Welcome :) Okay this is a bit of a special Mathologer today. A number of you have
requested that I do something on blackjack and card counting so here we
go--how to gamble yourself to fame and fortune. I am being assisted today by
fellow mathematician, longtime colleague and part-time gambler Marty Ross who
is really good at this stuff and who has offered to share some of the
mathematical secrets to coming out on top in gambling games like blackjack.
Okay so let's begin with a couple of puzzles. For the first puzzle suppose
you're looking to bet on roulette. The roulette wheel is numbered from 0 to 37
with 18 red numbers, 18 black numbers and the green 0. So the chances of red coming
up is just under 50/50. Now let's suppose you've been watching the roulette wheel
and of the last 100 spins red has come up 60 times. What should you bet will come
up next: red, black, doesn't matter? Sounds too easy? Well this probably comes as a
surprise but most people get this one wrong. We'll give the answer in a little
while. Our second puzzle actually arises in practice--a standard way that casinos
and gambling sites sucker people into betting. For this puzzle you're given a
$10 free bet coupon. You can use the coupon to place a bet on any standard
casino game: roulette, blackjack, craps, and so on. If your bet wins then you receive
the normal winnings. For example, let's say you bet red on roulette. If red comes
up you win $10, of course. Win or lose, the casino takes the coupon. Now here's the
question: what is the value of this coupon? In other words, what should or
would you be willing to pay for such a coupon? We leave that one for you to
fight over in the comments. But we'll give you a hint: whatever you think the
obvious answer is you're definitely wrong :) Now on with making our fortune.
Famously the mathematician Blaise Pascal sorted out the basics of probability in
order to answer some tricky gambling questions.
When not dropping rocks Galileo also dabbled in these ideas. So if we roll a
standard die, then there's a one in six chance that five will come up, on a
roulette wheel there is a 1 in 37 chance that 13 comes up, the usual stuff. And then
comes in the money. What really matters to a gambler is not only the odds of
winning but of course also how much they get paid if they win. right? And that is the
idea of expectation, the expected fraction of the gamblers bet he expects to win or
lose. As an example, suppose we bet a dollar on red on roulette. We have an 18
in 37 chance of red in which case we win $1. There's also a 19 and 37 chance
of losing $1. And so, if we keep betting $1 on red, on average we expect a loss of
18/37 - 19/37 which is - 1/37th of $1, or -0.03 dollars. What this tells us is
that in the long run we expect to have lost about 3% of whatever we've bet. 37
spins and we expect to have lost about one dollar. 370 spins and we've lost
about $10 and so on. Of course, dumb luck can mean that the actual amount we might
win or lose may vary dramatically. Again, in maths we express all this by saying
that the expectation of betting on red is - 1/37th or minus 3%. As another example,
what if you bet that the number 13 comes up? If 13 comes up we win $35 and
there's a 1in 37 chance of that. There's also a 36 and 37 chance of
losing your dollar and so our expectation comes to 35/37 - 36/37 or -1/37
which as in the first roulette game that we considered is equal to minus 1/37. In
fact, no matter what you bet on roulette, the expectation will always be
- 1/37 give or take some casino variation. Expectation
can vary dramatically on gambling games, from close to 0% on some casino games
down to -40% or so on some lotteries. But, unsurprisingly, the
expectation is pretty much guaranteed to be less than zero and minus means losing. So
far so really really bad :) Hmm what can we do about it? Well a popular
trick is to vary the size of your bet depending on whether you win or lose. The
most famous of such schemes is the so called martingale. This betting scheme
works like this: as before let's bet on red in roulette and let's start by
betting $1. If red comes up you win $1 and you repeat your $1 bet. If red does
not come up you lose your dollar. To make up for your loss you play again
but this time with a doubled wager of $2. If red comes up you win $2 which
together with the $1 loss in the previous game amounts an overall win of
2 minus 1 is equals $1. So you've won, so you go back to betting just $1. On the other
hand, if red does not come up you lose your $2 which then adds up to a total
loss of 2 plus 1 is 3 dollars. You've only lost so far so you play again, but this
time with a doubled wager of $4. If red comes up you win $4 which together with
the $3 loss so far means that overall you've won $1. You've won and so you
revert to betting just $1. On the other hand, if red does not come up you lose
your $4 which then adds up to a total loss of 4 plus 3 equals 7 dollars. So far you've
only lost so you play again but this time with a doubled wager of $8, etc. So
basically you keep doubling your bet until your bad luck runs out at which
time you start from the beginning by betting $1 next then keep doubling your
bet again until you win, and so on. As long as you stop playing
after some win, this betting strategy seems to guarantee you always coming out
on top overall. There are many such betting schemes the d'Alembert
the reverse Labouchere. Apparently these schemes work much better if they have
fancy French names, believe it or not. But do bet variation schemes work?
Probability questions like this one can be tricky, depending in a subtle way on
our assumptions. The martingale, for example, obviously works if you happen to
have infinitely dollars in your pocket. But then why bother gambling? And, of
course, whatever you do you can always get lucky but with a finite amount of
money in your pocket, what can we expect to happen? Well, suppose we make a
sequence of bets with the same expectation for each bet, as in the setup
we just looked at. Then the total amount we expect to win or lose is easy to
calculate. It's just E times that positive number there and if E is
negative then uhoh no luck. That brings us to the fundamental and very depressing
theorem of gambling. The theorem says that if the expectation is negative for
every individual bet then no bet variation can make the expectation
positive overall. Damn ! :) Okay, so we're not going to get rich unless we somehow find
a game with positive expectation. For the moment, let's just assume that such a
game exists. How well then can we do? Suppose we're betting on a casino game
for which the chances of winning are 2/3 and therefore a chances of losing are 1/3.
Let's also assume that just like in betting on red in roulette you win or
lose whatever amount you bet. Then the expectation for this game is actually
positive. To be precise it's a whopping 33%. Now such a huge positive expectation
in the casino game is clearly a fantasy. But bear with us. Ok, suppose we start with
$100. What are the chances of doubling our money to $200? Well, obviously, if we
just plunk it all down in one big bet of $100 then the chances of doubling are,
well, 2/3, of course. This may come as a surprise but we can actually improve our
chances if we bet $50 at a time and we play until we are either bankrupt or we have
doubled our money. Let's do the maths. If we place bets of
fifty dollars, after one bet, win or lose, we either have 150 or 50 dollars. And
after two bets we have $0, $100 or $200. Now, reading off the tree, we see
that at this point the probability of having doubled our money in the first
two plays is 2/3 times 2/3 which is equal to 4/9. And, similarly, the
probability to be back to where we started from with $100 is, well, 2/3
times 1/3 plus 1/3 times 2/3 which happens to also be 4/9. But if we're back
at $100 we can keep on playing until eventually we have doubled our money or are
bankrupt. It can actually take it while before this is sorted out, right? Now if
D are the chances of eventually doubling our money in this way, then D is
equal to what? Well, 4/9 the probability of having doubled our money after two
bets plus the second 4/9 the probability of being back where we started from
times the probability to be able to double from this point on. And what is
that? Well we're back to $100. So the probability is D again. It's
actually quite a nifty calculation when you think about it. Anyway, now we just
have to solve for D and this gives that D is equal to 4/5 which is 80%. And this
is definitely a lot better than 66% that going for just one bet of $100
guaranteed. Repeating the trick, we can consider betting 25 dollars at a time.
This results in an about 94% chance of doubling our money. In fact, by making the
bet size smaller and smaller we can push the probability of us eventually
doubling our money to as close to certainty as we wish and once we've
doubled our money, why not keep on playing to quadruple, octuple, etc. our
money. And since we can push the probability of doubling our money as
close to certainty as we like, the same is then also true for
of those more ambitious goals. Even better the same turns out to be true no
matter what probabilities we're dealing with. As long as the expectation of the
game we play is positive, as in the game that was played. The very surprising
conclusion to all this is our second very encouraging theorem of gambling. So
here we go. If the expectation is positive, then we can win as much as
like, with as little risk as we like, by betting small enough for long enough. And
so, finally, a bit of very good news, right? Alright, so all that's holding us back
from fame and fortune is finding a game of positive expectation. For that, of
course, we again turn to the game of roulette.
.. Just kidding :) and we'll get back to blackjack in a minute. But there are
many approaches to gambling and one factor to keep in mind is that games
like roulette are mechanical which means that the true odds aren't exactly what the
simple mathematics predicts. Is this sufficient to get an edge on the game?
Well I won't go into that today but in the references you can find some
fascinating stories of people who have tried to and occasionally succeeded in
beating a casino in this way and such attempts continue to this day.
And with that in mind, we'll now answer our roulette puzzle from the start. So if
60 of the last 100 spins have turned up red, then you should most definitely
bet on red. Of course, feel free to disagree vehemently in the comments. Ok
so finally on to making our fortune at blackjack, a possibility made famous in
the Kevin Spacey movie 21. Well Kevin's out of favour, now so should watch The
last casino instead, it's a much better movie anyway.
For this video we don't really have to worry too much about the rules of
blackjack, so here's just a rough sketch. Now blackjack is played with a standard
deck of 52 cards or nowadays a number of such decks. The goal is to get as close
to 21 without going over. All face cards count as ten, the aces
count as 1 or 11 the player can actually choose whichever works better
for them. In blackjack you're playing against the dealer. You're initially dealt
two cards and the dealer just one, all face-up for everybody to see. You go
first. You can ask for more cards one at a time
until you either bust which means you go over 21 in which case you lose
immediately or you stop before this happens. Then it's the dealer's turn who
will deal herself cards like a robot until she hits 17 or above and then
stops. The person closest 21 without having gone bust wins. The casino's edge
comes from you the player having to go first
knowing only the dealer's first card. So if you bust by going over 21 then you
lose immediately even if the dealer later busts as well. There are however some
compensating factors that favor the player including the ability to make
decisions such as when to stop receiving cards and whether to "split" or to "double".
We won't go on to this. Actually the ability to make decisions only favors
the player if they know what they're doing which is actually hardly ever the
case :) The fundamentals of optimizing blackjack play involve knowing what
decisions to make given any total of your cards and whatever the dealer's
card and this is known as "basic strategy" and was actually first figured out in
the 1950s by some army guys playing with their new electronic calculators. The
basic strategy can be summarized in a table which all expert players know by
heart. Here's a simplified version. Let's use it. At the moment our cards add up to,
well, 10 for the queen plus 5, that's 15, so look up 15 on the left side. The
dealer has 8 and so the basic strategy tells us that we should "hit" which means
ask for another card. Let's do that. Now we've got 19 and this means that the
basic strategy tells us to stand or stop which of course makes total sense at
this point in time. Figuring out the basic strategy just
involves a lot of easy probability tree diagrams and stuff like that. Casino rules
can differ which then changes the basic strategy slightly as well as the
resulting expectation but in a not too nasty casino the expectation,
given optimal play this way, might be about -0.5%. Close but no
banana. Of course plenty of people do worse than
that. Casinos play their cards close to their
chests but it seems that on average the casinos make well over 5% on blackjack, a
clearly better rate of return for the casino than on roulette. Anyway, if we
want to make our fortune we have to somehow get around that -0.5% and that's where card counting comes in.
Card counting arose in the
early sixties, courtesy of mathematician Edward Thorp and the fundamental idea is
very easy. Basic strategy assumes that any card has an equal likelihood of
appearing next. Well it's a fairly natural assumption to make if there's NO
other information to be had but of course there IS other information to be
had as cards get dealt the probabilities change. In general, high cards are better
for the player and low cards are worse. Then, as the cards are dealt out, the
expectation changes and the expectation will be positive if sufficiently many low
cards are dealt. That sounds like a lot of information to keep track of but
counting simplifies it all down to keeping track of just one number called
the running count. Every time the cards are shuffled the running count resets to
0. After the shuffle whenever you see a low card you add one to the running
count. Whenever you see a high card you
subtract one. Otherwise you don't do anything. The running count indicates how
many extra high cards there are among the cards left to be dealt. Keeping track
of the the running count may seem tricky to do in a casino with all the cards
zipping around on the table but it's actually pretty easy watching a blackjack table for about an hour most people can keep track
of the running count pretty accurately. There are also plenty of apps around
like that one there if you want to practice in the safety of your home or
you can just get a plain old deck of cards. Now were any of you fast enough
to keep track of the running count just now, over there. I showed this
one to Marty cold and he just had it straight away. Anyway what we really want
to know is not the number of extra high cards left to be dealt but the fraction
of extra high cards remaining. For example five extra high cards matter
much less if they're within three decks left to be played than if there's only
one deck left to be played. To account for this we simply take the running
count and divide by the number of decks left to be dealt. This number is called the
true count and here's the surprisingly simple formula that relates the true
count to the expectation at the given point of the game and this formula
contains some really good news. A true count of two or greater means that our
expectation is positive, right two minus one is positive. A true count of plus ten
which can easily happen just before the shuffle means the expectation is 4.5%
which is pretty amazing. So what does the card counter do? Well, ideally, she bets
little or nothing when the true count is negative, makes small bets if the true
count is slightly positive and then larger bets when the true count is
higher. The bad news is that betting in such a manner involves a lot of boring
waiting around followed by frantic and really really
suspicious betting perhaps hundreds of dollars on a few brief hands. How well
does it work? Well these days a typical betting scheme going up to say a maximum
bet of 200 dollars might result in an average of about 15 dollars an hour.
Wow, hmmm not what I would call a great hourly pay. And it gets worse, the result
in any given hour can differ massively. You can expect a standard deviation, a
typical plus or minus to be about $500. Of course the way card
counters bet makes them very easy to spot and Marty has had his run-ins with
casinos. So unless you're part of a well drilled team of counters and players or
you're really good at disguises there's a fair chance you get to meet some burly
casino employees within a few short hours. Well we did say blackjack is a
way to win a SMALL :) fortune. Good luck happy gambling and that's all
for today ... Except we've all heard that back in the 70s there were lots of
people making millions of dollars playing blackjack in the casinos. So what
has changed? Why can't we make millions of dollars these days. (Marty) well the casinos
have gotten a lot more careful and a lot smarter: they use more decks which
means the running count matters less, the true count is slower to get going, they
use automatic shuffling machines, they really are on the lookout for suspicious
betting. So unless you're incredibly good at disguising yourself, incredibly good at
team playing, it's pretty much dead. (Burkard) It's dead, that's sad but what about other games? There's
online gambling now so are there other ways to make money with gambling these days.
Absolutely yeah the casino is always looking to sucker more people into
betting and suckering old people into betting more more, so there's always
promotions, there's new games, new rules, some are knowingly have expectation
which is positive and they just watch out, others the casino makes mistakes or
online betting sites make mistakes. So you do a little expectation calculation
and often not always but often you can find a little edge and enough of these
little edges and you can make a nice little profit on the side and definitely
there's some people who just computerized everything, calculate to the
nth degree and there's some secret people I'm sure who are doing very very
well. All right. Well that's a perfect lead-in to our next video, at some point.
Anyway thanks Marty for coming today. Thank you and we'll have you again soon.
For more infomation >> Win a small fortune with counting cards-the math of blackjack & Co. - Duration: 22:03.
-------------------------------------------
YUVARLAK FACECAM NASIL YAPILIR (CAMTASİA STUDİO 9) - Duration: 3:42.
-------------------------------------------
Bangla Khobor 26 November 2017 Bangla Latest News Today Bangla Breaking News BD News all Bangla - Duration: 18:20.
Bangla Khobor 26 November 2017 Bangla Latest News Today Bangla Breaking News BD News all Bangla
-------------------------------------------
NEWS24 News 26 November 2017 Bangla latest News Today Bangla Breaking News BD News all Bangla - Duration: 27:41.
Today Bangla Breaking News Update, Bangla News update,
bangla news, Bangla tv News, Bangla News today, Today Bangla News
-------------------------------------------
김소영 오상진 신혼일기2 퇴사이유. |조회수4.989.283 - Duration: 8:25.
-------------------------------------------
카스바의 연인으로 유명한 가수 윤희상 별세. |조회수4.989.283 - Duration: 9:20.
-------------------------------------------
Syrian Born Muslim Mayor From NJ From Declares War On Trump, But It Immediately Blows Up In His Face - Duration: 3:22.
It's not exactly shocking that Mohamed Khairullah, the Syrian-born Mayor of Prospect Park, would
declare his city is a Sanctuary City.
He's a Democrat, a Muslim and an immigrant himself.
This is sure to give him political capital within the Democratic Party.
He actually comes from Aleppo.
He wants as many refugees and illegal immigrants to come in as possible… which you, of course,
would do if you wanted to invade a country from within.
He refuses to enforce federal immigration law and is in direct defiance of President
Trump.
This guy has been the mayor of that city since 2006.
New Jersey has had major problems with Muslims who want Shariah law instituted in the schools
there and throughout the state.
He claims he wants the laws upheld and in a massively hypocritical move… ignores them.
The heightened profile for Khairullah, a former teacher in the Paterson public schools who
worked at Office Depot, represents growing political power for Muslims in New Jersey
politics.
In fact, the whole state anymore seems to bow before Islam.
From Observer New Jersey Politics:
Watch for the political stock of Mohamed Khairullah, the Syrian-born Mayor of Prospect Park, to
rise in Democratic circles after he signed an executive order on Friday that declared
the Passaic County borough of 5,865 a sanctuary for immigrants.
Hailing from Aleppo, which has become synonymous with the worst violence of the long Syrian
civil war and has thus created tens of thousands of refugees, Khairullah immigrated to the
United States in 1991, was elected Councilman in 2001, and has been the Mayor since 2006.
According to the order, "No department, committee, agency, commission, officer or
employee of the Borough of Prospect Park shall use any Borough funds or resources to assist
in the enforcement of Federal Immigration Law."
Khairullah directly refers to his own past in explaining why he signed the order: "It
is important to me as a person who came to the U.S as an immigrant, that we uphold our
laws and values," he said Saturday, according to NJ.com.
"The U.S is the land of opportunity and dreams for many people all over the world."
The heightened profile for Khairullah, a former teacher in the Paterson public schools who
worked at Office Depot, represents growing political power for Muslims in New Jersey
politics.
Seven weeks ago, Passaic County elected its first Muslim Freeholder when Assad Akhter,
a deputy chief of staff to US Rep. Bill Pascrell and the son of Pakistani immigrants, took
the seat of Hector Lora.
Lora resigned to become Mayor of Passaic.
President Trump will indeed pull funds from that city and he should.
In fact, they are violating the law and I would say that if you do that, you should
be arrested and prosecuted for it.
It's just that simple.
Khairullah joins the ranks of other New Jersey mayors, such as Newark Mayor Ras Baraka and
Jersey City Mayor Steve Fulop, who have vowed to continue to protect immigrants.
Good luck with that.
The mayor of this city is a very nasty individual who staunchly defends the Ummah and I'm
sure believes that America should belong to Islam.
If he picks a fight with President Trump, he will lose and I can't wait to see it.
-------------------------------------------
An Obama Unaccompanied Minor Stabbed Man 100 times, Decapitated and Then Ripped Out His Heart - Duration: 6:38.
An Obama Unaccompanied Minor Stabbed Man 100 times, Decapitated and Then Ripped Out His
Heart.
And once again we see why we need to build that wall as soon as humanly possible!
Maryland authorities have now arrested a 19-year-old member of the MS-13 gang in connection with
the grissly stabbing death of an unidentified man whose decapitated body was found with
the heart removed.
Local police suspect that up to 10 members of the vicious gang which originated in Los
Angeles California lured the victim out to a park in Wheaton Maryland.
Where they stabbed him more than 100 times before burying him in a shallow grave in the
woods.
Allegedly among the people who lured this poor man was Miguel "Timido" Angel Lopez-Abrego,
who authorities recently arrested in North Carolina on November 11th on an unrelated
charge.
He has since been extradited to Maryland and has a bond review hearing scheduled for this
coming Wednesday afternoon.
Authorities added that the victim was likely killed between December 2016 and March 2017.
Breitbart Reports:
Almost one-third of 214 U.S.-based MS-13 gang members arrested in an international sweep
were invited into the United States by President Barack Obama's "Unaccompanied Alien Children"
policy.
The successful "Raging Bull' sweep was announced by Immigration and Customs Enforcement
(ICE) Deputy Director Tom Homan in a joint press conference at ICE headquarters in Washington,
D.C. on Thursday.
The operation is a "significant step towards dismantling and eradicating MS-13 in the United
States and in El Salvador," said Deputy Assistant Attorney General David Rybicki,
the second-ranking official at DOJ's Criminal Division.
El Salvador police also arrested 53 gang members in El Salvador.
Sixteen of the 214 arrestees in the United States are U.S. citizens.
Five were legal immigrants.
Ninety-three of 214 arrestees are charged with federal or state criminal offenses and
will face prison time in the United States, said Derek Benner, the deputy executive associate
director of the Homeland Security Investigations division.
The group of 214 include 193 illegal aliens, including 121 arrestees who will be deported
but will not face criminal charges.
Sixty-four of the 193 illegals – nearly one in three – are would-be "dreamers"
because they illegally crossed the border while claiming to be minors.
Their unscreened claims to be children — not adults — won them the legal status of "Unaccompanied
Alien Children," which allowed them to claim federal aid and be released into the United
States.
The status was provided by Obama's administration, which was seeking ways to welcome migrants
from Central America into the United States.
That invite spiraled out of control, resulting in a huge wave of migrants in 2014, which
helped Donald Trump get elected.
"Definitely some UACs end up being bad people and enter the country to do bad things,"
said Homan, who is serving as acting ICE director and was nominated on Tuesday by Trump to head
the agency.
"That's why we asked for several policy changes in [the requests] we sent to the Hill."
Criminal charges against the 214 gang-members include racketeering and conspiracy to commit
murder in the furtherance of racketeering.
According to Rybicki, an entire eight-man MS-13 "clique" (a local division of a
gang) was arrested in the operation.
This "Sailors Clique" operated in suburban Maryland, a hotspot of MS-13 activity, and
has been linked to at least three murders.
U.S. Border Patrol Deputy Chief Scott Luck explained that the operation worked with El
Salvadoran intelligence agencies to identify people with links to MS-13.
The gang was created in Los Angeles during the 1980s because the U..S government failed
to enforce immigration laws, which allowed El Salvador youths to sneak into the United
States.
Without economic skills in California's diverse society, they formed their own national
gang — and then recreated that gang in their own homeland once the illegal immigrants were
repatriated home.
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) Director Francis Cissna explained
that his agency's work to identify illegal aliens with gang affiliations was vital to
Raging Bull's success.
USCIS had one of its Fraud Detection and National Security Directorate (FDNS)agents at the Raging
Bull command center full time to work to that effect.
"That individual reviewed asylum claims for MS-13 members targeted by the operation
and assisted in assembling target packages for the immigration and/or criminal court
proceedings of these gang members arrested during the operation," Cissna said.
As Attorney General Jeff Sessions bemoaned in October, gang members and other unworthy
illegal aliens often use the United States's generous asylum policies to tie up their cases
in administrative proceedings, often needing only a "credible claim" of persecution
in their home country to avoid deportation for years.
"FDNS also notified ICE HSI regarding asylum applicants with strong ties to MS-13 or other
significant gang indicators," Cissna continued.
"Our headquarters FDNS officers search USCIS systems for information regarding 195 targeted
MS-13 members and associates identified by the operation for additional vetting."
Operation Raging Bull carries on a series of nationwide and international efforts against
the brutal gang.
In July, Attorney General Sessions went to El Salvador to announce nearly 600 arrests
in that country.
Earlier in the summer, ICE's "Operation Matador" netted dozens of arrests in the
United States.
El Salvador police also arrested 53 gang members in el Salvador.
President Donald Trump has warned us of the dangers surrounding the notorious Salvadorian
gang known as MS-13 from day one.
He has justly gone as far as to say MS-13 doesn't just like to shoot people because
that would be too fast and painless, they cut them up into little pieces because they
enjoy watching them suffer and beg for mercy, a mercy which never comes.
In a way, this makes them worse than Al Queda and Isis.
The fact that should bother all us American Citizens the most is that a large majority
of our politicians, on both sides of the political spectrum, want this fate for our awesome nation.
It's come to a point where either you are with the American people, or you're with
the gang members.
Plain and Simple!
What do you think about this?
Please Share this news if you support President Trump's battle against MS-13 and Illegal
Immigration.
Scroll down to comment below and don't forget to subscribe top stories today.
What do you think about this?
Please Share this news and Scroll down to comment below and don't forget to subscribe
top stories today.
-------------------------------------------
Appetizer for the New Year - "SANTA CLAUS" from the Tomatoes - Duration: 1:40.
-------------------------------------------
Cómo Vender Cualquier Producto | 30K | Coaching Comercial | Sandra Burgos - Duration: 3:32.
-------------------------------------------
Bangla News Today 26 November 2017 Bangla Breaking News BD News all Bangla latest News Today - Duration: 13:12.
Bangla News Today 26 November 2017 Bangla Breaking News BD News all Bangla latest News Today
-------------------------------------------
Selena Gomez stuns by going braless in sultry new shoot for Billboard's 'Woman Of The Year' - Duration: 1:40.
Hit the subscribe button and press the bell icon to get more take videos
Selena Gomez stuns by going braless in sultry new shoot for billboards woman of the year Selena Gomez 25
Has been named billboards 2017 woman of the year
But she's more like the woman of the decade or century in our minds
Just take one look at this devastatingly sexy new pic
Which has Elle bearing her decolletage in a tight suit jacket and pants the beautiful shot comes courtesy of celeb fashion
photographer Ruben a Feniger and stylist Kate Jung Joos sells outfit
dark lipstick and a dramatic smoky eye paired nicely with South Center parted hair
Which was styled in a wet look so good the wolf singer will be presented with the woman of the Year award at the annual
women in music dinner and awards gala the Ray Dolby Ballroom in Los Angeles, California on November 30th
And we can't wait not only is Selena soaring on the charts
But she continuously inspires young women everywhere to be authentic give back and to not be afraid to use their voice
president of The Hollywood Reporter billboard media group john amato said in a statement
She is never afraid to speak her mind and has used her platform to advocate for the needs of others
We are thrilled to be able to honor her as our
-------------------------------------------
여름철 휴가 물놀이 필수템 - Duration: 10:20.
-------------------------------------------
Levante vs Atletico Madrid -Full Match Highlights -l laliga santander 2017 - 18 l Gameplay ᴴᴰ ♥ - Duration: 22:02.
Levante vs Atletico Madrid -Full Match Highlights
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét