Since 1986, false claim to actions have recovered more than 56 billion dollars of taxpayer money
by exposing and penalizing industry-wide fraud schemes, and by incentivizing whistleblowers,
the government has recovered billions that otherwise would've been lost to fraud.
Last year alone, whistleblowers who filed lawsuits on behalf of the government reported
recoveries of more than 3.7 billion dollars the federal and state has been able to discover,
fraud, not because of agency oversight, but fraud because of government audits.
But through those efforts, a private whistleblower using the False Claims Act usually succeeds.
Over 80% of the cases brought under the federal False Claims Act are initiated by whistleblowers,
and an even larger percentage of the funds recovered can be ascribed to whistleblower
actions.
Joining me to talk about this in more detail is Attorney Nola Cross, who's obtained multimillion-dollar
recoveries in Medicare fraud.
Nola, it seems in a large part that the American system of Healthcare and other government
contracting is all about the common fraud within those industries.
That's the way it's looking right now.
Ever since, we see the onset of the hospital corporation.
There's no longer doctor and doctor-run hospitals.
We see this new thing, the corporate-owned health industry.
Isn't that part of the problem here?
I think it is, and I think that a lot of times some of the whistleblowers are actually competitors
because the profit model a lot of times is based on fraud, and it's hard to compete unless
you engage in it as well, especially with the merger, merger, merger.
It's very difficult for anybody else to compete who's not caught up in the fraud profit model.
Well, we know who could be a whistleblower.
I mean, anybody can be a whistleblower if they have inside information that is unique,
that nobody else knows about, that they've discovered.
The part of this story I'd like you to talk about a little bit is how so often the whistleblower
is victimized by the system.
I remember during the Obama Administration, his proclamation was, "We're gonna really
treat whistleblowers well.
If a whistleblower does something wrong, we're gonna protect that whistleblower."
Nothing is farther from the truth, in my experience watching these cases.
How about you?
I agree with you completely, and that's why there are so few whistleblowers in comparison
to the amount of fraud.
If people were ... Money isn't the only incentive.
There is an opportunity sometimes to prevail, and sometimes to get a whistleblower relator
share under the False Claims Act, but oftentimes, people are very afraid of being stigmatized,
of being blackballed in their industry, of never being able to work again in the healthcare
industry or the military industry or procurement industry, or whatever area of fraud that we're
talking about.
So, that's a big disincentive.
There's also a lot of retaliation that's immediate against any ... Usually it's an employee,
any employee who is attempting to stop false claims in the making, and the statute's pretty
strong on that, but the statute can take many, many years, often a decade, and in the meantime,
a lot of people are sidelined out of their careers.
Yeah.
Not only are they sidelined, but they're victimized so many times.
I mean, there's times when people have to move across the country, they have to move
out of the country, simply to protect themselves and their family.
What interests me is this.
Every state logically should have some form of False Claims Act.
I mean, it benefits the state.
What taxpayers don't understand, they'll hear the government is really bad, or a corporation
is really bad, about trying to make the whistleblower look like they've done something wrong, but
the truth is the taxpayer gets money back that the taxpayer would never see but for
the effort of the whistleblower, and so you wonder, why wouldn't every state benefit from
having a whistleblower statute, and do most of the states allow for that?
It seems like they should.
What's your take?
That's such a perfect question, especially when I'm speaking from Wisconsin, because
Wisconsin is very unique.
Most of the states, about 31, have what we call a mini key time statute, a mini False
Claims Act statute, that allows for whistleblowers to report fraud and to recover some share
in any recovery.
In fact, Puerto Rico just passed a False Claims Act statute for Puerto Rico, which I'm sure
will help them out quite a bit, because they have a lot of difficulties, some caused by
the government, but some I'm sure are from contractors of the government.
Strangely, though, there's one state, one state out of the entire 50 that actually repealed
their mini False Claims Act statute, and that's Wisconsin, and Governor Walker's initiative
in Wisconsin actually repeal the statute in 2015 so that there are no longer any provisions
for whistleblowers to call the fraud against the state of Wisconsin, and which is usually
Medicaid fraud.
That's what their statute is, Medicaid fraud statute.
So, who does that help?
Well, it's highly political.
I mean, corporate America has such influence on ... Especially with buffoons like Scott
Walker.
I mean, the guy is absolutely a total buffoon, and he knew that the statute had allowed the
state to actually collect money, taxpayers collect money from things like Medicaid fraud,
Medicare fraud, all different types of fraud that was taking place in the state.
Corporations got with the buffoon, and they convinced him that it was a bad idea, so of
course, he did away with it.
So, it's a very political kind of process.
I finished a book.
It was published several months ago.
It's called Law and Addiction.
It was a fiction book, but it was actually based on a case that we handled in here, just
to put into perspective how bad these cases can actually be.
This was a case where a gun sight on a pistols and rifle gun sight was called a holographic
gun sight, and it was so defective that at 50 yards it would be off two degrees.
You can imagine what that does to somebody taking a name, and people were killed because
of it.
Soldiers lost their lives because of it.
Police officers lost their lives.
When the whistleblower brought the case and tried to say to the government, "Look.
This is bad.
This is what's happening," that whistleblower was actually victimized, even though that
sight was used by police departments, it was used by the military, but the political influence
and the political impact was so strong that it actually interrupted the process of actually
getting the money back because of that fraudulent activity.
Well, actually, it was a piece of junk.
It was a completely useless gun sight.
But you see these cases often, don't you?
I mean, you see things that bad quite often in your practice, don't you?
Every day.
Every day.
It's so disgusting now.
You're talking about the 56 billion that's been collected since the incentivized relator
share came into play in a different format in 1986, and for fiscal year '17, the government
has actually recovered 3.7 billion, and over that 3.7 billion, 3.4 of that billion, 3.4
billion of the 3.7 billion was only recovered because a whistleblower brought the lawsuit
under the False Claims Act, but the types of cases that are brought are so disgusting,
and every time you read one, it's like you gotta take a shower afterwards.
It's like, who thought of this fraud scheme?
We had a recovery last year, in fiscal year '17, which was pharmaceutical fraud.
In that case, each pharmaceutical company has the ability, and usually does, purchase
the prescription history of every doctor on a weekly or sometimes a daily basis, so they
know how many pills of whatever it is this pharmacy company is pumping out, this doctor
is prescribing, and then they want to have the doctors in their so-called speaker program
so they can pay them some money, but then they're monitoring it, and if they don't prescribe
enough, they may be dropped out of their speaker program.
Those were allegations that we made in the recovery in that case, although the allegations
were not admitted-
Yeah, kickback, especially-
... the recovery was 38 million, 38 million.
Yeah, kickback is what that's called, and the anti-kickback statute is incorporated,
actually, by reference in the False Claims Act statute.
But the types of disgusting ... It's so bad, and patient harm, and the kinds of ... Just
absolutely no concern whatsoever for patients, or for the military and military fraud, and
the kind of patient with the kind of product parts, and military parts fraud.
It's so dangerous.
Nola Cross, thank you for joining us.
Keep up your good work.
Thank you very much.
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét