Youtube daily Jun 7 2018

no you did not read that title wrong you can get Google Drive unlimited storage

for extremely cheap by cheap I'm talking ten dollars a month unlimited

storage anything photos videos whatever you want to put on there if you've got a

billion documents you can throw them on there no problem before if you want a

Google Drive you would have to pay two dollars for one hundred gigabytes you

could pay ten dollars per month for one terabyte or

$99.99 for ten terabytes $99.99 per month now you can get unlimited for ten

dollars that is awesome for people like us

photographers videographers whatever you call yourself

anybody out there it's incredible you can store all of your data on Google's

cloud which is arguably the best they have an incredible interface and you can

be pretty confident that Google is not gonna crash they're not gonna lose all

their data once you put your data on there you can be pretty assured that

you're safe and so what I do is I actually now have transferred all of my

data and you might have seen in a previous video I kept it on Amazon Drive

Amazon Cloud Drive because I got unlimited photo storage with Prime but

this is unlimited completely so I transferred all my data from Amazon

Cloud Drive over to Google Drive and now I have all of my videos and photos

stored there I have about two terabytes right now and then it only goes up every

month so let me tell you about how you can do this what you're gonna need to do

first is go to something like Google domains and you're gonna need to buy a

domain name if you don't know what a domain name is it's something like I

have RickyKresslein.com so it's just a dot-com website it's not an actual

website you don't have to pay to build a website or anything you just need to get

that domain name on Google it costs about twelve dollars per year sometimes

you can find them cheaper but Google is just easiest to work with since you

already have you're getting the Google Drive so I bought RickyKresslein.com

and then what I did is I went to Google G suite business will allow you to pay

ten dollars per month ten dollars flat

and upload all of your documents there so just go and buy that domain go to

domains.Google I believe is a website I'll put it right here the

correct website and purchase a domain it can be whatever you want your name

Im just trying to get free Google Drive .com I can be whatever you want and then go

to the G suite and link that domain with a G suite business account for ten

dollars a month and you will automatically when you sign into that

account have unlimited google drive storage and that's all you need to do

and now you're ready to upload terabytes and terabytes and terabytes up to that

drive so go check it out let me know down in the comments how it worked out

for you if you got any questions comments concerns leave this video a

like if you like free storage and I will see you next time

For more infomation >> UNLIMITED Google Drive CHEAP Cloud Storage!!! - Duration: 3:12.

-------------------------------------------

Sarah Huckabee Sanders Swears She Has Credibility During Trainwreck Interview - Duration: 4:25.

On Wednesday CNN's Chris Cuomo invited Sarah Huckabee Sanders on the program.

He went to DC, they sat down face to face and Cuomo allowed Huckabee Sanders the opportunity

to tell her side of the story about her lie that Donald Trump did not dictate or otherwise

was not involved in that Donald Trump Jr. letter about the response to his Trump Tower

meeting last summer.

It took roughly 30 seconds for this interview to kind of go off the rails.

Take a look.

Sarah, it is good to see you.

Good to see you.

I respect you taking the opportunity.

Thank you.

Thanks for being in DC.

Well I came for you.

What do you think about this as a positive pivot?

Let's take a look at this situation and see if we can get to a place, mutual respect,

both sides think credibility counts and we move forward.

What do you say?

All right, we'll give it a shot.

All right.

I get it.

I get that that's the answer.

But you also get that's it's unsatisfying, right?

That's why we're frozen.

I don't understand having to answer the same question over and over and over again.

Well because you haven't answered it.

And expecting a different ...

In all due respect it's because you didn't answer it.

No that's not true.

I've answered it, you just didn't like the answer and there's a big difference between

me not answering it and you not liking the answer.

There can be, fair point.

There can be a difference however, I don't know that there is here because this is about

something you said.

I could've said this then.

When people asked you, "Hey, what Sekulow says, is it right?"

Why didn't you say then, it's a matter for counsel?

Again, I'm not get into a back and forth with you.

I've addressed it.

The outside counsel has addressed it.

They've answered this question over the last couple of days and I would refer you back

to those comments.

Let's look at it a different way.

You seem to be in a position where you feel that you are constrained to not be able to

answer.

We are purposefully walling ourselves off and allowing the outside counsel to do their

job and we're doing ours.

But you did initially answer it, right?

I did.

And again, I referred you.

Do you regret that?

No, I don't.

But I'm starting to regret sitting here because I'm answering the same question I've answered

a million times.

I wanted to give you a lot of chances at it because I think it matters.

I think it hurts your credibility.

I think it hurts the dynamic.

But I gave you the opportunities, you made of them what you wanted.

All right?

It's not the only reason I brought you here.

I'm very comfortable with my credibility and the fact that I think by sitting here right

now and taking questions now from you shows the type of person I am.

Shows my effort to provide information and frankly to be in an environment that's not

exactly friendly.

That's not exactly one that I think a lot of people in my position would come and sit

in and I think that speaks a lot to my credibility and if you want to focus on my credibility,

I think that's something that you should certainly look at.

See here's the thing Sarah though.

You do have a credibility problem.

You do.

You lied about this and as Chris Cuomo tried to tell you several times in that interview

even though you didn't want to listen to it, you never had to lie in the first place.

If you didn't know the answer you didn't have to give an answer.

You could've said, "I don't know, maybe I'll look into it."

Or, you could've given the response that you're trying to give now like, "Oh that's a question

for legal, go ask them."

Instead you made the choice just like you do every day, to tell a lie.

That's your choice.

That is a credibility problem.

In fact you don't have any credibility whatsoever.

And you're the communications director, the press secretary.

You run communications for the White House to the press.

You're the intermediary.

You're the go between.

You're the person who's supposed to relay that information and we can't trust you.

The press can't trust you.

Now I admire Chris Cuomo for what he attempted to do there which was to give you a platform

to set the record straight.

And like always, you failed to do it because there is something so wrong with you that

you are incapable of actually telling the truth to anyone.

It's apparently the same affliction that Donald Trump himself suffers from.

For more infomation >> Sarah Huckabee Sanders Swears She Has Credibility During Trainwreck Interview - Duration: 4:25.

-------------------------------------------

Watch Live: President Trump holds joint presser with Japanese PM Shinzo Abe - Duration: 36:20.

For more infomation >> Watch Live: President Trump holds joint presser with Japanese PM Shinzo Abe - Duration: 36:20.

-------------------------------------------

Why Can There Only Be One Dominant Woman in Rap? - Duration: 5:16.

Ever since "Bodak Yellow" launched Cardi B to the top of the charts last fall, there's

been an unofficial, but universal assumption that Nicki Minaj, the reigning queen of rap,

must be jealous.

And jealousy automatically equals beef—right?

Not necessarily.

In fact, the concept of female rap beef is pretty complicated.

Cardi and Nicki are a perfect illustration of how and why.

Last October, Migos dropped "MotorSport" with both Nicki and Cardi on the track.

The internet promptly lost it, with many thinking the women had subbed each other on the same

damn song.

The track in which Cardi literally says:

"Why would I hop in some beef when I could just hop in a Porsche?

/ You heard she gon' do what from who?

That's not a reliable source."

What source is more reliable than Cardi herself?

"I feel like people wouldn't even be satisfied if me and [Nicki] was making out on a freaking

photo.

I feel like people just want that drama because it's entertaining."

Meanwhile, Nicki addressed the beef rumors in a now-deleted string of tweets, saying

that men in the hip-hop community are pushing animosity on female rappers.

"These are men in our culture who simply refuse to let it go.

They don't do this to male M.C.'s."

She's right.

Dreezy, a female rapper out of Chicago, says she's constantly dealing with outsiders

reaching to stack her against someone else, purely because of gender.

"I always feel like I'm getting compared to other females.

It's kind of stupid because they don't do that to the male counterparts.

They all coexist, you feel me?"

Elizabeth Mendez-Berry, a hip-hop critic during the '90s, says the belief that there could

only be one dominant woman started way back when.

She noted that there was a strong sense that there was only room for one woman in the game

at any given time.

Or at least one type of woman.

"So it was Kim or Foxy.

There was definitely a moment with Missy and Lauryn and Kim and Foxy and Eve, but I'd say

that was the exception rather than the rule."

There was a moment of collective female dominance, but looking back, you can pinpoint the moment

when female rap took a hit and things shifted: Missy Elliott got sick.

Lil Kim went to jail.

Left Eye died.

And according to Frannie Kelley, co-host of the Microphone Check podcast, it got more

complicated from there.

"Trina was sort of moving between labels.

She was still around, playing shows, but she wasn't in the album release cycle conversation.

[Queen] Latifah gets into movies, Da Brat starts doing radio.

All of this shit happened in a five-year period."

Kamaiyah remembers things the same way, and figures that the dwindling number of female

rappers might be why things have ended up so restrictive today.

"The numbers of female rappers went away, so it made it easier for it to make it look

like it was only room for one," she said.

"Because if you are the only one, then you have this mentality that there can only be

one."

A 2012 George Mason University study mirrors Kamaiyah's thoughts.

Women are less supportive of other women when they are both underrepresented in a workplace

and feel there are only a few opportunities for advancement.

In other words: The smaller the space for women to succeed, the more likely they are

to turn on one another for success.

The tightened space for women in the rap landscape was the perfect breeding ground for competition.

We all remember who was there when the dust settled after the pool of female rappers shrunk:

Nicki Minaj.

Nicki, who crossed over from Young Money's resident female MC to international pop star.

Nicki, who passed up Aretha Franklin just last year for most Billboard Hot 100 hits

of any female artist, ever.

She redefined what it means to be a female rapper, and did so in such a major way that

it affected every woman entering the game after her.

Kid Fury, host of the wildly popular culture commentary podcast The Read, says the Nicki

comparisons new female MCs are faced with are unnecessary and unfair.

"Women are completely treated differently when it comes to rap.

They're not even allowed to like, stick a thigh through the door before somebody is

like, 'Who is this bitch trying to come in here and rap that isn't Nicki Minaj?'"

Bbymutha is someone who has been dragged into the pit of Nicki comparisons.

The Chattanooga rapper released a song called "Rules" last year that generated buzz

on social media and YouTube.

"People were trying to tell me that I should've sold it to Nicki.

And I'm just like, why would I have done that?

Why?

People take what I say the wrong way.

I was just like, 'Nicki couldn't have made a song like this.'

And I said that because it came from a personal place."

According to Frannie Kelley, the faulty mechanics of the rap industry opened the door for cookie-cutter

male artists.

"The industry throws resources at middling, mediocre, pointless men, and refuses to throw

money at women unless they have proven themselves on a level well past reason.

And yet they've built this entire fanbase and brand for themselves, and a body of work."

The patterns that have taken ahold of society as a whole represent what we're seeing in

hip-hop.

Men want their territory, and they're overtly encouraging women to take each other out of

the equation so they can keep it.

Women end up aiming to best each other because they know space alongside men is limited.

Competition equals survival, and nowhere is that more true than in hip-hop.

If the way women are positioned in society at large is any indication, a new era of female

rappers will still be duking it out long after Nicki and Cardi lay down their mics.

For more infomation >> Why Can There Only Be One Dominant Woman in Rap? - Duration: 5:16.

-------------------------------------------

"AŞPA Azərbaycan hökümətini cəzalandırır"-Əli Kərimli,"Xaləddin Əsgərovu əvəzləyən şəxs kimdir?" - Duration: 4:08.

For more infomation >> "AŞPA Azərbaycan hökümətini cəzalandırır"-Əli Kərimli,"Xaləddin Əsgərovu əvəzləyən şəxs kimdir?" - Duration: 4:08.

-------------------------------------------

8 Ball Pool - Victory Pro Box Free Offer How We Get Latest 2018 - Duration: 2:31.

For more infomation >> 8 Ball Pool - Victory Pro Box Free Offer How We Get Latest 2018 - Duration: 2:31.

-------------------------------------------

AT&T By the Numbers (1Q 18) Portuguese | AT&T - Duration: 3:14.

For more infomation >> AT&T By the Numbers (1Q 18) Portuguese | AT&T - Duration: 3:14.

-------------------------------------------

Barack Obama Colluded With One Country On A Secret Deal Everyone Says Is Treason - Duration: 3:31.

A secret report is about to doom Barack Obama for good.

Obama was caught red-handed colluding with the radical Islamic government.

And now everyone is saying it's the smoking gun proving treason.

Senate Republicans released the results of an investigation into Obama's shady collusion

with the Iranian government to help the rogue nation avoid sanctions.

Republicans found that in 2016, the Obama administration granted a license to Iran to

take nearly $6 billion held in Oman and convert it into Euros by passing it through the United

States.

The license was necessary because of United States sanctions.

This scheme failed because banks in America were also wary of running afoul of the law

and would not go through with the transaction.

The episode is another reminder of the shady "side deals" the Obama administration

cut with Iran.

Obama was desperate to win a "legacy" second-term achievement and bent over backwards

to appease the terrorist supporting government.

These side deals also included releasing prisoners as part of a swap with Iran which the Justice

Department considered a national security threat to the United States.

In addition, the Obama administration dropped investigations and arrest warrants of 14 other

individuals, many of whom were believed to be connected to Hamas.

America paid a steep price for the Iran deal.

Now Americans are learning just what the deal cost.

And Texas Senator Ted Cruz reacted with horror to this news.

Cruz put out a statement blasting the administration for betraying America.

The Texas Senator declared, "The Obama Iran nuclear deal was a devil's bargain, but

one exclusively designed to help the devil.

The Obama administration covertly greased the nuclear deal with bribes and secret agreements

that made it even worse for America.

Over the years we've discovered some of them: There was the nuclear side deal to let

Iran inspect itself.

There was the ransom deal that gave Iran $1.7 billion in cash.

There were several wire transfers from America to Iran, ranging from roughly $1 million to

$10 million, including a purchase of excess nuclear-related material that Iran never should

have been producing and America did not need from them."

Cruz described how the newly unearthed scheme set about to turn the U.S. economy into money

launderers for Iran, stating, "They subordinated American law and the U.S. financial system

to the deal, hatching a scheme that would have put the U.S. dollar and U.S. banks to

work moving money for the Iranians."

Cruz also pledged to dig up the complete truth about the side agreements the Obama administration

entered into in order to secure Iran's signature on the disastrous Iran deal, as well as, "all

of the many unclassified documents outlining what Iran was actually promised…"

The Iran nuclear deal was a disaster.

Even before this report came out, the deal pumped hundreds of millions of dollars into

the Iranian economy – which could have been used to support terrorism – and set the

rogue nation on a glide path to developing a nuclear weapon.

Now the American people are learning that wasn't even the worst of it.

The Obama administration colluded with the Iranian government to elude U.S. sanctions

and turn American banks into money mules for a terrorist government.

We will keep you up to date on any new developments in this story.

For more infomation >> Barack Obama Colluded With One Country On A Secret Deal Everyone Says Is Treason - Duration: 3:31.

-------------------------------------------

Weird Strange Dream Psychic Dejavu June 2, 2018 - Duration: 9:58.

okay I've just got to do a little video here I had a strange dream last night

today I think today's June 2nd 2nd or the 3rd maybe I'm not sure it's one of

those two days 2018 but the strange part about that was that I had this weird

dream and it was kind of like I was back in college maybe it's because I've been

doing so much reflection I don't know which I have then and so it took me it

had something to do with computer aided drafting and see back when I first moved

back to Iowa my dad said well why don't you do computer-aided drafting and so

what I said well what's that and he's like well yeah well you could transfer

the schematics of of old computer or of old old oh when they call it like the

plans to houses over onto a onto a computer basically is what it was so

there was some course for that in college and but but the thing is the

dream that I had you know that wasn't something that I decided I wanted to do

and now in hindsight I'm kind of thinking I'm glad that I didn't because

of the fact I'm thinking well like how long would that job of last because

computers can actually automatically generate drafts no so that job probably

doesn't even exist anymore that's what I'm kind of thinking but the weird part

about my dream was I would I had taken a course I signed up to take the course

and so I was going to college and so I showed up and was taking all these

classes and so then but the weird part is it's like it's dark it's like it's

dark in the classroom there's like no lights on but there's a bunch of people

there and so I'm in the classroom and I then like I'm following my my course

schedule and all that and so then like halfway through I get this note that

says well how come you've not been showing up for class

have been I've been showing up to all the classes and so they hand me this

note that says I haven't been showing up for my class at night and I'm thinking

well that's weird I've been showing up for all my classes and I've been passing

and getting A's and that's what my either a little printed sheet that they

give us they would print out a sheet that shows us our progress and we think

they'll get that at any time and so it was showing that I was getting like A's

and B's and stuff like that and so then they're like well no you haven't been

showing up for the the actual class at night and and so that I look and lo and

behold there's another class but they didn't tell me about it until halfway

through the curriculum that there was a night course that I was supposed to be

taking and so that I went and actually had to withdraw from that class because

of the fact that I'd already failed it so there was a class that are supposed

to be taking and that I had paid for off my Pell Grant and then halfway through

then I have to drop it that I ended up losing some of my money because of the

fact that which is from the Pell Grant because well what you know what you've

completed half like half they may they still make you pay for it even though

you haven't completed the course so they don't give you all your money back and

and that's what that's how it was to with what you need the courses that I

took back when I was brought into college but my dream was the same way

and so what kind of reminded me kind of reminded me of that maybe that's what

that is was like the birth of a memory that's how the birth of my memory came

in is in this particular dream of that a course that I didn't know about at night

then I learned about that I have to go withdraw from it or get an F that was

the choice either you would withdraw from the class and you don't get part of

your money back even though he didn't take the course

and and so I was thinking that's kind of a ripoff to in and of itself and you

know see that's taxpayer money there because that was part of a Pell Grant

taxpayer money and I'm thinking what kind of you know as so in that sense it

kind of reminds me of like if you don't cruise the I'm just comparing these

analogies these two analogies because like when you sign up for a cruise and

say that you can't go you don't get all your money back and that's the same

thing with college courses so say that you Eve you go or something comes up and

you have to withdraw and that's what was happening with the military and the

soldiers too because the soldiers that I know that was common in Germany you know

that was one of their biggest complaints they would take the course and and this

is free courses that they're getting so they don't they don't somebody has to

pay for it though the taxpayers are paying for it so they would sign up for

courses and but they wouldn't be able to complete them because what would happen

is they'd be going to a course and then they had to go to the field and then

they wouldn't be able to complete the course and and so that was a big

complaint that probably a lot of people don't know about and and I was oh maybe

that's kind of I'm kind of thinking that like here with you know how Walmart said

that they were going to offer their employees College free college or

inexpensive college and I'm thinking but when you're going to work and that's

what the biggest complaint the soldiers had was going to work

they don't have time they have families they have other things to do or what

they do so if the soldiers signed up then they ended up missing out on their

classes and I'm thinking now how many of Walmart employees are going to be able

to like if they have families and things that take care of aren't they going to

be in the same boat and what what kind of plan is that I'm one huh

but yeah it was kind of a it was strange it was so real and I've had surreal

dreams like that before in the past this isn't the first time it's like over my

decades I've had um I've had real dreams like that so yeah but I just wanted to

share that with you guys you know because when people are busy

with five which is expected well what good is free college when you don't have

time so say you're going to work you're working at retail working at Walmart

working working and you decide to take a course and then they call you in to work

and you can't know in what or say that the courses aren't scheduled the courses

you need aren't scheduled during your time then what go to the college courses

and that was the biggest complaint of the military was that you know of the

soldiers I talked to they said they were taking a course then either they would

get they would get sent down range which is deployed somewhere or they would have

field duty and so then they would end up missing out so what really what good is

it if they can't utilize it what good is a college education when they can't

utilize the actual degree or you know complete the work but yet colleges still

get paid the teachers still get paid do you are you guys here you know here in

something here here in a common denominator here the colleges and the

teachers still get paid at taxpayer expense and you know so and I have to

wonder I'm wondering I'm just wondering you know about some of this stuff where

some of them with with some of these companies who incentivize I'm just

wondering where some of the money comes from like have they tapped into some

grant money I mean it is that possible or you know like when you well you know

okay like when they have these campaigns of okay we're gonna hire soldiers then

there's grant money that's been set aside for them to hire soldiers and so

then there's like a key word they're investing in keywords and not people but

that's what I learned the other day from watching this show the boob tube yes I

was watching a show they said they're investing in keywords not people they

said so which which generates trends and so it's like well what so they don't

have to advertise so when you're when you're marketing and you've got

everybody talking about something then it generates trends in the search engine

and so a lot of these companies are being cheap they don't want to advertise

they don't want to pay their employees they don't want to do living wages and

that's what Bernie talks about all the time now this is just stuff I've kind of

figured out on my own I sit back and watch those of us who sit back and watch

are dangerous and and I say that figuratively weird and dangerous because

we're using our brain and so when we ask questions we get banned from when we ask

intelligent questions we get banned that's what's been happening to a lot of

women and even men too but primarily women right now are a lot of women who

ask smart questions the questions get ignored and so yeah if you if you ask a

smart question you get overlooked but if you do something really stupid

that's exploited yeah I see that you know that that's that's exploited so

yeah so anyway let me know what you think

For more infomation >> Weird Strange Dream Psychic Dejavu June 2, 2018 - Duration: 9:58.

-------------------------------------------

Surprise Move From 'Innocent' McCabe: Give Me Immunity or I Plead the 5th - Duration: 4:13.

This has to be making liberals very nervous.

Less than two months after the release of a Justice Department Inspector General's

report that showed just why former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe deserved to be fired

from his job, and with yet another inspector general's report due for release any day

now, McCabe is asking for immunity in exchange for his testimony to the Senate Judiciary

Committee.

And since that committee is investigating how the FBI handled the Hillary Clinton email

scandal, that doesn't look good for Democrats at all.

In a letter dated June 4, to Judiciary Committee Chairman Sen. Charles Grassley, McCabe's

attorney wrote that his client is willing to testify only if his words can't be used

against him in potential future criminal proceedings.

"Under the terms of such a grant of use immunity, no testimony or other information

provided by Mr. McCabe could be used against him in a criminal case," attorney Michael

R. Bromwich wrote.

And if the committee isn't willing to grant that immunity, Bromwich wrote, McCabe would

simply refuse to testify.

"If this Committee is unwilling or unable to obtain such an order, then Mr. McCabe will

have no choice but to invoke his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination," Bromwich

wrote.

Simply put, this doesn't look good for anyone involved from the Democrat perspective – not

former FBI Director James Comey or the FBI and Justice Department under the Obama administration,

not former Attorney General Loretta Lynch, and most of all not Hillary Clinton and former

President Barack Obama.

For liberals in the media, it might look even worse.

Not that long ago, McCabe was being hailed by mainstream news outlets and openly leftist

websites as the upright man being smeared by President Donald Trump's administration.

Washington Post contributing columnist Ronald Klain, a veteran of the Bill Clinton and Obama

White Houses who was an adviser to the Hillary Clinton campaign, published an op-ed in the

Post portraying McCabe as a victim of Trump vindictiveness.

It was headlined, "I Stand With Andrew McCabe."

At the liberal website Vox, a piece by Ezra Klein was headlined: "Donald Trump's corrupt

firing of Andrew McCabe."

At the radically leftist Mother Jones, blogger Kevin Drum wrote a piece in March titled "Andrew

McCabe is Completely Innocent of Wrongdoing."

(He backtracked a little after the IG report in April showed McCabe was maybe not so "innocent"

after all.)

To be fair, all these pieces allowed for the possibility that McCabe might have done something

technically wrong enough to get himself terminated, but the overall spirit was that under Trump,

a corrupt federal government was crushing an essentially innocent man.

Trump critics need that spirit for the liberal narrative to work, to keep convincing many

Americans that Trump's presidency is illegitimate and Hillary Clinton should have won the 2016

election.

McCabe's demand for immunity, coupled with the idea that he will plead the Fifth Amendment

to avoid potential criminal prosecution, shakes that narrative to the foundation.

The right to avoid self-incrimination in a criminal case is guaranteed by the United

States Constitution, of course, and no one is presumed guilty under the law.

But when a former FBI deputy director is forced to invoke it in a case involving the potential

corruption of a presidential campaign, there's clearly something deeper going on.

The idea that a man who was at the heart of the FBI's election operation, the guy who

worked closely with fanatical anti-Trump FBI Agent Peter Strzok and scheming, now-ex FBI

lawyer Lisa Page, might have serious criminal matters to worry about as the Senate Judiciary

Committee investigation plays out, is putting the whole anti-Trump narrative in a new light.

Headlines that go from "McCabe Is Innocent" to "McCabe Pleads the Fifth" are going

to give Americans a different idea of what really happened with the FBI and the kids-gloves

investigation of Hillary Clinton that almost gave her the presidency of the United States.

And that has to have liberals very, very nervous.

For more infomation >> Surprise Move From 'Innocent' McCabe: Give Me Immunity or I Plead the 5th - Duration: 4:13.

-------------------------------------------

Grassley Busts Rosenstein On What He May Be Trying To Hide In The Secret Documents - Duration: 3:10.

Grassley Busts Rosenstein On What He May Be Trying To Hide In The Secret Documents.

Senate Judiciary Chairman, Chuck Grassley, wants answers and he wants them NOW.

Grassley has given, what he considers, ample amount of time for the FBI and DOJ to hand

over key documents related to General Flynn.

Rosenstein stone-walled the release of the documents and continues to make excuses for

not releasing all of them.

But Grassley is not about to take "no" for an answer anymore, and he sent a clear

message to Rosenstein that he's messing with the wrong guy.

On Wednesday, Grassley sent a letter addressed directly to Rod Rosenstein, where he called

out the Deputy Attorney General for providing "insufficient documents" related to a

request he made on May 11 and May 25 separate letters to FBI Director Christopher Wray and

Rod Rosenstein.

You can read more about the May 11 letter HERE.

Grassley asked for communication logs between General Flynn and the Russian Ambassador,

Sergey Kislyak, and transcripts of Flynn's initial interrogation conducted by the FBI

in regards to the conversations with the Ambassador.

Rosenstein eventually reached out, yet gave very little of the information Grassley had

requested, leaving him questioning what they may be trying to hide.

And he is not giving up!

In his letter to Rosenstein, Grassley pointed out that it's been well over a year since

the initial request was made in a "bipartisan basis" and it's been over 5 months since

Flynn pleaded guilty.

So, according to Grassley, there is no reason for the "improper excuses in refusing to

provide the requested information."

Grassley lays out his case and directly slammed Rosenstein and other powers that be when he

said:

"It has been more than five months since his guilty plea.

Thus, there is no longer any legitimate reason to withhold facts from the Senate about the

circumstances of his conversations with the Russian ambassador and his FBI interview."

"…Presuming that the facts are consistent with the plea agreement, there is absolutely

nothing for the Department to hide and no reason to act like it has something to hide.

Resisting Congressional oversight only serves to further undermine public trust in the Department."

Grassley also said it is "disingenuous and extremely disturbing" that Rosenstein and

the DOJ are slamming the Committee for wanting to interview Special Agent Pientka, who assisted

in interrogating Flynn.

In his recent letters, Grassley has expressed concern over former FBI Director James Comey's

inconsistent statements related to the Flynn case and is more than determined to get to

the bottom of it.

Is there key info in the secret Flynn documents?

If so, what are they desperately hiding?

Do you think it's time for Congress to take more action to force the Flynn documents from

the hands of the FBI and DOJ if they don't comply with the Senate Judiciary chairman's

demand?

What do you think about this?

Please share this news and scroll down to Comment below and don't forget to subscribe

USA FACTS Today.

For more infomation >> Grassley Busts Rosenstein On What He May Be Trying To Hide In The Secret Documents - Duration: 3:10.

-------------------------------------------

দ্রুত পেটের মেদ ভুড়ি কমানোর উপায় কী??? bangla health tips বাংলা health টিপস - Duration: 1:43.

For more infomation >> দ্রুত পেটের মেদ ভুড়ি কমানোর উপায় কী??? bangla health tips বাংলা health টিপস - Duration: 1:43.

-------------------------------------------

Como trocar amortecedores dianteiros VW PASSAT VARIANT B6 (3C5) [TUTORIAL AUTODOC] - Duration: 20:46.

Loosen the wheel mounting bolts.

Remove the front wheels.

Unscrew the stabilizer link upper fastening. Use an end bit №5 and a combination spanner №19.

Disconnect the ABS sensor. Disconnect the brake hose holder from the shock absorber strut.

Use a socket №18.

Use a special puller to take the tie rod end out.

Unscrew the brake caliper fastening. Use a socket №21.

Remove the brake caliper. Attach the brake caliper to the suspension or the body by a wire on Volkswagen Passat B6 without disconnecting the brake hose to avoid the brake system leakage.

Use a torx №T30. Unscrew the brake disc mounting bolts and remove it.

Use a socket №24. Unscrew the wheel hub axle nut.

Use a socket №17. Disconnect the spherical joint from the arm.

Remove the drive shaft from the wheel hub.

Use a socket №18 and a torx № M14. Unscrew the lower fastener of the shock absorber strut.

Disconnect the steering knuckle from the shock absorber strut.

Remove the upper seal from the firewall. Remove the protective cover.

Use a socket №13. Unscrew the upper fastening of the shock absorber strut. Remove the suspension strut.

Using a special tool take out the spring.

Set the shock absorber strut on the spring compressor tool.

Note that when using a spring compressor, spring coils need to be securely gripped, compressing the spring on the opposite sides.

Use a combination spanner №21 and a hex-nut wrench №7. Unscrew the top fastening of the shock strut mount.

Remove the top mount, the support bearing and the upper spring cup. Remove the spring and shock absorber dust cap and the bump stop.

Before installing new shock absorbers it is strongly recommended to pump them over for 3-5 times manually.

Install a new shock absorber on a special fixture for further mounting of the spring.

Install the spring.

Install the dust sleeve and the bump stop on the new shock absorber.

Install the top mount, the strut mount bearing and the upper spring cup.Compress the spring.

Use a combination spanner №21 and a hex-nut wrench №7. Tighten the upper fastener of the shock absorber strut mount.

Install the shock strut into the wheel arch.

Use a socket №13. Tighten the shock strut top mount.

Install the protective cover. Install the upper seal on the firewall.

Install the steering knuckle onto the shock absorber strut.

Use a socket №18 and a torx № M14. Tighten the lower fastening of the shock absorber.

Install the drive shaft into the wheel hub.

Use a socket №17. Tighten the ball joint fastener.

Use a socket №24. Screw the wheel hub axle nut.

Use a torx №T30. Install the brake disc and secure it.

Install the brake caliper and fix it. Use a socket №21.

Connect the brake hose fastener to the shock absorber strut.

Connect the ABS sensor.

Connect the tie rod end to the steering knuckle and tighten it. Use a socket №18.

Tighten the stabilizer link upper fastening. Use an end bit №5 and a combination spanner №19.