BREAKING: Key Evidence Just Stolen Out Of US Congress In MAJOR Coverup Dems Trying To
Hide.
Washington, D.C. is rife with controversy especially when it comes to the Democratic
Party.
Especially when it comes to Florida Congressional Member, Debbie Wasserman Schultz.
While she came under scrutiny during the 2016 presidential election for her nefarious ties
to Hillary Clinton while she was in charge of the Democratic National Committee she is
now coming under fire for her ties to her information technology staffers.
Those same staffers have been accused of hacking into sensitive information and misusing their
privileges as congressional staffers.
The Gateway Pundit reported,
"Imran Awan worked for Debbie Wasserman Schultz for thirteen years since she came
into office in 2004 as a Florida representative.
Imran and his two Pakistani brothers managed the IT affairs for several Democratic government
officials.
They were relieved of their duties in February 2017 on suspicion that they accessed specific
computer networks without permission, also known as hacking.
Abid, Imran, and Jamal Awan were barred from computer networks at the House of Representatives
in February 2017.
Imran Awan was married to two women at once, including his first cousin, as is his country's
custom.
Imran and his two Pakistani brothers managed the IT affairs for several Democratic government
officials.
They were relieved of their duties in February 2017 on suspicion that they accessed specific
computer networks without permission, also known as hacking.
Abid, Imran, and Jamal Awan were barred from computer networks at the House of Representatives
in February 2017.
Imran Awan was married to two women at once, including his first cousin, as is his country's
custom.
Imran had his court case rescheduled recently until next month.
Imran Awan and his wife Alvi reportedly struck a plea deal this week.
Daily Caller investigative journalist Luke Rosiak joined Lou Dobbs on Wednesday to discuss
the latest in the Imran Awan Pakistani hacking scandal.
In his interview Wednesday night Luke Rosiak mentioned that Attorney General Jeff Sessions
is refusing to bring up charges against Wasserman Shultz's IT expert Imran Awan.
Now this…
The Awan brothers' server with much of the key evidence to the case has gone missing.
In a behind-closed-door briefing to the House leadership in September 2016, the inspector
general said their activity was suspicious in part because the IT workers had taken steps
to conceal their identities.
"Excessive logons are an indication that the server is being used for nefarious purposes
and elevated the risk that individuals could be reading and/or removing information,"
reads a presentation by the inspector general that was not released to the public.
The inspector general also warned of the risk that the server could be used as a repository
to store documents "taken from other offices or evidence of other illicit activity."
The investigation had uncovered Dropbox accounts installed on at least two Democratic Caucus
computers used by the IT workers, against House IT policy.
The two accounts associated with the Dropbox accounts on the computers each contained thousands
of files.
"We have not been permitted to view content of the files on these workstations.
However, based on the file names, some of the information is likely sensitive," the
presentation says.
The inspector general also warned House leadership that the accounts could have been used to
exfiltrate information.
"While file-sharing sites, such as Dropbox, have legitimate business purposes, use of
such sites is also a classic method for insiders to exfiltrate data from an organization."
Server Goes Missing.
Following the second briefing in late September 2016, in which the House inspector warned
the House leadership of "continuing unauthorized access," the investigation was moved to
the Capitol Police in October.
It was not until months later, on Feb. 2, 2017, that the House sergeant at arms banned
the IT workers from the House network.
The Democratic Caucus server, which had been identified by the inspector general as ground
zero of the suspicious activity, had disappeared at that time."
If we cannot trust the federal government to protect sensitive information that they
are working on then who can we trust?
Cybersecurity is an ever-increasing problem in a world of foreign bad actors.
For the United States to be dealing with internal bad actors is additional problems that this
country does not need.
We need American citizens who want to serve their country to the benefit of their fellow
citizens serving in the halls of Congress.
For a member of the Democratic Party to hire and retain staff who are capable of this type
of criminal activity speaks volumes about the integrity, character, and wherewithal,
or lack thereof that their party has.
Rep. Schultz should equally be held responsible for this because she hired these individuals.
Whether it be paying a fine, getting censured by Congress, or being forced to resign she
too should be forced to pay for the consequences of her actions just as everyone else.
It should not just be her staffers that are held responsible.
Share if you agree that these IT officials should have been fired soon
Share if you believe that Rep. Schultz staffing these individuals in her office speaks volumes
about her character
Share if you think that we should hold our federal employees who work for the government
to higher standards
Share if you agree that this proves that the Democratic Party is corrupt
what do you think about this?
Please Share this news and Scroll down to comment below and don't forget to subscribe
top stories today.
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét