around the world, four national elections, tens of
thousands of people.
I've been studying exactly how many votes or opinions Google can change, Google can
shift, just by them manipulating those search results when we type in a search term and
they give us a list."
"It turns out that what's at the top of the list," said Epstein, "people believe
is better and truer than what's lower in the list, that's why 50 percent of the clicks
go to the top two items."
Epstein continued, "so it turns out we showed in our studies, that if you favor one candidate
in search results, so maybe higher ranked results make that candidate look better, you
click on it, it takes you to a webpage that makes that candidate look really good, if
you favor one candidate in search results among voters , who are undecided you can easily
shift at least 20 percent of them towards that candidate, up to 80 percent.
And at least one demographic group that , we found and the most vulnerable group that we've
ever found in our five years of studies, is moderate Republicans."
"You could've guessed that," joked Ann Coulter.
Alex Marlow interjected, "but luckily, since Google are the masters of the universe with
their incredible amounts of power they decided to be entirely fair and keep the results equal
for Trump and Hillary Clinton, correct?"
Epstein paused before replying, "no… no, that was sarcasm right?"
Marlow said, "but this is something that in your research you looked at when you start
typing into a Google search bar and you start typing 'D-O-N-A-L' it'll give you some
result , probably Donald Trump-based, same thing for Hillary Clinton when you start typing
names that should yield familiar search terms, the terms for Donald Trump were more negative,
the terms for Hillary Clinton were more positive, is that what you found?"
"There's two main things that we have found," said Epstein.
"We came up with a system, a monitoring system for monitoring search results on Google,
Bing and Yahoo for nearly six months before the election in 2016.
This story about our findings was broken by the Washington Post in early 2017 and here's
what we found . We found that Google's search results favored Hillary Clinton in all ten
positions of those search results on the first page for almost all of those six months leading
up to the election . Now that's enough to shift two to three million votes, at least,
without anyone knowing that they have been manipulated."
"Another thing, we followed up on a media report, it was kind of a hysterical media
report by an organization named Sourcefed , they said 'we just figured out that when
you're doing searches, you're typing in search terms, you can't get negatives for
Hillary Clinton on Google.
So eight people on my staff spent that summer of 2016, I published in the fall of that year,
seeing if they could get negatives for Hillary Clinton."
He followed up by stating that if you actually typed "Hillary Clinton is….." on Bing
or Yahoo you would get answers like . 'Hillary Clinton is the devil', 'Hillary Clinton
is sick', Hillary Clinton is dying of cancer .' You would literally get eight or ten
extremely negative search results because that's what people were, and had searched
for in the recent past.
But when you would go to Google the search suggestions looked a lot different .
If you typed in the same phrase you would get suggestions such as 'Hillary Clinton
is awesome', 'Hillary Clinton is winning', plus some positive information about her positions
during the 2016 campaign.
This is illustrated clearly in the graphic below.
A senior research psychologist at the American Institute for Behavioral Research and Technology
is now claiming that Google did, in fact, favor positive results in searches for Hillary
Clinton above those of President Trump.
Both now and during the 2016 campaign.
Robert Epstein continued his Breitbart Town Hall lecture by explaining the intricate power
of tech companies when it comes to elections and the way they use the trust people put
in them to influence voters.
He added that he had been studying the phenomenon of people changing their minds during elections
just by how internet search engines manipulate their searches for more than 5 years with
what he referred to as 'Controlled Experiments" around the world during national elections
using tens of thousands of people who voted.
Epstein explained: "Epstein discussed his work surrounding the power of tech companies
on elections and their influence on voters saying, "I have been studying for more than
five years with controlled experiments around the world, four national elections, tens of
thousands of people.
I've been studying exactly how many votes or opinions Google can change, Google can
shift, just by them manipulating those search results when we type in a search term and
they give us a list."
"It turns out that what's at the top of the list," said Epstein, "people believe
is better and truer than what's lower in the list, that's why 50 percent of the clicks
go to the top two items."
Epstein continued, "so it turns out we showed in our studies that if you favor one candidate
in search results, so maybe higher ranked results make that candidate look better, you
click on it, it takes you to a webpage that makes that candidate look really good, if
you favor one candidate in search results among voters who are undecided you can easily
shift at least 20 percent of them towards that candidate, up to 80 percent.
And at least one demographic group that we found and the most vulnerable group that we've
ever found in our five years of studies, is moderate Republicans."
"You could've guessed that," joked Ann Coulter.
Alex Marlow interjected, "but luckily, since Google are the masters of the universe with
their incredible amounts of power they decided to be entirely fair and keep the results equal
for Trump and Hillary Clinton, correct?"
Epstein paused before replying, "no… no, that was sarcasm right?"
Marlow said, "but this is something that in your research you looked at when, you start
typing into a Google search bar and you start typing 'D-O-N-A-L' it'll give you some
result probably Donald Trump-based, same thing for Hillary Clinton when you start typing
names that should yield familiar search terms, the terms for Donald Trump were more negative,
the terms for Hillary Clinton were more positive, is that what you found?"
"There's two main things that we have found," said Epstein.
"We came up with a system, a monitoring system for monitoring search results on Google,
Bing and Yahoo for nearly six months before the election in 2016 .
This story about our findings was broken by the Washington Post in early 2017 and here's
what we found . We found that Google's search results favored Hillary Clinton in all ten
positions of those search results on the first page for almost all of those six months leading
up to the election . Now that's enough to shift two to three million votes, at least,
without anyone knowing that they have been manipulated."
"Another thing, we followed up on a media report, it was kind of a hysterical media
report by an organization named Sourcefed , they said 'we just figured out that when
you're doing searches, you're typing in search terms, you can't get negatives for
Hillary Clinton on Google.
So eight people on my staff spent that summer of 2016, I published in the fall of that year,
seeing if they could get negatives for Hillary Clinton."
He followed up by stating that if you actually typed "Hillary Clinton is….." on Bing
or Yahoo you would get answers like.
'Hillary Clinton is the devil', 'Hillary Clinton is sick', Hillary Clinton is dying
of cancer.'
You would literally get eight or ten extremely negative search results because that's what
people were, and had searched for in the recent past.
But when you would go to Google the search suggestions looked a lot different.
If you typed in the same phrase you would get suggestions such as 'Hillary Clinton
is awesome', 'Hillary Clinton is winning', plus some positive information about her positions
during the 2016 campaign.
This is illustrated clearly in the graphic below.
So basically what Google was doing is trying to influence and manipulate a presidential
election in order to favor the candidate they believed would benefit them the most.
Not unlike what the Democrats are now accusing the Russians of doing . But no one is investigating
Google because it's too big to be investigated, we know the drill.
For more infomation >> 3 AWESOME LIFE HACKS - Duration: 8:09. 
For more infomation >> Bus Crash Involving Canadian Junior Hockey Team Kills 14 | TODAY - Duration: 1:21. 
For more infomation >> Passengers Riled After Norwegian Cruise Line Ship Set Sail Under Construction | TODAY - Duration: 1:44. 
For more infomation >> Fire At Trump Tower Leaves 1 Dead, 6 Firefighters Injured | Sunday TODAY - Duration: 2:15. 
For more infomation >> How To Survive Spring Allergies — And Prevent Them Before Symptoms Start | TODAY - Duration: 3:36. 
For more infomation >> Revivals And Reboots Prove To Be Successful For TV Networks | TODAY - Duration: 3:03. 
For more infomation >> Emily Blunt Got 'Closer' To John Krasinski During 'A Quiet Place' | Sunday TODAY - Duration: 8:18. 
For more infomation >> Does Mozilla Firefox Hold The Answer To Better Internet Security? | Sunday TODAY - Duration: 4:49. 
For more infomation >> Facebook's Sheryl Sandberg: 'We Didn't Do Enough' To Protect User Data | TODAY - Duration: 4:40. 
For more infomation >> 50 Years After 'Mister Rogers' Neighborhood' Premiered, His Legacy Lives On | Sunday TODAY - Duration: 3:43. 
For more infomation >> Trump Defends Embattled EPA Chief Scott Pruitt Amid Intense Scrutiny | Sunday TODAY - Duration: 2:43. 
For more infomation >> 영화배우 김태우 아내(부인)권은정-의지가 재능을 넘는 ► Youtube 순간 ► https://goo.gl/zavFgD - Duration: 10:19. 
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét